Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
Please confirm you are human
(Sign Up for free to never see this)
← Back to Search

Influencing Lumbar Posture Through Real-time Biofeedback And Its Effects On The Kinematics And Kinetics Of A Repetitive Lifting Task.

M. Boocock, Yanto Naudé, S. Taylor, J. Kilby, G. Mawston
Published 2019 · Medicine

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
BACKGROUND Repetitive, flexed lumbar postures are a risk factor associated with low back injuries. Young, novice workers involved in manual handling also appear at increased risk of injury. The evidence for the effectiveness of postural biofeedback as an intervention approach is lacking, particularly for repetitive, fatiguing tasks. RESEARCH QUESTION How does real-time lumbosacral (LS) postural biofeedback modify the kinematics and kinetics of repetitive lifting and the risk of low back injury? METHODS Thirty-four participants were randomly allocated to two groups: biofeedback (BF) and non-biofeedback (NBF). Participants repetitively lifted a 13 kg box at 10 lifts per minute for up to 20 min. Real-time biofeedback of LS posture occurred when flexion exceeded 80% maximum. Three-dimensional motion analysis and ground reaction forces enabled estimates of joint kinematics and kinetics. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was measured throughout. RESULTS The BF group adopted significantly less peak lumbosacral flexion (LSF) over the 20 min when compared to the NBF group, which resulted in a significant reduction in LS passive resistance forces. This was accompanied by increased peak hip and knee joint angular velocities in the BF group. Lower limb moments did not significantly differ between groups. Feedback provided to participants diminished beyond 10 min and subjective perceptions of physical exertion were lower in the BF group. SIGNIFICANCE Biofeedback of lumbosacral posture enabled participants to make changes in LSF that appear beneficial in reducing the risk of low back injury during repetitive lifting. Accompanying behavioural adaptations did not negatively impact on physical exertion or lower limb joint moments. Biofeedback of LS posture offers a potential preventative and treatment adjunct to educate handlers about their lifting posture. This could be particularly important for young, inexperienced workers employed in repetitive manual handling who appear at increased risk of back injury.
This paper references
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ce1201
Quantitative Dynamic Measures of Physical Exposure Predict Low Back Functional Impairment
W. Marras (2010)
10.1097/01.BRS.0000128755.84693.10
Use of Ultrasonography to Evaluate Thickness of the Erector Spinae Muscle in Maximum Flexion and Extension of the Lumbar Spine
K. Watanabe (2004)
Risk factors for lower back injury in male dancers performing ballet lifts.
J. Alderson (2009)
10.2514/3.28474
A Personalized Mathematical Model of the Human Body
E. P. Hanavan (1966)
10.1002/JOR.1100110606
Electromyographic studies of the lumbar trunk musculature during the generation of low‐level trunk acceleration
W. Marras (1993)
10.1097/00007632-199410000-00011
The Relationship Between Intramuscular Pressure of the Paraspinal Muscles and Low Back Pain
S. Konno (1994)
R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
R. Team (2014)
10.1097/00007632-199008000-00007
The Loads on the Lumbar Spine during Work at an Assembly Line: The Risks for Fatigue Injuries of Vertebral Bodies
M Magnusson (1990)
10.1097/01.brs.0000182086.33984.b3
Torso Flexion Loads and the Fatigue Failure of Human Lumbosacral Motion Segments
S. Gallagher (2005)
10.1002/9780470549148
Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement
D. Winter (1990)
10.1097/00007632-198809000-00004
1988 Volvo Award in Biomechanics: The Triaxial Coupling of Torque Generation of Trunk Muscles during Isometric Exertions and the Effect of Fatiguing Isoinertial Movements on the Motor Output and Movement Patterns
M. Parnianpour (1988)
10.1097/00007632-199304000-00015
The Role of Dynamic Three-Dimensional Trunk Motion in Occupationally-Related Low Back Disorders: The Effects of Workplace Factors, Trunk Position, and Trunk Motion Characteristics on Risk of Injury
W. Marras (1993)
10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00086-4
Repetitive lifting tasks fatigue the back muscles and increase the bending moment acting on the lumbar spine.
P. Dolan (1998)
10.1016/0021-9290(94)90277-1
Bending and compressive stresses acting on the lumbar spine during lifting activities.
P. Dolan (1994)
10.1097/01.brs.0000255203.96898.f2
Can a New Behaviorally Oriented Training Process to Improve Lifting Technique Prevent Occupationally Related Back Injuries Due to Lifting?
S. Lavender (2007)
10.1146/ANNUREV.PU.12.050191.001041
Cost, controversy, crisis: low back pain and the health of the public.
R. Deyo (1991)
10.1093/OCCMED/KQH091
Risk factors for first-ever low back pain among workers in their first employment.
A. van Nieuwenhuyse (2004)
10.1016/0021-9290(94)90224-0
Passive tissues help the back muscles to generate extensor moments during lifting.
P. Dolan (1994)
10.18637/JSS.V067.I01
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Douglas Bates (2014)
10.2106/JBJS.E.01273
Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain: socioeconomic factors and consequences.
J. Katz (2006)
10.1186/1743-0003-10-60
Biofeedback in rehabilitation
Oonagh M. Giggins (2012)
10.1002/art.34347
A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain.
D. Hoy (2012)
10.5271/SJWEH.1700
Back disorders and nonneutral trunk postures of automobile assembly workers.
L. Punnett (1991)
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.12.010
Age-related differences do affect postural kinematics and joint kinetics during repetitive lifting.
M. Boocock (2015)
10.1080/00140138408963506
The physiological cost of three different methods of lifting in sagittal and lateral planes.
S. Kumar (1984)
10.2310/6640.2003.37832
Low Back Disorders: Evidence-Based Prevention and Rehabilitation
S. McGill (2002)
10.1097/00007632-198909000-00014
Lumbar Muscle Fatigue and Chronic Lower Back Pain
S. Roy (1989)
10.1080/00140139.2014.887788
Physiological and biomechanical responses to a prolonged repetitive asymmetric lifting activity
Jay P. Mehta (2014)
10.3200/JMBR.41.3.207-218
Contributions of Cocontraction and Eccentric Activity to Stiffness Regulation
P. Silva (2009)
10.1111/j.1600-0838.2005.00448.x
A comparison between three rating scales for perceived exertion and two different work tests
E. Borg (2006)
10.1002/JOR.1100020110
An epidemiologic study of lifting and twisting on the job and risk for acute prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc
J. Kelsey (1984)
10.1016/J.CLINBIOMECH.2006.10.007
The effects of prior exposure, warning, and initial standing posture on muscular and kinematic responses to sudden loading of a hand-held box.
G. Mawston (2007)
10.1080/00140139508925111
Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorders.
W. Marras (1995)
10.1016/j.spinee.2013.05.040
Biomechanical constraints remain major risk factors for low back pain. Results from a prospective cohort study in French male employees.
A. Ramond-Roquin (2015)
10.1016/j.berh.2010.10.002
The Epidemiology of low back pain.
D. Hoy (2010)



This paper is referenced by
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar