Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Coronary Angiogram Interpretation. Interobserver Variability.

J. E. Galbraith, M. Murphy, N. D. de Soyza
Published 1978 · Medicine

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy Visualize in Litmaps
Share
Reduce the time it takes to create your bibliography by a factor of 10 by using the world’s favourite reference manager
Time to take this seriously.
Get Citationsy
Clinicopathological correlation of premortem coronary angiograms and postmortem data was performed to determine the degree of interobserver variability in the clinical interpretation of coronary angiograms using the pathological findings as the standard of accuracy. Comparison of the independent interpretations of the antemortem coronary angiograms by three cardiologists showed no substantial difference in overall diagnostic accuracy among the three observers. In the majority of instances where a substantial angiographic lesion was found on coronary angiography, it was verified pathologically. In false-positive or false-negative interpretations, a majority opinion was accurate when compared with a pathological lesion in 50% of the instances. Despite the fact that coronary angiography is an excellent diagnostic tool, there remain limitations of the accuracy of interpretation not solved by a majority opinion.
This paper references
New radiopaque mass for vascular injection.
Schlesinger Mj (1957)
Cine-coronary arteriography.
Sones Fm (1962)
10.1161/01.CIR.26.6.1288
Atherosclerotic Disease of the Coronary Arteries: A Pathologic‐Radiologic Correlative Study
J. H. Eusterman (1962)
10.1161/01.CIR.26.4.494
Correlation of Arteriographic and Pathologic Findings in the Coronary Arteries in Man
C. R. Gray (1962)
10.1136/hrt.25.5.644
TECHNIQUE AND INTERPRETATION OF SELECTIVE CORONARY ARTERIOGRAPHY IN MAN
G. Hale (1963)
10.1161/01.CIR.36.4.526
Diagnostic Accuracy of Selective Coronary Cinearteriography
H. Kemp (1967)
10.1148/89.5.815
Selective Coronary Arteriography
M. Judkins (1967)
10.1111/J.0954-6820.1971.TB04406.X
Post mortem, coronary arteriographic, clinical and electrocardiographic findings in 80 patients investigated with coronary arteriography.
S. A. Forsberg (1971)
10.1001/ARCHINTE.1971.00310140150035
Measurement in Exercise Electrocardiography.
W. J. Walker (1971)
10.1161/01.CIR.47.1.162
Correlation of the Antemortem Coronary Arteriogram and the Postmortem Specimen
Z. Vlodaver (1973)
10.1378/CHEST.65.6.622
The electrocardiographic diagnosis of right ventricular hypertrophy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
M. Murphy (1974)
10.7326/0003-4819-81-3-307
Left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with chronic bronchitis and emphysema.
M. Murphy (1974)
10.1161/01.CIR.49.4.703
Discrepancies Between Cineangiographic and Postmortem Findings in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Recent Myocardial Revascularization
C. Grondin (1974)
10.1161/01.CIR.52.6.979
Observer Agreement in Evaluating Coronary Angiograms
K. Detre (1975)
10.1016/0002-9149(75)90896-6
Comparison of observer performance with 16 mm cinefluorography and 70 mm camera fluorography in coronary arteriography.
L. Björk (1975)
10.1016/0002-9149(75)90522-6
Comparison of angiographic and postmortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease.
J. Schwartz (1975)
10.1161/01.CIR.53.4.627
Interobserver Variability in Coronary Angiography
L. Zir (1976)
10.1161/01.CIR.56.1.32
Correlation of Coronary Arteriograms and Left Ventriculograms with Postmortem Studies
G. Hutchins (1977)
10.1378/CHEST.71.6.712
Evaluation of cardiac size in chronic bronchitis and pulmonary emphysema.
M. Murphy (1977)



This paper is referenced by
10.1093/icvts/ivaa006
The role of fractional flow reserve in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a meta-analysis.
Shruti Jayakumar (2020)
10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.02.026
Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Invasive Angiography to Assess Medina Classification in Coronary Bifurcations.
Kajetan Grodecki (2020)
Detection and localization of Coronary Arterial Lesion with the Aid of Impedance Cardiography
Sudipta Ghosh (2020)
10.1007/s00392-020-01743-5
Dual-axis rotational coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography: a randomized comparison
M. Hell (2020)
10.1109/BIBE50027.2020.00113
Detection and localization of Coronary Arterial Lesion with the Aid of Impedance Cardiography and Artificial Neural Network
Sudipta Ghosh (2020)
10.1016/j.ihj.2019.10.005
Coronary artery size in North Indian population – Intravascular ultrasound-based study
S. Reddy (2019)
10.1007/s11886-019-1218-5
Cath Lab Robotics: Paradigm Change in Interventional Cardiology?
Zachary K. Wegermann (2019)
10.1109/ICOMET.2019.8673506
An Intelligent Real-time Heart Diseases Diagnosis Algorithm
Rooh Ullah Khan (2019)
10.1016/j.iccl.2018.03.002
Intravascular Ultrasound for Guidance and Optimization of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Dhruv Mahtta (2018)
10.1007/s10554-018-1362-9
Clinical outcomes of complete revascularization using either angiography-guided or fractional flow reserve-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in non-culprit vessels in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients: insights from a study based on a systematic review and meta-analysis
Alexandre Hideo-Kajita (2018)
10.1016/j.nefro.2017.05.011
Prospective evaluation of the development of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing rotational coronary angiography vs. conventional coronary angiography: CINERAMA study.
D. Fernández-Rodríguez (2018)
10.5830/CVJA-2018-024
Comparison of quantitative and qualitative coronary angiography: computer versus the eye.
T. Şen (2018)
10.15212/CVIA.2017.0029
Intravascular Ultrasound‐Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Review
Dhruv Mahtta (2018)
10.1016/J.NEFROE.2018.02.001
Prospective evaluation of the development of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing rotational coronary angiography vs. conventional coronary angiography: CINERAMA study
D. Fernández-Rodríguez (2018)
10.1016/J.ACMX.2017.08.002
Impacto de la angiografía coronaria rotacional en la cantidad total de contraste administrado y la exposición a las radiaciones ionizantes en pacientes en los que se realizan procedimientos coronarios invasivos: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis
D. Fernández-Rodríguez (2018)
10.1002/ccd.27243
Visual estimation versus different quantitative coronary angiography methods to assess lesion severity in bifurcation lesions
M. Grundeken (2018)
10.3348/kjr.2018.19.1.101
Findings of Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography and Its Relation with Quantitative Coronary Angiography in Patients with Significant Stenosis of the Left Main Coronary Artery
Hack-Lyoung Kim (2018)
10.1016/J.NEFRO.2017.05.011
Evaluación prospectiva del desarrollo de nefropatía inducida por contraste en pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo tratados con angiografía coronaria rotacional vs. angiografía coronaria convencional: Estudio CINERAMA
D. Fernández-Rodríguez (2017)
10.1007/174_2016_89
Noninvasive Coronary Artery Imaging
M. Mannil (2017)
10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00465
State of the art: coronary angiography.
C. Collet (2017)
10.15212/CVIA.2016.0011
Fractional Flow Reserve-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Standing the Test of Time
F. Zimmermann (2016)
Physiology-based treatment in stable angina and acute myocardial infarction
V. Nunen (2016)
Percutaneous coronary interventions of bifurcation lesions
M. Grundeken (2016)
10.1002/ccd.25925
Comparison between two‐ and three‐dimensional quantitative coronary angiography bifurcation analyses for the assessment of bifurcation lesions: A subanalysis of the TRYTON pivotal IDE coronary bifurcation trial
T. Muramatsu (2015)
Comparison of fluoro and cine coronary angiography: balancing acceptable outcomes with a reduction in radiation dose.
A. Olcay (2015)
10.4244/EIJV11SVA10
The need for dedicated bifurcation quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) software algorithms to evaluate bifurcation lesions.
M. Grundeken (2015)
10.1016/j.jcin.2014.12.002
Inter-core lab variability in analyzing quantitative coronary angiography for bifurcation lesions: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized trial.
M. Grundeken (2015)
10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.042
Comparison of Contrast Volume, Radiation Dose, Fluoroscopy Time, and Procedure Time in Previously Published Studies of Rotational Versus Conventional Coronary Angiography.
R. Loomba (2015)
10.1002/ccd.25780
Interoperator and intraoperator (in)accuracy of stent selection based on visual estimation
P. Campbell (2015)
10.1016/j.carrev.2015.06.005
The impact of precise robotic lesion length measurement on stent length selection: ramifications for stent savings.
P. Campbell (2015)
10.1007/978-1-4939-0572-0_4
Use of Intravascular Ultrasound in Interventional Cardiology
S. Sidharta (2014)
10.1111/joic.12148
A randomized trial comparing dual axis rotational versus conventional coronary angiography in a population with a high prevalence of coronary artery disease.
Rafael S O Giuberti (2014)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar