← Back to Search
Motivational Interviewing For Alcohol Misuse In Young Adults.
D. Foxcroft, L. Coombes, S. Wood, D. Allen, Nerissa M L Almeida Santimano
Published 2014 · Medicine
Download PDFAnalyze on Scholarcy
BACKGROUND Globally, harmful use of alcohol results in approximately 2.5 million deaths each year. About 9% of these deaths are young people between the ages of 15 and 29 years (WHO 2011), mainly resulting from motor vehicle accidents, homicides, suicides and drownings. Hazardous drinking levels for men (consuming over 40 g/day alcohol on average, that is 5 units) double the risk of liver disease, raised blood pressure, some cancers and violent death (because some people who have this average alcohol consumption drink heavily on some days). For women, over 24 g/day average alcohol consumption (3 units) increases the risk for developing liver disease and breast cancer. Motivational interviewing (MI) is a popular technique for addressing excessive drinking in young adults but its effectiveness has not previously been examined in a Cochrane review. OBJECTIVES The specific objectives were:(1) to summarise current evidence about the effects of MI intended to address alcohol and alcohol-related problems in young adults, compared with no intervention or a different intervention, on alcohol consumption and other substantive outcome measures;(2) to investigate whether the effects of MI are modified by the length of the intervention. SEARCH METHODS Relevant evidence was identified from (1) Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (October 2013), (2) MEDLINE (January 1966 to October 2013), (3) EMBASE (January 1988 to October 2013), and (4) PsycINFO (1985 to October 2013). References of topic-related systematic reviews and the included studies were handsearched. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials and cluster randomised controlled trials of young people up to the age of 25 years in college and non-college settings comparing MIs with no intervention or a different intervention for prevention of alcohol misuse and alcohol-related problems were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used the standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration. MAIN RESULTS A total of 66 randomised trials (17,901 participants) were included four of which were cluster randomised. Studies with longer-term follow-up (four plus months) were of more interest when considering the sustainability of intervention effects.At four or more months follow-up, effects were found for the quantity of alcohol consumed (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.14; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.20 to -0.08 or a reduction from 13.7 drinks/week to 12.2 drinks/week), moderate quality of evidence; frequency of alcohol consumption (SMD -0.11; 95% CI -0.19 to -0.03 or a reduction in the number of days/week alcohol was consumed from 2.74 days to 2.57 days), moderate quality of evidence; and peak blood alcohol concentration (BAC) (SMD -0.14; 95% CI -0.23 to -0.05 or a decrease in peak BAC from 0.144% to 0.129%), moderate quality of evidence. A marginal effect was found for alcohol problems (SMD -0.08; 95% CI -0.15 to 0.00 or a reduction in an alcohol problems scale score from 8.91 to 8.18), low quality of evidence. No effects were found for binge drinking (SMD -0.05; 95% CI -0.12 to 0.01), moderate quality of evidence; or average BAC (SMD -0.08; 95% CI -0.22 to 0.06), moderate quality of evidence. We also considered other outcomes and at four or more months follow-up we found no effects on drink-driving (SMD -0.11; 95% CI -0.31 to 0.09), moderate quality of evidence; or other alcohol-related risky behaviour (SMD -0.14; 95% CI -0.30 to 0.02), moderate quality of evidence.Further analyses showed that the type of control comparison (assessment only versus alternative intervention) did not predict the outcome in a clear or straightforward way; and there was no consistent relationship between the duration of the MI intervention (in minutes) and effect size. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The results of this review indicate that there are no substantive, meaningful benefits of MI interventions for the prevention of alcohol misuse. Although some significant effects were found, we interpret the effect sizes as being too small, given the measurement scales used in the studies included in the review, to be of relevance to policy or practice. Moreover, the statistically significant effects are not consistent for all misuse measures, heterogeneity was a problem in some analyses and bias cannot be discounted as a potential cause of these findings.
This paper references
Evaluating a brief alcohol intervention with fraternities.
M. Larimer (2001)
Brief intervention for heavy-drinking college students: 4-year follow-up and natural history.
J. Baer (2001)
Group-based motivational interviewing for alcohol use among college students: An exploratory study.
K. Michael (2006)
An evaluation of a brief motivational intervention among young ecstasy and cocaine users: no effect on substance and alcohol use outcomes.
J. Marsden (2006)
How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies?
M. Fewtrell (2008)
The efficacy of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.
Brian L. Burke (2003)
Two brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students.
B. Borsari (2005)
Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: results from a 2-year follow-up assessment.
G. Marlatt (1998)
Assessing the effectiveness of peer-facilitated interventions addressing high-risk drinking among judicially mandated college students.
M. Cimini (2009)
The Effectiveness of Intervention Studies to Decrease Alcohol Use in College Undergraduate Students: An Integrative Analysis
Judith Hunter Fager (2004)
The efficacy of single-component brief motivational interventions among at-risk college drinkers.
M. Martens (2013)
Continued) to unexpectedly having to replace one therapist with another who was under time constraints, the first seven participants were randomized to either treatment
Steele Seel (2010)
Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
S. Rubak (2005)
Brief motivational interviewing for teens at risk of substance use consequences: a randomized pilot study in a primary care clinic.
E. D’Amico (2008)
Brief physician advice for heavy drinking college students: a randomized controlled trial in college health clinics.
M. Fleming (2010)
Brief motivational interventions for heavy college drinkers: A randomized controlled trial.
K. Carey (2006)
Social determinants of alcohol consumption: the effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol.
R. L. Collins (1985)
An overview of health risks and benefits of alcohol consumption.
K. D. Thakker (1998)
Alcohol screening and brief intervention in a college student health center: a randomized controlled trial.
James F Schaus (2009)
Short-term effects of a brief motivational intervention to reduce alcohol and drug risk among homeless adolescents.
P. L. Peterson (2006)
Is brief motivational intervention effective in reducing alcohol use among young men voluntarily receiving it? A randomized controlled trial.
J. Gaume (2011)
Randomized controlled trial of motivational interviewing compared with drug information and advice for early intervention among young cannabis users.
J. McCambridge (2008)
HIV Risk Reduction Among Detained Adolescents: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
A. Bryan (2009)
Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Omid Azizi Farzan Modarresi (2015)
Adolescent Tobacco, Alcohol, and Drug Abuse: Prevention Strategies, Empirical Findings, and Assessment Issues
G. Botvin (1992)
Computer-based brief intervention a randomized trial with postpartum women.
S. Ondersma (2007)
A randomized motivational enhancement prevention group reduces drinking and alcohol consequences in first-year college women.
J. Labrie (2008)
Cost-effectiveness analysis of motivational interviewing with feedback to reduce drinking among a sample of college students.
Alexander J. Cowell (2012)
Randomized controlled trial of proactive web-based alcohol screening and brief intervention for university students.
K. Kypri (2009)
Motivational counseling reduces future police charges in court referred youth.
T. Nirenberg (2013)
Dismantling motivational interviewing and feedback for college drinkers: a randomized clinical trial.
S. Walters (2009)
The efficacy of motivational interviewing
B Burke 2002 b Burke (2002)
Effects of a brief intervention for reducing violence and alcohol misuse among adolescents: a randomized controlled trial.
M. Walton (2010)
Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers.
B. Borsari (2000)
Brief intervention in alcohol-positive traffic casualties: is it worth the effort?
A. R. Dauer (2006)
Randomized trial comparing computer-delivered and face-to-face personalized feedback interventions for high-risk drinking among college students.
T. Wagener (2012)
Moderators and mediators of two brief interventions for alcohol in the emergency department.
N. Barnett (2010)
Mailed personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for at-risk college drinkers.
S. Collins (2002)
A Meta-Analysis of Motivational Interviewing: Twenty-Five Years of Empirical Studies
B. Lundahl (2010)
Randomized controlled trial of web-based alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care.
K. Kypri (2008)
Timeline Follow-Back A Technique for Assessing Self-Reported Alcohol Consumption
L. Sobell (1992)
Motivational interviewing for substance abuse.
G. Smedslund (2011)
Relative efficacy of a brief motivational intervention for college student drinkers.
J. Murphy (2001)
Evaluation of a group-based substance abuse treatment program for adolescents.
R. Battjes (2004)
Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II.
J. Saunders (1993)
Brief Motivational Interviewing Intervention for Peer Violence and Alcohol Use in Teens: One-Year Follow-up
R. Cunningham (2012)
Brief motivational interview and educational brochure in emergency room settings for adolescents and young adults with alcohol-related problems: a randomized single-blind clinical trial.
Maria Luiza Segatto (2011)
Motivational interviewing: research, practice, and puzzles.
W. Miller (1996)
Brief intervention in substance-use among adolescent psychiatric patients: a randomized controlled trial
J. Goti (2009)
Brief intervention for harm reduction with alcohol-positive older adolescents in a hospital emergency department.
P. Monti (1999)
Incapacitated Sexual Violence Involving Alcohol Among College Women: The Impact of a Brief Drinking Intervention
Monique Clinton-Sherrod (2011)
Motivational interviewing with adolescents and young adults for drug-related problems
J. Grenard (2006)
Alcohol policy and the public good.
G. Edwards (1997)
Evaluating two brief substance-use interventions for mandated college students.
H. White (2006)
Which heavy drinking college students benefit from a brief motivational intervention?
K. Carey (2007)
Cluster randomised trial of the effectiveness of motivational interviewing for universal prevention.
J. Mccambridge (2011)
Randomized controlled trial of brief interventions to reduce college students' drinking and risky sex.
K. Dermen (2011)
A randomized controlled trial of a behavioral economic supplement to brief motivational interventions for college drinking.
J. Murphy (2012)
A Randomized Trial of Motivational Interviewing and Feedback with Heavy Drinking College Students
Patricia Juárez (2006)
Evaluating the effects of a brief motivational intervention for injured drinkers in the emergency department.
R. Longabaugh (2001)
Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change.
W. R. Miller (2002)
Treatment may influence self-report and jeopardize our understanding of outcome.
T. Nirenberg (2013)
Healthy choices: motivational enhancement therapy for health risk behaviors in HIV-positive youth.
S. Naar-King (2006)
Using daily drinking data to characterize the effects of a brief alcohol intervention in an emergency room.
C. Gwaltney (2011)
Pilot randomized controlled trial of a brief alcohol intervention group for adolescents.
Kylie A. Bailey (2004)
Brief report: maintenance of effects of motivational enhancement therapy to improve risk behaviors and HIV-related Health in a randomized controlled trial of youth living with HIV.
S. Naar-King (2008)
Alcohol and marijuana use outcomes in the Healthy Choices motivational interviewing intervention for HIV-positive youth.
D. Murphy (2012)
The use of brief interventions adapted from motivational interviewing across behavioral domains: a systematic review.
C. Dunn (2001)
Motivational interviewing versus feedback only in emergency care for young adult problem drinking.
P. Monti (2007)
Motivational Interviewing with Underage College Drinkers: A Preliminary Look at the Role of Empathy and Alliance
S. Feldstein (2007)
A. Gibson (2000)
The efficacy of motivational interviewing as a brief intervention for excessive drinking: a meta-analytic review.
Eirini I Vasilaki (2006)
GENETIC STUDY: Do genetic and individual risk factors moderate the efficacy of motivational enhancement therapy? Drinking outcomes with an emerging adult sample
Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing (2009)
Brief motivational and parent interventions for college students: a randomized factorial study.
M. Wood (2010)
An experimental test of three methods of alcohol risk reduction with young adults.
J. Baer (1992)
Effects of two types of brief intervention and readiness to change on alcohol use in hazardous drinkers.
S. Maisto (2001)
Efficacy of counselor vs. computer-delivered intervention with mandated college students.
N. Barnett (2007)
Motivational interviewing: a pilot test of active ingredients and mechanisms of change.
J. Morgenstern (2012)
Reducing Alcohol Use in College Students: A Controlled Trial of Two Brief Interventions
S. Walters (2000)
A randomized controlled trial of goal choice interventions for alcohol use disorders among men who have sex with men.
J. Morgenstern (2007)
Therapist behavior as a determinant for client noncompliance: a paradox for the behavior modifier.
G. Patterson (1985)
Motivational interviewing preparing people for change (2nd edition)
M. Farrell (2006)
Clinical outcomes of a brief motivational intervention for heavy drinking mandated college students: a pilot study.
Meredith A. Terlecki (2010)
The efficacy of single-session motivational interviewing in reducing drug consumption and perceptions of drug-related risk and harm among young people: results from a multi-site cluster randomized trial.
J. Mccambridge (2004)
Social Learning Theory
A. Bandura (1971)
Reducing Alcohol Risk in Adjudicated Male College Students: Further Validation of a Group Motivational Enhancement Intervention
J. Labrie (2010)
The Ethics of Motivational Interviewing Revisited
W. R. Miller (1995)
Project Towards No Drug Abuse: long-term substance use outcomes evaluation.
W. Sun (2006)
Randomized trial of group interventions to reduce HIV/STD risk and change theoretical mediators among detained adolescents.
S. Schmiege (2009)
A randomized clinical trial evaluating a combined alcohol intervention for high-risk college students.
R. Turrisi (2009)
Randomized Controlled Trial
V. Preedy (2010)
Effects of motivational interviewing for incarcerated adolescents on driving under the influence after release.
L. Stein (2006)
Transdisciplinary research to improve brief interventions for addictive behaviors.
D. Abrams (2001)
Motivational interviewing: a review
E. Britt (2003)
Identification, prevention, and treatment revisited: individual-focused college drinking prevention strategies 1999-2006.
M. Larimer (2007)
Computerized versus motivational interviewing alcohol interventions: impact on discrepancy, motivation, and drinking.
J. Murphy (2010)
The role of marijuana use in brief motivational intervention with young adult drinkers treated in an emergency department.
M. Magill (2009)
Individual and family motivational interventions for alcohol-positive adolescents treated in an emergency department: results of a randomized clinical trial.
A. Spirito (2011)
C. E. Miller (2001)
Exploring the dose-response relationship between alcohol consumption and the risk of several alcohol-related conditions: a meta-analysis.
G. Corrao (1999)
A systematic review of the effectiveness of brief interventions with substance using adolescents by type of drug.
R. Tait (2003)
Randomized Controlled Trials
A. Jadad (2007)
Long-term effects of brief substance use interventions for mandated college students: sleeper effects of an in-person personal feedback intervention.
H. White (2007)
A brief motivational interview in a pediatric emergency department, plus 10-day telephone follow-up, increases attempts to quit drinking among youth and young adults who screen positive for problematic drinking.
J. Bernstein (2010)
A randomized clinical trial of a brief motivational intervention for alcohol-positive adolescents treated in an emergency department.
A. Spirito (2004)
Brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students: comparison of face-to-face counseling and computer-delivered interventions.
K. Carey (2011)
In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors.
J. Prochaska (1992)
Methods for testing theory and evaluating impact in randomized field trials: intent-to-treat analyses for integrating the perspectives of person, place, and time.
C. H. Brown (2008)
Eliciting abstinence and improving retention in a vocational and educational training program for young people : a pilot study
Julie Steele Seel (2010)
A randomized controlled trial of a brief intervention after alcohol-related facial injury.
A. J. Smith (2003)
Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking.
H. White (1989)
Possible metabolic pathways of ethanol responsible for oxidative DNA damage in human peripheral lymphocytes.
Y. Yan (2011)
Adolescents, alcohol, and substance abuse: reaching teens through brief interventions.
P. Monti (2001)
Ethnicity as a moderator of motivational interviewing for incarcerated adolescents after release.
M. Clair (2013)
Brief alcohol intervention for college drinkers: how brief is?
M. Kulesza (2010)
A comparison of personalized feedback for college student drinkers delivered with and without a motivational interview.
J. Murphy (2004)
Motivational interviewing + feedback intervention to reduce alcohol-exposed pregnancy risk among college binge drinkers: determinants and patterns of response
S. Ceperich (2010)
Motivational interviewing for incarcerated adolescents: effects of depressive symptoms on reducing alcohol and marijuana use after release.
L. Stein (2011)
Motivational enhancement and other brief interventions for adolescent substance abuse: foundations, applications and evaluations.
T. Tevyaw (2004)
Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People to Change Addictive Behavior
W. R. Miller (1991)
Enhancing motivation for change in problem drinking: a controlled comparison of two therapist styles.
W. Miller (1993)
Psychological Theories of Drinking and Alcoholism
H. Blane (1986)
Preventing high-risk drinking in youth in the workplace: a web-based normative feedback program.
D. Doumas (2008)
Motivational Interviewing with Problem Drinkers
W. R. Miller (1983)
This paper is referenced by
Einfluss von Berater/innen- und Interventionsvariablen auf die Veränderungsmotivation nach einer motivierenden Kurzintervention zur Reduktion riskanten Alkoholkonsums
Silke Diestelkamp (2016)
Erreichbarkeit Jugendlicher für ein Internet- und SMS-Programm zum Thema Alkohol
S. Haug (2015)
Social norms information for alcohol misuse in university and college students.
D. Foxcroft (2015)
Inside the black box : an exploration of change mechanisms in drug and alcohol rehabilitation projects
D. Leighton (2017)
Single-Session Alcohol Interventions for Heavy Drinking College Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Jennifer E. Samson (2015)
The value of weekly short message service interventions targeting medication adherence : a multi-national economic evaluation in HIV and tuberculosis infection
Anik Patel (2017)
Studies on routine inquiry about violence victimization and alcohol consumption in youth clinics
Anna Palm (2016)
Emergency department-based brief interventions for individuals with substance-related problems : a review of effectiveness EMCDDA PAPERS
Back to basics.
A. Gual (2016)
Substance Abuse, General Principles.
Kirstin A. Nackers (2015)
Has Motivational Interviewing Fallen into its Own Premature Focus Trap?
C. Hilton (2016)
Operating under the influence: Three year recidivism rates for motivation-enhancing versus standard care programs.
B. Beadnell (2015)
Outpatient psychosocial substance use treatments for young people: An overview of reviews.
Nicole Snowdon (2019)
Feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial on the effect of motivational interviewing in facilitating hearing aid use
Hashir Aazh (2016)
Effectiveness of Psychosocial Interventions Targeting Hazardous and Harmful Alcohol Use and Alcohol-Related Symptoms in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review
Melissa Preusse (2020)
Motivational Interviewing for Parent-child Health Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
B. Borrelli (2015)
Efficacy and outcomes of a mobile app targeting alcohol use in young people.
L. Hides (2018)
Is motivational interviewing effective at reducing alcohol misuse in young adults? A critical review of Foxcroft et al. (2014).
Eun-Young Mun (2015)
A meta-analysis of brief alcohol interventions for adolescents and young adults: variability in effects across alcohol measures
Emily E. Tanner-Smith (2016)
Summer Versus School-Year Alcohol Use Among Mandated College Students.
M. Miller (2016)
Predicting Youths' Adherence to Treatment and Retention in Teenage Pregnancy Prevention Interventions
E. M. Walker (2016)
Att förebygga missbruk av alkohol, droger och spel hos barn och unga
K. Nilsson (2015)
Evaluating Alternative Designs of a Multilevel HIV Intervention in Maharashtra, India: The Impact of Stakeholder Constraints
A. Patel (2018)
Motivational interviewing for the prevention of alcohol misuse in young adults.
D. Foxcroft (2016)
Efficacy of a Web- and Text Messaging-Based Intervention to Reduce Problem Drinking in Adolescents: Results of a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial
S. Haug (2017)
Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing on adult behaviour change in health and social care settings: A systematic review of reviews
H. Frost (2018)
Underage drinking, brief interventions, and trauma patients: Are they really special?
P. Ehrlich (2016)
Betting on the fastest horse: Using computer simulation to design a combination HIV intervention for future projects in Maharashtra, India
K. Ruggles (2017)
Alcohol drinking patterns in young people: A survey-based study
G. Martinotti (2017)
Correlates of Motivational Interviewing Use Among Substance Use Treatment Programs Serving American Indians/Alaska Natives
D. Dickerson (2016)
How do youth with experience of violence victimization and/or risk drinking perceive routine inquiry about violence and alcohol consumption in Swedish youth clinics? A qualitative study.
A. Palm (2017)
Circadian misalignment and weekend alcohol use in late adolescent drinkers: preliminary evidence
B. Hasler (2019)See more