Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Influence Of Sand Gradation On Compaction Of Loess Soils

J. Herrero, J. Colazo, D. Buschiazzo, J. Galantini
Published 2020 · Environmental Science

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
Abstract Assessing the interaction among soil organic carbon (OC), Atterberg limits and soil texture, especially sand gradation, in maximum bulk density (BDMAX) can improve prediction of soil compactibility. Our objectives were a) to compare the effect of total OC, complexed OC (COC) and silt + clay (S + C) content on maximum bulk density in cultivated (CULT) and uncultivated (UNCULT) soils, and b) to evaluate how useful it may be to group soils according to Atterberg limits and the sand uniform coefficient (CU) in order to improve BDMAX prediction. Sixteen pairs of CULT and UNCULT soils were sampled in the province of San Luis, Argentina. The standard Proctor test was used to determine BDMAX. The BDMAX was related to OC and S + C in both managements. The BDMAX was better explained by S + C in CULT (R2 = 0.52) and by OC in UNCULT (R2 = 0.62). The COC did not improve prediction compared to OC. The plastic limits of soil, also called Atterberg limits, determine a range of soil moisture contents in which soil has a plastic consistency. Consequently, non-plastic soils are those lacking plastic consistency. In all non-plastic CULT soils, BDMAX was not associated with S + C. However, when these soils were grouped according to CU, the BDMAX was linearly related to S + C, both in well-graded sands (R2 = 0.47) and in poorly graded sands (R2 = 0.27). On the other hand, the relationship between BDMAX and S + C in plastic soils was negative and linear (R2 = 0.96). In coarse-textured soils, soils with a higher CU (well-graded sands) were more easily compacted than soils with a lower CU (poorly graded sands). Therefore, according to this model, in CULT soils with the same S + C content, compaction is 8–10% higher for soils with well-graded sands than those with poorly graded sands.
This paper references
10.1016/J.STILL.2005.04.001
Bulk density by Proctor test as a function of texture for agricultural soils in Maputo province of Mozambique
Alfredo B Nhantumbo (2006)
10.2136/SSSAJ2008.0353
No-till Induced Increase in Organic Carbon Reduces Maximum Bulk Density of Soils
H. Blanco-Canqui (2009)
10.2136/SSSAJ2009.0053
Soil Texture and Carbon Dynamics in Savannah Vegetation Patches of Central Argentina
Adriana Gili (2010)
10.1016/S0167-1987(97)00023-8
Assessing the compaction susceptibility of South African forestry soils. II. Soil properties affecting compactibility and compressibility
C. Smith (1997)
Status of the World’s Soil Resources Main report
L. Montanarella (2015)
10.1016/J.STILL.2004.08.009
Soil compaction in cropping systems: A review of the nature, causes and possible solutions
M. Hamza (2005)
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
Jean L. Cornillot (2016)
10.1201/9780203908600-9
Liquid and Plastic Limits
D. Campbell (2000)
10.1111/sum.12212
A review of the impacts of degradation threats on soil properties in the UK
A. S. Gregory (2015)
10.1016/S0167-1987(00)00145-8
Soil compactibility in relation to physical and organic properties at 156 sites in UK
B. Ball (2000)
10.2136/SSSAJ2005.0355
Organic Carbon Influences on Soil Particle Density and Rheological Properties
H. Blanco-Canqui (2006)
10.2136/SSSAJ2007.0075
Maximum Bulk Density of British Columbia Forest Soils from the Proctor Test: Relationships with Selected Physical and Chemical Properties
Y. Zhao (2008)
10.1071/SR11174
Plastic limits of agricultural soils as functions of soil texture and organic matter content
Thomas Keller (2012)
10.1016/J.STILL.2008.07.002
Reference bulk density and critical degree-of-compactness for no-till crop production in subtropical highly weathered soils
J. M. Reichert (2009)
10.1002/LDR.2297
The Impact of Agriculture on Soil Texture Due to Wind Erosion
J. Colazo (2015)
10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2016.09.008
Estimating soil bulk density with information metrics of soil texture
M. L. Martín (2017)
Physical properties of tropical sandy soils : a large range of behaviours
A. Bruand (2005)
10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2017.12.052
Does soil compaction increase floods? A review
A. Alaoui (2018)
10.1016/0167-1987(90)90029-D
The role of organic matter in soil compactibility: a review of some practical aspects.
B. D. Soane (1990)
Principles of Geotechnical Engineering
B. Das (1990)
10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00049-5
Soil compaction is related to management practices in the semi-arid Argentine pampas
A. Quiroga (1999)
10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2017.04.021
Optimal organic carbon values for soil structure quality of arable soils. Does clay content matter
Alice Johannes (2017)
10.1016/S0167-1987(00)00089-1
Effect of soil texture, organic carbon and water retention on the compactability of soils from the Argentinean pampas.
M. Díaz-Zorita (2000)
10.1016/J.STILL.2014.09.011
Mitigating arable soil compaction: A review and analysis of available cost and benefit data
W. C. T. Chamen (2015)
10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2008.01.022
Complexed organic matter controls soil physical properties
A. Dexter (2008)
Analyzing Multivariate Data
P. Green (1978)
10.2136/SSSABOOKSER5.3.C34
Total carbon organic carbon and organic matter
D. Nelson (1983)
10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2009.11.013
Estimation of reference bulk density from soil particle size distribution and soil organic matter content
T. Keller (2010)
10.1016/J.AEOLIA.2011.08.002
The aeolian system of central Argentina
M. Zárate (2012)
10.2136/SSSABOOKSER5.1.2ED.C15
Particle Size Analysis
G. Gee (1986)
10.1016/S0167-1987(00)00144-6
Maximum compactibility of Argentine soils from the Proctor test;: The relationship with organic carbon and water content
A. Aragón (2000)
10.2111/1551-5028(2004)057\[0511:STATCI\]2.0.CO;2
Soil texture and tree coverage influence on organic matter
D. Buschiazzo (2004)
10.4141/S03-056
Soil properties influencing compactability of forest soils in British Columbia
M. Kržić (2004)



This paper is referenced by
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar