Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

What Are The Risks Of Diagnostic And Therapeutic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography?

G. Tzovaras, P. Shukla, L. Kow, D. Mounkley, T. Wilson, J. Toouli
Published 2000 · Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
BACKGROUND Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been practised widely over the last 20 years, and it has revolutionized the diagnosis and management of biliary and pancreatic conditions. More recently newer techniques (magnetic resonance imaging) for diagnosis and therapy (laparoscopic biliary surgery) have evolved. The present paper evaluates the risks of ERCP procedures in a modern setting. METHODS A prospective audit of all ERCP carried out by a single unit across two campuses over 12 months was undertaken. All procedures were included and predetermined morbidity criteria were recorded and evaluated by independent observers who did not perform the procedures. RESULTS During this period 372 procedures were performed. A total of 9.4% of procedures failed to achieve the preprocedure-stated goal. There were five deaths (30-day mortality of 1.3%) and in 16 patients complications were recorded (morbidity of 4.3%). Two clinical and two technical factors were shown to be associated with the morbidity and mortality by multiple logistic regression analysis: diagnosis of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction; presence of jaundice; need to perform percutaneous transhepatic drainage of an obstructed biliary system after a failed endoscopic approach; and multiple ERCP. CONCLUSIONS These results compare favourably with results from other reported series and serve to illustrate the relative safety of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP.
This paper references
10.1016/S0016-5107(05)80487-0
Underestimation of adverse events following ERCP: A prospective 30 day follow-up study
Mk Newcomer (1995)
10.1016/S0016-5107(89)72921-7
Precut papillotomy--a risky technique for experts only.
P. Cotton (1989)
10.1016/S0016-5107(74)73914-1
Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater.
K. Kawai (1974)
10.1056/NEJM199609263351301
Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.
M. Freeman (1996)
10.1016/S0016-5107(91)70740-2
Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.
P. Cotton (1991)
10.1016/S0016-5107(96)70045-7
Long-term follow-up after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients younger than 60 years of age.
J. Bergman (1996)
10.1055/S-0028-1107790
Endoskopische Sphinkterotomie der Papilla Vateri und Steinextraktion aus dem Ductus choledochus
M. Classen (1974)
10.1016/0016-5085(91)90735-4
Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy. A prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and nondilated bile ducts.
S. Sherman (1991)
10.1097/00000658-198902000-00004
A Multivariate Analysis of Preoperative Risk Factors in Patients with Common Bile Duct Stones: Implications for Treatment
J. Neoptolemos (1989)
10.7326/0003-4819-125-12-199612150-00009
Quantitative Assessment of Procedural Competence: A Prospective Study of Training in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
P. Jowell (1996)
10.1136/gut.41.4.545
Are complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy age related?
G. Deans (1997)
10.1056/NEJM199609263351309
Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy and their prevention.
K. Huibregtse (1996)
10.1016/0016-5085(90)90026-W
Follow-up 6 to 11 years after duodenoscopic sphincterotomy for stones in patients with prior cholecystectomy.
R. Hawes (1990)
Endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis: increased risk associated with nondilated bile ducts and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.
Y. Chen (1994)



This paper is referenced by
10.4172/2165-7092.1000185
Preoperative Biliary Drainage of Jaundiced Patients with Pancreatic Head Cancer: A Routine or Selective Strategy
F. Tshijanu (2017)
Post-ERCP pancreatitis: patient and technique-related risk factors.
M. Freeman (2002)
10.1148/RADIOGRAPHICS.21.6.G01NV101441
Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: spectrum of abnormalities demonstrated with CT.
H. Pannu (2001)
10.1016/J.CGH.2007.09.007
Pancreatic stents for prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.
M. Freeman (2007)
10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70028-X
Evidence-based assessment: patient, procedure, or operator factors associated with ERCP complications.
N. Aronson (2002)
10.1111/ans.13734
Outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a series from a provincial New Zealand hospital
Simon J G Richards (2018)
10.6092/1590-8577/3223
Using the 4-hour Post-ERCP amylase level to predict post-ERCP pancreatitis.
V. R. Sutton (2011)
10.1001/ARCHSURG.140.5.504
Surgical sphincteroplasty in 446 patients.
J. Madura (2005)
10.1016/S0034-9356(08)70581-4
Parada cardiorrespiratoria en paciente sometido a colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE)
J. Samper (2008)
10.1007/S11894-003-0084-9
Understanding risk factors and avoiding complications with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
M. Freeman (2003)
REVIEW ARTICLE Management of Benign Biliary Strictures
H. Laasch (2002)
10.1007/s00464-011-1638-9
Predictors of complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prognostic model for early discharge
S. Jeurnink (2011)
10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04300.x
OUTCOMES OF ERCP: PROSPECTIVE SERIES FROM A RURAL CENTRE
P. Dundee (2007)
10.1016/S1052-5157(03)00107-7
Adverse outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: avoidance and management.
M. Freeman (2003)
10.4321/S1130-01082004000300002
Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A study in a small ERCP unit
J. Lizcano (2004)
10.1016/S0016-5107(04)00353-0
Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a comprehensive review.
M. Freeman (2004)
10.1002/9780470987490
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy: ERCP
Peter B. Cotton (2005)
10.1007/s00270-002-1888-y
Management of Benign Biliary Strictures
H. Laasch (2002)
10.1016/S0016-5107(05)01574-9
Intravenous N-acetylcysteine does not prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis.
P. Katsinelos (2005)
10.1055/a-1068-9153
Telepresence-teleguidance to facilitate training and quality assurance in ERCP: a health economic modeling approach
Johanna Brinne Roos (2020)
Eventos adversos esperados e inesperados en la endoscopia terapéutica de la vía biliar(CPRE): Experiencia en un centro privado nacional con 1356 casos consecutivos (1999-2008)
Simón Yriberry Ureña (2009)
10.1097/01.mcg.0000225695.46874.b5
Risk for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis After Needle Knife Precut Sphincterotomy Following Repeated Cannulation Attempts
J. Lee (2007)
10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03171.x
Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis
L. Kow (2004)
10.1046/j.1440-1746.17.s1.2.x
Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis
J. Toouli (2002)
Adverse outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
M. Freeman (2002)
10.1097/MPA.0000000000000086
The Effect of Indomethacin in the Prevention of Post–Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: A Meta-Analysis
Dina S. Ahmad (2014)
10.1007/978-88-470-0763-5_28
Common Bile Duct Stones in Cholecystectomized Patients
C. Sciumé (2008)
10.1016/j.gie.2008.07.040
Evaluation of recombinant platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase for reducing the incidence and severity of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis.
S. Sherman (2009)
10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01344.x
Comparison of carbon dioxide and air insufflation use by non‐expert endoscopists during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Takashi Muraki (2013)
10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70025-4
Adverse outcomes of ERCP.
M. Freeman (2002)
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x
Incidence Rates of Post-ERCP Complications: A Systematic Survey of Prospective Studies
A. Andriulli (2007)
10.1007/s12664-013-0383-5
Complications of ERCP
N. Guda (2013)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar