Structure And Genetics Of Cave Populations
Published 2018 · Biology
Download PDFAnalyze on Scholarcy
Cave populations have been traditionally perceived as genetically strongly structured and less diverse than related surface populations because of the patchiness of subterranean habitats, low dispersal of cave species, and genetic bottlenecks at colonization. These patterns are at odds with relatively large and/or disjunct ranges of many troglobionts, as well as the countless successful cave colonizations. One way to disentangle those discrepancies is to discriminate between exogenous processes that take place at the surface or during invasion, and endogenous ones that take place in and are governed by the specific conditions of caves. Genetic evidence collected over the past decades suggests that ongoing endogenous processes, endogenous vicariance, and gene flow between allopatric cave populations have less effect on the genetic structure of cave populations than patterns inherited from past exogenous events. Conversely, most known cases of recent migration between non-neighboring cave populations entail the possibility of dispersal via the surface. Gene pools of young cave populations often show strong exogenous imprints such as multiple colonization events and/or recurring gene flow from the surface. This is compatible with the high propagule pressure hypothesis of successful biological invasions, while convincing molecular evidence for the genetic bottleneck hypothesis of cave colonization is sparse.
This paper references
Cave Ecology and the Evolution of Troglobites
T. Barr (1968)
Bayesian phylogeographic inferences reveal contrasting colonization dynamics among European groundwater isopods.
D Eme (2013)
The limits of cryptic diversity in groundwater: phylogeography of the cave shrimp Troglocaris anophthalmus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Atyidae).
V. Zakšek (2009)
Early Pliocene range expansion of a clade of subterranean Pyrenean beetles
V. Rizzo (2013)
Evolution in Hawaiian cave-adapted isopods (Oniscidea: Philosciidae): vicariant speciation or adaptive shifts?
M. A. J. Rivera (2002)
Small-scale genetic structuring in a tropical cave snail and admixture with its above-ground sister species†
Menno Schilthuizen (2012)
The “Alluvial Mesovoid Shallow Substratum”, a New Subterranean Habitat
V. Ortuño (2013)
STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE ENDANGERED BENTON CAVE CRAYFISH, CAMBARUS ACULABRUM (DECAPODA: CAMBARIDAE)
G. O. Graening (2006)
Marine regressions and the evolution of groundwater dwelling amphipods (Crustacea)
J. Notenboom (1991)
Phylogeny of the cave shrimp Troglocaris: Evidence of a young connection between Balkans and Caucasus.
V. Zakšek (2007)
Species are hypotheses: avoid connectivity assessments based on pillars of sand.
E. Pante (2015)
Parallels between two geographically and ecologically disparate cave invasions by the same species, Asellus aquaticus (Isopoda, Crustacea)
Marjeta Konec (2015)
Molecular genetic variation and population structure in morphologically differentiated cave and surface populations of the freshwater amphipod Gammarus minus.
D. Carlini (2009)
The cave environment.
T. L. Poulson (1969)
Allopatric speciation illustrated: The hypogean genus Geotrechus Jeannel, 1919 (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Trechini), with description of four new species from the Eastern Pyrenees (Spain)
A. Faille (2015)
Fine‐scale genetics of subterranean syncarids
Maria Gulbrandsen Asmyhr (2014)
A molecular test for cryptic diversity in ground water: how large are the ranges of macro-stygobionts?
P. Trontelj (2009)
Vicariance, dispersal and scale in the aquatic subterranean fauna of karst regions
D. Culver (2009)
Adaptation and Natural Selection in Caves: The Evolution of Gammarus minus
D. Culver (1995)
Global patterns of speciation and diversity
M. A. M. Aguiar (2009)
Under the volcano: phylogeography and evolution of the cave-dwelling Palmorchestia hypogaea (Amphipoda, Crustacea) at La Palma (Canary Islands)
C. Villacorta (2008)
Cave beetle genetics: geology and gene flow
Thomas C Kane (1992)
Next generation phylogeography of cave and surface Astyanax mexicanus.
Lyndon M Coghill (2014)
Cave Life: Evolution and Ecology
D. Culver (1982)
Cave Adaptation in Amblyopsid Fishes
T. L. Poulson (1963)
Monitoring the effective population size of a brown bear (Ursus arctos) population using new single-sample approaches.
T. Skrbinšek (2012)
Gene flow and population structure in the Mexican blind cavefish complex (Astyanax mexicanus)
Martina Bradic (2011)
Biochemical divergence between cavernicolous and marine Sphaeromidae and the Mediterranean salinity crisis
V. Sbordoni (1980)
Phylogeography of a subterranean amphipod reveals cryptic diversity and dynamic evolution in extreme environments.
T. Lefébure (2006)
Studies in cave life evolution: a rationale for future theoretical developments using phylogenetic inference
L. Grandcolas (2009)
Karst of eastern Herzegovina, the Dubrovnik littoral and western Montenegro
Petar T. Milanović (2014)
Gene Flow and Genetic Variability in Cave and Surface Populations of the Mexican Tetra, Astyanax mexicanus (Teleostei: Characidae)
Kanchana Panaram (2005)
Phylogeography: The History and Formation of Species
J. Avise (2000)
MOLECULAR BIOGEOGRAPHY OF CAVE LIFE: A STUDY USING MITOCHONDRIAL DNA FROM BATHYSCIINE BEETLES
A. Caccone (2001)
Evolutionary rates and phylogenetic age in some stygobiontic species
C. Boutin (2000)
Subterranean archipelago in the Australian arid zone: mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of amphipods from central Western Australia.
S. Cooper (2007)
Fine-scale comparative phylogeography of a sympatric sister species triplet of subterranean diving beetles from a single calcrete aquifer in Western Australia.
M. Guzik (2009)
Phylogeography of subterranean and surface populations of water lice Asellus aquaticus (Crustacea: Isopoda).
R. Verovnik (2004)
EVOLUTIONARY GENETICS OF CAVE‐DWELLING FISHES OF THE GENUS ASTYANAX
J. Avise (1972)
Can Environment Predict Cryptic Diversity? The Case of Niphargus Inhabiting Western Carpathian Groundwater
Ioana N. Meleg (2013)
Population studies on an endemic troglobitic beetle: geographical patterns of genetic variation, gene flow and genetic structure compared with morphometric data.
B. Crouau-Roy (1989)
Testing dispersal and cryptic diversity in a widely distributed groundwater amphipod (Niphargus rhenorhodanensis).
T. Lefébure (2007)
Conservation and the genetics of populations
F. Allendorf (2006)
Paradox lost: genetic diversity and the success of aquatic invasions.
J. Roman (2007)
Isolation-by-Distance and Outbreeding Depression Are Sufficient to Drive Parapatric Speciation in the Absence of Environmental Influences
G. Hoelzer (2008)
EVOLUTION OF SUBTERRANEAN DIVING BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: DYTISCIDAE HYDROPORINI, BIDESSINI) IN THE ARID ZONE OF AUSTRALIA
R. Leys (2003)
Population genetic structure, speciation and evolutionary rates in cave dwelling organisms
Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Diversity among Surface and Subterranean Populations of Asellus aquaticus (Crustacea: Isopoda)
R. Verovnik (2004)
Shallow Subterranean Habitats: Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation
D. Culver (2014)
Phylogeography and molecular rates of subterranean aquatic Stenasellid Isopods with a peri-Tyrrhenian distribution.
V. Ketmaier (2003)
Founder effects initiated rapid species radiation in Hawaiian cave planthoppers
A. Wessel (2013)
Subterranean phylogeography of freshwater crayfishes shows extensive gene flow and surprisingly large population sizes.
J. E. Buhay (2005)
DNA barcoding sheds light on hidden subterranean boundary between Adriatic and Danubian drainage basins
Marjeta Konec (2016)
Evidence for population fragmentation within a subterranean aquatic habitat in the Western Australian desert
M. Guzik (2011)
Local adaptation and pronounced genetic differentiation in an extremophile fish, Poecilia mexicana, inhabiting a Mexican cave with toxic hydrogen sulphide.
M. Plath (2007)
Is Radon Emission in Caves Causing Deletions in Satellite DNA Sequences of Cave-Dwelling Crickets?
Giuliana Allegrucci (2015)
The Role of Propagule Pressure in Biological Invasions
D. Simberloff (2009)
Patterns of population genetic variation in sympatric chiltoniid amphipods within a calcrete aquifer reveal a dynamic subterranean environment
T. Bradford (2013)
Distribution patterns of interstitial freshwater meiofauna over a range of spatial scales, with emphasis on alluvial river-aquifer systems
J. Ward (2004)
Ecological genetics of the cave beetle Neaphaenops tellkampfii (Coleoptera: Carabidae)
Edwin J. Turanchik (1979)
Go West: A One Way Stepping-Stone Dispersion Model for the Cavefish Lucifuga dentata in Western Cuba
Damir Hernández (2016)
The Monkey's Voyage: How Improbable Journeys Shaped the History of Life.—By Alan de Queiroz.
David Anthony Morrison (2014)
Rising from Down Under: developments in subterranean biodiversity in Australia from a groundwater fauna perspective
W. Humphreys (2008)
Correlation between Fitness and Genetic Diversity
D. Reed (2003)
Islands within islands: Diversification of tailless whip spiders (Amblypygi, Phrynus) in Caribbean caves.
Lauren A. Esposito (2015)
Parallel speciation in Astyanax cave fish (Teleostei) in Northern Mexico.
U. Strecker (2012)
Population genetics and evolutionary biology of the cave beetle Ptomaphagus hirtus
C. Laing (1976)
BEHAVIOR AND FORM IN THE EVOLUTION OF CAVE COLLEMBOLA
K. Christiansen (1965)
This paper is referenced by
A new non-invasive in situ underwater DNA sampling method for estimating genetic diversity
Gergely Balázs (2020)