Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.

Examination Of Efficacious, Efficient, And Socially Valid Error-correction Procedures To Teach Sight Words And Prepositions To Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Tiffany M Kodak, Vincent Campbell, Samantha Bergmann, Brittany A. LeBlanc, Eva Kurtz-Nelson, Tom Cariveau, S. Shamshul Haq, Patricia K. Zemantic, Jacob J. Mahon
Published 2016 · Psychology, Medicine
Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Prior research shows that learners have idiosyncratic responses to error-correction procedures during instruction. Thus, assessments that identify error-correction strategies to include in instruction can aid practitioners in selecting individualized, efficacious, and efficient interventions. The current investigation conducted an assessment to compare 5 error-correction procedures that have been evaluated in the extant literature and are common in instructional practice for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Results showed that the assessment identified efficacious and efficient error-correction procedures for all participants, and 1 procedure was efficient for 4 of the 5 participants. To examine the social validity of error-correction procedures, participants selected among efficacious and efficient interventions in a concurrent-chains assessment. We discuss the results in relation to prior research on error-correction procedures and current instructional practices for learners with ASD.

This paper is referenced by
A comparison of different reinforcement contingencies during skill acquisition programs for children with autism spectrum disorder
Tyla Marie Frewing (2018)
Comparing the Efficacy and Efficiency of Varying Task Interspersal Ratios
Sophie Claire Knutson (2017)
Evaluating Instructive Feedback as a Maintenance Procedure During Discrete-Trial Instruction
Jessica M. Cheatham (2017)
Effects of exposure to prompts on the acquisition of intraverbals in children with autism spectrum disorder.
Jessica Kay (2019)
Comparison of task interspersal ratios on efficiency of learning and problem behavior for children with autism spectrum disorder.
Sophie Claire Knutson (2019)
An evaluation of parent preference for prompting procedures.
Mary E Halbur (2019)
A Preliminary Analysis of Equivalence-Based Instruction to Train Instructors to Implement Discrete Trial Teaching
Tom Cariveau (2019)
Using an abbreviated assessment to identify effective error-correction procedures for individual learners during discrete-trial instruction.
Regina A. Carroll (2018)
The effects of error correction with and without reinforcement on skill acquisition and preferences of children with autism spectrum disorder
Chengan Yuan (2018)
Evaluating the use of programmed reinforcement in a correction procedure with children diagnosed with autism
Ana Carolina Cabral Carneiro (2019)
A comparison of blocked and mixed-trial methods for teaching auditory-visual discriminations.
Stephanie N Bentham (2019)
Quantifying Errors of Bias and Discriminability Emitted by Children during a Matching-to-Sample Task
Courtney Hannula (2018)
Comparing procedures on the acquisition and generalization of tacts for children with autism spectrum disorder.
Lauren K. Schnell (2018)
A review of error correction procedures during instruction for children with developmental disabilities.
Tom Cariveau (2019)
Reinforcement Contingencies in Language Acquisition
Anna Ingeborg Pétursdóttir (2017)
A Comparison of Error-Correction Procedures Within Audio–Visual Conditional Discrimination Training
James William Moore (2018)
A comparison of methods to teach foreign-language targets to young children.
Ashley L. Matter (2019)
An Evaluation of Mand and Tact Assessment Procedures
Brittany A. LeBlanc (2017)
The Role of Reinforcement in Multiple Response Repetition Error Correction and Treatment Preference of Chinese Children with Autism
Chengan Yuan (2019)
Baseline reinforcement rate and resurgence of destructive behavior.
Wayne W. Fisher (2019)
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar