Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
Referencing for people who value simplicity, privacy, and speed.
Get Citationsy
← Back to Search

An Accurate Estimation Of Bone Density Improves The Accuracy Of Subject-specific Finite Element Models.

E. Schileo, E. Dall’Ara, F. Taddei, A. Malandrino, Tom Schotkamp, M. Baleani, M. Viceconti
Published 2008 · Medicine, Engineering

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy Visualize in Litmaps
Share
Reduce the time it takes to create your bibliography by a factor of 10 by using the world’s favourite reference manager
Time to take this seriously.
Get Citationsy
An experimental-numerical study was performed to investigate the relationships between computed tomography (CT)-density and ash density, and between ash density and apparent density for bone tissue, to evaluate their influence on the accuracy of subject-specific FE models of human bones. Sixty cylindrical bone specimens were examined. CT-densities were computed from CT images while apparent and ash densities were measured experimentally. The CT/ash-density and ash/apparent-density relationships were calculated. Finite element models of eight human femurs were generated considering these relationships to assess their effect on strain prediction accuracy. CT and ash density were linearly correlated (R(2)=0.997) over the whole density range but not equivalent (intercep t <0, slope >1). A constant ash/apparent-density ratio (0.598+/-0.004) was found for cortical bone. A lower ratio, with a larger dispersion, was found for trabecular bone (0.459+/-0.100), but it became less dispersed, and equal to that of cortical tissue, when testing smaller trabecular specimens (0.598+/-0.036). This suggests that an experimental error occurred in apparent-density measurements for large trabecular specimens and a constant ratio can be assumed valid for the whole density range. Introducing the obtained relationships in the FE modelling procedure improved strain prediction accuracy (R(2)=0.95, RMSE=7%). The results suggest that: (i) a correction of the densitometric calibration should be used when evaluating bone ash-density from clinical CT scans, to avoid ash-density underestimation and overestimation for low- and high-density bone tissue, respectively; (ii) the ash/apparent-density ratio can be assumed constant in human femurs and (iii) the correction improves significantly the model accuracy and should be considered in subject-specific bone modelling.
This paper references
10.1002/AJPA.1330290113
Density of fresh and embalmed human compact and cancellous bone.
P. Blanton (1968)
10.1016/J.CLINBIOMECH.2006.01.010
Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
S. Gupta (2006)
10.1016/S0268-0033(02)00207-3
Finite element analysis of the initial stability of ankle arthrodesis with internal fixation: flat cut versus intact joint contours.
A. A. Vázquez (2003)
10.1002/JOR.1100090315
Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography
S. Snyder (1991)
10.1016/J.MEDENGPHY.2004.10.001
Validation of a finite element model of the human metacarpal.
D. S. Barker (2005)
10.1097/01.blo.0000164400.37905.22
Predicting Proximal Femoral Strength Using Structural Engineering Models
J. Keyak (2005)
10.1016/0141-5425(93)90066-8
Validation of an automated method of three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone.
J. Keyak (1993)
10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00036-1
Sensitivity of periprosthetic stress-shielding to load and the bone density-modulus relationship in subject-specific finite element models.
H. Weinans (2000)
10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00467-7
The influence of bone volume fraction and ash fraction on bone strength and modulus.
C. Hernandez (2001)
10.1243/095441105X34293
Effect of Bone Material Properties on the Initial Stability of a Cementless Hip Stem: A Finite Element Study
A. S. Wong (2005)
10.1118/1.596899
A phantom for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by QCT and DXA: design considerations and specifications.
W. Kalender (1992)
10.1016/J.JBIOMECH.2004.03.005
The effect of muscle loading on the simulation of bone remodelling in the proximal femur.
C. Bitsakos (2005)
10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00069-5
Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur.
D. Wirtz (2000)
10.1002/JBM.820281111
Correlations between orthogonal mechanical properties and density of trabecular bone: use of different densitometric measures.
J. Keyak (1994)
10.1016/j.cmpb.2007.05.002
Multimod Data Manager: A tool for data fusion
M. Viceconti (2007)
10.1016/J.CLINBIOMECH.2007.08.024
Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a literature review.
B. Helgason (2008)
10.2106/00004623-197759070-00021
The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure.
D. Carter (1977)
10.1016/J.JBIOMECH.2005.07.018
Subject-specific finite element models of long bones: An in vitro evaluation of the overall accuracy.
F. Taddei (2006)
10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00099-8
Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA.
D. Cody (1999)
10.1243/095441104322984022
Development and experimental validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the human scapula
S. Gupta (2004)
10.1016/J.JBIOMECH.2003.08.010
Mechanical properties, density and quantitative CT scan data of trabecular bone with and without metastases.
T. S. Kaneko (2004)
10.1016/0021-9290(94)90014-0
The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone.
R. Goulet (1994)
10.1016/0021-9290(88)90186-8
Stiffness of compact bone: effects of porosity and density.
M. Schaffler (1988)
10.1016/S1350-4533(03)00030-4
Relationships between material properties and CT scan data of cortical bone with and without metastatic lesions.
T. S. Kaneko (2003)
10.1016/S8756-3282(03)00210-2
Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography.
R. Crawford (2003)
10.1016/J.JBIOMECH.2007.02.010
Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones.
E. Schileo (2007)
10.1016/0268-0033(94)90018-3
Formalin fixation effects on vertebral bone density and failure mechanics: an in-vitro study of human and sheep vertebrae.
S. Edmondston (1994)
10.1115/1.2794181
Development and validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the pelvic bone.
M. Dalstra (1995)
10.1016/0021-9290(88)90167-4
Elastic modulus of trabecular bone material.
R. B. Ashman (1988)
10.1016/J.JBIOMECH.2006.11.020
Mechanical testing of cancellous bone from the femoral head: experimental errors due to off-axis measurements.
C. Ohman (2007)
10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00123-1
Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling.
J. Keyak (1998)
10.1016/0021-9290(94)90056-6
Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone.
T. Keller (1994)
10.1016/J.MEDENGPHY.2006.10.014
The material mapping strategy influences the accuracy of CT-based finite element models of bones: an evaluation against experimental measurements.
F. Taddei (2007)
10.1016/J.MEDENGPHY.2006.10.002
Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions.
V. Báča (2007)
10.1016/J.CLINBIOMECH.2005.01.010
Extracting clinically relevant data from finite element simulations.
M. Viceconti (2005)
10.1067/MOE.2002.126451
A 3-dimensional finite-element analysis investigating the biomechanical behavior of the mandible and plate osteosynthesis in cases of fractures of the condylar process.
A. Wagner (2002)
10.1016/S1350-4533(03)00138-3
An improved method for the automatic mapping of computed tomography numbers onto finite element models.
F. Taddei (2004)
10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00071-X
Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site.
E. Morgan (2003)



This paper is referenced by
Heuristic optimization of bone cement distribution for prevention of osteoporotic hip fractures
María E. Santana Artiles (2016)
10.18297/ETD/2890
Investigating the likelihood of pediatric femur fracture due to falls through finite element analysis.
Keyonna McKinsey (2018)
10.1007/s11914-018-0438-8
Are CT-Based Finite Element Model Predictions of Femoral Bone Strengthening Clinically Useful?
M. Viceconti (2018)
10.1080/10255842.2011.641122
Development and validation of a subject-specific finite element model of a human clavicle
Zuoping Li (2013)
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.08.032
Volume to density relation in adult human bone tissue.
Simone Tassani (2011)
Image-based, personalised and multiscale modelling to predict the risk of fracture in osteoporotic patients: the VPHOP integrated project
M. Viceconti (2012)
10.1080/10255842.2019.1699545
Elementwise material assignment in reconstructed or transformed patient-specific FEA models developed from CT scans
Peter Schwarzenberg (2019)
10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.010
Stemmed TKA in a femur with a total hip arthroplasty: is there a safe distance between the stem tips?
M. Soenen (2013)
Image-based Finite Element Analysis of Head Injuries and Helmet Design
Zhaoyang Liang (2012)
The p- and B-spline versions of the geometrically nonlinear finite cell method and hierarchical refinement strategies for adaptive isogeometric and embedded domain analysis
D. Schillinger (2012)
Mapping Bone Mineral Density Obtained by Quantitative Computed Tomography to Bone Volume Fraction
J. A. Pennline (2017)
A multiscale finite element model of a stress fracture
Alexander Wing̊ard (2014)
10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.08.022
An investigation to determine if a single validated density-elasticity relationship can be used for subject specific finite element analyses of human long bones.
S. Eberle (2013)
10.1118/1.3582946
A calibration methodology of QCT BMD for human vertebral body with registered micro-CT images.
E. Dallara (2011)
10.1016/j.bone.2012.09.006
A nonlinear QCT-based finite element model validation study for the human femur tested in two configurations in vitro.
E. Dallara (2013)
10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.06.021
Comprehensive evaluation of PCA-based finite element modelling of the human femur.
L. Grassi (2014)
10.7892/BORIS.4643
Mesh-based vs. Image-based Statistical Appearance Model of the Human Femur: a Preliminary Comparison Study for the Creation of Finite Element Meshes
S. Bonaretti (2011)
10.1142/S0219519414500328
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CONTRALATERAL BONES OF THE HUMAN LOWER LIMBS: A MULTISCALE INVESTIGATION
L. Cristofolini (2014)
10.1007/s00198-017-4319-2
Association of incident hip fracture with the estimated femoral strength by finite element analysis of DXA scans in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study
L. Yang (2017)
10.1098/rsif.2013.1146
Effects of densitometry, material mapping and load estimation uncertainties on the accuracy of patient-specific finite-element models of the scapula
G. Campoli (2014)
10.1007/s10439-019-02312-2
Material Mapping of QCT-Derived Scapular Models: A Comparison with Micro-CT Loaded Specimens Using Digital Volume Correlation
N. Knowles (2019)
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.04.050
Predicting surface strains at the human distal radius during an in vivo loading task--finite element model validation and application.
V. Bhatia (2014)
10.1007/978-3-319-22997-3_14
Computational Bone Mechanics: From the Cloud to an Orthopedists Mobile Device
Z. Yosibash (2015)
10.1080/13588265.2012.730212
Determining the strain rate dependence of cortical and cancellous bones of human tibia using a Split Hopkinson pressure bar
C. K. Teja (2013)
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.02.032
How accurately can subject-specific finite element models predict strains and strength of human femora? Investigation using full-field measurements.
L. Grassi (2016)
10.1111/jmi.12159
Influence of segmentation on micro‐CT images of trabecular bone
S. Tassani (2014)
10.1098/rsta.2010.0046
Mechanical testing of bones: the positive synergy of finite–element models and in vitro experiments
L. Cristofolini (2010)
10.1016/j.bone.2018.09.014
Biofidelic finite element models for accurately classifying hip fracture in a retrospective clinical study of elderly women from the AGES Reykjavik cohort.
W. Enns-Bray (2019)
10.1007/s11914-020-00592-5
Modelling Human Locomotion to Inform Exercise Prescription for Osteoporosis
S. Martelli (2020)
10.1007/8415_2011_86
Patient Specific Modeling of Musculoskeletal Fractures
E. Peleg (2011)
10.1155/2015/837585
A QCT-Based Nonsegmentation Finite Element Head Model for Studying Traumatic Brain Injury
Zhaoyang Liang (2015)
3-D visualization and prediction of spine fractures under axial loading
H. Ali (2013)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar