Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Familial Breast Cancer: Collaborative Reanalysis Of Individual Data From 52 Epidemiological Studies Including 58 209 Women With Breast Cancer And 101 986 Women Without The Disease

Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer
Published 2001 · Medicine

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
BACKGROUND Women with a family history of breast cancer are at increased risk of the disease, but no study has been large enough to characterise reliably how, over women's lives, this risk is influenced by particular familial patterns of breast cancer. This report, on the relevance of breast cancer in first-degree relatives, is based on combined data from 52 epidemiological studies. METHODS Individual data on breast cancer in first-degree relatives (mothers, sisters, and daughters) of 58209 women with breast cancer and of 101986 controls were collected, checked, and analysed centrally. Risk ratios for breast cancer were calculated by conditional logistic regression, stratified by study, age, menopausal status, number of sisters, parity, and age when the first child was born. Breast-cancer incidence and mortality rates for particular family histories were calculated by applying age-specific risk ratios to breast-cancer rates typical for more-developed countries. FINDINGS Altogether 7496 (12.9%) women with breast cancer and 7438 (7.3%) controls reported that one or more first-degree relatives had a history of breast cancer: 12% of women with breast cancer had one affected relative and 1% had two or more. Risk ratios for breast cancer increased with increasing numbers of affected first-degree relatives: compared with women who had no affected relative, the ratios were 1.80 (99% CI 1.69-1.91), 2.93 (2.36-3.64), and 3.90 (2.03-7.49), respectively, for one, two, and three or more affected first-degree relatives (p<0.0001 each). The risk ratios were greatest at young ages, and for women of a given age, were greater the younger the relative was when diagnosed. The results did not differ substantially between women reporting an affected mother (9104) or sister (6386). Other factors, such as childbearing history, did not significantly alter the risk ratios associated with a family history of breast cancer. For women in more-developed countries with zero, one, or two affected first-degree relatives, the estimated cumulative incidence of breast cancer up to age 50 was 1.7%, 3.7%, and 8.0%, respectively; corresponding estimates for incidence up to age 80 were 7.8%, 13.3%, and 21.1%. Corresponding estimates for death from breast cancer up to age 80 were 2.3%, 4.2%, and 7.6%. The age when the relative was diagnosed had only a moderate effect on these estimates. INTERPRETATION Eight out of nine women who develop breast cancer do not have an affected mother, sister, or daughter. Although women who have first-degree relatives with a history of breast cancer are at increased risk of the disease, most will never develop breast cancer, and most who do will be aged over 50 when their cancer is diagnosed. In countries where breast cancer is common, the lifetime excess incidence of breast cancer is 5.5% for women with one affected first-degree relative and 13.3% for women with two.

This paper is referenced by
Development and Validation of a Clinical Polygenic Risk Score to Predict Breast Cancer Risk
E. Hughes (2020)
Congenic and functional analysis of rat mammary cancer susceptibility.
S. Le (2016)
Stress during cancer diagnostic workup
Q. Shen (2020)
Tumour spectrum in non-BRCA hereditary breast cancer families in Sweden
Camilla Wendt (2015)
Tamoxifen Pharmacogenomics: The Role of CYP2D6 as a Predictor of Drug Response
M. Goetz (2008)
A genome wide linkage search for breast cancer susceptibility genes
P. Smith (2006)
Risk of cancer development in relation to oral contraception
M. Lech (2006)
The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers: updates and extensions
A. Antoniou (2008)
Copy number variations are not modifiers of phenotypic expression in a pair of identical twins carrying a BRCA1 mutation
A. Lasa (2010)
Breast Cancer Relative Hazard Estimates From Case–Control and Cohort Designs With Missing Data on Mammographic Density
Jinbo Chen (2008)
Actual State of Knowledge on the Association between Physical Activity and Cancer
J. Kruk (2006)
Association between 1p11-rs11249433 Polymorphism and Breast Cancer Susceptibility: Evidence from 15 Case-Control Studies
S. Wu (2013)
A case-control study of breast cancer risk factors in 7,663 women in Malaysia
M. Tan (2018)
9q31.2-rs865686 as a Susceptibility Locus for Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Evidence from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium
H. Warren (2012)
Identification of a Breast Cancer Susceptibility Locus at 4q31.22 Using a Genome-Wide Association Study Paradigm
Yadav Sapkota (2013)
Disease Spectrum of Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes
J. Wang (2020)
CSN6 promotes the cell migration of breast cancer cells by positively regulating Snail1 stability
Jie Mou (2020)
Understanding breast cancer risk ‐ where do we stand in 2005?
R. Dumitrescu (2005)
The influence of common polymorphisms on breast cancer.
D. Eccles (2010)
Weight Management & Physical Activity and Breast Cancer: Knowing the Facts and Removing the Stigma
Mathew Gregoski (2016)
Use of exogenous hormones and the risk of breast cancer: results from self-reported survey data with validity assessment
S. Heikkinen (2015)
Associations between ALDH1A1 polymorphisms, alcohol consumption, and mortality among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women diagnosed with breast cancer: the Breast Cancer Health Disparities Study
Zhiyu Xia (2017)
Association of Epstein Barr Virus Infection (EBV) with Breast Cancer in Rural Indian Women
D. Joshi (2009)
Sociodemographic and Reproductive Risk Factors for Breast Cancer: A Case-Control Study in the Setif Province, Northern Algeria
M. Hamdi-Cherif (2020)
Proportion of women with self-reported opportunistic mammography before organized screening
S. Heikkinen (2016)
RAD51C is a susceptibility gene for ovarian cancer.
Liisa M. Pelttari (2011)
Do Alterations in Mitochondrial DNA Play a Role in Breast Carcinogenesis?
T. Rohan (2010)
Nonpalpable breast lesions: impact of a second-opinion review at a breast unit on BI-RADS classification
C. de Margerie-Mellon (2021)
The Relationship between Seven Common Polymorphisms from Five DNA Repair Genes and the Risk for Breast Cancer in Northern Chinese Women
P. Ding (2014)
Family History of Cancer in Relation to Breast Cancer Subtypes in African American Women
Traci N Bethea (2015)
Family History Questionnaires Designed for Clinical Use: A Systematic Review
G. Reid (2008)
The Association of Modifiable Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Somatic Genomic Alterations in Breast Tumors: The Cancer Genome Atlas Network
Y. J. Heng (2020)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar