Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.

Ethical Considerations In Mouse Experiments.

B. Baertschi, Marcel Gyger
Published 2011 · Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Mice count morally because they can be harmed. This raises a moral issue in animal experimentation. Three main ethical attitudes towards animals are reviewed here. The Kantian view denies moral value to animals because they lack reason. The second view, by Singer, considers animals as sentient creatures (i.e., able to suffer). Finally, Regan considers that animals are subjects of their own life; they are autonomous and therefore have moral rights. Singer is a reformist and allows animal experimentation under certain conditions. Regan is abolitionist, saying that animals have moral rights that cannot be negotiated. Current animal protection legislation strives to put in balance the human and animal interests to decide whether an animal experiment is morally justified or not. An ethical evaluation process is conducted based on the harm-benefit assessment of the experiment. The researcher has to implement the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) to minimize the harms to the animals and make sure that the outcomes are scientifically significant and that the quality of the science is high, in order to maximize benefits to humans and animals. Curr. Protoc. Mouse Biol. 1:155-167. © 2011 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
This paper references
The humaneness of rodent pest control.
Georgia Mason (2003)
Assessing the Search for and Implementation of the Three Rs: A Survey among Scientists
Marlies Leenaars (2009)
The ethics of rodent control.
B. Meerburg (2008)
The ethical acceptability of animal experiments: a proposal for a system to support decision-making
F. R. Stafleu (1999)
When to experiment on animals.
P. Bateson (1986)
Quality Control and Standard Operating Procedures
Ulrich Dirnagl (2010)
Contemporary Issues in Bioethics
T. Beauchamp (1978)
Anthropology, History, and Education: Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view (1798)
R. Louden (2007)
The Case for Animal Rights
T. Regan (1983)
Human Dignity In Bioethics And Biolaw
D. Beyleveld (2001)
Using MeSH to Search for Alternatives to the Use of Animals in Research
Marina Chilov (2007)
The Design of Animal Experiments: Reducing the use of animals in research through better experimental design. (Revised and updated edition)
Mfw Festing (2002)
Ethical scores for animal experiments
D. G. Porter (1992)
Enhancing search efficiency by means of a search filter for finding all studies on animal experimentation in PubMed
C. Hooijmans (2010)
Principles and practice in ethical review of animal experiments across Europe: summary of the report of a FELASA working group on ethical evaluation of animal experiments
J. Smith (2007)
A Gold Standard Publication Checklist to Improve the Quality of Animal Studies, to Fully Integrate the Three Rs, and to Make Systematic Reviews More Feasible
C. Hooijmans (2010)
The principles of humane experimental technique.
W. S. Russell (1959)
Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research
C. Kilkenny (2010)
Advancing refinement of laboratory animal use
L. Smaje (1998)
Survey of the Quality of Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Research Using Animals
C. Kilkenny (2009)
Refinement and Reduction in the Production of Genetically Modified Mice
V. Robinson (2004)
Refinement and reduction in production of genetically modified mice
V. Robinson (2003)
Public health concerns take center stage in Nuffield Council on Bioethics
J. Allan (1996)

This paper is referenced by
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar