Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Research Institutes As Hybrid Organizations: Central Challenges To Their Legitimacy

M. Gulbrandsen
Published 2011 · Sociology

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
Research institutes, here defined as organizations involved in research and development but outside of the higher education sector and often in close cooperation with users, are found in most countries but not very well understood. This paper argues that institutes can be considered “hybrid organizations”, caught in between dichotomous cultural spheres with differing values. To retain their hybridity and to survive in the long run, research institutes need to create and sustain organizational legitimacy by establishing congruence with values from these different spheres. The paper discusses how institutes try to establish legitimacy in the science–non-science dimension and the public–private dimension and that these attempts sometimes come into conflict with one another. The framework of the legitimacy of hybrid organizations could constitute a fruitful starting point for a discussion of the future place of research institutes in society.
This paper references
10.1628/0932456041960605
The Economics of Hybrid Organizations
C. Ménard (2004)
10.4135/9781412990127
Handbook of Science and Technology Studies
S. Jasanoff (1995)
10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199286805.003.0008
Universities in National Innovation Systems
D. Mowery (2006)
10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00126-7
Public research and industrial innovations in Germany
M. Beise (1999)
10.1177/0162243908329187
National Innovation System
B. Godin (2009)
10.1016/0048-7333(94)00817-5
Linking technology and institutions: the innovation community framework
L. Lynn (1996)
Classifying research units by patterns of performance and influence: A typology of the Round 1 data
G. A. Cole (1979)
10.1023/A:1014382532639
The Economics of Science and Technology
D. Audretsch (2002)
10.3138/9781442684829
Strategic science in the public interest
G. Bruce Doern (2007)
Innovation, Path Dependency, and Policy: The Norwegian Case
J. Fagerberg (2009)
Research, bureaucracy and the drift of epistemic criteria
A. Elzinga (1985)
10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JPART.A024276
Comparing Public and Private Organizations: Empirical Research and the Power of the A Priori
H. G. Rainey (2000)
On the road to total hybridisation? Eroding dichotomies in public service provision. Paper presented at the workshop Innovation and change through alliances in the service, public and education
P. M. Karré (2008)
10.2307/2067363
Scientific Productivity: The Effectiveness of Research Groups in Six Countries
F. Andrews (2009)
10.2307/2393356
Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives
O. Williamson (1994)
10.1177/030631299029001004
Stabilizing the Boundary between US Politics and Science:
D. Guston (1999)
10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17011-1
The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields
Paul J. DiMaggio (1800)
Universities in national innovation systems The oxford handbook of innovation
D C Mowery (2005)
10.2307/2392787
Organizational Legitimacy and the Liability of Newness
J. Singh (1986)
Research partnerships 1 This paper has benefited from the insightful comments and suggestions of And
J. Hagedoorn (2000)
10.2307/1388226
Organizational Legitimacy
J. Dowling (1975)
10.3152/147154303781780713
Six major challenges facing public intervention in higher education, science, technology and innovation
P. Larédo (2003)
10.1177/016224390102600405
Hybrid Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime
C. Miller (2001)
10.1017/CBO9780511818110
The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics
J. R. A. Pielke (2007)
10.1177/016224390102600401
Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction
D. Guston (2001)
Vitenskap, teknologi og makt—fire perspektiver på evaluering
E. Kallerud (2002)
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199551552.003.0003
Public sector research and industrial innovation in Norway: a historical perspective
M. Gulbrandsen (2007)
10.1016/J.ENVSCI.2006.10.001
The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science
D. Sarewitz (2007)
10.1353/TECH.1999.0093
Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation
D. Channell (1999)
10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199286805.001.0001
The Oxford handbook of innovation
J. Fagerberg (2006)
Policy Sci
Types of output mix of research organizations and their complementarity
E. Trist (1972)
10.2307/2095325
Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional
T. Gieryn (1983)
International Comparative Analysis
A. Luijten-Lub (2004)
10.1080/00221546.1987.11778284
The university research system : the public policies of the home of scientists
B. Wittrock (1987)
Forholdet mellom næringslivet og UoH-sektoren – et krevende mangfold
Magnus Gulbrandsen (2000)
10.1093/ICC/11.3.497
Developing innovative competences: the role of institutional frameworks
R. Whitley (2002)
10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00112-9
Competition and pluralism in the public sciences: the impact of institutional frameworks on the organisation of academic science ☆
R. Whitley (2003)
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199551552.003.0012
The technical-industrial research institutes in the Norwegian innovation system
Lars Nerdrum (2007)
10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00103-1
Designing Dolly: Interactions between economics, technology and science and the evolution of hybrid institutions
M. Fransman (2001)
Limited by design. R&D laboratories in the U.S. national innovation system
M. M. Crow (1998)
10.2307/40253438
Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation
D. Stokes (1997)
Types of output mix of research organizations and their complementarity Social science and government: Politics and problems
E Trist (1972)
10.1023/B:MINE.0000017698.38154.A6
Public Sector Research: A Growing Role in Innovation Systems
P. Larédo (2004)
Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy: An International Comparative Analysis
P. Larédo (2001)
10.5465/AMR.1988.4306858
The Public-Private Distinction in Organization Theory: A Critique and Research Strategy
J. Perry (1988)
Vitenskap, teknologi og makt—fire perspektiver på evaluering Oslo: Cappelen akademisk forlag
E Kallerud (2002)
10.4135/9781412990127.n25
Changing Policy Agendas in Science and Technology
A. Elzinga (1995)
10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00111-7
From separate systems to a hybrid order: accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities
Jason Owen-Smith (2003)
10.1016/S0160-791X(99)00002-0
Prediction in science and policy
D. Sarewitz (1999)
The co-evolution of research institutes with universities and user needs: a historical perspective
M. Gulbrandsen (2012)
10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and
H. Etzkowitz (2000)



This paper is referenced by
10.7165/WTR2015.4.3.126
Sharing Innovation's Benefits
Deog-Seong Oh (2015)
10.1038/nplants.2015.193
Growing innovations for the bioeconomy.
Angela Karp (2015)
The knowledge base for spatial policy
Patricia Feiertag (2018)
10.1016/j.glt.2020.09.002
How product development partnerships support hybrid collaborations dealing with global health challenges
M. Hoogstraaten (2020)
Institutens roll för att stärka SMFs innovativa förmåga och konkurrenskraft : Tre fallstudier inom "Vinnova-piloten"
Hans Hellsmark (2012)
Wissenschaftsbasierte Politikberatung auf Abruf. Zur Rolle von Ressortforschungseinrichtungen für Ministerien am Beispiel der Politikberatung des Umweltbundesamtes
Michael Böcher (2012)
10.1111/PADM.12140
EMERGING HYBRID PRACTICES IN PUBLIC–PRIVATE RESEARCH CENTRES
M. Gulbrandsen (2015)
10.1080/07341512.2016.1278092
The technoscientists: a Swedish construction of basic research in World War II
Ingemar Pettersson (2016)
Wise by Design: A Wisdom-Based Framework for Innovation and Organizational Design and its Potential Application in the Future of Higher Education
Juan F. Suarez (2014)
10.1093/reseval/rvaa013
The classification of public research organizations: Taxonomical explorations
Laura Cruz-Castro (2020)
10.1108/S2051-663020150000004005
Defining Hybridity and Hybrid Contingencies in Public Organizations: An Alternative Conceptual Model
L. D. Waele (2015)
Implementation of a research networking system in the Institute of Systems and Computer Engineering, Porto (INESC TEC): an exploratory study to specify institutional requirements
Sharon Okori (2015)
10.1111/GEC3.12442
The role of university‐industry research centers in embedding foreign subsidiaries: Insights from automotive research and development in Ontario
Elena Goracinova (2019)
Collaborating for Synchronized Disaster Responses in the National Capital Region
Marilyn Peppers-Citizen (2016)
10.1080/09540962.2016.1241577
Valuing the project: a knowledge-action response to network governance in collaborative research
Peter L. Freeman (2017)
Business Model Innovation: A Multi-Level Routine- Based Conceptualization
Christian Byrge (2019)
10.1108/S0733-558X201600048B003
Institutional Hybridity in Public Sector Reform: Replacement, Blending, or Layering of Administrative Paradigms
T. Polzer (2016)
Science, Risk and Legitimacy: Investigating the dynamics of knowledge and networks in the contentious policy arena of unconventional gas.
Naomi Smith Devetak (2015)
10.1109/PICMET.2016.7806605
Technology assessment: A role for UNESCO and S&T parks
Deog-seong Oh (2016)
10.3390/joitmc5040091
Implementing Open Innovation in Research and Technology Organisations: Approaches and Impact
Ramon Uribe-Echeberria (2019)
10.1080/1533015X.2013.821869
Climate Change Communication by a Research Institute: Experiences, Successes, and Challenges from a North European Perspective
Jari Lyytimäki (2013)
Exploring Subcultural Perceptions That Influence Change Success Within a Hybrid Organization
Kevin Morgan Sorbello (2019)
10.1093/reseval/rvaa012
A register of public-sector research organizations as a tool for research policy studies and evaluation
B. Lepori (2020)
10.1016/J.FORPOL.2016.04.001
How does science-based policy advice matter in policy making? The RIU model as a framework for analyzing and explaining processes of scientific knowledge transfer☆
Michael Böcher (2016)
10.1007/978-3-319-94177-6_3
Making and Publishing Knowledge in Research Institutes
Elina Late (2019)
10.1016/J.RESPOL.2018.08.008
Same but different? Research and technology organizations, universities and the innovation activities of firms
Eleni Giannopoulou (2019)
10.1007/s11024-018-9349-1
Autonomy and Authority in Public Research Organisations: Structure and Funding Factors
Laura Cruz-Castro (2018)
10.1080/00963402.2016.1240484
Technology assessment and the social and human impact of innovation
F. Phillips (2016)
Science-policy interfaces for enriched environmental decision-making : A research into the strategies of boundary work, illustrated by case studies in the Dutch Wadden Sea
W. I. V. Enst (2018)
10.1177/0971721816640627
Access to ICT and Research Output of Agriculture Researchers in Kenya
M. Schafer (2016)
10.1016/J.ENVSCI.2015.08.016
Boundary organisations and their strategies : Three cases in the Wadden Sea
Wynanda I. van Enst (2016)
10.1016/J.MARPOL.2015.07.001
Co-managing public research in Australian fisheries through convergence–divergence processes
D. Dentoni (2015)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar