Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

75NC007 Device For Noninvasive Stress Urinary Incontinence Management In Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

jean‐nicolas cornu, S. Mouly, G. Amarenco, B. Jacquetin, C. Ciofu, F. Haab, the 75NC007 Study Group
Published 2012 · Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
Introduction and hypothesisManagement of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with intravaginal devices is an alternative to surgical management, but data of a high level of evidence remain scarce. Our goal was to assess efficacy, tolerance, and acceptability of the 75NC007 intravaginal device for SUI management.MethodsA phase III, multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted. After an initial washout period with no treatment, allowing baseline evaluation, women with SUI were randomly assigned to a treatment or control group (no treatment). The primary endpoint was the reduction of incontinence episode frequency (IEF), according to bladder diaries, as compared to baseline. Secondary endpoints were variation of the Urinary Symptom Profile (USP) score, of 24-h pad test, and of CONTILIFE questionnaire scores as compared to baseline. Intent-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were conducted.ResultsFifty-five patients were enrolled and analyzed (26 controls and 29 treated). The mean relative variations of IEF, SUI USP subscore, and overactive bladder (OAB) USP subscore were more significant in the treatment group than in the control group (−31.7 ± 65.1 % vs −7.6 ± 24.5 %, p = 0.002, −2.4 ± 2.6 vs 0.2 ± 2.2, p = 0.004, and −1.5 ± 2.8 vs 0.2 ± 1.8, p = 0.016, respectively). The dysuria USP subscore was slightly decreased in the treatment group. CONTILIFE scores were slightly improved in the treatment group. Pad test variations were not different between groups. No serious adverse event was noted throughout the entire study.ConclusionsThe 75NC007 intravaginal device is a safe and effective noninvasive treatment of SUI in women.
This paper references
[Urinary incontinence in women].
J. Praest (1984)
Prevention of exercise incontinence with mechanical devices.
I. Nygaard (1995)
10.1007/s00192-004-1163-7
Vaginal pessaries for the management of stress and mixed urinary incontinence
M. Donnelly (2004)
Reseña de "Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence" de Novara G, Artibani W, Barber MD et al.
Andrés Felipe Gutiérrez Rojas (2011)
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d055d4
Continence Pessary Compared With Behavioral Therapy or Combined Therapy for Stress Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial
H. Richter (2010)
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00067.x
Duloxetine versus placebo in the treatment of European and Canadian women with stress urinary incontinence
P. Kerrebroeck (2004)
10.1016/J.AJOG.2006.11.038
Effectiveness of a new self-positioning pessary for the management of urinary incontinence in women.
S. Farrell (2007)
10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.100
Comprehensive evaluation of bladder and urethral dysfunction symptoms: development and psychometric validation of the Urinary Symptom Profile (USP) questionnaire.
F. Haab (2008)
10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.022
Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.
G. Novara (2010)
10.1002/nau.20744
Reductions in stress urinary incontinence episodes: What is clinically important for Women?
I. Yalcin (2010)
10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00598-2
Burden of stress urinary incontinence for community-dwelling women.
N. Fultz (2003)
10.1002/14651858.CD001756
Mechanical devices for urinary incontinence in women
M. Frazer (1999)
10.1016/S1701-2163(16)30486-8
Continence pessaries in the management of urinary incontinence in women.
S. Farrell (2004)
10.1007/s001920070021
Epidemiology and Natural History of Urinary Incontinence
S. Hunskaar (2000)
10.1001/jama.2010.749
Incontinence in older women.
P. Goode (2010)
10.1136/bmj.38875.675486.55
A meta-analysis of the association between adherence to drug therapy and mortality
S. Simpson (2006)
10.7326/0003-4819-148-6-200803180-00211
Systematic Review: Randomized, Controlled Trials of Nonsurgical Treatments for Urinary Incontinence in Women
T. Shamliyan (2008)
10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.047
Restoration of continence by pessaries: magnetic resonance imaging assessment of mechanism of action.
Y. Komesu (2008)
10.1097/01.AOG.0000134525.86480.0f
Pharmacological Treatment of Women Awaiting Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence
L. Cardozo (2004)
10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00054-X
European psychometric validation of the CONTILIFE: a Quality of Life questionnaire for urinary incontinence.
G. Amarenco (2003)
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08371.x
The burden of lower urinary tract symptoms: evaluating the effect of LUTS on health‐related quality of life, anxiety and depression: EpiLUTS
K. Coyne (2009)
10.1056/NEJMoa0912658
Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence.
H. Richter (2010)
10.1007/s001920200070
Long-term Assessment of the Incontinence Ring Pessary for the Treatment of Stress Incontinence
M. Robert (2002)
10.1016/S0849-5831(16)30965-X
Pessaries for the Management of Stress Urinary Incontinence
S. Farrell (2001)



This paper is referenced by
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar