Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.

Efficacy Of Stapler Versus Hand-sewn Closure After Distal Pancreatectomy (DISPACT): A Randomised, Controlled Multicentre Trial

Markus K Diener, Christoph M. Seiler, Inga Rossion, Joerg Kleeff, Markus W. Büchler
Published 2011 · Medicine
Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
BACKGROUND The ideal closure technique of the pancreas after distal pancreatectomy is unknown. We postulated that standardised closure with a stapler device would prevent pancreatic fistula more effectively than would a hand-sewn closure of the remnant. METHODS This multicentre, randomised, controlled, parallel group-sequential superiority trial was done in 21 European hospitals. Patients with diseases of the pancreatic body and tail undergoing distal pancreatectomy were eligible and were randomly assigned by central randomisation before operation to either stapler or hand-sewn closure of the pancreatic remnant. Surgical performance was assessed with intraoperative photo documentation. The primary endpoint was the combination of pancreatic fistula and death until postoperative day 7. Patients and outcome assessors were masked to group assignment. Interim and final analysis were by intention to treat in all patients in whom a left resection was done. This trial is registered, ISRCTN18452029. FINDINGS Between Nov 16, 2006, and July 3, 2009, 450 patients were randomly assigned to treatment groups (221 stapler; 229 hand-sewn closure), of whom 352 patients (177 stapler, 175 hand-sewn closure) were analysed. Pancreatic fistula rate or mortality did not differ between stapler (56 [32%] of 177) and hand-sewn closure (49 [28%] of 175; OR 0·84, 95% CI 0·53–1·33; p=0·56). One patient died within the fi rst 7 days after surgery in the hand-sewn group; no deaths occurred in the stapler group. Serious adverse events did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION Stapler closure did not reduce the rate of pancreatic fistula compared with hand-sewn closure for distal pancreatectomy. New strategies, including innovative surgical techniques, need to be identified to reduce this adverse outcome. FUNDING German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.
This paper references
10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ae34be
Risk Factors for Pancreatic Leak After Distal Pancreatectomy
H. N. Nathan (2009)
10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001
Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition.
C. Bassi (2005)
10.1159/000018740
Technical Aspects of Left-Sided Pancreatic Resection for Cancer
Åke Andrén-Sandberg (1999)
10.1016/j.gassur.2005.01.287
The unsolved problem of fistula after left pancreatectomy: The benefit of cautious drain management
Gianpaolo Balzano (2005)
10.1080/13651820701348621
Analysis of closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatic resection.
Udo Lorenz (2007)
10.6092/1590-8577/3430
Impact of pancreatic gland volume on fistula formation after pancreatic tail resection.
Farshad Frozanpor (2010)
10.1097/00000658-199905000-00012
Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients.
K. Lillemoe (1999)
10.3321/J.ISSN:0529-5815.2008.01.010
[The utility of stapler in distal pancreatectomy].
Y. Zhao (2008)
10.1001/archsurg.143.10.956
Critical appraisal of 232 consecutive distal pancreatectomies with emphasis on risk factors, outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula: a 21-year experience at a single institution.
Brian K P Goh (2008)
Distal pancreatectomy: does the method of closure influence fistula formation?
Maureen K. Sheehan (2002)
10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02821.x
Distal pancreatectomy: is staple closure beneficial?
Kunio Takeuchi (2003)
10.1186/1745-6215-10-58
Perioperative management in distal pancreatectomy: results of a survey in 23 European participating centres of the DISPACT trial and a review of literature
H. Bruns (2009)
10.1007/s00534-008-1328-8
A simple and safe pancreas transection using a stapling device for a distal pancreatectomy.
Keiichi Okano (2008)
10.1016/j.surg.2004.06.063
Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal morbidity after distal pancreatectomy.
J. Sledzianowski (2005)
10.3748/WJG.V13.I38.5096
Risk factors associated with pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy, which technique of pancreatic stump closure is more beneficial?
Marco Pericoli Ridolfini (2007)
10.1177/1740774508096140
DISPACT trial: a randomized controlled trial to compare two different surgical techniques of DIStal PAnCreaTectomy — study rationale and design
Markus K Diener (2008)
10.1002/bjs.5107
Meta-analysis of the value of somatostatin and its analogues in reducing complications associated with pancreatic surgery.
Saxon Connor (2005)
10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00790-0
Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy.
B. Fahy (2002)
The Risk of Pancreaticointestinal Anastomosis Can Be Predicted Preoperatively
Helmut Friess (1996)
10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2
Meta-analysis in clinical trials.
R. Dersimonian (1986)
10.1002/bjs.1800831216
Quick and simple distal pancreatectomy using the GIA stapler: report of 35 cases.
Y. Kajiyama (1996)
10.1002/bjs.5000
Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy.
H. Knaebel (2005)
10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cf863d
Randomized Controlled Trials of Surgical Interventions
F. Farrokhyar (2010)
10.1001/archsurg.141.11.1071
Pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: predictive risk factors and value of conservative treatment.
V. Pannegeon (2006)
10.1002/bjs.4032
Pancreatic leak after left pancreatectomy is reduced following main pancreatic duct ligation.
Malcolm M. Bilimoria (2003)
10.1007/s11605-008-0636-2
Pancreatic Fistula Rates After 462 Distal Pancreatectomies: Staplers Do Not Decrease Fistula Rates
Cristina R Ferrone (2008)



This paper is referenced by
10.3919/JJSA.73.2657
A case of treatment of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic-tail cancer with pancreas divisum by endoscopic transampullary pancreatic duct stenting
Tatsuya Orimo (2012)
10.1186/2047-783X-18-33
Is the covering of the resection margin after distal pancreatectomy advantageous?
Aycan Akca (2013)
10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a4e87c
250 Robotic Pancreatic Resections: Safety and Feasibility
Amer H Zureikat (2013)
10.1007/s00423-016-1374-7
Risk factors for delayed gastric emptying following distal pancreatectomy
Tim R. Glowka (2016)
10.1055/S-0042-109979
Die Pankreaslinksresektion mit autologem Fibrinkleber – Anwendung eines etablierten Versiegelungskonzepts in der Pankreaschirurgie
Andreas Minh Luu (2016)
10.1002/9781118781166.CH24
Indications and contraindications for laparoscopic pancreas surgery
Hanno Niess (2016)
10.1007/s00103-014-2113-2
Nutzenbewertung operativer Maßnahmen aus der Perspektive der chirurgischen Forschung
Felix J Hüttner (2014)
10.5152/tjg.2018.17567
Pancreatic stump closure using only stapler is associated with high postoperative fistula rate after minimal invasive surgery.
Adem Yüksel (2018)
10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.081
A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas: it's time to randomize.
Arianeb Mehrabi (2015)
Author's response to reviews Title: Pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction after partial PANCreatoduodenectomy - A randomized controlled trial (RECOPANC) Authors:
Ulrich F Wellner (2012)
10.1016/J.CIRENG.2012.05.002
[Results of the laparoscopic approach in left-sided pancreatectomy].
Ignasi Poves (2013)
10.1002/bjs.9136
Systematic review of central pancreatectomy and meta-analysis of central versus distal pancreatectomy.
Calogero Iacono (2013)
10.1007/978-3-319-12553-4_10
Research gaps in pancreatic cancer research and comparative effectiveness research methodologies.
Haejin In (2015)
10.1016/J.JCHIRV.2015.11.008
Intervention d’Appleby modifiée pour adénocarcinome borderline et localement avancé du pancréas gauche : une intervention lourde pour des patients sélectionnés
Manuela Cesaretti (2016)
10.1159/000445007
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Pancreatic Disease - Current Status
Guido Alsfasser (2016)
10.1097/SLA.0000000000001859
No Need for Routine Drainage After Pancreatic Head Resection: The Dual-Center, Randomized, Controlled PANDRA Trial (ISRCTN04937707)
Helmut Witzigmann (2016)
10.1097/SLA.0b013e318251610f
The Effect of Prophylactic Transpapillary Pancreatic Stent Insertion on Clinically Significant Leak Rate Following Distal Pancreatectomy: Results of a Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial
Farshad Frozanpor (2012)
10.21037/jovs.2017.08.14
Robotic-assisted spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy: a technical review.
Yen-Yi Juo (2017)
10.1007/s00104-011-2219-0
Klinische Studien in der Chirurgie
M. K. Diener (2011)
10.1016/j.pan.2013.04.196
Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy: current concepts.
M Abu Hilal (2013)
10.1002/jhbp.4
Less morbidity after introduction of a new departmental policy for patients who undergo open distal pancreatectomy.
Rintaro Yui (2014)
10.1007/s00104-015-0003-2
Management der postoperativen Pankreasfistel
Thilo Hackert (2015)
10.1007/s00104-016-0301-3
Verschluss des Pankreasstumpfes bei Links- und Segmentresektion
Christoph W. Michalski (2016)
10.1007/s00595-017-1554-2
Risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy using a triple-row stapler
Hiromichi Kawaida (2017)
10.1007/978-981-10-7464-6
Surgery for Pancreatic and Periampullary Cancer
Mallika Tewari (2018)
10.1097/SLA.0000000000000630
Drainage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: controversy revitalized.
Oliver Strobel (2014)
ESA-RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL Teres Ligament Patch Reduces Relevant Morbidity After Distal R Randomized Controlled Trial) Pancreatectomy (the DISCOVE
Matthias Hassenpflug (2016)
A Systematic Review of a Clinical Challenge
Jonathan M. Harnoss (2014)
10.1007/s11605-017-3395-0
Intra-Operative Amylase Concentration in Peri-Pancreatic Fluid Predicts Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy
C. Nahm (2017)
10.1007/s00068-015-0510-3
Management of blunt pancreatic trauma: what’s new?
Douglas A. Potoka (2015)
10.1007/s00464-014-3879-x
Results of 100 consecutive laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies: postoperative outcome, cost-benefit analysis, and quality of life assessment
Marco Braga (2014)
10.1007/978-1-4939-6631-8_57-1
Staging and Postoperative Outcomes Using the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) Classifications
Thilo Welsch (2016)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar