Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.

Association Of Video Completed By Audio In Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With Improvements In Operative Reporting.

Özgür Eryigit, Floyd W van de Graaf, Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs, Meindert N Sosef, Eelco J. R. de Graaf, Anand G. Menon, Marilyne M. Lange, Johan F. M. Lange
Published 2020 · Medicine
Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
Importance All events that transpire during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) cannot be adequately reproduced in the operative note. Video recording is already known to add important information regarding this operation. Objective It is hypothesized that additional audio recordings can provide an even better procedural understanding by capturing the surgeons' considerations. Design, Setting, and Participants The Simultaneous Video and Audio Recording of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Procedures (SONAR) trial is a multicenter prospective observational trial conducted in the Netherlands in which operators were requested to dictate essential steps of LC. Elective LCs of patients 18 years and older were eligible for inclusion. Data collection occurred from September 18, 2018, to November 13, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures Adequacy rates for video recordings and operative note were compared. Adequacy was defined as the competent depiction of a surgical step and expressed as the number of adequate steps divided by the total applicable steps for all cases. In case of discrepancies, in which a step was adequately observed in the video recording but inadequately reported in the operative note, an expert panel analyzed the added value of the audio recording to resolve the discrepancy. Results A total of 79 patients (49 women [62.0%]; mean [SD] age, 54.3 [15.9] years) were included. Video recordings resulted in higher adequacy for the inspection of the gallbladder (note, 39 of 79 cases [49.4%] vs video, 79 of 79 cases [100%]; P < .001), the inspection of the liver condition (note, 17 of 79 [21.5%] vs video, 78 of 79 cases [98.7%]; P < .001), and the circumferential dissection of the cystic duct and the cystic artery (note, 25 of 77 [32.5%] vs video, 62 of 77 [80.5%]; P < .001). The total adequacy was higher for the video recordings (note, 849 of 1089 observations [78.0%] vs video, 1005 of 1089 observations [92.3%]; P < .001). In the cases of discrepancies between video and note, additional audio recordings lowered discrepancy rates for the inspection of the gallbladder (without audio, 40 of 79 cases [50.6%] vs with audio, 17 of 79 cases [21.5%]; P < .001), the inspection of the liver condition (without audio, 61 of 79 [77.2%] vs with audio, 37 of 79 [46.8%]; P < .001), the circumferential dissection of the cystic duct and the cystic artery (without audio, 43 of 77 cases [55.8%] vs with audio, 17 of 77 cases [22.1%]; P < .001), and similarly for the removal of the first accessory trocar (without audio, 27 of 79 [34.2%] vs with audio, 16 of 79 [20.3%]; P = .02), the second accessory trocar (without audio, 24 of 79 [30.4%] vs with audio, 11 of 79 [13.9%]; P < .001), and the third accessory trocar (without audio, 27 of 79 [34.2%] vs with audio, 14 of 79 [17.7%]; P < .001). The total discrepancy was lower with audio adjustment (without audio, 254 of 1089 observations [23.3%] vs with audio, 128 of 1089 observations [11.8%]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance Audio recording during LC significantly improves the adequacy of depicting essential surgical steps and exhibits lower discrepancies between video and operative note.
This paper references
10.1080/136518201753242208
Quality control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operation notes, video or photo print?
Peter W. Plaisier (2001)
10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a5cf36
Comparative Operative Outcomes of Early and Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Population-Based Propensity Score Analysis
Charles de Mestral (2014)
10.1007/s00464-015-4485-2
Beyond the learning curve: incidence of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy normalize to open in the modern era
Caitlin A. Halbert (2015)
10.1007/s00268-015-3281-4
Bile Duct Injuries Associated With 55,134 Cholecystectomies: Treatment and Outcome from a National Perspective
Jenny Rystedt (2015)
10.1245/s10434-016-5616-2
Erratum to: Imaging for Quality Control: Comparison of Systematic Video Recording to the Operative Note in Colorectal Cancer Surgery. A Pilot Study
F. W. Graaf (2016)
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.02.053
Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Steven M. Strasberg (2010)
10.1007/s00464-018-6333-7
Bile duct injuries (BDI) in the advanced laparoscopic cholecystectomy era
Christopher W. Mangieri (2018)
10.3748/wjg.v8.i1.5
Changing patterns of traumatic bile duct injuries: a review of forty years experience.
Zhi-qiang Huang (2002)
10.1016/j.surg.2018.01.016
Lacunar implementation of the critical view of safety technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Results of a nationwide survey
Floyd W van de Graaf (2018)
History of laparoscopic surgery.
Alex G. Nagy (1992)
Iatrogenic bile duct injuries. The real incidence and contributing factors--implications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Lauren Caputo (1992)
10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.05205.x
Management of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review.
W. Lau (2010)
10.1002/bjs.7576
Operative notes do not reflect reality in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
L. S. G. L. Wauben (2011)
10.1007/s00268-011-1061-3
Safety Measures During Cholecystectomy: Results of a Nationwide Survey
Karel T Buddingh (2011)
10.1007/s00464-017-5847-8
Bile duct injury and morbidity following cholecystectomy: a need for improvement
Meredith E. Barrett (2017)
10.1016/j.janh.2015.02.006
The Earliest-Known Extant Motion Picture of Anesthesia in the World was Filmed in Buenos Aires.
Adolfo Héctor Venturini (2015)
Open cholecystectomy: its morbidity and mortality as a reference standard.
R M Girard (1993)
Continuing hazards of the learning curve in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Leon Morgenstern (1995)
10.1097/00004836-199412000-00015
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: from gimmick to gold standard.
Dennis G. Begos (1994)
10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5246
Comparison of Systematic Video Documentation With Narrative Operative Report in Colorectal Cancer Surgery.
Floyd W van de Graaf (2019)
10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00699-7
The tail of the learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Andrus J. Voitk (2001)
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.11.003
A simple effective method for generation of a permanent record of the Critical View of Safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy by intraoperative "doublet" photography.
Dominic E. Sanford (2014)
10.1001/archsurg.141.12.1207
Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a population-based study of 152 776 cholecystectomies in the Swedish Inpatient Registry.
Anne Waage (2006)
10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80956-0
Complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
H. Russell Bernard (1993)
10.1007/s00268-007-9323-9
Evaluation of Protocol Uniformity Concerning Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in The Netherlands
L. S. G. L. Wauben (2007)
An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Steven M. Strasberg (1995)
10.1097/01.SLA.0000060680.92690.E9
Causes and Prevention of Laparoscopic Bile Duct Injuries: Analysis of 252 Cases From a Human Factors and Cognitive Psychology Perspective
Lawrence W. Way (2003)
10.1007/s00268-019-05017-8
A Systematic Review on the Synoptic Operative Report Versus the Narrative Operative Report in Surgery
Özgür Eryigit (2019)



Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar