Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
Please confirm you are human
(Sign Up for free to never see this)
← Back to Search

Detection Of Longitudinal Visual Field Progression In Glaucoma Using Machine Learning.

S. Yousefi, Taichi Kiwaki, Y. Zheng, H. Sugiura, R. Asaoka, H. Murata, H. Lemij, Kenji Yamanishi
Published 2018 · Medicine

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
PURPOSE Global indices of standard automated perimerty are insensitive to localized losses, while point-wise indices are sensitive but highly variable. Region-wise indices sit in between. This study introduces a machine learning-based index for glaucoma progression detection that outperforms global, region-wise, and point-wise indices. DESIGN Development and comparison of a prognostic index. METHOD Visual fields from 2085 eyes of 1214 subjects were used to identify glaucoma progression patterns using machine learning. Visual fields from 133 eyes of 71 glaucoma patients were collected 10 times over 10 weeks to provide a no-change, test-retest dataset. The parameters of all methods were identified using visual field sequences in the test-retest dataset to meet fixed 95% specificity. An independent dataset of 270 eyes of 136 glaucoma patients and survival analysis were used to compare methods. RESULTS The time to detect progression in 25% of the eyes in the longitudinal dataset using global mean deviation (MD) was 5.2 (95% confidence interval, 4.1-6.5) years; 4.5 (4.0-5.5) years using region-wise, 3.9 (3.5-4.6) years using point-wise, and 3.5 (3.1-4.0) years using machine learning analysis. The time until 25% of eyes showed subsequently confirmed progression after 2 additional visits were included were 6.6 (5.6-7.4) years, 5.7 (4.8-6.7) years, 5.6 (4.7-6.5) years, and 5.1 (4.5-6.0) years for global, region-wise, point-wise, and machine learning analyses, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Machine learning analysis detects progressing eyes earlier than other methods consistently, with or without confirmation visits. In particular, machine learning detects more slowly progressing eyes than other methods.
This paper references
Ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph to Detect Early Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss
F. Mikelberg (1995)
Current Practice with Standard Automated Perimetry
C. Bosworth (2000)
Automated Static Perimetry
D. Anderson (1992)
Mapping the visual field to the optic disc in normal tension glaucoma eyes.
D. Garway-Heath (2000)
Detection of Functional Change Using Cluster Trend Analysis in Glaucoma
S. Gardiner (2017)
A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression.
B. Bengtsson (2008)
Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
P. Artes (2005)
Glaucoma Hemifield Test. Automated visual field evaluation.
P. Åsman (1992)
Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli.
M. Wall (1997)
Learning From Data: Recognizing Glaucomatous Defect Patterns and Detecting Progression From Visual Field Measurements
S. Yousefi (2014)
Detecting Change Using Standard Global Perimetric Indices in Glaucoma.
S. Gardiner (2017)
Singular-value decomposition and embedding dimension.
Mees (1987)
Recognizing patterns of visual field loss using unsupervised machine learning
S. Yousefi (2014)
Detecting Functional Changes in the Patient’s Vision: Visual Field Analysis
C. A. Johnson (2010)
Frequency of Testing to Detect Visual Field Progression Derived Using a Longitudinal Cohort of Glaucoma Patients.
Zhichao Wu (2017)
Examination of different pointwise linear regression methods for determining visual field progression.
S. Gardiner (2002)
Detectability of Glaucomatous Changes Using SAP, FDT, Flicker Perimetry, and OCT
Hiroki Nomoto (2009)
Glaucomatous Patterns in Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry Data Identified by Unsupervised Machine Learning Classifiers
C. Bowd (2014)
High spatial resolution automated perimetry in glaucoma
M. Westcott (1997)
Visual field changes after cataract extraction: the AGIS experience.
B. Koucheki (2004)
Glaucoma Progression Detection Using Structural Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements and Functional Visual Field Points
S. Yousefi (2014)
A class of rank test procedures for censored survival data
D. Harrington (1982)
Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma.
F. Fitzke (1996)
Frequency of testing for detecting visual field progression
S. Gardiner (2002)
Frequency of visual field testing when monitoring patients newly diagnosed with glaucoma: mixed methods and modelling
D. Crabb (2014)
Unsupervised Gaussian Mixture-Model With Expectation Maximization for Detecting Glaucomatous Progression in Standard Automated Perimetry Visual Fields
S. Yousefi (2016)
Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP).
C. Johnson (2002)

This paper is referenced by
Glaucoma management in the era of artificial intelligence
Sripad Krishna Devalla (2019)
Macular GCIPL Thickness Map Prediction via Time-Aware Convolutional LSTM
Zhiqi Chen (2020)
Role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in ophthalmology
J. Akkara (2019)
A Review of Deep Learning for Screening, Diagnosis, and Detection of Glaucoma Progression
A. C. Thompson (2020)
Application of Pattern Recognition Analysis to Optimize Hemifield Asymmetry Patterns for Early Detection of Glaucoma
Jack Phu (2018)
Artificial intelligence in glaucoma
C. Zheng (2019)
Visual Field Prediction using Recurrent Neural Network
Keunheung Park (2019)
Estimating Rates of Progression and Predicting Future Visual Fields in Glaucoma Using a Deep Variational Autoencoder
S. Berchuck (2019)
Glaucoma Monitoring Using Manifold Learning and Unsupervised Clustering
S. Yousefi (2018)
An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Detect Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma Based on Spatial Pattern Analysis
Mengyu Wang (2019)
The usefulness of the Deep Learning method of variational autoencoder to reduce measurement noise in glaucomatous visual fields
R. Asaoka (2020)
Fundus-controlled perimetry (microperimetry): Application as outcome measure in clinical trials
M. Pfau (2020)
Evaluation of deep convolutional neural networks for glaucoma detection
S. Phan (2019)
Monitoring Glaucomatous Functional Loss Using an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Dashboard.
S. Yousefi (2020)
Machine Learning in the Detection of the Glaucomatous Disc and Visual Field
D. Smits (2019)
An artificial intelligence model for the simulation of visual effects in patients with visual field defects.
Z. Zhou (2020)
Artificial Intelligence Algorithms to Diagnose Glaucoma and Detect Glaucoma Progression: Translation to Clinical Practice
A. S. Mursch-Edlmayr (2020)
Artificial Intelligence Classification of Central Visual Field Patterns in Glaucoma.
Mengyu Wang (2019)
Artificial intelligence (AI) impacting diagnosis of glaucoma and understanding the regulatory aspects of AI-based software as medical device.
B. Prabhakar (2020)
Validating the efficacy of the binomial pointwise linear regression method to detect glaucoma progression with multicentral database
Shotaro Asano (2019)
Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Deep-Learning Models for Classifying Normal and Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Exudative and Non-Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration Changes
Naohiro Motozawa (2019)
Scalable Modeling of Spatiotemporal Data using the Variational Autoencoder: an Application in Glaucoma.
S. Berchuck (2019)
Comparing 10-2 and 24-2 Visual Fields for Detecting Progressive Central Visual Loss in Glaucoma Eyes with Early Central Abnormalities.
Zhichao Wu (2019)
Optical coherence tomography-based deep-learning model for detecting central serous chorioretinopathy
Jeewoo Yoon (2020)
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Management of Glaucoma
Rahul Kapoor (2019)
Artificial intelligence and deep learning in ophthalmology
D. Ting (2019)
Early Detection of Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression Using Pointwise Linear Regression With Binomial Test in the Central 10 Degrees.
Shotaro Asano (2019)
Development and clinical deployment of a smartphone-based visual field deep learning system for glaucoma detection
F. Li (2020)
Estimating Rates of Progression and Predicting Future Visual Fields in Glaucoma Using a Deep Variational Autoencoder
S. Berchuck (2019)
Digital technology, tele-medicine and artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: A global perspective
Ji-Peng Olivia Li (2020)
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar