Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Major Early Complications From Diagnostic And Therapeutic ERCP: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

S. Loperfido, G. Angelini, G. Benedetti, F. Chilovi, F. Costan, F. de Berardinis, M. de Bernardin, A. Ederle, P. Fina, A. Fratton
Published 1998 · Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
BACKGROUND There is a lack of multicenter prospective studies on complications of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS We studied 2769 consecutive patients undergoing ERCP at nine centers in the Triveneto region of Italy over a 2-year period. Six centers performed ERCP on less than 200 patients per year (small centers). General and ERCP-specific major complications were predefined. Data were collected at the time of ERCP, before discharge, and in cases of readmission within 30 days. ERCP was defined as therapeutic when endoscopic sphincterotomy (n = 1583), precut (n = 419), or drainage (n = 701) had been carried out, singularly or in combination. RESULTS One hundred eleven major complications (4.0%) were recorded: moderate-severe pancreatitis 36 (1.3%), cholangitis 24 (0.87%), hemorrhage 21 (0.76%), duodenal perforation 16 (0.58%), others 14 (0.51%). Among 942 diagnostic ERCPs there were 13 major complications (1.38%) and 2 deaths (0.21%), whereas among 1827 therapeutic ERCPs there were 98 major complications (5.4%) and 9 deaths (0.49%). The difference in the incidence of complications between diagnostic and therapeutic ERCPs was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Small center and precut were recognized as independent risk factors for overall major complications of therapeutic ERCP, whereas the following risk factors were identified in relation to specific complications: (1) pancreatitis: age less than 70 years, pancreatic duct opacification, and nondilated common bile duct; (2) cholangitis: small center, jaundice; (3) hemorrhage: small center; and (4) retroperitoneal duodenal perforation: precut, intramural injection of contrast medium, and Billroth II gastrectomy. CONCLUSIONS Major complications are mostly associated with therapeutic procedures and low case volume. Present data support a policy of centralization of ERCP in referral centers. A more selected and safer use of precut may be expected to further limit the adverse events of ERCP.
This paper references
10.1016/S0016-5107(91)70740-2
Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.
P. Cotton (1991)
10.2307/2531133
Epidemiologic Research: Principles and Quantitative Methods.
S. Pocock (1982)
A prospective study of the safety of endoscopic therapy for choledocholithiasis in an outpatient population.
A. Elfant (1996)
10.1016/S0016-5107(05)80501-2
The precut-technique is a safe procedure and does not increase the overall complication risk of sphincterotomy
T. Rabenstein (1995)
10.1016/S0016-5107(91)70819-5
Needle knife papillotomy for endoscopic sphincterotomy and cholangiography.
D. Tweedle (1991)
10.7326/0003-4819-125-12-199612150-00009
Quantitative Assessment of Procedural Competence: A Prospective Study of Training in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
P. Jowell (1996)
A comparative study of contrast agents for endoscopic retrograde pancreatography.
J. Barkin (1991)
10.1016/S0016-5107(96)80355-5
The risk of bleeding after endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (EBS) in patients with peri-ampullary diverticula (PAD): A prospective trial
Ab Elfant (1996)
10.1097/00000658-199311000-00006
Relation of Perioperative Deaths to Hospital Volume Among Patients Undergoing Pancreatic Resection for Malignancy
M. Lieberman (1995)
10.1016/S0016-5107(05)80435-3
Success and complications of 224 ERCP'S in billroth-II (B-II) patients: A 5 year review
Ab Elfant (1995)
Endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis: increased risk associated with nondilated bile ducts and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.
Y. Chen (1994)
10.1016/S0016-5107(93)70128-5
Acute cholecystitis after palliative stenting for malignant obstruction of the biliary tree.
R. Dolan (1993)
10.1016/S0016-5107(96)80438-X
Prospective study of post-ERCP complications following diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP
J. Vandervoort (1996)
10.1016/S0016-5107(05)80497-3
Diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP in the very old: Safe with a high success rate
G. Portwood (1995)
10.1097/00000658-196805000-00013
Endoscopic cannulation of the ampulla of Vater: a preliminary report. By William S. McCune, Paul E. Shorb, and Herbert Moscovitz, 1968.
W. S. Mccune (1988)
10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80618-X
Surgical management of complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy with precut papillotomy.
F. Booth (1990)
10.1136/gut.34.6.721
Towards safer endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
J. Thornton (1993)
10.1136/gut.32.1.95
Provision of gastrointestinal endoscopy and related services for a district general hospital. Working Party of the Clinical Services Committee of the British Society of Gastroenterology.
J. E. Lenard-Jones (1991)
10.1016/S0016-5107(95)70272-5
A prospective assessment of results for needle-knife papillotomy and standard endoscopic sphincterotomy.
P. Foutch (1995)
10.1016/S0016-5107(89)72897-2
The needle knife: a valuable tool in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP.
J. Siegel (1989)
10.1016/0016-5085(91)90735-4
Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy. A prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and nondilated bile ducts.
S. Sherman (1991)
[Quo vadis endoscopic sphincterotomy?].
E. Seifert (1989)
10.1016/S0016-5107(96)80076-9
ERCP biliary stenting practice: A prospective multicenter study
P. Cotton (1996)
10.1016/S0016-5107(98)70348-7
Pure cut electrocautery current for sphincterotomy causes less post-procedure pancreatitis than blended current.
G. Elta (1998)
10.1097/00042737-199602000-00010
ERCP: present practice in a single region. Suggested standards for monitoring performance
A. R. Tanner (1996)
10.1002/BJS.1800780822
Gallbladder sepsis after stent insertion for bile duct obstruction: Management by percutaneous cholecystostomy
C. Ainley (1991)
10.1056/NEJM199609263351301
Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.
M. Freeman (1996)
10.1055/S-2007-1005476
Needle-knife sphincterotomy as a precut procedure: a retrospective evaluation of efficacy and complications.
W. Bruins Slot (1996)
10.1055/S-2007-1005482
Needle-knife access papillotomy: an unfairly maligned technique?
J. Vandervoort (1996)
10.1053/GAST.1996.V110.PM8566608
Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
J. Soto (1996)
10.1016/S1052-5157(18)30368-4
Complications related to diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
G. Aliperti (1996)
10.1136/gut.37.2.279
Endoscopic biliary stenting in a district general hospital.
K. Rao (1995)
10.1055/S-2007-1008945
Endoscopic papillotomy for common bile duct stones: factors influencing the complication rate.
J. Boender (1994)
10.1055/S-2007-1008946
Management of clinically relevant bleeding following endoscopic sphincterotomy.
J. Boujaoudé (1994)
10.1016/S0016-5107(89)72721-8
Acute cholecystitis after stenting of the common bile duct for obstruction secondary to pancreatic cancer.
J. Leung (1989)
10.1016/S0016-5107(96)70053-6
Papillary roof incision using the Erlangen-type pre-cut papillotome to achieve selective bile duct cannulation.
K. Binmoeller (1996)
10.1016/S0016-5107(05)80459-6
Biliary endoscopy in nonagenarians- “ERCP in the nineties”
Fe Kasmin (1995)
10.1016/S0016-5107(96)80342-7
ERCP induced acute pancreatitis: Risk assessment based on diagnostic and specific therapeutic cases
M. Catalano (1996)



This paper is referenced by
10.1097/00004836-200301000-00019
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Is Safe and Effective in Patients 90 Years of Age and Older
R. M. Mitchell (2003)
10.1007/s00464-017-5995-x
Surgeon-performed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Outcomes of 2392 procedures at two tertiary care centers
Mazen R. Al-Mansour (2017)
10.1159/000078073
Präzisionssteigerung in der Operationsplanung hilärer Gallengangkarzinome: Erste Erfahrungen mit der computerunterstützten 3D-CT-Bildgebung
J. Harms (2004)
10.1007/s00535-007-2013-4
Is post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis the same as acute clinical pancreatitis?
Ph.D. Tetsuya Mine M.D. (2007)
10.1007/978-0-387-77498-5_22
Principles and Applications of Proteomics in Pancreatic Cancer
Sarah Tonack (2010)
Shinju ArataTadahiro TakadaKoichi HirataMasahiro YoshidaToshihiko MayumiMorihisa Hirota • Masamichi YokoeMasahiko HirotaSeiki KiriyamaMiho SekimotoHodaka AmanoKeita Wada • Yasutoshi KimuraToshifumi GabataKazunori TakedaKeisho KataokaTetsuhide ItoMasao Tanaka
Tadahiro Takada (2010)
10.1055/S-2006-950869
Biliary candida infections in primary sclerosing cholangitis
H. Kulaksiz (2006)
10.1016/J.GIE.2005.11.028
Successful endoscopic closure of a lateral duodenal perforation at ERCP with fibrin glue.
M. Mutignani (2006)
Traitement endoscopique de la pancréatite chronique
M. Barthet (2008)
10.1016/J.CGH.2007.09.007
Pancreatic stents for prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.
M. Freeman (2007)
The role of the systemic inflammatory response, the JAK STAT pathway and the MAPK pathway in the prognosis of resectable pancreatic cancer
S. Denley (2008)
[S3-guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of gallstones. German Society for Digestive and Metabolic Diseases and German Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract].
F. Lammert (2007)
Symptomatisch galsteenlijden : een operatie-indicatie
A. H. Schiphorst (2006)
10.1016/S0016-5107(05)01574-9
Intravenous N-acetylcysteine does not prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis.
P. Katsinelos (2005)
10.11280/GEE1973B.47.1556
HOW CAN WE PREVENT POST-SPHINCTEROTOMY BLEEDING?
M. Inomata (2005)
10.1016/S0016-5107(04)00363-3
A simple way of avoiding post-ERCP pancreatitis.
F. Lella (2004)
10.1055/s-0042-117633
Metal stent for refractory post-ES bleeding: Is this the ultimate treatment modality?
E. Iwasaki (2016)
Colangiopancreatografía magnética: valor diagnóstico para detectar coledocolitiasis en pacientes con pancreatitis aguda leve
Geanny Mogollón Reyes (2014)
10.1007/978-3-642-60248-1_8
Therapeutisches Splitting: Präoperative Diagnostik, therapeutisches Procedere und Ergebnisse
D. Henne-Bruns (1999)
10.1007/BF03015798
Indications actuelles de la pancréatographie et de la pancréatoscopie
M. Jung (2008)
10.1016/j.gie.2010.11.022
Identifying and reporting risk factors for adverse events in endoscopy. Part I: cardiopulmonary events.
J. Romagnuolo (2011)
10.3329/BMJ.V44I2.27251
Complications of ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreaticogrphy) in Gastroenterology department of BSMMU
Razibul Alam (2016)
10.22516/25007440.235
Terapia de rescate en perforación de vía biliar con stent metalico autoexpandible totalmente cubierto posterior a falla en el manejo conservador: reporte de un caso.
G. Fierro (2018)
10.1007/s00464-018-6334-6
Digital single-operator cholangioscopy: a useful tool for selective guidewire placements across complex biliary strictures
Arne Bokemeyer (2018)
10.1016/j.pan.2019.07.046
Peri-Procedural Aggressive Hydration for Post Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Pancreatitis Prophylaxsis: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Dhruvil Radadiya (2019)
10.1007/978-1-4614-5061-0_11
Liver Disease in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease
P. Valentino (2013)
10.1007/978-3-030-42569-2_14
Biliary Sphincterotomy and Precut
Vincenzo Cennamo (2020)
10.1016/j.giec.2015.08.004
Pediatric Considerations in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.
David M. Troendle (2016)
10.1007/978-3-319-31211-8_17
Interventional Radiology in the Treatment of Complications After Digestive and Biliopancreatic Endoscopy
A. M. Ierardi (2016)
10.1007/s00464-019-06733-x
ERCP-related perforation: an analysis of operative outcomes in a large series over 12 years
N. Patil (2019)
10.1002/9781118512074.ch82
82. Acute Pancreatitis
H. Algül (2015)
10.1007/978-3-319-22765-8_14
Management of Surgical Complications
H. Khadra (2016)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar