Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Differential Performance Of Science Park Firms: An Integrative Model

Kholekile L. Gwebu, J. Sohl, Jing Wang
Published 2019 · Business

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
This study integrates perspectives from the literature on science parks, environment dynamism, and on the resources-based view of the firm, to develop an integrative model of the park location value to resident firms. Consistent with our theorizing, the externalities generated by the science park, the firm’s idiosyncratic endowment in a wide range of resources, and its heterogeneous competitive environment jointly influence the differential performance of science park firms. The results suggest that firms residing in science parks with more co-located complementary firms demonstrate better sales and sales growth performance. A firm’s certain internal and external resource endowment and the munificent environments within which a firm operates serve as enabling conditions for better sales and sales growth performance.
This paper references
10.1016/J.RESPOL.2008.09.001
Are new technology-based firms located on science parks really more innovative?: Evidence from Taiwan
Chih-Hai Yang (2009)
10.2307/2392787
Organizational Legitimacy and the Liability of Newness
J. Singh (1986)
10.5465/AMR.1985.4278950
Contingency Perspectives of Organizational Strategy: A Critical Review of the Empirical Research
A. Ginsberg (1985)
10.1016/J.JBUSVENT.2004.01.001
Entrepreneurial Orientation and Small Business Performance: A Configurational Approach
J. Wiklund (2005)
10.2139/ssrn.2566222
Science and Technology Parks in Italy: Main Features and Analysis of Their Effects on the Firms Hosted
D. Liberati (2014)
10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00015-9
Pioneers and followers: Competitive tactics, environment, and firm growth
J. G. Covin (2000)
10.1002/SMJ.2058
Parenting advantage in the MNC: An embeddedness perspective on the value added by headquarters
P. Nell (2013)
10.1016/J.JBUSVENT.2004.10.001
The influence of guided preparation on the long-term performance of new ventures
James J. Chrisman (2005)
10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00101-4
Startup size and the mechanisms of external learning: increasing opportunity and decreasing ability?
Paul Almeida (2003)
10.1016/0883-9026(90)90006-F
Starting up in a turbulent environment: A process model of failure among firms with high customer dependence
S. Venkataraman (1990)
10.2307/2393553
Measurement of potential absorption capacity in Colombia's innovative companies
E. Sánchez (2017)
10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2008.02.003
Specialization as strategy for business incubators: An assessment of the Central German Multimedia Center
M. Schwartz (2008)
10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2015.06.045
Do backward linkages in export processing zones increase dynamically? Firm-level evidence from Costa Rica
M. Jenkins (2016)
10.1016/J.JBUSVENT.2003.06.002
Knowledge relatedness and post-spin-off growth
H. Sapienza (2004)
10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2004.02.007
R&D networks and product innovation patterns—academic and non-academic new technology-based firms on Science Parks
Hans Löfsten (2005)
10.1111/1467-9310.00041
R&D ‘inputs’ and ‘outputs’ of technology‐based firms located on and off Science Parks
P. Westhead (1997)
10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00178-0
How effective are technology incubators?: Evidence from Italy
M. Colombo (2002)
10.1007/S10961-016-9522-3
Science and technology parks: an annotated and analytical literature review
Kelsi G. Hobbs (2017)
10.5465/256862
Simplicity as a Strategy-Making Process: The Effects of Stage of Organizational Development and Environment on Performance
G. Lumpkin (1995)
10.1016/0883-9026(87)90017-6
Corporate ventures into industrial markets: Dynamics of aggressive entry☆
I. MacMillan (1987)
10.1177/104225879902400103
The Sustainability of the Entrepreneurial Orientation—Performance Relationship
J. Wiklund (1999)
10.1023/B:JOTT.0000011178.44095.CD
Science Parks and the Development of NTBFs— Location, Survival and Growth
Richard Ferguson (2004)
10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.002
Diversification and hybridization in firm knowledge bases in nanotechnologies
E. Avenel (2007)
10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2010.05.001
Cooperation patterns of incubator firms and the impact of incubator specialization: Empirical evidence from Germany
M. Schwartz (2010)
10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17018-4
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
J. Barney (1991)
10.2307/256549
Relating Porter's Business Strategies to Environment and Structure: Analysis and Performance Implications
D. Miller (1988)
10.1080/14632440050119550
Technology-Based Firms Located on Science Parks: The Applicability of Bullock's 'Soft-Hard' Model
P. Westhead (2000)
10.5465/AMR.1991.4279475
Environmental Munihcence; A Theoretical Assessment
Gary J. Castrogiovanni (1991)
10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00282.x
Are we Comparing Apples with Apples or Apples with Oranges? Appropriateness of Knowledge Accumulation across Growth Studies
D. Shepherd (2009)
10.1016/0165-4896(90)90064-E
‘Silicon Valley’ locational clusters: when do increasing returns imply monopoly?
W. Arthur (1990)
10.1007/S10961-013-9329-4
Knowledge spillovers in science and technology parks: how can firms benefit most?
Isabel Diez-Vial (2015)
10.2139/SSRN.1552141
Regulatory Environment and Strategic Orientations in a Transitional Economy: A Study of Chinese Private Enterprise
Justin Tan (1996)
10.5465/AMJ.2005.17843944
Slack Resources and the Performance of Privately Held Firms
G. George (2005)
10.1177/104225879902300401
A Historical Perspective on Small Firm Development
Reuben Vinnell (1999)
10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00636.x
Effects of Firm R&D Investment and Environment on Acquisition Likelihood
Michael B. Heeley (2006)
10.1093/ICC/10.3.675
Organizational Environments and Industry Exit: the Effects of Uncertainty, Munificence and Complexity
P. Anderson (2001)
10.1016/0883-9026(92)90004-B
Emerging high-tech firms: How durable are their comparative start-up advantages?☆
J. Doutriaux (1992)
10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00088-2
When do start-ups that exploit patented academic knowledge survive?
A. Nerkar (2003)
10.2307/2393080
Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments.
G. Dess (1984)
10.1057/PALGRAVE.JIBS.8400027
Market-seeking MNEs in an emerging market: How parent–subsidiary links shape overseas success
Y. Luo (2003)
10.2307/40252749
The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail
Clayton M. Christensen (1997)
10.1007/S10961-007-9037-Z
Science Parks’ tenants versus out-of-Park firms: who innovates more? A duration model
M. Squicciarini (2008)
10.1002/SMJ.4250050306
Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit
G. Dess (1984)
10.1023/A:1022861823493
Science Park Location and New Technology-Based Firms in Sweden – Implications for Strategy and Performance
P. Lindelöf (2003)
10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00086-9
Assessing the impact of university science parks on research productivity: exploratory firm-level evidence from the United Kingdom
D. Siegel (2003)
10.1016/0305-0483(95)00021-F
Links between higher education institutions and high technology firms
Paul Westhead (1995)
10.1002/SMJ.4250140303
The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view
Margaret A. Peteraf (1993)
10.1086/510763
Why Are Black‐Owned Businesses Less Successful than White‐Owned Businesses? The Role of Families, Inheritances, and Business Human Capital
R. Fairlie (2007)
10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00185.x
Alternative Knowledge Strategies, Competitive Environment, and Organizational Performance in Small Manufacturing Firms
Paul E. Bierly (2007)
10.1016/J.RESPOL.2006.08.003
Technology parks and regional economic growth in China
A. Hu (2007)
10.2307/2666997
Firm Strategy and Age Dependence: A Contingent View of the Liabilities of Newness, Adolescence, and Obsolescence
A. Henderson (1999)
10.1109/PICMET.2009.5262027
Knowledge exchange behaviors of science park firms: The innovation hub case
Kai-Ying A. Chan (2009)
10.1002/SMJ.4250160702
Strategy and environment as determinants of performance: Evidence from the Japanese machine tool industry
Suresh Kotha (1995)
10.1016/J.JBUSVENT.2009.04.004
Performance differentials within geographic clusters
B. McCann (2011)
10.1007/S10961-015-9455-2
The role of Science Parks: a puzzle of growth, innovation and R&D investments
F. Lamperti (2017)
10.1007/S11187-008-9104-3
The role of clustering in the growth of new technology-based firms
E. Maine (2010)
10.2307/2065200
The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective.
R. Stern (1978)
10.1016/0166-4972(92)90033-E
Academic-industry links and innovation: questioning the science park model*
P. Quintas (1992)
10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2016.11.012
Technology Parks versus Science Parks: does the university make the difference?
Alberto Albahari (2013)
10.2307/2392714
Discerning threats and opportunities.
S. E. Jackson (1988)
10.1016/J.IJINDORG.2005.07.005
Science Parks in Japan and Their Value-Added Contributions to New Technology-Based Firms
N. Fukugawa (2006)
10.5465/256654
The Resource-Based View of the Firm in Two Environments: The Hollywood Film Studios From 1936 to 1965
Danny Miller (1996)
An assessment of firms located on and off Science Parks in the United Kingdom
D. Storey (1994)
10.1111/1467-9310.00219
Science parks in Sweden – industrial renewal and development?
Hans Löfsten (2001)
10.1016/J.JBUSVENT.2003.12.001
Science parks and incubators: Observations, synthesis and future research
Phillip H. Phan (2005)
10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2015.09.001
How knowledge links with universities may foster innovation: The case of a science park
Isabel Diez-Vial (2016)
10.2307/2393553
ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION
W. Cohen (1990)
10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00803.x
Research and Technology Commercialization
G. D. Markman (2008)
10.1002/SMJ.435
Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms
H. Tanriverdi (2005)
10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2010.09.010
Innovation, organizational learning, and performance
Daniel Jimenez-Jimenez (2011)
10.1016/J.JBUSVENT.2012.06.002
Growth paths and survival chances: an application of Gambler's Ruin theory
A. Coad (2013)
10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00054-2
The virtual incubator: managing human capital in the software industry
M. Nowak (2000)
10.1177/027046769001000430
Science Parks and the Growth of High Technology Firms, C.S.P. Monck, R.B. Porter, P.R. Quintas, and D.J. Storey. 1988. Routledge. 224 pages. ISBN: 0-415-00092-0. $69.50
C. Monck (1988)
10.1093/RFS/HHR083
The Costs of Being Private: Evidence from the Loan Market
A. Saunders (2011)
10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00080-0
Arriving at the High-Growth Firm
Frédéric Delmar (2003)
10.1023/B:JOTT.0000034125.29979.AE
Proximity as a Resource Base for Competitive Advantage: University–Industry Links for Technology Transfer
P. Lindelöf (2004)
10.1007/S00191-013-0337-1
The impact of science and technology parks on firms’ product innovation: empirical evidence from Spain
Ángela Rocio Vásquez-Urriago (2011)
10.1002/SMJ.4250110602
Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model
B. Boyd (1990)
10.1093/OXREP/GRM030
The Economics of University Research Parks
A. Link (2007)
10.5465/256023
Privately-Held and Publicly-Held Companies: A Comparison of Strategic Choices and Management Processes
Albert O. Trostel (1982)
10.1002/SMJ.4250070106
Entrepreneurship and paths to business ownership
A. C. Cooper (1986)
Accelerating New Product Development and Successful Market Introduction
S. Zahra (1993)
10.1177/089124240001400105
Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy
M. E. Porter (2000)
10.1111/0022-1082.25448
Why Do Companies Go Public? An Empirical Analysis
M. Pagano (1995)
10.1016/0883-9026(89)90004-9
Entrepreneurship and the initial size of firms
A. C. Cooper (1989)



This paper is referenced by
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar