Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.

An Accurate Estimation Of Bone Density Improves The Accuracy Of Subject-specific Finite Element Models.

Enrico Schileo, Enrico Dall’Ara, Fulvia Taddei, Andrea Malandrino, Tom Schotkamp, Massimiliano Baleani, Marco Viceconti
Published 2008 · Medicine, Engineering
Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
An experimental-numerical study was performed to investigate the relationships between computed tomography (CT)-density and ash density, and between ash density and apparent density for bone tissue, to evaluate their influence on the accuracy of subject-specific FE models of human bones. Sixty cylindrical bone specimens were examined. CT-densities were computed from CT images while apparent and ash densities were measured experimentally. The CT/ash-density and ash/apparent-density relationships were calculated. Finite element models of eight human femurs were generated considering these relationships to assess their effect on strain prediction accuracy. CT and ash density were linearly correlated (R(2)=0.997) over the whole density range but not equivalent (intercep t <0, slope >1). A constant ash/apparent-density ratio (0.598+/-0.004) was found for cortical bone. A lower ratio, with a larger dispersion, was found for trabecular bone (0.459+/-0.100), but it became less dispersed, and equal to that of cortical tissue, when testing smaller trabecular specimens (0.598+/-0.036). This suggests that an experimental error occurred in apparent-density measurements for large trabecular specimens and a constant ratio can be assumed valid for the whole density range. Introducing the obtained relationships in the FE modelling procedure improved strain prediction accuracy (R(2)=0.95, RMSE=7%). The results suggest that: (i) a correction of the densitometric calibration should be used when evaluating bone ash-density from clinical CT scans, to avoid ash-density underestimation and overestimation for low- and high-density bone tissue, respectively; (ii) the ash/apparent-density ratio can be assumed constant in human femurs and (iii) the correction improves significantly the model accuracy and should be considered in subject-specific bone modelling.
This paper references
10.1016/S0268-0033(02)00207-3
Finite element analysis of the initial stability of ankle arthrodesis with internal fixation: flat cut versus intact joint contours.
A. Alonso Vázquez (2003)
10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.10.001
Validation of a finite element model of the human metacarpal.
Daniel S. Barker (2005)
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.03.005
The effect of muscle loading on the simulation of bone remodelling in the proximal femur.
Charalampos Bitsakos (2005)
10.1118/1.596899
A phantom for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by QCT and DXA: design considerations and specifications.
Willi A. Kalender (1992)
10.1016/0141-5425(93)90066-8
Validation of an automated method of three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone.
Joyce H. Keyak (1993)
10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00467-7
The influence of bone volume fraction and ash fraction on bone strength and modulus.
Christopher J Hernandez (2001)
10.1243/095441105X34293
Effect of Bone Material Properties on the Initial Stability of a Cementless Hip Stem: A Finite Element Study
Andrew See Weng Wong (2005)
10.1002/jor.1100090315
Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography.
Stephen Snyder (1991)
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.01.010
Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
Sanjay Gupta (2006)
10.1002/ajpa.1330290113
Density of fresh and embalmed human compact and cancellous bone.
Patricia L. Blanton (1968)
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.07.018
Subject-specific finite element models of long bones: An in vitro evaluation of the overall accuracy.
Fulvia Taddei (2006)
10.2106/00004623-197759070-00021
The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure.
Dennis R. Carter (1977)
10.1097/01.blo.0000164400.37905.22
Predicting Proximal Femoral Strength Using Structural Engineering Models
Joyce H. Keyak (2005)
10.1016/j.cmpb.2007.05.002
Multimod Data Manager: A tool for data fusion
Marco Viceconti (2007)
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.08.024
Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a literature review.
Benedikt Helgason (2008)
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.08.010
Mechanical properties, density and quantitative CT scan data of trabecular bone with and without metastases.
Tadashi S. Kaneko (2004)
10.1016/0021-9290(94)90014-0
The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone.
Rick Goulet (1994)
10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00036-1
Sensitivity of periprosthetic stress-shielding to load and the bone density-modulus relationship in subject-specific finite element models.
Harrie H. Weinans (2000)
10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00069-5
Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur.
Dieter C. Wirtz (2000)
10.1002/jbm.820281111
Correlations between orthogonal mechanical properties and density of trabecular bone: use of different densitometric measures.
Joyce H. Keyak (1994)
10.1016/0021-9290(88)90186-8
Stiffness of compact bone: effects of porosity and density.
Mitchell B. Schaffler (1988)
10.1016/S1350-4533(03)00030-4
Relationships between material properties and CT scan data of cortical bone with and without metastatic lesions.
Tadashi S. Kaneko (2003)
10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00099-8
Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA.
Dianna D. Cody (1999)
10.1243/095441104322984022
Development and experimental validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the human scapula
Sushmita Gupta (2004)
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.11.020
Mechanical testing of cancellous bone from the femoral head: experimental errors due to off-axis measurements.
Caroline Ohman (2007)
10.1115/1.2794181
Development and validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the pelvic bone.
Michel Dalstra (1995)
10.1016/0021-9290(88)90167-4
Elastic modulus of trabecular bone material.
Richard B. Ashman (1988)
10.1016/S8756-3282(03)00210-2
Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography.
Ruairidh Crawford (2003)
10.1016/0268-0033(94)90018-3
Formalin fixation effects on vertebral bone density and failure mechanics: an in-vitro study of human and sheep vertebrae.
Stephen J. Edmondston (1994)
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.02.010
Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones.
Enrico Schileo (2007)
10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.10.014
The material mapping strategy influences the accuracy of CT-based finite element models of bones: an evaluation against experimental measurements.
Fulvia Taddei (2007)
10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00123-1
Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling.
Joyce H. Keyak (1997)
10.1016/0021-9290(94)90056-6
Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone.
Tony S. Keller (1994)
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.01.010
Extracting clinically relevant data from finite element simulations.
Marco Viceconti (2005)
10.1016/S1350-4533(03)00138-3
An improved method for the automatic mapping of computed tomography numbers onto finite element models.
Fulvia Taddei (2004)
10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.10.002
Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions.
Václav Báča (2007)
10.1067/moe.2002.126451
A 3-dimensional finite-element analysis investigating the biomechanical behavior of the mandible and plate osteosynthesis in cases of fractures of the condylar process.
Arne Wagner (2002)
10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00071-X
Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site.
Elise Feng-i Morgan (2003)



This paper is referenced by
10.18297/etd/2890
Investigating the likelihood of pediatric femur fracture due to falls through finite element analysis.
Keyonna McKinsey (2018)
10.1007/s11914-018-0438-8
Are CT-Based Finite Element Model Predictions of Femoral Bone Strengthening Clinically Useful?
Marco Viceconti (2018)
Heuristic optimization of bone cement distribution for prevention of osteoporotic hip fractures
María E. Santana Artiles (2016)
10.1080/10255842.2011.641122
Development and validation of a subject-specific finite element model of a human clavicle
Zuoping Li (2013)
10.1098/rsif.2013.1146
Effects of densitometry, material mapping and load estimation uncertainties on the accuracy of patient-specific finite-element models of the scapula
Gianni Campoli (2014)
10.1142/S0219519414500328
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CONTRALATERAL BONES OF THE HUMAN LOWER LIMBS: A MULTISCALE INVESTIGATION
Luca Cristofolini (2014)
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.04.050
Predicting surface strains at the human distal radius during an in vivo loading task--finite element model validation and application.
Varun A. Bhatia (2014)
10.1007/s10439-019-02312-2
Material Mapping of QCT-Derived Scapular Models: A Comparison with Micro-CT Loaded Specimens Using Digital Volume Correlation
Nikolas K. Knowles (2019)
10.1007/s00198-017-4319-2
Association of incident hip fracture with the estimated femoral strength by finite element analysis of DXA scans in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study
Lei Yang (2017)
10.1007/978-3-319-22997-3_14
Computational Bone Mechanics: From the Cloud to an Orthopedists Mobile Device
Zohar Yosibash (2015)
Image-based, personalised and multiscale modelling to predict the risk of fracture in osteoporotic patients: the VPHOP integrated project
Marco Viceconti (2012)
10.1080/10255842.2019.1699545
Elementwise material assignment in reconstructed or transformed patient-specific FEA models developed from CT scans
Peter Schwarzenberg (2019)
10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.010
Stemmed TKA in a femur with a total hip arthroplasty: is there a safe distance between the stem tips?
Marc Soenen (2013)
The p- and B-spline versions of the geometrically nonlinear finite cell method and hierarchical refinement strategies for adaptive isogeometric and embedded domain analysis
Dominik Schillinger (2012)
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.08.032
Volume to density relation in adult human bone tissue.
Simone Tassani (2011)
10.1371/journal.pone.0218268
Finite element modelling of the developing infant femur using paired CT and MRI scans
A P G Castro (2019)
10.1016/J.CLINBIOMECH.2019.05.028
Finite element analyses for predicting anatomical neck fractures in the proximal humerus.
Gal Dahan (2019)
10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.10.007
Stochastic analysis of a heterogeneous micro-finite element model of a mouse tibia.
Yongtao Lu (2019)
10.7712/130113.4398.S2139
MATERIAL CHARACTERIZATION ISSUES IN FEA OF LONG BONES
Nikola Korunovic (2013)
10.1002/jor.22266
The importance of lag screw position for the stabilization of trochanteric fractures with a sliding hip screw: a subject-specific finite element study.
Jérôme M. Goffin (2013)
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.03.024
Patient-specific finite element analysis of the human femur--a double-blinded biomechanical validation.
Nir Trabelsi (2011)
10.3389/fmats.2017.00031
Precision of Digital Volume Correlation Approaches for Strain Analysis in Bone Imaged with Micro-Computed Tomography at Different Dimensional Levels
Enrico Dall’Ara (2017)
10.1080/10255842.2017.1291805
A new evolutionary optimization method for osteoporotic bone augmentation
María E. Santana Artiles (2017)
Finite element advancements to improve performance of cementless hip implants
Maria Tarala (2012)
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.10.013
Development of a validated glenoid trabecular density-modulus relationship.
Nikolas K. Knowles (2019)
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.01.014
Mechanical behavior of metastatic femurs through patient-specific computational models accounting for bone-metastasis interaction.
Cristina Falcinelli (2019)
The Digital Astronaut Project Bone Remodeling Model
James A. Pennline (2014)
10.1007/s10237-011-0322-2
The finite cell method for bone simulations: verification and validation
Martin Ruess (2012)
10.1016/J.ENGFRACMECH.2018.04.024
Modelling of femur fracture using finite element procedures
Miguel Marco (2018)
10.1002/cnm.2989
Numerical investigation of the effect of bone cement porosity on osteoporotic femoral augmentation.
María E Santana Artiles (2018)
10.1038/s41598-018-36503-z
Anatomic grooved stem mitigates strain shielding compared to established total hip arthroplasty stem designs in finite-element models
Mark Heyland (2019)
10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.11.005
Balancing incompatible endoprosthetic design goals: a combined ingrowth and bone remodeling simulation.
Maria Tarala (2011)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar