Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
Please confirm you are human
(Sign Up for free to never see this)
← Back to Search

The Role Of The Primary Somatosensory Cortex In An Auditorily Paced Finger Tapping Task

B. Pollok, K. Müller, G. Aschersleben, A. Schnitzler, W. Prinz
Published 2004 · Psychology, Medicine

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
It has been suggested that a simple auditorily paced finger tapping task is associated with three tap-related neuromagnetic sources in the primary sensorimotor cortex contralateral to the tapping hand. Since a first source peaking at ~100 ms before tap-onset most likely represents activation of the primary motor cortex (M1) due to the motor command, a second source localized in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) peaking around tap-onset could be due to kinesthetic feedback of the finger movement. A third source peaking at ~100 ms after tap-onset is also localized in the primary somatosensory cortex but inferior to the first S1 source (S1 inferior). The functional meaning of this source is still under debate. On the one hand it has been argued that S1 inferior represents the neuromagnetic correlate of tactile-kinesthetic feedback due to finger-taps and movements. On the other hand the functional meaning of this source could go beyond the sole processing of somatosensory feedback monitoring the temporal distance between tap and pacer (click) to keep the subject in time with the external event. This hypothesis is based on the observation that (1) S1 inferior seems to be coupled equally well to tap and click and (2) that this source might be triggered by the last event (i.e. tap or click). In the present study we re-examined this hypothesis by using a 122-channel whole-head neuromagnetometer. Eight healthy subjects synchronized their right index finger taps to an auditory pacing signal presented with a constant interstimulus interval of 800 ms. To test the hypothesis that the last event triggers S1 inferior we compared neuromagnetic activity following the tap as the first and the last event. In the auditorily paced finger tapping task usually the tap leads over the click (negative asynchrony). Therefore, the tap usually occurs as the first event. Since it has been shown that delivering additional feedback at the time of tap-onset results in a reduced negative asynchrony, in a second run auditory feedback was presented at tap-onset to enhance the number of positive asynchronies (i.e. the tap is the last event). Since no latency differences of S1 inferior associated with positive and negative asynchronies were found, results from the present study do not support the assumption that S1 inferior is triggered by the last event. Moreover, the amplitude of S1 inferior is significantly reduced following positive asynchronies as compared to negative asynchronies. Additionally, tap duration (i.e. the time between tap-onset and tap-offset) is significantly reduced while subjects produce positive asynchronies. Therefore, the amplitude of S1 inferior seems to be modulated by movement kinematics. This observation agrees well with the idea that activation of S1 is solely associated with the processing of somatosensory information. To conclude, our data contradict the hypothesis of an evaluation process localized in the primary somatosensory cortex and substantiate the idea that S1 inferior exclusively represents the processing of somatosensory feedback information.
This paper references
10.1007/s002210000581
Passive finger movement evoked fields in magnetoencephalography
R. Lange (2000)
10.3758/BF03213056
Synchronizing actions with events: The role of sensory information
G. Aschersleben (1995)
10.1016/S0924-980X(98)00045-9
Cortical activation during fast repetitive finger movements in humans: steady-state movement-related magnetic fields and their cortical generators.
C. Gerloff (1998)
10.1097/00001756-200302100-00018
Cortical activations associated with auditorily paced finger tapping
B. Pollok (2003)
10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00052-9
Sensorimotor synchronization: the impact of temporally displaced auditory feedback.
J. Mates (2000)
10.1016/S0921-884X(96)96039-7
Steady-state movement-related cortical potentials: a new approach to assessing cortical activity associated with fast repetitive finger movements.
C. Gerloff (1997)
10.1002/ANA.410200107
Cortical potentials related to voluntary and passive finger movements recorded from subdural electrodes in humans
B. I. Lee (1986)
10.2307/4615733
A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure
S. Holm (1979)
10.1080/00222899709603468
Delayed auditory feedback in synchronization.
G. Aschersleben (1997)
Temporal coordination of simple movements
G. Aschersleben (2002)
10.1162/089892900562282
Neuromagnetic Correlates of Sensorimotor Synchronization
K. Mller (2000)
10.1017/S0140525X01000103
The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning.
B. Hommel (2001)
10.1016/S0301-0082(99)00063-5
The somatosensory evoked magnetic fields
R. Kakigi (2000)
10.1016/0013-4694(80)90147-9
Cortical potentials following voluntary and passive finger movements.
H. Shibasaki (1980)
10.1023/A:1007830118227
Steady-State Movement-Related Potentials Evoked by Fast Repetitive Movements
B. Kopp (2004)
10.1097/00004691-199811000-00009
Cortical activation during fast repetitive finger movements in humans: dipole sources of steady-state movement-related cortical potentials.
C. Gerloff (1998)



This paper is referenced by
Low frequency rTMS effects on sensorimotor
M. Doumas (2005)
10.1007/s00426-015-0721-6
Sensorimotor synchronization: neurophysiological markers of the asynchrony in a finger-tapping task
Luz Bavassi (2017)
10.3389/fneng.2014.00003
Decoding repetitive finger movements with brain activity acquired via non-invasive electroencephalography
A. Paek (2014)
10.1007/s00221-005-0029-7
Low frequency rTMS effects on sensorimotor synchronization
M. Doumas (2005)
10.1093/cercor/bht261
Capturing with EEG the neural entrainment and coupling underlying sensorimotor synchronization to the beat.
S. Nozaradan (2015)
10.1002/hbm.22593
Spatiotemporal characteristics of electrocortical brain activity during mental calculation
M. J. Vansteensel (2014)
UNCORRECTED PROOF 1 Corticokinematic coherence mainly reflects movement-induced 2 proprioceptive feedback
Mathieu Bourguignon (2014)
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.09.018
Temporal information processing in ADHD: Findings to date and new methods
M. Toplak (2006)
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.026
Corticokinematic coherence mainly reflects movement-induced proprioceptive feedback
M. Bourguignon (2015)
Brain signal analysis in space-time-frequency domain : an application to brain computer interfacing
K. Nazarpour (2008)
10.3758/BF03206433
Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature
B. Repp (2005)
10.1007/s00221-007-1155-1
Inter- versus intramodal integration in sensorimotor synchronization: a combined behavioral and magnetoencephalographic study
K. Müller (2007)
10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00147
Motor Timing and Covariation with Time Perception: Investigating the Role of Handedness
L. O’Regan (2017)
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.207
Interactions between auditory and dorsal premotor cortex during synchronization to musical rhythms
J. L. Chen (2006)
10.1016/j.jphysparis.2005.06.002
How the brain controls repetitive finger movements
B. Pollok (2006)
10.1162/jocn.2008.20506
Evidence for Anticipatory Motor Control within a Cerebello-Diencephalic-Parietal Network
B. Pollok (2008)
The neuropsychology and functional anatomy of timing
Catharine R Jones (2005)
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.022
Neuronal network coherent with hand kinematics during fast repetitive hand movements
M. Bourguignon (2012)
10.3758/s13423-011-0070-4
Audiotactile interactions in temporal perception
Valeria Occelli (2011)
The role of the primary motor cortex (M1) in volitional and reflexive pharyngeal swallowing.
Aamir K. Al-Toubi (2013)
10.3389/fnint.2016.00001
Impact of Auditory Context on Executed Motor Actions
Michal Yoles-Frenkel (2016)
10.1163/22134468-03002037
Movement Enhances Perceived Timing in the Absence of Auditory Feedback
Fiona C. Manning (2015)
10.1097/01.NPT.0000282337.95380.EF
Movement Control And Cortical Activation In Functional Ankle Instability
K. Anderson (2005)
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116177
Coupling between human brain activity and body movements: Insights from non-invasive electromagnetic recordings
M. Bourguignon (2019)
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar