Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
Please confirm you are human
(Sign Up for free to never see this)
← Back to Search

The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations For Improving The Quality Of Reports Of Parallel-group Randomised Trials

D. Moher, K. Schulz, D. Altman, for the Consort Group
Published 2003 · Psychology, Medicine

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
To comprehend the results of a randomised controlled trial (RCT), readers must understand its design, conduct, analysis, and interpretation. That goal can be achieved only through total transparency from authors. Despite several decades of educational efforts, the reporting of RCTs needs improvement. Investigators and editors developed the original CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement to help authors improve reporting by use of a checklist and flow diagram. The revised CONSORT statement presented here incorporates new evidence and addresses some criticisms of the original statement. The checklist items pertain to the content of the Title, Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion. The revised checklist includes 22 items selected because empirical evidence indicates that not reporting this information is associated with biased estimates of treatment effect, or because the information is essential to judge the reliability or relevance of the findings. We intended the flow diagram to depict the passage of participants through an RCT. The revised flow diagram depicts information from four stages of a trial (enrolment, intervention allocation, follow- up, and analysis). The diagram explicitly shows the number of participants, for each intervention group, included in the primary data analysis. Inclusion of these numbers allows the reader to judge whether the authors have done an intention- to-treat analysis. In sum, the CONSORT statement is intended to improve the reporting of an RCT, enabling readers to understand a trial's conduct and to assess the validity of its results.
This paper references
Hoey J . CMAJ endorses the CONSORT statement
P Huston (1996)
10.1001/JAMA.285.15.1992
Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation.
D. Moher (2001)
CMAJ endorses the CONSORT statement
J. Huston P. Hoey (1996)
Consort statement on the reporting standards of clinical trials. MRC uses checklist similar to CONSORT's.
L. O'Toole (1997)
CMAJ endorses the CONSORT statement. CONsolidation of Standards for Reporting Trials.
P. Huston (1996)
10.1002/SIM.4780101011
Analysis of clinical trials by treatment actually received: is it really an option?
Y. J. Lee (1991)
10.7326/0003-4819-133-3-200008010-00017
News from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
F. Davidoff (2000)
10.1136/BMJ.308.6924.283
The scandal of poor medical research
D. Altman (1994)
Treatment of attention deficit / hyperactivity disorder
ダニエル ダブリュ グッドマン (2002)
10.1136/bmj.314.7087.1126
CONSORT statement on the reporting standards of clinical trials
D. Altman (1997)
10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement
D. Moher (1999)
10.1001/JAMA.279.18.1487
Beyond CONSORT: need for improved reporting standards for clinical trials. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials.
C. Meinert (1998)
The value of patient flow charts in reports of randomized controlled trials : bibliographic study
M Egger
10.7326/0003-4819-126-1-199701010-00011
CONSORT: An Important Step toward Evidence-Based Health Care
N. Freemantle (1997)
The Quest for Unbiased Research : Randomized Clinical Trials and the CONSORT Reporting Guidelines
R. Fishman
10.1136/bmj.314.7087.1127
Details of patients' consent in studies should be reported
M. Nylenna (1997)
10.1016/S0140-6736(98)01085-X
Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
D. Moher (1998)
10.1001/JAMA.273.5.408
Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.
K. Schulz (1995)
10.7326/0003-4819-132-12-200006200-00007
The Quality of Reporting in Published Cost-Utility Analyses, 19761997
P. Neumann (2000)
10.1136/bmj.319.7211.670
What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials
S. Hollis (1999)
10.7326/0003-4819-108-2-266
Guidelines for statistical reporting in articles for medical journals. Amplifications and explanations.
J. C. Bailar (1988)
10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1181
Content and quality of 2000 controlled trials in schizophrenia over 50 years
B. Thornley (1998)
10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00012
The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration
D. Altman (2001)
10.1136/BMJ.320.7240.1007
Intention to treat analysis is related to methodological quality
M. Ruíz-Canela (2000)
10.1002/1097-0258(20010215)20:3<489::AID-SIM806>3.0.CO;2-S
Extending the CONSORT statement to cluster randomized trials: for discussion.
D. Elbourne (2001)
10.1001/JAMA.1996.03540160061034
Recommendations for Reporting Cost-effectiveness Analyses
J. Siegel (1996)
10.1136/jech.51.4.354
Putting trials on trial--the costs and consequences of small trials in depression: a systematic review of methodology.
M. Hotopf (1997)
10.1136/bmj.313.7057.570
Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement
D. Altman (1996)
10.1016/S0167-8140(97)00226-0
Towards evidence based radiation oncology: improving the design, analysis, and reporting of clinical outcome studies in radiotherapy.
S. Bentzen (1998)
10.1136/bmj.320.7245.1308
Size and quality of randomised controlled trials in head injury: review of published studies
K. Dickinson (2000)
10.1016/S0002-9394(14)70422-2
Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.
C. Begg (1996)
10.1186/cvm-1-1-003
Current Controlled Trials: an opportunity to help improve the quality of clinical research
I. Chalmers (2000)
10.1001/JAMA.283.15.2008
Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.
D. Stroup (2000)



This paper is referenced by
10.1097/SCS.0000000000004900
Assessing the Compliance of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Craniofacial Surgery Journals With the CONSORT Statement
M. Borrelli (2019)
10.1002/hed.21585
Surgical salvage nasopharyngectomy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A multivariate analysis of prognostic factors
A. Vlantis (2011)
10.1002/14651858.CD008512.pub2
Interventions for the prevention of postoperative ear discharge after insertion of ventilation tubes (grommets) in children.
M. Syed (2013)
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02004.x
Mandibular single-implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised-control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems.
N. Alsabeeha (2011)
10.1186/s12888-015-0465-2
Protocol for CHANGE: a randomized clinical trial assessing lifestyle coaching plus care coordination versus care coordination alone versus treatment as usual to reduce risks of cardiovascular disease in adults with schizophrenia and abdominal obesity
H. Speyer (2015)
10.1186/s13014-018-1053-7
Quality of radiotherapy reporting in randomized controlled trials of prostate cancer
Y. Y. Soon (2018)
10.3109/0142159X.2014.970617
Feedback providers’ credibility impacts students’ satisfaction with feedback and delayed performance
J. M. M. van de Ridder (2015)
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.011
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 1: an introduction to a series of articles that provide guidance and tools for reviews of complex interventions.
Jeanne-Marie Guise (2017)
10.1080/10503307.2012.726750
School-based humanistic counseling for psychological distress in young people: Pilot randomized controlled trial
K. McArthur (2013)
10.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1032
A systematic review of randomized trials on the effect of cervical disc arthroplasty on reducing adjacent-level degeneration.
R. Botelho (2010)
PSYCHOSOCIAL ISSUES FOR PEOPLE WITH ADVANCED CANCER: OVERCOMING THE RESEARCH CHALLENGES
P. Schofield (2006)
10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.005
Circumferential bone loss around splinted and nonsplinted immediately loaded implants retaining mandibular overdentures: A randomized controlled clinical trial using cone beam computed tomography.
M. A. Elsyad (2016)
10.1016/J.NURPRA.2008.09.004
Evaluation of Thiazolidinediones on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review
J. Lee (2009)
10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820da3eb
Randomized Controlled Trials
C. McCarthy (2011)
Evidence-Based Medicine Series Systematic Review Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries With Special Reference to Surgical Technique and Rehabilitation: An Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials
D. Andersson (2009)
10.1111/jvim.14613
Effect of Cranberry Extract on the Frequency of Bacteriuria in Dogs with Acute Thoracolumbar Disk Herniation: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
N.J. Olby (2017)
10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003564
Treating lateral epicondylitis with corticosteroid injections or non-electrotherapeutical physiotherapy: a systematic review
Morten Olaussen (2013)
10.1007/s00192-007-0476-8
Risk evaluation of smoking and age on the occurrence of postoperative erosions after transvaginal mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapses
F. Araco (2007)
10.1080/00016340601134598
Outpatient cervical ripening before first‐trimester surgical abortion: a comparison between misoprostol and isosorbide mononitrate
N. Radulovic (2007)
10.1002/hep.21415
Prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence with alpha‐interferon after liver resection in HCV cirrhosis
V. Mazzaferro (2006)
10.1007/s00586-005-1057-5
Methodological aspects of outcomes research
R. Hiebert (2005)
10.1111/J.1365-2753.2005.00568.X
Cluster randomized controlled trials.
S. Puffer (2005)
10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01918.x
Results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of posterior ZrSiO(4)-ceramic crowns.
B. Encke (2009)
10.1016/J.IJCARD.2007.03.132
A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials assessing drug-eluting stents and vascular brachytherapy in the treatment of coronary artery in-stent restenosis.
L. Oliver (2008)
10.1016/j.jmig.2007.08.596
Use of misoprostol prior to hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Aurélio Antônio Ribeiro da Costa (2008)
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.535161
Prevention of Syncope Trial (POST): A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Metoprolol in the Prevention of Vasovagal Syncope
R. Sheldon (2006)
Integrating FAMILY-FOCUSED Practice Into Routine Addiction Services
C. Hampson (2014)
Statistical Methods for Life History Analysis Involving Latent Processes
Hua Shen (2014)
10.1002/14651858.CD007107.pub2
Prophylactic antibiotics or G-CSF for the prevention of infections and improvement of survival in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
C. Herbst (2009)
10.1007/s00264-011-1233-7
No clinical difference between large metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and 28-mm-head total hip arthroplasty?
W. Zijlstra (2011)
10.1136/bjo.2009.160796
Authors’ response
Sc Binder (2009)
10.1097/YIC.0b013e32834d0e50
Evaluation of naltrexone for dissociative symptoms in borderline personality disorder
C. Schmahl (2012)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar