Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Science Faculty’s Subtle Gender Biases Favor Male Students

C. Moss-Racusin, J. Dovidio, V. Brescoll, M. Graham, J. Handelsman
Published 2012 · Psychology, Medicine

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy Visualize in Litmaps
Share
Reduce the time it takes to create your bibliography by a factor of 10 by using the world’s favourite reference manager
Time to take this seriously.
Get Citationsy
Despite efforts to recruit and retain more women, a stark gender disparity persists within academic science. Abundant research has demonstrated gender bias in many demographic groups, but has yet to experimentally investigate whether science faculty exhibit a bias against female students that could contribute to the gender disparity in academic science. In a randomized double-blind study (n = 127), science faculty from research-intensive universities rated the application materials of a student—who was randomly assigned either a male or female name—for a laboratory manager position. Faculty participants rated the male applicant as significantly more competent and hireable than the (identical) female applicant. These participants also selected a higher starting salary and offered more career mentoring to the male applicant. The gender of the faculty participants did not affect responses, such that female and male faculty were equally likely to exhibit bias against the female student. Mediation analyses indicated that the female student was less likely to be hired because she was viewed as less competent. We also assessed faculty participants’ preexisting subtle bias against women using a standard instrument and found that preexisting subtle bias against women played a moderating role, such that subtle bias against women was associated with less support for the female student, but was unrelated to reactions to the male student. These results suggest that interventions addressing faculty gender bias might advance the goal of increasing the participation of women in science.
This paper references
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Stanford
L Festinger (1957)
Convergent and Discriminant Validity by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix,” Psychological Bulletin (2), March, pp. .
D. Campbell (1959)
10.1037/H0046016
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
D. Campbell (1959)
10.1007/BF03180445
Are women prejudiced against women?
P. Goldberg (1968)
Are women prejudiced against women? Transaction 5(5):28–30
P Goldberg (1968)
Are women prejudiced against women? Transaction
P Goldberg (1968)
10.2307/2529115
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Jacob Cohen (1969)
10.1038/264210d0
Careers in science
D. Koshland (1976)
10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence
C. Lord (1979)
SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES
L. V. Jones (1982)
10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.
A. Bandura (1982)
10.1016/s0065-2601(08)x6019-8
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
L. Berkowitz (1986)
10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.422
Consequences of violating the independence assumption in analysis of variance.
D. A. Kenny (1986)
10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.
R. M. Baron (1986)
The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. Psychology of Intergroup Relations, eds
H Tajfel (1986)
The effects of address personalization on mailed questionnaires response rate , time , and quality
GC Wunder (1988)
The effects of address personalization on mailed questionnaires response rate , time , and quality
GC Wunder (1988)
10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components.
P. Devine (1989)
10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
The case for motivated reasoning.
Z. Kunda (1990)
10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.812
Processing of persuasive in-group messages.
D. Mackie (1990)
10.1126/SCIENCE.265.5180.1787
Careers in science.
D. Koshland (1991)
10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.140
Sex bias in the naming of stimulus persons.
J. Kasof (1993)
10.1080/14792779543000002
Are People Prejudiced Against Women? Some Answers From Research on Attitudes, Gender Stereotypes, and Judgments of Competence
A. Eagly (1994)
10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199
Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices.
J. Swim (1995)
10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4
Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.
A. Greenwald (1995)
10.1146/ANNUREV.PSYCH.47.1.59
The design and analysis of social-interaction research.
D. A. Kenny (1996)
10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.138
A general procedure for the estimation of interdependence.
D. A. Kenny (1996)
10.2307/2787021
Double Standards in the Evaluation of Men and Women
M. Foschi (1996)
Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of
C. Goldin (1997)
10.1257/AER.90.4.715
Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of "Blind" Auditions on Female Musicians
C. Goldin (1997)
10.5860/choice.34-5652
Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences
E. Seymour (1997)
10.1038/387341A0
Nepotism and sexism in peer-review
C. Wennerås (1997)
10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199707)18:4<377::AID-JOB807>3.0.CO;2-1
Relationships of gender, family responsibility and flexible work hours to organizational commitment and job satisfaction
T. Scandura (1997)
10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00533.x
Should Significance Tests be Banned? Introduction to a Special Section Exploring the Pros and Cons
P. Shrout (1997)
10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00098.x
The Attitudes Toward Women Scale and Attitude Change in College Students
J. T. Spence (1997)
10.1007/978-3-642-72087-1
Classification, Data Analysis, and Data Highways
I. Balderjahn (1998)
A Study on the Status of Women Faculty in Science at MIT
R. Birgeneau (1999)
10.1111/0022-4537.00126
The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate?
M. Brewer (1999)
10.1023/A:1018839203698
The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study
R. Steinpreis (1999)
10.1146/ANNUREV.SOC.26.1.21
Double Standards for Competence: Theory and Research
M. Foschi (2000)
10.1017/cbo9780511996481
Handbook of Research Methods. in Social and Personality Psychology
Ha Si (2000)
10.1073/PNAS.97.2.525
PNAS Early Edition.
N. Cozzarelli (2000)
Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, eds Reis HT
JA Bargh (2000)
10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.856
"Unlearning" automatic biases: the malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes.
L. Rudman (2001)
10.1177/0146167201272002
Measuring Global Self-Esteem: Construct Validation of a Single-Item Measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
R. Robins (2001)
10.1037/0022-0167.48.4.474
The role of contextual supports and barriers in the choice of math/science educational options: A test of social cognitive hypotheses
R. Lent (2001)
10.1006/JESP.2001.1476
The good, the bad, and the manly: Threats to one's prototypicality and evaluations of fellow in-group members.
Michael T. Schmitt (2001)
The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory : Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism
Pam Flaskrud (2001)
10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.33
Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice.
B. Monin (2001)
Math = male, me = female, therefore math not = me.
Brian A. Nosek (2002)
10.1063/1.1505288
A Study on the Status of Women Faculty in Science at MIT
Nancy Hopkins (2002)
10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.44
Math Male, Me Female, Therefore Math Me
Brian A. Nosek (2002)
10.1111/1471-6402.00042
Learning in a Man's World: Examining the Perceptions of Undergraduate Women in Male-Dominated Academic Areas
J. Steele (2002)
10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.101
Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site
Brian A. Nosek (2002)
10.1146/ANNUREV.PSYCH.53.100901.135228
Self and social identity.
N. Ellemers (2002)
10.2139/ssrn.422902
Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination
Marianne Bertrand (2003)
10.1037//0003-066x.51.2.157
Male-Female Differences : A Computer Simulation
R. Martell (2003)
State of the Union Address
W. Clinton (2003)
White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack.
P. Mcintosh (2003)
10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.944
The role of intent and harm in judgments of prejudice and discrimination.
J. Swim (2003)
10.1111/J.1467-9221.2004.00402.X
A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo
J. Jost (2004)
10.1073/PNAS.0403723101
Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers.
L. Hong (2004)
10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416
Penalties for success: reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks.
M. Heilman (2004)
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed
JF Dovidio (2004)
Constructed Criteria. Redefining Merit to Justify Discrimination
E. Uhlmann (2005)
10.1037/0003-066X.60.9.950
Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science?: a critical review.
E. Spelke (2005)
10.1007/BF01173636
Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system
M. Mahoney (2005)
10.1126/SCIENCE.1113252
More Women in Science
J. Handelsman (2005)
Careers in science. More women in science
J Handelsman (2005)
10.1126/SCIENCE.1132154
Gender Similarities in Mathematics and Science
J. Hyde (2006)
10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01664.x
The Development of Implicit Attitudes
A. Baron (2006)
10.3386/W12691
Does Science Promote Women? Evidence from Academia 1973-2001
D. Ginther (2006)
Diversity. Gender similarities in mathematics and science
JS Hyde (2006)
10.1016/J.OBHDP.2007.07.001
"I think it, therefore it's true": Effects of self-perceived objectivity on hiring discrimination.
E. Uhlmann (2007)
Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal ? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination
C. Goldin (2007)
10.5465/AMP.2007.27895335
Making the Difference: Applying a Logic of Diversity
S. Page (2007)
Beyond Bias and Barriers : Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering
M. Cabbolet (2007)
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering
A. Agogino (2007)
10.1177/0002716206294796
The Use of Field Experiments for Studies of Employment Discrimination: Contributions, Critiques, and Directions for the Future
D. Pager (2007)
10.1002/hbm.20320
Neural correlates of automatic beliefs about gender and race
K. Knutson (2007)
The use of fi eld experiments for studies of employment discrimination : Contributions , critiques , and directions for the future
D Pager (2007)
Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology, eds
AL Holbrook (2007)
The science of gender differences in science and mathematics
DF Halpern (2007)
10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02079.x
Can an Angry Woman Get Ahead?
V. Brescoll (2008)
10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00454.x
Competent Yet Out in the Cold: Shifting Criteria for Hiring Reflect Backlash Toward Agentic Women
J. Phelan (2008)
Survey of Earned Doctorates (National Science Foundation
(2008)
Can angry women get ahead? Status conferral, gender, and workplace emotion expression
VL Brescoll (2008)
Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in
(2009)
Digest of Education Statistics 2008 (U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, Washington, DC), NCES Publ No 2009-020
TD Snyder (2009)
10.1016/J.JESP.2009.11.010
Identity salience moderates processing of group-relevant information
Angela T Maitner (2010)
10.1177/0963721410383241
Sex Differences in Math-Intensive Fields
S. Ceci (2010)
10.1037/A0018093
When men break the gender rules: Status incongruity and backlash against modest men.
C. Moss-Racusin (2010)
10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01561.x
Disruptions in Women's Self-Promotion: The Backlash Avoidance Model 1
C. Moss-Racusin (2010)
Graduate Enrollment and Degrees
N Bell (2010)
Gender differences in math-intensive fields
SJ Ceci (2010)
Graduate Enrollment and Degrees: 1999 to 2009 (Council of Graduate Schools
N Bell (2010)
Faculty Salary Equity: Still a Gender Gap?On Campus with Women 39(1)
JW Curtis (2010)
10.1080/1047840X.2011.619112
Do Subtle Cues About Belongingness Constrain Women's Career Choices?
S. Ceci (2011)
10.1111/J.2044-8325.2010.02008.X
Reducing the backlash effect: Self‐monitoring and women's promotions
O. A. O'Neill (2011)
10.1037/A0022953
The Impact of the Workshop Activity for Gender Equity Simulation in the Academy (WAGES-Academic) in Demonstrating Cumulative Effects of Gender Bias
S. Shields (2011)
10.1007/978-1-4419-7488-4_16
Handbook of Research Methods
F. Betz (2011)
10.1126/science.1204109
Graduate Students’ Teaching Experiences Improve Their Methodological Research Skills
D. Feldon (2011)
10.1177/1745691611406922
Whites See Racism as a Zero-Sum Game That They Are Now Losing
M. Norton (2011)
10.1126/science.1211704
Weaving a Richer Tapestry in Biomedical Science
L. Tabak (2011)
10.1073/pnas.1014871108
Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science
S. Ceci (2011)
10.1187/cbe.10-12-0145
Integrating Theory and Practice to Increase Scientific Workforce Diversity: A Framework for Career Development in Graduate Research Training
Angela Byars-Winston (2011)
10.1038/470153a
Science gender gap probed.
Gwyneth Dickey Zakaib (2011)
10.1080/1047840X.2011.607313
Ingroup Experts and Peers as Social Vaccines Who Inoculate the Self-Concept: The Stereotype Inoculation Model
N. Dasgupta (2011)
Seeing the unseen: Attention to daily encounters with sexism as way to reduce sexist beliefs
JC Becker (2011)
Gender discrimination in science is a myth Available at http:// www.nationalreview.com/articles/256816/gender-discrimination-science-myth-alex-b- berezow?pg=2
Ab Berezow (2011)
10.1177/0891243212451904
Gender Segregation in Elite Academic Science
E. Ecklund (2012)
10.3410/f.717956885.793462071
F1000Prime recommendation of Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students.
W. Hanna-Rose (2012)
10.1007/S11199-012-0181-Z
How to Talk about Gender Inequity in the Workplace: Using WAGES as an Experiential Learning Tool to Reduce Reactance and Promote Self-Efficacy
M. Zawadzki (2012)
10.1016/J.JESP.2011.10.008
Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders.
L. Rudman (2012)
10.1353/pbm.2012.0007
Interpreting Evidence: Why Values Can Matter As Much As Science
I. de Melo-Martín (2012)
Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Report to the President.
Steve Olson (2012)
10.1007/s11162-011-9247-y
From Gatekeeping to Engagement: A Multicontextual, Mixed Method Study of Student Academic Engagement in Introductory STEM Courses
Josephine A. Gasiewski (2012)
10.1037/A0028128
Promoting Institutional Change Through Bias Literacy.
M. Carnes (2012)
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, eds Devine P, Plant A (Elsevier
LA Rudman (2012)
Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics
President’s Council of Advisors on Science (2012)
41 | 16479 PSYCHOLOGICAL AND COGNITIVE SCIENCES
Moss-Racusin (2012)
Advances in telephone survey methodology
James M. Lepkowski ... et al. (2013)
10.1177/1075547012472684
The Matilda Effect in Science Communication
Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick (2013)
10.1017/CBO9780511996481
Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology: Author Index
H. Reis (2013)
10.1111/jeb.12198
Fewer invited talks by women in evolutionary biology symposia
J. Schroeder (2013)
10.1038/504211A
Bibliometrics: global gender disparities in science.
V. Larivière (2013)
10.1016/B978-0-12-382165-2.00285-3
National Academy of Sciences (NAS)
S. A. Cole (2013)
10.1038/495022a
Inequality quantified: Mind the gender gap
H. Shen (2013)
10.1038/NMIDDLEEAST.2013.33
Remove social barriers
L. Al-Gazali (2013)
10.3386/W19905
Collaborating with People Like Me: Ethnic Co-Authorship within the Us
R. Freeman (2014)
10.1073/pnas.1403334111
Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women
Jason M. Sheltzer (2014)
10.1177/1745691614527466
Rethinking the Baseline in Diversity Research
E. Apfelbaum (2014)
10.5334/JOPD.AA
Data from Paper “False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant”
J. Simmons (2014)
10.1073/pnas.1314788111
How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science
Ernesto Reuben (2014)
of Education (2014) Science, Technology, Engineering andMath: Education for Global Leadership
US Departmen (2014)
Productivity or Sexism? Inside Higher Education
S Jaschik (2014)
Social science. Scientific diversity interventions
CA Moss-Racusin (2014)
Cover story text. The text in the figure was viewed by participants in PDF format without additional supporting text
Fig
Gender discrimination in science is a myth
A B Berezow
Lab manager application materials (female student condition). The only differences in the male student condition were that the name "Jennifer" was replaced with "John
Fig
Available at http://classifications. carnegiefoundation.org/lookup_listings/srp.php?clq=%7B%22basic2005_ids%22%3A% 2215%22%7D&start_page=standard



This paper is referenced by
10.1007/978-3-030-51031-2
Closing the Gender Pay Gap in Medicine: A Roadmap for Healthcare Organizations and the Women Physicians Who Work for Them
A. Gottlieb (2021)
10.1016/J.BIOCON.2021.109134
Persistent gender bias in marine science and conservation calls for action to achieve equity
S. Giakoumi (2021)
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663252
Gender, Race and Parenthood Impact Academic Productivity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Survey to Action
F. Staniscuaski (2021)
10.1386/JEM_00036_1
Media representation and gender bias in science
Catherine Macdonald (2021)
10.1257/PANDP.20211027
Women in Academic Economics: Have We Made Progress?
D. Ginther (2021)
10.1353/rhe.2021.0012
Leveraging, Checking, and Structuring Faculty Discretion to Advance Full Participation
K. O’Meara (2021)
10.1177/00380385211028064
Promoting Diversity but Striving for Excellence: Opening the ‘Black Box’ of Academic Hiring
Julia Orupabo (2021)
10.1097/GME.0000000000001713
#Menopause on Instagram: a mixed-methods study.
Morgan E Arseneau (2021)
10.1093/SF/SOAB026
Highly Skilled Women Reaching the Top: A Cost-free Achievement? Analyzing the Gender Promotion Gap in the Medical Profession
C. Gaiaschi (2021)
10.1016/j.cmi.2021.03.022
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic puts the spotlight on gender inequality in clinical research
M. Søgaard (2021)
10.1021/ACS.JCHEMED.0C01037
College Chemistry Textbooks Fail on Gender Representation
M. L. Becker (2021)
10.1016/J.TIGE.2020.12.006
Forks in the Road—As Faced by Women in Gastroenterology
Jessica Bernica (2021)
Running Head: IMPLICIT BIAS IN BEHAVIOR 1 The Relationship of Implicit Social Cognition and Discriminatory Behavior
Tessa E. S. Charlesworth (2021)
10.1007/S10869-021-09747-2
Subtle Discrimination Overtakes Cognitive Resources and Undermines Performance
S. S. Walker (2021)
10.1017/qrd.2021.3
A large ‘discovery’ experiment: Gender Initiative for Excellence (Genie) at Chalmers University of Technology
Maria Saline (2021)
10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-140045
Gender bias in reference letters for residency and academic medicine: a systematic review
Shawn Khan (2021)
10.1177/0149206320982654
Bias in Context: Small Biases in Hiring Evaluations Have Big Consequences
Jay H. Hardy (2021)
10.1007/S40299-020-00546-6
Reasonable or Unwarranted? Benevolent Gender Prejudice in Education in China
Na Li (2021)
10.1187/cbe.20-11-0260
Meta-analysis of Gender Performance Gaps in Undergraduate Natural Science Courses.
Sarah B. Odom (2021)
10.1007/s10734-021-00683-x
Back out or hang on? An event history analysis of withdrawal from doctoral education in Germany
Steffen Jaksztat (2021)
10.3390/JOITMC7030182
Inclusively Recognizing Faculty Innovation and Entrepreneurship Impact within Promotion and Tenure Considerations
Jana Bouwma-Gearhart (2021)
10.1080/13611267.2021.1899588
Understanding what STEM mentoring ecosystems need to thrive: A STEM-ME framework
J. Mondisa (2021)
10.1007/s00113-021-01071-x
Traumberuf Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie – Dies kann auch für Frauen in Erfüllung gehen!
A. Bühren (2021)
10.1108/AJIM-05-2020-0170
Gender differences in the Israeli academia: a bibliometric analysis of different disciplines
Tzipi Cooper (2021)
10.1007/978-3-030-71855-8_3
Strategies for Applicants Belonging to Underrepresented Groups
C. Deville (2021)
10.1093/ornithapp/duab001
Juggling parenthood and ornithology: A full lifecycle approach to supporting mothers through the American Ornithological Society
S. Lerman (2021)
10.1101/2021.02.02.429450
The effect of mentee and mentor gender on scientific productivity of applicants for NIH training fellowships
Hao Yu (2021)
10.1007/978-3-030-81350-5_8
Transferability of Methods and Strategies for Advancing Gender Equality in Academia and Research: A Case Study of an Online Course Aimed at Academics and Professionals
Rita Bencivenga (2021)
10.20913/1815-3186-2021-1-25-42
Наука о науке
С. Фортунато (2021)
10.1002/SCE.21599
Intergroup dialogue: A justice‐centered pedagogy to address gender inequity in STEM
B. White (2021)
10.1007/S11109-021-09680-3
You’re Not From Here!: The Consequences of Urban and Rural Identities
J. Lyons (2021)
10.21203/RS.3.RS-142879/V1
The Impact of Gender on Researchers’ Assessment: A Randomized Controlled Trial
M. C. Franco (2021)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar