Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Analysis Of 59 ERCP Lawsuits; Mainly About Indications.

P. Cotton
Published 2006 · Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
BACKGROUND This study reports the analysis of a personal series of 59 cases in which ERCP malpractice was alleged. METHODS Half of the cases involved pancreatitis; 16 suffered perforation after sphincterotomy (8 of which involved pre-cutting), and 10 had severe biliary infection. There were 2 esophageal perforations. Fifteen of the patients died. The most common allegation (54% of cases) was that the ERCP, or the therapeutic procedure, was not indicated. Most of these patients had pain only, usually after cholecystectomy. Negligent performance was alleged in 19 cases, with corroborating evidence in 8. Inadequate postprocedure care was alleged in 5 cases, including 3 with a delayed diagnosis of perforation. Disputes about the extent of the education and consent process were common. RESULTS The final outcome was available in 40 cases. Sixteen were withdrawn, and 14 were settled. Of the 10 that came to trial, half were defense verdicts. CONCLUSIONS The lessons are clear. ERCP should be done for good indications, by trained endoscopists with standard techniques, with good documented patient informed consent and communication before and after the procedure. Speculative ERCP, sphincterotomy, and pre-cuts are high-risk for patients and for practitioners.
This paper references
10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70351-9
National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: ERCP for diagnosis and therapy, January 14-16, 2002.
Sidney Cohen (2002)
10.1016/S1052-5157(18)30453-7
Prevention of hospital liability for granting privileges to unqualified physicians.
M. S. Sundermeyer (1995)
10.1136/gut.42.1.139
Reducing risks in gastroenterological practice
G. Neale (1998)
10.1136/bmj.307.6917.1483
Clinical analysis of 100 medicolegal cases.
G. Neale (1993)
10.1111/J.1572-0241.2002.05526.X
How many times have you done this procedure, doctor?
P. Cotton (2002)
10.1016/S1052-5157(01)00016-2
Risk management for the endoscopy center.
P. Gerstenberger (2002)
10.1159/000067681
Informed Consent for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A 2002 ESGE Survey
K. Triantafyllou (2002)
10.1067/S0016-5107(03)00006-3
Perceptions of gastroenterology fellows regarding ERCP competency and training.
T. Kowalski (2003)
10.1055/s-1999-13659
Severe and fatal complications after diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective series of claims to insurance covering public hospitals.
R. Trap (1999)
10.1016/S0016-5107(93)70052-8
Malpractice claims in gastrointestinal endoscopy: analysis of an insurance industry data base.
P. Gerstenberger (1993)
10.1067/MGE.2001.118446
ERCP is most dangerous for people who need it least.
P. Cotton (2001)
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.01829.x
The myth of informed consent
M. Kirsch (2000)
10.1016/J.GIE.2005.04.048
Excellence in endoscopy: toward practical metrics.
P. Cotton (2006)
10.1016/S0016-5107(89)72921-7
Precut papillotomy--a risky technique for experts only.
P. Cotton (1989)
10.1016/S0016-5107(96)70068-8
Is your sphincterotomy really safe--and necessary?
P. Cotton (1996)
10.12968/HOSP.2004.65.1.2409
Medical litigation: past, present and future.
G. Neale (2004)
10.1067/MGE.2002.123622
ERCP outcomes: defining the operators, experience, and environments.
B. Petersen (2002)
10.1055/S-2007-1004329
Needleknife precut sphincterotomy: the devil is in the indications.
P. Cotton (1997)
10.1007/s00464-003-9069-x
Analysis of 153 deaths after upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: room for improvement?
A. Thompson (2003)
10.1016/S0016-5107(91)70740-2
Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.
P. Cotton (1991)
10.1053/GE.2003.V57.AMGE030576633
Complications of ERCP.
J. Mallery (2003)
10.1067/MGE.2000.107433
Excellence in endoscopy.
M. Kimmey (2000)
Twenty strategies to reduce the risk of a malpractice claim.
Irving Av (1998)



This paper is referenced by
10.1038/ajg.2008.2
Neorectal Irritability After Short-Term Preoperative Radiotherapy and Surgical Resection for Rectal Cancer
R. Bakx (2009)
Reflections on indications for ERCP among patients with suspected choledocholithiasis
L. Cancio Rodríguez (2011)
10.1016/B978-1-4377-1529-3.00009-9
Reporting, Documentation, and Risk Management
Ian D. Norton (2012)
10.1007/s00464-011-1582-8
An appraisal of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for pancreaticobiliary disease in children: our institutional experience in 231 cases
Alana K. Otto (2011)
10.3748/WJG.V13.I26.3567
Early successes and late failures in the prevention of post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
J. Lieb (2007)
10.4161/jig.1.2.15047
Multidisciplinary team meeting before therapeutic ERCP: A prospective study with 1,909 cases.
Z. Liao (2011)
10.1007/s10620-012-2250-0
Low Yield of Significant Findings on Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with Pancreatobiliary Pain and No Objective Findings
Timothy D. Imler (2012)
10.1159/000354136
Incidence of Pancreatic Fistula after Distal Pancreatectomy and Efficacy of Endoscopic Therapy for Its Management: Results from a Tertiary Care Center
S. Reddymasu (2013)
10.1089/lap.2012.0397
Lithotomy using cholangioscopy via the left hepatic duct orifice versus the common bile duct in laparoscopic treatment of left-sided hepatolithiasis: a comparative study.
M. Hu (2013)
10.4172/2165-7092.1000116
Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Mechanisms, Risk Factors, and Prevention
Majed El Zouhairi (2013)
10.3998/PANC.2015.19
Prevention of ERCP-induced Pancreatitis
B. Elmunzer (2015)
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x
Incidence Rates of Post-ERCP Complications: A Systematic Survey of Prospective Studies
A. Andriulli (2007)
10.1016/J.GIE.2005.11.040
The ERCP-related lawsuit: "Best avoid it!".
J. Frakes (2006)
10.1055/a-1075-4080
ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.
J. Dumonceau (2019)
10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.068
Laparoscopic left-sided hepatectomy for the treatment of hepatolithiasis: A comparative study with open approach.
Long Peng (2017)
10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04792.x
Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography during pregnancy
Mohammed N Bani Hani (2009)
10.1016/J.GIE.2007.02.029
Informed consent for GI endoscopy.
M. Zuckerman (2007)
10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.003
ERCP: pearls of wisdom from master endoscopists.
R. Singhania (2011)
10.3748/WJG.V12.I42.6857
Medical malpractice litigation related to gastrointestinal endoscopy in Japan: a two-decade review of civil court cases.
T. Hiyama (2006)
10.1016/J.GIE.2005.06.001
Fools rush in ...
J. Petrini (2006)
10.4253/wjge.v5.i4.169
Malpractice claims for endoscopy.
L. Hernandez (2013)
10.1002/9781118769409.CH1
Training and assessment of competence (Preparing the endoscopist)
J. Leung (2020)
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01630.x
Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Racial Disparities?
R. B. Freeman (2008)
10.1016/J.TGIE.2012.05.001
Indications for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
J. Chennat (2012)
10.1007/978-0-387-73064-6
Avoiding medical malpractice
W. Choctaw (2008)
10.1016/J.SURG.2007.02.002
Operative treatment of periampullary retroperitoneal perforation complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy.
L. Sarli (2007)
10.1007/s00595-009-4331-z
Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography perforation managed by surgery or percutaneous drainage
R. Krishna (2009)
10.1097/MEG.0b013e328305e175
Consenting patients for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: results of a survey of 182 UK endoscopists and 2059 of their patients
E. Williams (2009)
10.1007/s10620-011-1593-2
Management of Common Bile Duct Stones in Cirrhotic Patients with Coagulopathy: A Comparison of Supra-Papillary Puncture and Standard Cannulation Technique
E. L. Artifon (2011)
10.1002/9781118769409.CH17
The patient with pain; suspected gallbladder and sphincter dysfunction
P. Cotton (2014)
10.1586/17474124.2013.824703
Improving ERCP quality and decreasing risk to patients and providers
Toufic Kachaamy (2013)
10.3748/WJG.V12.I47.7671
Defensive medicine practices among gastroenterologists in Japan.
T. Hiyama (2006)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar