Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
Please confirm you are human
(Sign Up for free to never see this)
← Back to Search

The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations For Improving The Quality Of Reports Of Parallel-group Randomised Trials

D. Moher, K. Schulz, D. Altman, for the Consort Group
Published 2003 · Psychology, Medicine

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
To comprehend the results of a randomised controlled trial (RCT), readers must understand its design, conduct, analysis, and interpretation. That goal can be achieved only through total transparency from authors. Despite several decades of educational efforts, the reporting of RCTs needs improvement. Investigators and editors developed the original CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement to help authors improve reporting by use of a checklist and flow diagram. The revised CONSORT statement presented here incorporates new evidence and addresses some criticisms of the original statement. The checklist items pertain to the content of the Title, Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion. The revised checklist includes 22 items selected because empirical evidence indicates that not reporting this information is associated with biased estimates of treatment effect, or because the information is essential to judge the reliability or relevance of the findings. We intended the flow diagram to depict the passage of participants through an RCT. The revised flow diagram depicts information from four stages of a trial (enrolment, intervention allocation, follow- up, and analysis). The diagram explicitly shows the number of participants, for each intervention group, included in the primary data analysis. Inclusion of these numbers allows the reader to judge whether the authors have done an intention- to-treat analysis. In sum, the CONSORT statement is intended to improve the reporting of an RCT, enabling readers to understand a trial's conduct and to assess the validity of its results.
This paper references
Hoey J . CMAJ endorses the CONSORT statement
P Huston (1996)
Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation.
D. Moher (2001)
CMAJ endorses the CONSORT statement
J. Huston P. Hoey (1996)
Consort statement on the reporting standards of clinical trials. MRC uses checklist similar to CONSORT's.
L. O'Toole (1997)
CMAJ endorses the CONSORT statement. CONsolidation of Standards for Reporting Trials.
P. Huston (1996)
Analysis of clinical trials by treatment actually received: is it really an option?
Y. J. Lee (1991)
News from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
F. Davidoff (2000)
The scandal of poor medical research
D. Altman (1994)
Treatment of attention deficit / hyperactivity disorder
ダニエル ダブリュ グッドマン (2002)
CONSORT statement on the reporting standards of clinical trials
D. Altman (1997)
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement
D. Moher (1999)
Beyond CONSORT: need for improved reporting standards for clinical trials. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials.
C. Meinert (1998)
The value of patient flow charts in reports of randomized controlled trials : bibliographic study
M Egger
CONSORT: An Important Step toward Evidence-Based Health Care
N. Freemantle (1997)
The Quest for Unbiased Research : Randomized Clinical Trials and the CONSORT Reporting Guidelines
R. Fishman
Details of patients' consent in studies should be reported
M. Nylenna (1997)
Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
D. Moher (1998)
Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.
K. Schulz (1995)
The Quality of Reporting in Published Cost-Utility Analyses, 19761997
P. Neumann (2000)
What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials
S. Hollis (1999)
Guidelines for statistical reporting in articles for medical journals. Amplifications and explanations.
J. C. Bailar (1988)
Content and quality of 2000 controlled trials in schizophrenia over 50 years
B. Thornley (1998)
The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration
D. Altman (2001)
Intention to treat analysis is related to methodological quality
M. Ruíz-Canela (2000)
Extending the CONSORT statement to cluster randomized trials: for discussion.
D. Elbourne (2001)
Recommendations for Reporting Cost-effectiveness Analyses
J. Siegel (1996)
Putting trials on trial--the costs and consequences of small trials in depression: a systematic review of methodology.
M. Hotopf (1997)
Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement
D. Altman (1996)
Towards evidence based radiation oncology: improving the design, analysis, and reporting of clinical outcome studies in radiotherapy.
S. Bentzen (1998)
Size and quality of randomised controlled trials in head injury: review of published studies
K. Dickinson (2000)
Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.
C. Begg (1996)
Current Controlled Trials: an opportunity to help improve the quality of clinical research
I. Chalmers (2000)
Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.
D. Stroup (2000)

This paper is referenced by
Assessing the Compliance of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Craniofacial Surgery Journals With the CONSORT Statement
M. Borrelli (2019)
Surgical salvage nasopharyngectomy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A multivariate analysis of prognostic factors
A. Vlantis (2011)
Interventions for the prevention of postoperative ear discharge after insertion of ventilation tubes (grommets) in children.
M. Syed (2013)
Mandibular single-implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised-control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems.
N. Alsabeeha (2011)
Protocol for CHANGE: a randomized clinical trial assessing lifestyle coaching plus care coordination versus care coordination alone versus treatment as usual to reduce risks of cardiovascular disease in adults with schizophrenia and abdominal obesity
H. Speyer (2015)
Quality of radiotherapy reporting in randomized controlled trials of prostate cancer
Y. Y. Soon (2018)
Feedback providers’ credibility impacts students’ satisfaction with feedback and delayed performance
J. M. M. van de Ridder (2015)
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 1: an introduction to a series of articles that provide guidance and tools for reviews of complex interventions.
Jeanne-Marie Guise (2017)
School-based humanistic counseling for psychological distress in young people: Pilot randomized controlled trial
K. McArthur (2013)
A systematic review of randomized trials on the effect of cervical disc arthroplasty on reducing adjacent-level degeneration.
R. Botelho (2010)
P. Schofield (2006)
Circumferential bone loss around splinted and nonsplinted immediately loaded implants retaining mandibular overdentures: A randomized controlled clinical trial using cone beam computed tomography.
M. A. Elsyad (2016)
Evaluation of Thiazolidinediones on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review
J. Lee (2009)
Randomized Controlled Trials
C. McCarthy (2011)
Evidence-Based Medicine Series Systematic Review Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries With Special Reference to Surgical Technique and Rehabilitation: An Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials
D. Andersson (2009)
Effect of Cranberry Extract on the Frequency of Bacteriuria in Dogs with Acute Thoracolumbar Disk Herniation: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
N.J. Olby (2017)
Treating lateral epicondylitis with corticosteroid injections or non-electrotherapeutical physiotherapy: a systematic review
Morten Olaussen (2013)
Risk evaluation of smoking and age on the occurrence of postoperative erosions after transvaginal mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapses
F. Araco (2007)
Outpatient cervical ripening before first‐trimester surgical abortion: a comparison between misoprostol and isosorbide mononitrate
N. Radulovic (2007)
Prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence with alpha‐interferon after liver resection in HCV cirrhosis
V. Mazzaferro (2006)
Methodological aspects of outcomes research
R. Hiebert (2005)
Cluster randomized controlled trials.
S. Puffer (2005)
Results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of posterior ZrSiO(4)-ceramic crowns.
B. Encke (2009)
A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials assessing drug-eluting stents and vascular brachytherapy in the treatment of coronary artery in-stent restenosis.
L. Oliver (2008)
Use of misoprostol prior to hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Aurélio Antônio Ribeiro da Costa (2008)
Prevention of Syncope Trial (POST): A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Metoprolol in the Prevention of Vasovagal Syncope
R. Sheldon (2006)
Integrating FAMILY-FOCUSED Practice Into Routine Addiction Services
C. Hampson (2014)
Statistical Methods for Life History Analysis Involving Latent Processes
Hua Shen (2014)
Prophylactic antibiotics or G-CSF for the prevention of infections and improvement of survival in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
C. Herbst (2009)
No clinical difference between large metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and 28-mm-head total hip arthroplasty?
W. Zijlstra (2011)
Authors’ response
Sc Binder (2009)
Evaluation of naltrexone for dissociative symptoms in borderline personality disorder
C. Schmahl (2012)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar