Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Quantitative Evaluation Of Upper-limb Motor Control In Robot-aided Rehabilitation

L. Zollo, L. Rossini, M. Bravi, G. Magrone, S. Sterzi, E. Guglielmelli
Published 2011 · Engineering, Medicine, Computer Science

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy Visualize in Litmaps
Share
Reduce the time it takes to create your bibliography by a factor of 10 by using the world’s favourite reference manager
Time to take this seriously.
Get Citationsy
This paper is focused on the multimodal analysis of patient performance, carried out by means of robotic technology and wearable sensors, and aims at providing quantitative measure of biomechanical and motion planning features of arm motor control following rehabilitation. Upper-limb robotic therapy was administered to 24 community-dwelling persons with chronic stroke. Performance indices on patient motor performance were computed from data recorded with the InMotion2 robotic machine and a magneto-inertial sensor. Motor planning issues were investigated by means of techniques of motion decomposition into submovements. A linear regression analysis was carried out to study correlation with clinical scales. Robotic outcome measures showed a significant improvement of kinematic motor performance; improvement of dynamic components was more significant in resistive motion and highly correlated with MP. The analysis of motion decomposition into submovements showed an important change with recovery of submovement number, amplitude and order, tending to patterns measured in healthy subjects. Preliminary results showed that arm biomechanical functions can be objectively measured by means of the proposed set of performance indices. Correlation with MP is high, while correlation with FM is moderate. Features related to motion planning strategies can be extracted from submovement analysis.
This paper references
10.1037/H0092992
THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT
R. Woodworth (1899)
10.1093/PTJ/63.10.1606
Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident.
P. Duncan (1983)
10.1037/0033-295X.95.3.340
Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements.
D. Meyer (1988)
10.1162/jocn.1991.3.3.220
Arm Trajectory Modifications During Reaching Towards Visual Targets
T. Flash (1991)
10.1016/0306-4522(92)90113-G
A model for the generation of movements requiring endpoint precision
T. Milner (1992)
10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019837
Organization of motor output in slow finger movements in man.
A. Vallbo (1993)
10.7551/mitpress/1477.003.0047
Optimization and Learning in Neural Networks for Formation and Control of Coordinated Movement
D. Meyer (1993)
Optimization and learning in neural networks for formation and control of coordinated movement
M. Kawato (1993)
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-05-03208.1994
Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task
R. Shadmehr (1994)
Interactive robotic therapist
N Hogan (1995)
10.1037/0012-1649.32.5.811
Learning to reach: A mathematical model.
N. Berthier (1996)
10.1017/S0140525X00041467
What are “normal movements” in atypical populations?
M. L. Latash (1996)
10.1007/PL00005770
Manual interception of moving targets II. On-line control of overlapping submovements
D. Lee (1997)
10.1109/86.662623
Robot-aided neurorehabilitation.
H. Krebs (1998)
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-22-10153.1999
Motor Skills Training Enhances Lesion-Induced Structural Plasticity in the Motor Cortex of Adult Rats
T. Jones (1999)
10.1007/s004220050543
Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields
Nikhil Bhushan (1999)
Cortical plasticity after stroke: implications for rehabilitation.
R. J. Nudo (1999)
10.1016/S0167-9457(00)00006-3
The coordination of reaching and grasping in spastic hemiparesis
B. Steenbergen (2000)
10.1007/s002210000366
Kinematic properties of rapid hand movements in a knob turning task
K. Novak (2000)
10.1038/35000576
Motor disorder in Huntington's disease begins as a dysfunction in error feedback control
M. Smith (2000)
10.1016/S0079-6123(00)27004-0
Activity-dependent regulation of neuronal plasticity and self repair.
G. Kempermann (2000)
10.1093/AGEING/29.3.223
Reliability of measurements of muscle tone and muscle power in stroke patients.
J. Gregson (2000)
10.1093/BRAIN/123.5.940
Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke.
M. Cîrstea (2000)
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-18-08297.2002
Movement Smoothness Changes during Stroke Recovery
B. Rohrer (2002)
10.1007/s00221-002-1060-6
The use of overlapping submovements in the control of rapid hand movements
K. Novak (2002)
10.1002/14651858.cd003586.pub2
Cognitive rehabilitation for spatial neglect following stroke.
A. Bowen (2002)
10.1152/JN.00152.2002
Voluntary exercise induces a BDNF-mediated mechanism that promotes neuroplasticity.
F. Gomez-Pinilla (2002)
10.1007/s00221-003-1525-2
Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements
J. Saunders (2003)
10.1007/s00422-003-0428-4
Avoiding spurious submovement decompositions: a globally optimal algorithm
B. Rohrer (2003)
10.1023/A:1024576330213
Guest Editorial: Special Issue on Rehabilitation Robotics
P. Dario (2003)
10.1023/A:1024494031121
Rehabilitation Robotics: Performance-Based Progressive Robot-Assisted Therapy
H. Krebs (2003)
Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories.
G. Kwakkel (2004)
10.1007/BF00236911
Spatial control of arm movements
P. Morasso (2004)
10.1161/01.STR.0000143153.76460.7d
Effects of Augmented Exercise Therapy Time After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis
G. Kwakkel (2004)
10.1007/s00221-005-2264-3
Kinematic properties of on-line error corrections in the monkey
A. Fishbach (2005)
Research Methods and Statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach
S. Jackson (2005)
10.1152/JN.00943.2004
Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration.
M. Smith (2005)
10.1097/01.WCO.0000200544.29915.CC
Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation.
J. Krakauer (2006)
10.1007/s00221-006-0652-y
Deciding when and how to correct a movement: discrete submovements as a decision making process
A. Fishbach (2006)
10.1682/JRRD.2005.04.0076
Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke.
G. Prange (2006)
10.1007/s00422-006-0055-y
Avoiding Spurious Submovement Decompositions II: A Scattershot Algorithm
B. Rohrer (2006)
10.1310/tsr1406-22
Poststroke Upper Extremity Rehabilitation: A Review of Robotic Systems and Clinical Results
B. R. Brewer (2007)
10.1109/TNSRE.2007.903899
Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation: A Robot for Wrist Rehabilitation
H. Krebs (2007)
10.1002/14651858.CD006876.pub2
Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke.
J. Mehrholz (2008)
10.1177/1545968307303401
Assessing Mechanisms of Recovery During Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation of the Upper Limb
R. Colombo (2008)
10.1186/1743-0003-6-1
Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design
A. Timmermans (2008)
10.1093/BRAIN/AWM311
Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke.
C. Takahashi (2008)
10.3238/arztebl.2008.0329
The rational use of robots in neurorehabilitation - fact or fiction?
H. Masur (2008)
10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.536219
Electromechanical and Robot-Assisted Arm Training for Improving Arm Function and Activities of Daily Living After Stroke
J. Mehrholz (2009)
10.1177/1545968308328727
What Do Motor “Recovery” and “Compensation” Mean in Patients Following Stroke?
M. Levin (2009)
10.3200/35-09-004-RC
Sensitivity of Smoothness Measures to Movement Duration, Amplitude, and Arrests
N. Hogan (2009)
10.1056/NEJMe1003399
Brain repair after stroke.
S. Cramer (2010)
10.1097/00131402-200106000-00013
Aids to the Examination of the Peripheral Nervous System
Michael T. O'Brien (2010)
10.1310/tsr1702-99
A Systematic Review of Cognitive Interventions to Improve Functional Ability in People Who Have Cognitive Impairment Following Stroke
T. Hoffmann (2010)
10.1056/NEJMoa0911341
Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke.
A. Lo (2010)
10.1177/1545968309343214
Kinematic Robot-Based Evaluation Scales and Clinical Counterparts to Measure Upper Limb Motor Performance in Patients With Chronic Stroke
C. Bosecker (2010)
Neuroinspired interfaces for human-machine interaction
L Rossini (2010)
Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for upper-limb therapy and assessment in chronic stroke.
L. Zollo (2011)
10.1109/BIOROB.2012.6290822
Dynamic submovement composition for motion and interaction control of a robot manipulator
L. Zollo (2012)



This paper is referenced by
10.1155/2021/6621950
Motor Function Assessment of Upper Limb in Stroke Patients
Bingyu Pan (2021)
10.3389/fbioe.2021.660015
Association Between Finger-to-Nose Kinematics and Upper Extremity Motor Function in Subacute Stroke: A Principal Component Analysis
Ze-Jian Chen (2021)
10.1186/s12984-021-00875-7
Clinical validation of kinematic assessments of post-stroke upper limb movements with a multi-joint arm exoskeleton
F. Grimm (2021)
10.3390/s20154269
A Gesture-Controlled Rehabilitation Robot to Improve Engagement and Quantify Movement Performance
A. Segal (2020)
10.1186/s12984-020-00730-1
Can kinematic parameters of 3D reach-to-target movements be used as a proxy for clinical outcome measures in chronic stroke rehabilitation? An exploratory study
C. Adans-Dester (2020)
10.1109/THMS.2020.2976905
State-of-the-Art Robotic Devices for Wrist Rehabilitation: Design and Control Aspects
Shahid Hussain (2020)
10.1038/s41598-020-59927-y
A 3D printing approach toward targeted intervention in telerehabilitation
Roni Barak Ventura (2020)
10.1186/s12984-020-00672-8
Key components of mechanical work predict outcomes in robotic stroke therapy
Zachary A. Wright (2020)
10.21203/rs.3.rs-52210/v1
Clinical Validation of Kinematic Assessments of Post-Stroke Upper Limb Movements with a Multi-Joint Arm Exoskeleton
F. Grimm (2020)
10.48011/asba.v2i1.1083
Análise de Movimentos Compensatórios na Reabilitação de Membros Superiores através do Kinect
A. T. Garcia (2020)
10.1186/s12984-020-00749-4
Characterization and wearability evaluation of a fully portable wrist exoskeleton for unsupervised training after stroke
Charles Lambelet (2020)
10.1002/pmrj.12294
The Effects of Upper Limb Motor Recovery on Submovement Characteristics among the Patients with Stroke: A Meta‐Analysis
Seyedeh Somayeh Naghibi (2019)
10.1155/2019/4251089
Kinematic Parameters for Tracking Patient Progress during Upper Limb Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation: An Observational Study on Subacute Stroke Subjects
M. Goffredo (2019)
10.1109/CCDC.2019.8832370
Direct Adaptive Fuzzy Compensation Control of a Skeleton Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Robot’s Wrist Joint With Unmodeled Dynamics
Xiongjun Wu (2019)
10.1007/s11517-019-02076-w
Quantitative assessment of lower limbs gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy based on surface EMG and inertial sensors
Xiang Chen (2019)
10.2196/12708
The Role of Social Interactions in Motor Performance: Feasibility Study Toward Enhanced Motivation in Telerehabilitation
Roni Barak Ventura (2019)
10.3233/RNN-180892
Can robot-based measurements improve prediction of motor performance after robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation in patients with moderate-to-severe sub-acute stroke?
C. Duret (2019)
10.3389/fneur.2019.00412
Robot-Assisted Therapy in Upper Extremity Hemiparesis: Overview of an Evidence-Based Approach
C. Duret (2019)
10.1080/17483107.2017.1290702
Serious games for upper limb rehabilitation: a systematic review
João Pedro Proença (2018)
10.1186/s12984-018-0348-0
Human arm joints reconstruction algorithm in rehabilitation therapies assisted by end-effector robotic devices
Arturo Bertomeu-Motos (2018)
10.1109/JTEHM.2018.2877980
Robust and Accurate Capture of Human Joint Pose Using an Inertial Sensor
P. Pathirana (2018)
10.1016/j.hcl.2018.06.002
Assessment of the Spastic Upper Limb with Computational Motion Analysis.
T. Karakostas (2018)
Récupération motrice du membre supérieur post-AVC : recherche de mesures adaptées pour l'évaluation et étude de l'efficacité de stratégies thérapeutiques
N. Brihmat (2018)
Survey of Common Issues in Magnetic Inertial Sensors : Main NeuroRehabilitation Applications
E. Belalcazar-Bolaños (2018)
10.1109/MeMeA.2018.8438677
Submovement changes in goal-directed and non-goal-directed ankle movements using pediAnklebot
F. Martelli (2018)
10.1186/s12984-018-0385-8
Reliability, validity and discriminant ability of the instrumental indices provided by a novel planar robotic device for upper limb rehabilitation
M. Germanotta (2018)
10.1109/IECON.2018.8591265
L1 Gain Control of the Skeleton Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Robot's Wrist Joint Subject to Magnitude, Rate and Output Saturation
Xiongjun Wu (2018)
10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2864935
Wrist Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation Treatment in Subacute and Chronic Stroke Patients: From Distal-to-Proximal Motor Recovery
S. Mazzoleni (2018)
10.2174/1874120701812010135
Motion Tracking for Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of Upper Limb Movements Following Acromioclavicular Joint Ligament Reconstruction: A Pilot Study
S. Mazzoleni (2018)
10.5507/bp.2018.061
Functional differences in upper limb movement after early and chronic stroke based on kinematic motion indicators.
Monika Błaszczyszyn (2018)
10.1155/2018/7438609
An Orthopaedic Robotic-Assisted Rehabilitation Method of the Forearm in Virtual Reality Physiotherapy
Miguel A Padilla-Castañeda (2018)
10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.12.005
Kinematic measures for upper limb robot-assisted therapy following stroke and correlations with clinical outcome measures: A review.
V. Tran (2018)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar