Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Evidence And Expert Opinions: Dry Needling Versus Acupuncture (II)

A. Fan, Jun Xu, Yong-ming Li
Published 2017 · Medicine

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy Visualize in Litmaps
Reduce the time it takes to create your bibliography by a factor of 10 by using the world’s favourite reference manager
Time to take this seriously.
Get Citationsy
In the United States and other Western countries, dry needling has been a topic in academic and legal fields. This White Paper is to provide the authoritative information of dry needling versus acupuncture to academic scholars, healthcare professionals, administrators, policymakers, and the general public by providing the authoritative evidence and expertise regarding critical issues of dry needling and reaching a consensus. We conclude that Dr. Travell, Dr. Gunn, Dr. Baldry and others who have promoted dry needling by simply rebranding (1) acupuncture as dry needling and (2) acupuncture points as trigger points (dry needling points). Dry needling simply using English biomedical terms (especially using "fascia" hypothesis) in replace of their equivalent Chinese medical terms. Dry needling is an over-simplified version of acupuncture derived from traditional Chinese acupuncture except for emphasis on biomedical language when treating neuromuscularskeletal pain (dry needling promoters redefined it as "myofascial pain"). Trigger points belong to the category of Ashi acupuncture points in traditional Chinese acupuncture, and they are not a new discovery. By applying acupuncture points, dry needling is actually trigger point acupuncture, an invasive therapy (a surgical procedure) instead of manual therapy. Dr. Travell admitted to the general public that dry needling is acupuncture, and acupuncture professionals practice dry needling as acupuncture therapy and there are several criteria in acupuncture profession to locate trigger points as acupuncture points. Among acupuncture schools, dry needling practitioners emphasize acupuncture's local responses while other acupuncturists pay attention to the responses of both local, distal, and whole body responses. For patients' safety, dry needling practitioners should meet standards required for licensed acupuncturists and physicians.
This paper references
Trigger points and acupuncture points for pain: Correlations and implications
R. Melzack (1977)
: correlations and implications
S Birch (1977)
Trigger point--acupuncture point correlations revisited.
S. Birch (2003)
Identification and quantification of myofascial taut bands with magnetic resonance elastography.
Qingshan Chen (2007)
Can classical acupuncture points and trigger points be compared in the treatment of pain disorders? Birch's analysis revisited.
Peter T. Dorsher (2008)
Biochemicals associated with pain and inflammation are elevated in sites near to and remote from active myofascial trigger points.
J. Shah (2008)
Trigger Points and Classical Acupuncture Points
P. T. Dorsher (2009)
Increased trapezius pain sensitivity is not associated with increased tissue hardness.
H. Andersen (2010)
Acupuncture points are large fields: The fuzziness of acupuncture point localization by doctors in practice
A. Molsberger (2012)
Quantification of Myofascial Taut Bands.
Qingshan Chen (2016)
Response to Dommerholt and Stanborough Re: "Evidence That Dry Needling Is the Intent to Bypass Regulation to Practice Acupuncture in the United States".
A. Fan (2017)
Evidence and expert opinions: Dry needling versus acupuncture (III) — The American Alliance for Professional Acupuncture Safety (AAPAS) White Paper 2016
A. Fan (2017)

This paper is referenced by
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar