Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.

Morphological Characters

J. Clackson, Joe Eska, Craig Melchert, John Penney

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
In one respect the coding of these characters differs fundamentally from that of the lexical characters. In the case of the latter we restricted ourselves to a single well-attested dialect of each language in order to assure some degree of uniformity in the data. For the characters coded here that would be self-defeating, because (a) there is ample evidence that these characters are far likelier to reflect the true tree—so that we want to recover as much evidence as possible for each character in each language—and (b) we know a great deal about the prehistory of some details for some languages. Thus we have not excluded Old Latin, G3thic Avestan, morphological relics, and so on in the coding of the phonological and morphological characters, whereas we did exclude archaic and dialectal forms, as well as relic words, from our lexical database. The number of morphological characters is much smaller than we would have preferred , for the following reasons. Many potential characters exhibit the same state for all the languages, or all the languages but one; they are compatible with every possible tree and are thus uninformative, and including them would not help to find the true tree. Still others exhibit distinctive innovations for each well-established subgroup, so that including them simply confirms the existence of the known subgroups without contributing to the reconstruction of their interrelationships; we have included a few exceptionally interesting ones, and further examples can be found in the standard handbooks. Finally, many potential morphological characters exhibit clear parallel development; the loss of various grammatical categories (such as the dual) is an obvious example, and other examples can be found in the development of the verb system and of pronouns. Several characters that were originally included in our database were eventually removed for that and other reasons (see the discussion at the end), and new evidence shows that one which is still listed below—M11— should be removed as well (see the discussion under that character; we continue to include it here because it was used in Ringe, Warnow, and Taylor 2002). A few uninformative characters have been included in spite of the considerations just outlined because of their interest to specialists in the field. Except as noted, our morphological characters are not directed. helpful discussion of particular morphological characters and for several references.
This paper references
The Noun in Biblical Armenian
B. Olsen (1999)
Indo-European and Indo-Europeans
J. D. Muhly (1971)
The Indo-European thematic aorists
G. Cardona (1966)
Studies in the ancient Greek verbs in -skō
Jason R. Zerdin (1999)
Traces of a PIE aspectual contrast in Anatolian? Incontri Linguistici 20
Indo-European origins of the Celtic verb. I. The sigmatic aorist. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies
Calvert Watkins (1962)
Lettische Grammatik
J3nis Endzel1ns (1923)
Indogermanisches Nomen : Derivation, Flexion und Ablaut : Akten der Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Freiburg, 19. bis 22. September 2001
Indogermanische Gesellschaft. Arbeitstagung (2003)
Berthold Delbrück y la sintaxis indoeuropea hoy
J. Ramón (1997)
On the Chronology of Sound Changes in Tocharian. Volume I: From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Tocharian
D. Q. Adams (1998)
Notes on the Armenian Personal Endings
Jay H. Jasanoff (1979)
Towards an interpretation of the Hispano-Celtic inscription of Botorrita
J. F. Eska (1989)
Studien Zum Mykenischen Kasussystem
I. Hajnal (1995)
Das keltische Verbalsystem auf dem Hintergrund des indo-iranischgriechischen
Helmut Rix (1977)
Homer and Hittite revisited. Paper read at the 15th East Coast Indo-European Conference
Topics in Indo-European personal pronouns
J. Katz (1998)
Anatolian historical phonology
H. Melchert (1994)
Syntaxe latine
Alfred Ernout (1953)
Introduction to Anatolian. Unpublished materials for an LSA Linguistics Institute course
Vergleichende Grammatik der baltischen Sprachen
Christian S. Stang (1968)
-1-in Latin denominative derivation
Alan Nussbaum (1975)
Computational cladistics and the position of Tocharian
D. Ringe (1998)
Final IE*-S and the old Armenian plural Marker -K'
R. Stempel (1994)
From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic
Donald Ringe (2006)
The Bronze Age and Early Iron Age Peoples of Eastern Central Asia
B. Reviews (1998)
Historische Laut- und Formenlehre der lateinischen Sprache
C. Martínez (2001)
Gleanings from the Gododdin and other Early Welsh texts
John T Koch (1991)
The Sigmatic Aorist in Indo-European: Evidence for the Space-Time Hypothesis
Briget Anne Drinka (1995)
Italie and Celtic Superlatives and the Dialects of Indo-European
Warren Cowgill (1970)
Der Prospektiv — eine verkannte indogermanische Verbalkategorie? Schlerath and Rittner
Jens Rasmussen (1985)
Die Genitivformen des Hieroglyphisch-Hethitischen. RHA
Vladimir I Georgiev (1967)
The Hittite mediopassive endings in -ri
吉田 和彦 (1990)
Gedanken über den lateinischen a-Konjunktiv. Beiträge zur griechischen und lateinischen Sprachforschung (Festschrift Kretschmer
Nikolai Trubetzkoy (1926)
Grammatische Kategorien : Funktion und Geschichte : Akten der VII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Berlin, 20.-25. Februar 1983
Indogermanische Gesellschaft. Fachtagung (1985)
Vergleichende Grammatik der keltischen Sprachen
H. Pedersen (1909)
Indo‐European and Computational Cladistics
D. Ringe (2002)
Vergleichende Syntax Der Indogermanischen Sprachen
B. Delbrück (2009)
Das altarmenische Verbum
Gert Klingenschmitt (1982)
Die Partikel -z des Hethitischen (mit einem Exkurs zu den Medialformen auf -t, -ti)
Norbert Oettinger (1997)
Indo-European studies
C. Watkins (1981)
Studies in memory of Warren Cowgill
C. Watkins (1987)
The Indo-European origins of the Old Irish nasal presents, subjunctives and futures
K. McCone (1991)
Homer and Hittite. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprach- wissenschaft
Jaan Puhvel (1991)
Lapis Satricanus. The Hague: Staatsuitgeverij
Conrad M Stibbe (1980)
Some irregular imperatives in
Hittite nominal stems in -anzan
Symbolae linguisticae in honorem Georgii Kuryłowicz
A. Heinz (1965)

This paper is referenced by
Inferring evolutionary scenarios with geostatistics and geographical information systems for the viperid snakes Vipera latastei and Vipera monticola
J. Brito (2008)
Modeling of the Equilibrium Moisture Content (EMC) of Tarragon (Artemisia Dracunculus L.)
Akbar Arabhosseini (2005)
The Chilopoda and Diplopoda of the southern Carnarvon Basin, Western Australia
M. Harvey (2000)
M. Carretero (2002)
H. Toju (2011)
Character displacement: in situ evolution of novel phenotypes or sorting of pre‐existing variation?
A. Rice (2007)
Does host diet govern the structure and diversity of tapeworm assemblages in sharks? Insights from the literature and a model shark species; Cephaloscyllium isabellum
Trent K. Rasmussen (2018)
The importance of phylogeny and ecology in microgeographical variation in the morphology of four Canarian species of Aeonium (Crassulaceae)
T. H. Jorgensen (2002)
Varanops brevirostris (Eupelycosauria: Varanopidae) from the Lower Permian of Texas, with Discussion of Varanopid Morphology and Interrelationships
Nicolás E. Campione (2010)
First mitochondrial genomes of five hoverfly species of the genus Eristalinus (Diptera: Syrphidae).
Gontran Sonet (2019)
Growth, Maturity and Form Factor of Mola Carplet (Amblypharyngodon mola) from the Ganges River, Northwestern Bangladesh
Fairuz Nawer (2018)
Parallel evolution and ecological selection: replicated character displacement in spadefoot toads
A. Rice (2009)
Formation, structure, and function of extra‐skeletal bones in mammals
A. Nasoori (2020)
Fusarium subglutinans: A new eumycetoma agent☆
Pablo Campos-Macías (2013)
Contrasting patterns of divergence in quantitative traits and neutral DNA markers: analysis of clinal variation.
J. F. Storz (2002)
The roles of vicariance and isolation by distance in shaping biotic diversification across an ancient archipelago: evidence from a Seychelles caecilian amphibian
S. T. Maddock (2020)
Development and phenotypic correlations: the evolution of tooth shape in Sorex araneus
P. D. Polly (2005)
Phenotypic and molecular variation in the green and black poison-dart frog Dendrobates auratus (Anura: Dendrobatidae) from Costa Rica
Lisa D. Patrick (2009)
New Species of Lipinia (Squamata: Scincidae) from Borneo, Revealed by Molecular and Morphological Data
I. Das (2007)
Genetic differentiation and gene flow between the Drnholec and Łęgucki Młyn chromosome races of the common shrew Sorex araneus in northern Poland
M. Ratkiewicz (2000)
Can diet explain intraspecific venom variation? Reply to Sasa
J. C. Daltry (1999)
Morphological and genetic divergence of intralacustrine stickleback morphs in Iceland: a case for selective differentiation?
G. A. Olafsdóttir (2007)
The Association of Sugarcane Technologists of India
P. Singh (2012)
Do riverine barriers, history or introgression shape the genetic structuring of a common shrew (Sorex araneus) population?
N. Lugon-Moulin (1999)
Behavioural interactions, kin and disease susceptibility in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris
E. Mallon (2004)
Family I. Oceanospirillaceae fam. nov
G. Garrity (2019)
RNA interference‐mediated knockdown of the Halloween gene Spookiest (CYP307B1) impedes adult eclosion in the western tarnished plant bug, Lygus hesperus
E. Van Ekert (2016)
Climate shapes population variation in dogwhelk predation on foundational mussels
Gina M. Contolini (2020)
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar