Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.

Higher Flower And Seed Number Leads To Higher Yield Under Water Stress Conditions Imposed During Reproduction In Chickpea.

R. Pushpavalli, M. Zaman-Allah, N. Turner, R. Baddam, M. V. Rao, V. Vadez
Published 2015 · Medicine, Biology

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
The reproductive phase of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is more sensitive to water deficits than the vegetative phase. The characteristics that confer drought tolerance to genotypes at the reproductive stage are not well understood; especially which characteristics are responsible for differences in seed yield under water stress. In two consecutive years, 10 genotypes with contrasting yields under terminal drought stress in the field were exposed to a gradual, but similar, water stress in the glasshouse. Flower number, flower+pod+seed abortion percentage, pod number, pod weight, seed number, seed yield, 100-seed weight (seed size), stem+leaf weight and harvest index (HI) were recorded in well watered plants (WW) and in water-stressed plants (WS) when the level of deficit was mild (phase I), and when the stress was severe (phase II). The WS treatment reduced seed yield, seed and pod number, but not flower+pod+seed abortion percentage or 100-seed weight. Although there were significant differences in total seed yield among the genotypes, the ranking of the seed yield in the glasshouse differed from the ranking in the field, indicating large genotype×environment interaction. Genetic variation for seed yield and seed yield components was observed in the WW treatment, which also showed differences across years, as well as in the WS treatment in both the years, so that the relative seed yield and relative yield components (ratio of values under WS to those under WW) were used as measures of drought tolerance. Relative total seed yield was positively associated with relative total flower number (R2=0.23 in year 2) and relative total seed number (R2=0.83, R2=0.79 in years 1 and 2 respectively). In phase I (mild stress), relative yield of seed produced in that phase was found to be associated with the flower number in both the years (R2=0.69, R2=0.76 respectively). Therefore, the controlled drought imposition that was used, where daily water loss from the soil was made equal for all plants, revealed genotypic differences in the sensitivity of the reproductive process to drought. Under these conditions, the seed yield differences in chickpea were largely related to the capacity to produce a large number of flowers and to set seeds, especially in the early phase of drought stress when the degree of water deficit was mild.
This paper references
Remobilization of carbon and nitrogen supports seed filling
SL Davies (2000)
Regional Shift in Chickpea Production in India
C. L. L. Gowda (2009)
10.1071/EA98134
Seed growth of desi and kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in a short-season Mediterranean-type environment
S. Davies (1999)
Molecular and physiological analysis of drought stress in Arabidopsis reveals early responses leading to acclimation in plant growth
A Harb (2010)
Adaptation of chickpea
Khm Siddique (2000)
10.1016/S0065-2113(05)87005-1
Seed Filling in Grain Legumes Under Water Deficits, with Emphasis on Chickpeas
N. Turner (2005)
10.1071/CP10349
An early transient water deficit reduces flower number and pod production but increases seed size in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
Xiangling Fang (2011)
Growth and development.
E. KostShelton (1951)
10.1186/1471-2229-8-106
Genetic structure, diversity, and allelic richness in composite collection and reference set in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
H. Upadhyaya (2008)
Adaptation to drought : lessons from studies with chickpea
N. Turner (2003)
10.1093/JXB/49.325.1381
The effect of pot size on growth and transpiration of maize and soybean during water deficit stress
J. Ray (1998)
10.1007/978-94-011-4385-1
Linking Research and Marketing Opportunities for Pulses in the 21st Century
R. Knight (2000)
Remobilization of carbon and nitrogen supports seed fi lling in chickpea subjected to water de fi cit
SL Davies (2000)
10.1071/FP10244
Chickpea genotypes contrasting for seed yield under terminal drought stress in the field differ for traits related to the control of water use.
Mainassara A. Zaman-Allah (2011)
10.1007/978-94-011-4385-1_26
Adaptation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and faba bean (Vicia faba L.) to Australia.
K. H. Siddique (2000)
10.1080/713610855
Low-Temperature Stress: Implications for Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Improvement
J. Croser (2003)
10.1071/AR04104
Genotype by environment studies across Australia reveal the importance of phenology for chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) improvement
J. Berger (2004)
10.1016/S1161-0301(98)00042-2
Water relations, gas exchange and growth of cool-season grain legumes in a Mediterranean-type environment
L. Leport (1998)
10.1093/JEXBOT/52.354.153
Leaf ureide degradation and N(2) fixation tolerance to water deficit in soybean.
V. Vadez (2001)
10.1016/J.EJA.2005.08.005
Variation in pod production and abortion among chickpea cultivars under terminal drought
L. Leport (2006)
10.1016/J.FCR.2010.08.002
Sources of tolerance to terminal drought in the chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) minicore germplasm
Lakshman Krishnamurthy (2010)
Seed fi lling in grain legumes under water de fi cits , with emphasis on chickpeas
HD Upadhyaya (2005)
10.1016/S1161-0301(99)00039-8
Physiological responses of chickpea genotypes to terminal drought in a mediterranean-type environment
L. Leport (1999)
10.1038/ncomms1322
Growth and development.
R. Hauspie (2011)
10.1071/PP9850213
Who Taught Plants Thermodynamics? The Unfulfilled Potential of Plant Water Potential
F. Hewitt (1985)
10.1071/AR00018
Remobilisation of carbon and nitrogen supports seed filling in chickpea subjected to water deficit
S. L. Davies (2000)
10.1007/s00122-001-0556-y
A mini core subset for capturing diversity and promoting utilization of chickpea genetic resources in crop improvement
H. Upadhyaya (2001)
10.1016/J.EJA.2012.03.008
Large number of flowers and tertiary branches, and higher reproductive success increase yields under salt stress in chickpea
V. Vadez (2012)
The chickpea book : a technical guide to chickpea production
S. P. Loss (1998)
10.1093/jxb/erp307
Flower numbers, pod production, pollen viability, and pistil function are reduced and flower and pod abortion increased in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under terminal drought
Xiangwen Fang (2010)
10.1093/jxb/err139
A conservative pattern of water use, rather than deep or profuse rooting, is critical for the terminal drought tolerance of chickpea
M. Zaman-Allah (2011)



This paper is referenced by
10.1007/978-3-319-56321-3
Water-Conservation Traits to Increase Crop Yields in Water-deficit Environments: Case Studies
Thomas R. Sinclair (2017)
10.3389/fpls.2018.01705
Drought or/and Heat-Stress Effects on Seed Filling in Food Crops: Impacts on Functional Biochemistry, Seed Yields, and Nutritional Quality
Akanksha Sehgal (2018)
Response of Foliar Application of Water, Salicylic Acid and Nutrient on Physiology of Chickpea Genotypes Growth and Productivity under Rainfed and Irrigated Late Sown Condition
Rahul Raghuwanshi (2018)
10.1111/JAC.12169
Drought Stress in Grain Legumes during Reproduction and Grain Filling
M. Farooq (2017)
10.1111/jac.12393
Cross‐tolerance for drought, heat and salinity stresses in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
Raju Pushpavalli (2020)
10.29312/remexca.v8i5.114
Respuesta del rendimiento de genotipos de garbanzo blanco a la sequía terminal
Gustavo Adolfo Fierros Leyva (2017)
Advances in Food Legumes Research at ICRISAT
Pankaj Gaur (2018)
10.1016/J.FCR.2017.01.017
Recently-released genotypes of naked oat (Avena nuda L.) out-yield early releases under water-limited conditions by greater reproductive allocation and desiccation tolerance
Tao Wang (2017)
10.1016/J.BIORI.2020.03.001
Evaluation of Setaria viridis physiological and gene expression responses to distinct water-deficit conditions
Tamires de Souza Rodrigues (2020)
10.3389/fpls.2017.01375
Pattern of Water Use and Seed Yield under Terminal Drought in Chickpea Genotypes
J. Pang (2017)
10.1007/s10535-016-0695-2
Differential proline metabolism in vegetative and reproductive tissues determine drought tolerance in chickpea
Davinderdeep Kaur (2016)
10.1093/jxb/erw153
Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to terminal drought: leaf stomatal conductance, pod abscisic acid concentration, and seed set
J. Pang (2017)
10.1007/s00572-018-0856-6
Salicylic acid improves arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, and chickpea growth and yield by modulating carbohydrate metabolism under salt stress
N. Garg (2018)
10.15666/aeer/1706_1397513988
GENETIC INHERITANCE OF GRAIN YIELD AND ITS RELATED TRAITS IN MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L.) UNDER WATER DEFICIT
M. Ramzan (2019)
Antioxidative defence system and protein profiling in relation to water deficit stress in chickpea cultivars differing in rooting system
D. Kaur (2016)
10.25909/5b3d9f11c9bac
Unravelling the physiology and genetics of salinity tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
Judith Atieno (2017)
10.2134/AGRONJ2018.09.0561
Mulching Affects Seed Set, Provisioning, and Offspring Performance of Vicia unijuga (Fabaceae)
W. Tang (2019)
10.1093/jxb/erx415
Profligate and conservative: water use strategies in grain legumes
Carola H. Blessing (2018)
10.1038/s41598-017-01211-7
Exploring genetic variation for salinity tolerance in chickpea using image-based phenotyping
J. Atieno (2017)
10.11648/j.jps.20190701.11
Response of Maize ( Zea mays L.) Hybrids to Diurnal Variation of Vapor Pressure Deficit (VPD) and Progressive Soil Moisture Depletion
O. Moussa (2019)
10.1038/srep33602
Alterations in flowering strategies and sexual allocation of Caragana stenophylla along a climatic aridity gradient
Lina Xie (2016)
10.3390/ijms20102541
Research Progress and Perspective on Drought Stress in Legumes: A Review
M. Nadeem (2019)
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar