Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Significance Of Changes In The Reference Position For Measurements Of Tibial Translation And Diagnosis Of Cruciate Ligament Deficiency

C. Ma, M. A. Janaushek, T. M. Vogrin, T. W. Rudy, C. Harner, S. Woo
Published 2000 · Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
Measurements of tibial translation in response to an external load are used in clinical and laboratory settings to diagnose and characterize knee‐ligament injuries. Before these measurements can be quantified, a reference position of the knee must be established (defined as the position of the knee with no external forces or moments applied). The objective of this study was to determine the effects of cruciate ligament deficiency on this reference position and on subsequent measurements of tibial translation and, in so doing, to establish a standard of kinematic measurement for future biomechanical studies. Thirty‐six human cadaveric knees were studied with a robotic/universal force‐moment sensor testing system. The reference positions of the intact and posterior cruciate ligament‐deficient knees of 18 specimens were determined at full extension and at 30, 60, 90, and 120° of flexion, and the remaining five‐degree‐of‐freedom knee motion was unrestricted. Subsequently, under a 134‐N anterior‐posterior load, the resulting knee kinematics were measured with respect to the reference positions of the intact and posterior cruciate ligament‐deficient knees. With posterior cruciate ligament deficiency, the reference position of the knee moved significantly in the posterior direction, reaching a maximal shift of 9.3 ± 3.8 mm at 90° of flexion. For the posterior cruciate ligament‐deficient knee, posterior tibial translation ranged from 13.0 ± 3.4 to 17.7 ± 3.6 mm at 30 and 90° respectively, when measured with respect to the reference positions of the intact knee. When measured with respect to the reference positions of the posterior cruciate ligament‐deficient knee, these values were significantly lower, ranging from 11.7 ± 4.3 mm at 30° of knee flexion to 8.4 ± 4.8 mm at 90°. A similar protocol was performed to study the effects of anterior cruciate ligament deficiency on 18 additional knees. With anterior cruciate ligament deficiency, only a very small anterior shift in the reference position was observed. Overall, this shift did not significantly affect measurements of tibial translation in the anterior cruciate ligament‐deficient knee. Thus, when the tibial translation in the posterior cruciate ligament‐injured knee is measured when the reference position of the intact knee is not available, errors can occur and the measurement may not completely reflect the significance of posterior cruciate ligament deficiency. However, there should be less corresponding error when measuring the tibial translation of the anterior cruciate ligament‐injured knee because the shift in reference position with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency is too small to be significant. We therefore recommend that in the clinical setting, where the reference position of the knee changes with injury, comparison of total anterior‐posterior translation with that of the uninjured knee can be a more reproducible and accurate measurement for assessing cruciate‐ligament injury, especially in posterior cruciate ligament‐injured knees. Similarly, in biomechanical testing where tibial translations are often reported for the ligament‐deficient and reconstructed knees, a fixed reference position should be chosen when measuring knee kinematics. If such a standard is set, measurements of knee kinematics will more accurately reflect the altered condition of the knee and allow valid comparisons between studies.
This paper references
10.1177/03635465980260030901
Determination of the In Situ Forces in the Human Posterior Cruciate Ligament Using Robotic Technology
R. Fox (1998)
10.1177/036354659702500410
Intratester and Intertester Reliability of the KT-1000 Arthrometer in the Assessment of Posterior Laxity of the Knee
F. Huber (1997)
10.1177/036354659502300409
The Effect of Femoral Tunnel Position and Graft Tensioning Technique on Posterior Laxity of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knee
W. C. Burns (1995)
10.2106/00004623-198062020-00013
Ligamentous restraints to anterior-posterior drawer in the human knee. A biomechanical study.
D. Butler (1980)
10.2165/00007256-199826060-00003
Biomechanical Risk Factors for Exercise-Related Lower Limb Injuries
F. Neely (1998)
10.1097/00003086-198702000-00023
Measurements of anterior laxity in normal and anterior cruciate absent knees with two instrumented test devices.
O. Sherman (1987)
10.2106/00004623-198567050-00006
Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee.
D. Daniel (1985)
10.2106/00004623-198466020-00011
Measurement of knee stiffness and laxity in patients with documented absence of the anterior cruciate ligament.
K. Markolf (1984)
10.1177/036354659101900209
Assessing the limits of knee motion
D. Daniel (1991)
10.2106/00004623-197658020-00002
Classification of knee ligament instabilities. Part II. The lateral compartment.
J. C. Hughston (1976)
10.1016/0021-9290(80)90239-0
The function of the primary ligaments of the knee in anterior-posterior and medial-lateral motions.
R. Piziali (1980)
10.1177/036354657600400206
Clinical I diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament instability in the athlete
J. Torg (1976)
10.2106/00004623-198870010-00014
Limits of movement in the human knee. Effect of sectioning the posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral structures.
E. Grood (1988)
10.1177/036354659502300411
The Role of the Cruciate and Posterolateral Ligaments in Stability of the Knee
D. M. Veltri (1995)
10.1002/JOR.1100050310
Accuracy and reproducibility of instrumented knee‐drawer tests
P. Edixhoven (1987)
10.2106/00004623-197658050-00001
Stiffness and laxity of the knee--the contributions of the supporting structures. A quantitative in vitro study.
K. Markolf (1976)
10.1302/0301-620X.72B2.2312560
Posterior instability of the knee near extension. A clinical and stress radiographic analysis of acute injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament.
H. Staeubli (1990)
10.2106/00004623-198870030-00010
Use of the quadriceps active test to diagnose posterior cruciate-ligament disruption and measure posterior laxity of the knee.
D. Daniel (1988)
10.1177/036354659302100216
The role of the lateral extraarticular restraints in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee
R. Wroble (1993)
10.2106/00004623-198466060-00015
Medial restraints to anterior-posterior motion of the knee.
D. Sullivan (1984)
10.1097/00003086-199606000-00033
In Vitro Study of Knee Stability After Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
A. Pearsall (1996)
10.2106/00004623-197860080-00001
Anterior subluxation of the lateral tibial plateau. A diagnostic test and operative repair.
R. Losee (1978)
10.2165/00007256-198401060-00002
Posterior Cruciate Ligament Insufficiency
T. M. Barton (1984)
10.2106/00004623-198769020-00010
The role of the posterolateral and cruciate ligaments in the stability of the human knee. A biomechanical study.
D. Gollehon (1987)
10.2106/00004623-198264020-00018
An in vitro biomechanical evaluation of anterior-posterior motion of the knee. Tibial displacement, rotation, and torque.
T. Fukubayashi (1982)
10.2106/00004623-198668010-00009
The role of the meniscus in the anterior-posterior stability of the loaded anterior cruciate-deficient knee. Effects of partial versus total excision.
S. Shoemaker (1986)



This paper is referenced by
10.1177/0363546503258880
Effects of Increasing Tibial Slope on the Biomechanics of the Knee
J. Robert Giffin (2004)
10.14279/depositonce-5056
Understanding rotational joint laxity in the human knee
P. Moewis (2016)
10.3928/01477447-20150105-50
Biomechanical analysis of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with aperture femoral fixation.
Amar B Mutnal (2015)
10.1016/J.JBIOMECH.2004.02.010
Interactions between kinematics and loading during walking for the normal and ACL deficient knee.
T. Andriacchi (2005)
10.1115/1.2768983
Reproduction of in vivo motion using a parallel robot.
R. Howard (2007)
10.1520/JAI100251
A Simulator Study of TKR Kinematics Using Modeled Soft-Tissue Constraint: Virtual Soft-Tissue Control for Knee Simulation
B. White (2006)
10.1007/s00167-015-3584-x
Posterior tibial translation resulting from the posterior drawer manoeuver in cadaveric knee specimens: a systematic review
M. Kowalczuk (2015)
10.1177/0363546507304665
Importance of Tibial Slope for Stability of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament—Deficient Knee
J. Robert Giffin (2007)
10.1177/0363546506294363
Effects of Initial Graft Tension on the Tibiofemoral Compressive Forces and Joint Position after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
M. Brady (2007)
10.1016/B978-0-323-32903-3.00006-8
Human Movement and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Function
Sean F. Scanlan (2017)
10.1016/J.JBIOMECH.2004.10.025
Biomechanics of knee ligaments: injury, healing, and repair.
S. Woo (2006)
10.1115/1.4035644
Use of Robotic Manipulators to Study Diarthrodial Joint Function.
R. Debski (2017)
10.1177/03635465030310061901
Measurement of Posterior Tibial Translation in the Posterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knee
C. Ma (2003)
10.1016/J.ORTHRES.2004.05.011
Evidence for differential control of tibial position in perturbed unilateral stance after acute ACL rupture
T. Chmielewski (2005)
10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00265-6
The effect of initial graft tension on the biomechanical properties of a healing ACL replacement graft: A study in goats
S. Abramowitch (2003)
10.1097/00013611-200106000-00002
Biomechanics of the posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee
T. M. Vogrin (2001)
10.1115/IMECE2003-43090
Estimation of ACL Forces Utilizing a Novel Non-Invasive Methodology That Reproduces Knee Kinematics Between Sets of Knees
S. P. Darcy (2003)
10.1016/B978-012369391-4/50078-3
A Model for Understanding the Pathomechanics of Osteoarthritis in Aging
T. Andriacchi (2006)
10.1023/B:ABME.0000017541.82498.37
A Framework for the in Vivo Pathomechanics of Osteoarthritis at the Knee
Thomas P. Andriacchi (2004)
10.1016/j.knee.2015.09.013
Ligament and meniscus loading in the ovine stifle joint during normal gait.
J. Rosvold (2016)
10.1097/00132585-200311020-00008
Ligament Deficiency With Mal Alignment
H. Elkousy (2003)
10.1097/00132585-200210010-00009
Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes: Anatomy, physiology, and motor control
B. Yu (2002)
10.1016/J.JBIOMECH.2007.10.025
A comparison of passive flexion-extension to normal gait in the ovine stifle joint.
S. Darcy (2008)
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.08.019
Novel technique for evaluation of knee function continuously through the range of flexion.
K. Bell (2015)
10.1371/journal.pone.0159600
The Restoration of Passive Rotational Tibio-Femoral Laxity after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
P. Moewis (2016)
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar