Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.

Comparison Of Markers For Muscle Damage, Inflammation, And Pain Using Minimally Invasive Direct Anterior Versus Direct Lateral Approach In Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

K. E. Mjaaland, K. Kivle, S. Svenningsen, A. Pripp, L. Nordsletten
Published 2015 · Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
It is proposed that the use of biochemical markers for muscle damage and inflammation provides an objective measure on invasiveness in total hip arthroplasty. We analyzed levels of creatine kinase and C-reactive protein (CRP) after total hip arthroplasty in patients randomized to minimally invasive direct anterior approach or direct lateral approach, also recording consumption of pain medication and levels of pain postoperatively. Eighty-three patients were operated by the use of anterior approach and eighty using lateral. Creatine kinase and CRP levels were measured preoperatively, creatine kinase directly after surgery, and both creatine kinase and CRP on postoperative day 1 through 4. The use of pain medication and levels of pain were recorded. Creatine kinase were higher in the anterior group compared to the lateral group, reaching statistical significance directly postoperative and on day 4. Levels of CRP did not differ, reaching a maximum of mean 52 mg/L on day 3. The use of pain medication was higher in the lateral group on the day of surgery (p = 0.011), and pain levels were higher on all days in the lateral group (p < 0.007). In conclusion, the use of minimally invasive anterior approach caused less pain, but higher postoperative levels of CK, than the use of direct lateral approach.
This paper references
10.1097/00003086-197510000-00021
Rate of wear in total hip replacement.
J. Charnley (1975)
[Blood loss in total hip prosthesis implantation: lateral versus supine position].
S. Locher (1999)
10.4081/or.2013.e19
A Prospective Randomized Peri- and Post-Operative Comparison of the Minimally Invasive Anterolateral Approach Versus the Lateral Approach
S. Landgräber (2013)
10.1007/s00264-010-1197-z
Over 25 years survival after Charnley’s total hip arthroplasty
J. Caton (2010)
10.1177/0269216311398300
Choosing the unit of measurement counts: The use of oral morphine equivalents in studies of opioid consumption is a useful addition to defined daily doses
K. Svendsen (2011)
10.3109/17453674.2010.537804
Soft tissue damage after minimally invasive THA
J. van Oldenrijk (2010)
10.1007/s00264-010-1075-8
Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes
T. Smith (2010)
10.2106/00004623-200300004-00005
Total Hip Arthroplasty Through a Minimally Invasive Anterior Surgical Approach
R. Kennon (2003)
10.2106/JBJS.J.00557
Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers.
Patrick F. Bergin (2011)
10.1016/S0196-0644(96)70238-X
Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity.
K. Todd (1996)
10.3109/17453674.2011.623569
Is reverse hybrid hip replacement the solution?
E. Lindalen (2011)
10.1016/J.ARTH.2004.09.061
Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study.
G. Chimento (2005)
10.1152/jappl.1988.65.6.2598
Enzymatic estimation of skeletal muscle damage by analysis of changes in serum creatine kinase.
F. Apple (1988)
10.1016/J.ARTH.2005.03.041
Lateral trochanteric pain following primary total hip arthroplasty.
R. Iorio (2006)
10.1007/s11999-010-1568-1
High Complication Rate With Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasties on a Fracture Table
B. Jewett (2011)
10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.027
Single-incision direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty using a standard operating table.
Tim P Lovell (2008)
10.2106/JBJS.D.02645
A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
L. Ogonda (2005)
10.1302/0301-620X.64B1.7068713
The direct lateral approach to the hip.
K. Hardinge (1982)
10.1111/J.1553-2712.1998.TB02667.X
Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain?
A. Kelly (1998)
10.1007/s00264-011-1280-0
Reduced postoperative pain in total hip arthroplasty after minimal-invasive anterior approach
S. Goebel (2011)
10.1007/BF00389709
Creatine kinase in tibial shaft fractures
K. Larsson (1981)
10.1055/S-2008-1039350
Blutverlust bei Hüfttotalprothesenimplantationen: Seitenlage versus Rückenlage
S. Locher (2008)
10.1302/0301-620X.54B1.61
The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention.
J. Charnley (1972)
10.1302/0301-620X.71B1.2915004
Abductor function after total hip replacement. An electromyographic and clinical review.
A. Baker (1989)
10.1302/0301-620X.93B7.25058
Soft-tissue changes in hip abductor muscles and tendons after total hip replacement: comparison between the direct anterior and the transgluteal approaches.
A. K. Bremer (2011)
10.1016/S1526-5900(03)00716-8
Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain.
M. Jensen (2003)
10.3109/17453674.2013.773412
High complication rate in the early experience of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty by the direct anterior approach
Y.M. den Hartog (2013)
10.1067/MEM.2001.118863
Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale.
E. Gallagher (2001)
10.1053/AJEM.2002.33778
Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED.
E. Gallagher (2002)



This paper is referenced by
10.1177/1120700018810673
Muscular strength and function after total hip arthroplasty performed with three different surgical approaches: one-year follow-up study
Siri B Winther (2019)
10.1007/s00264-017-3480-8
Transitioning to the direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Is it a true muscle sparing approach when performed by a low volume hip replacement surgeon?
Dan-Viorel Nistor (2017)
10.2106/JBJS.16.00494
Implant Survival After Minimally Invasive Anterior or Anterolateral Vs. Conventional Posterior or Direct Lateral Approach: An Analysis of 21,860 Total Hip Arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (2008 to 2013)
K. E. Mjaaland (2017)
JAAOSGlobal-D-19-00118 1..7
David R. Maldonado ()
10.1016/j.arth.2019.05.057
Postoperative Opioid Consumption After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Three Surgical Approaches.
Sebastian Seah (2019)
10.1016/j.arth.2018.06.033
Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Adjunct to an Enhanced Recovery Pathway: Outcomes and Learning Curve Effects in Surgeons Transitioning From Other Surgical Approaches.
M. Free (2018)
10.5301/hipint.5000337
Risk of Stem Undersizing with Direct Anterior Approach for Total HIP Arthroplasty
F. Rivera (2016)
10.1053/J.OTO.2017.05.008
Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Implant, Instrument, and Approach
Jason P. Zlotnicki (2017)
10.1080/17453674.2020.1732749
Greater early migration of a short-stem total hip arthroplasty is not associated with an increased risk of osseointegration failure: 5th-year results from a prospective RSA study with 39 patients, a follow-up study
T. Floerkemeier (2020)
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.12.004
No effect of conventional vs. minimally invasive surgical approach on clinical outcome and migration of a short stem total hip prosthesis at 2‐year follow‐up: A randomized controlled study
M. Schwarze (2018)
10.1016/J.ARTH.2019.06.046
Thirty-Day Major and Minor Complications Following Total Hip Arthroplasty-A Comparison of the Direct Anterior, Lateral, and Posterior Approaches.
Adam Hart (2019)
Creatine Phosphokinase Serum Levels in Acute Closed Isolated Femur Fractures.
Dorcas W Chomba (2017)
Optimizing Perioperative Care for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients
Yvon M. den Hartog (2016)
10.1302/2058-5241.3.180023
Total hip arthroplasty through an anterior approach
Georgios Kyriakopoulos (2018)
10.1007/s11239-017-1492-2
Effects of thromboprophylactic doses of apixaban and rivaroxaban on coagulation and thrombin generation in association with total hip replacement
Tuukka A Helin (2017)
10.1007/s00198-018-4557-y
Biomarkers of muscle damage increased in anterolateral compared to direct lateral approach to the hip in hemiarthroplasty: no correlation with clinical outcome
T O Ugland (2018)
10.1016/j.arth.2016.10.006
Patient Perceptions of the Direct Anterior Hip Arthroplasty.
William H. Trousdale (2017)
10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.056
Comparison of Early Functional Recovery After Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Direct Anterior or Posterolateral Approach: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
H. Zhao (2017)
10.3928/01477447-20170918-05
Conjoint Tendon Release in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: No Impact on Patient Outcomes.
Reina Yao (2017)
10.1186/s13018-019-1095-z
Direct anterior versus lateral approaches for clinical outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
Z. Wang (2019)
10.1097/MD.0000000000002126
Comparison of Direct Anterior and Lateral Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty
C. Yue (2015)
10.1080/17453674.2018.1504505
Early gain in pain reduction and hip function, but more complications following the direct anterior minimally invasive approach for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized trial of 100 patients with 5 years of follow up
B. Brismar (2018)
10.1016/j.crad.2018.02.014
The gluteal muscles in end-stage osteoarthritis of the hip: intra- and interobserver reliability and agreement of MRI assessments of muscle atrophy and fatty degeneration.
Kjetil Kivle (2018)
10.1186/s12891-017-1597-y
Correlations between inflammatory cytokines, muscle damage markers and acute postoperative pain following primary total knee arthroplasty
Hai-bo Si (2017)
10.5301/hipint.5000319
The Less Invasive Anterior Approach for Total HIP Arthroplasty: A Comparison to other Approaches and an Evaluation of the Learning Curve - A Systematic Review
Y. M. den Hartog (2016)
Laboratory Monitoring of Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Tuukka A Helin (2017)
10.1177/1120700019900987
Traction table versus standard table total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach: a systematic review.
Mohamed Sarraj (2020)
10.1016/j.surge.2018.09.001
A meta-analysis comparing the direct anterior with other approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty.
Fatih Kucukdurmaz (2018)
10.1038/s41598-017-13377-1
Interventions for treating displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in the elderly: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Bin-fei Zhang (2017)
10.1097/CORR.0000000000000439
Do Postoperative Results Differ in a Randomized Trial Between a Direct Anterior and a Direct Lateral Approach in THA?
K. E. Mjaaland (2019)
10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.015
Internet Promotion of Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty by Members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons.
Ademola Shofoluwe (2018)
10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.008
Posterolateral vs Direct Anterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty (POLADA Trial): A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess Differences in Serum Markers.
K. Rykov (2017)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar