Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
Please confirm you are human
(Sign Up for free to never see this)
← Back to Search

Expert Evidence Pertaining To Battered Women: The Impact Of Gender Of Expert And Timing Of Testimony

R. Schuller, J. Cripps
Published 1998 · Psychology, Medicine

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
The present study investigated the impact of two variables relating to general expert testimony pertaining to battered women on juror decision processes. Specifically, the gender of the expert, as well as the timing of the presentation of the testimony, were investigated in a simulated homicide trial involving a battered woman who had killed her abuser. Results indicated that when the expert was female and the testimony was presented prior to the defendant's testimony, jurors' verdicts were more lenient. Moreover, across a range of case judgments, male jurors' perceptions were more favorable to the defendant when the expert was female as opposed to male. On two of the judgments this latter pattern of results was only evidenced when the testimony was presented early as opposed to late. The significance of these findings is discussed.
This paper references
Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis.
A. Eagly (1992)
Effects of juror and expert witness gender on jurors' perceptions of an expert witness
Lynelle Vondergeest (1993)
Social Frameworks: A New Use of Social Science in Law
L. Walker (1987)
Factors predicting verdicts in cases where battered women kill their husbands
D. Follingstad (1989)
The self-defense defense and community sentiment
N. Finkel (1991)
Social science research in law: A new paradigm.
J. Monahan (1988)
Mistaken Identification: The Eyewitness, Psychology and the Law
B. Cutler (1995)
Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?
J. Swim (1989)
Explanation-based decision making: effects of memory structure on judgment
N. Pennington (1988)
Source credibility and perceived expertness of testimony in a simulated child-custody case.
R. Swenson (1984)
Battered women who kill
Marilyn Kasian (1993)
Are women prejudiced against women?
P. Goldberg (1968)
Evidence evaluation in complex decision making.
N. Pennington (1986)
Jurors' Decisions in Trials of Battered Women Who Kill: The Role of Prior Beliefs and Expert Testimony1
R. Schuller (1994)
Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social-cognitive analysis.
N. Brekke (1988)
On the requirements of proof: The timing of judicial instruction and mock juror verdicts.
S. Kassin (1979)
The impact of battered woman syndrome evidence on jury decision processes
R. Schuller (1992)

This paper is referenced by
Factors influencing juror decision-making in a mock jury trial : examining the role of need for cognition in primacy and recency effects
Karene S. Saad (2003)
O pensamento contrafactual e a percepção de crimes: revisitando Macrae, Milne e Griffiths (1993)...
A. Martins (2012)
Approaches to Gender and the Law: Research and Applications
J. Goodman-Delahunty (1998)
When Cross‐Examination Offends: How Men and Women Assess Intrusive Questioning of Male and Female Expert Witnesses
Bridget A. Larson (2010)
Gender of an Expert Witness and the Jury Verdict
J. Couch (2002)
Compelled mental health examinations, liability decisions, and damage awards in sexual harrassment cases: Issues for jury research.
M. B. Kovera (2002)
Lay perceptions of an expert witness in a sexual discrimination in the workplace case
Lloyd Carson (2008)
Jury Decision Making: The State of the Science
D. Devine (2012)
Jurors and juries: A review of the field.
Edith Greene (2002)
Perceptions of Domestic Violence and Mock Jurors' Sentencing Decisions
Rosalie P. Kern (2007)
Spring 5-9-2019 Examining Witness Testimony in Domestic Homicides
Hana Chae (2019)
Research on Gender and the Law: Where Are We Going, Where Have We Been?
P. Frazier (1998)
Timing of eyewitness expert testimony, jurors' need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts.
Michael R. Leippe (2004)
Aggravation and Mitigation: Findings and Implications
Marla Sandys (2009)
The Impact of Expert Testimony on Jurors’ Decisions: Gender of the Expert and Testimony Complexity
R. Schuller (2005)
Serial effects of evidence on legal decision-making
R. Enescu (2012)
Vocal pitch manipulation and credibility in the courtroom: Differences between male and female expert witnesses
J. Boyle (2014)
Psychological Explanations of How Gender Relates to Perceptions and Outcomes at Trial
Tyler N. Livingston (2019)
Assessment of the commonsense psychology underlying Daubert: Legal decision makers' abilities to evaluate expert evidence in hostile work environment cases.
M. B. Kovera (2002)
The Effectiveness of Opposing Expert Witnesses for Educating Jurors about Unreliable Expert Evidence
L. Levett (2008)
Social Influence and Gender
L. Carli (2017)
Expert Evidence and Jurors’ Views on Expert Witnesses
S. Blackwell (2015)
Battered Women Who Kill: Impact of Expert Testimony Type and Timing
C. A. Terrance (2014)
Women as expert witnesses: a review of the literature.
T. Neal (2014)
The Impact of Negative Forensic Evidence on Mock Jurors’ Perceptions of a Trial of Drug-Facilitated Sexual Assault
Gwen Jenkins (2007)
Attitudes Toward Battered Women Who Kill
B. Russell (2006)
Jurors’ Responses to Expert Witness Testimony: The Effects of Gender Stereotypes
B. McKimmie (2002)
It's Not What She Says, It's How She Says It: The Influence of Language Complexity and Cognitive Load on the Persuasiveness of Expert Testimony
B. McKimmie (2013)
Gender differences in the practice patterns of forensic psychiatry experts.
M. Price (2004)
Jurors and Juries
Edith Greene (2004)
Intimate Partner Violence Stigma: The Intersection of Race and Socioeconomic Status
Antoinette Fleming (2018)
Blind Justice: Seeing Race and Gender in Cases of Violent Crime
Irfan Nooruddin (2007)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar