Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
Please confirm you are human
(Sign Up for free to never see this)
← Back to Search

Towards Analytic‐deliberative Forms Of Risk Governance In The UK? Reflecting On Learning In Radioactive Waste

J. Chilvers
Published 2007 · Sociology

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
While participatory forms of risk assessment and management have been the focus of much conceptualisation, experimentation, and evaluation, relatively less effort has gone into understanding how so called ‘analytic‐deliberative’ processes are developing across policy‐for‐real decision contexts. This paper develops a novel typology of citizen‐science interaction as a basis for analysing the nature and extent of recent participatory risk assessment practice in the UK. It draws on the reflections of professional actors operating across the UK environmental risk domain, focusing down on practice in the area of radioactive waste between 1998 and 2003. Compared with past science‐centred approaches, analysis shows an ‘opening up’ of risk decision processes to extended actors, knowledges, and values, with particular importance placed on public involvement in front‐end framing. This is being constrained by a failure to integrate engagement throughout decision processes, the exclusion of publics from assessing/evaluating environmental risks, and the upholding of a strict separation between citizens/science. These patterns of analytic‐deliberative practice — determined by contextual influences, barriers and challenges operating across UK environmental risk issue‐areas — highlight the need for further methodological development and systematic evaluation of relations between processes and outcomes.
This paper references
Opening Up Or Closing Down? Analysis, Participation And Power In The Social Appraisal Of Technology
A. Stirling (2005)
10.1086/592673
:Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States
E. Carlson (2008)
10.1088/0952-4746/17/3/020
Understanding Risk - Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society
Mary Morris (1997)
10.1080/1366987042000171285
Can we learn from failure? Examining US experiences with nuclear repository siting
W. Freudenburg (2003)
10.1177/0306312702032002003
The Third Wave of Science Studies
H. Collins (2002)
Citizens and specialists deliberate options for managing the UK's legacy intermediate and high level radio-active waste: A report of the Deliberative Mapping Trial, June-July 2004.
J. Burgess (2004)
Advice to Ministers on the Process for Formulation of Future Policy for the Long Term Management of UK Solid Radioactive Waste (London: Radioactive Waste Management Advisory Committee)
(2001)
10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8
Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation
O. Renn (1995)
10.1002/1099-1301(199907/09)1:3<119::AID-JEM20>3.0.CO;2-K
Risk at a turning point
A. Stirling (1999)
Democratizing Science In The Uk: The Case Of Radioactive Waste Management
J. Chilvers (2005)
Popular epidemiology: Community response to toxic waste-induced disease in
P Brown (1987)
10.2307/3324060
Rationality and ritual: The Windscale Inquiry and nuclear decisions in Britain
B. Wynne (1982)
Participation: the New Tyranny?
B. Cooke (2001)
Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process
Division on Earth (1983)
10.1068/c9s
Environmental Valuation Analysis, Public Deliberation, and their Pragmatic Syntheses: A Critical Appraisal
S. Niemeyer (2001)
10.1126/science.254.5038.1603
Perceived Risk, Trust, and the Politics of Nuclear Waste
P. Slovic (1991)
Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms, Science, Technology and Human Values
D Fiorino (1990)
10.1080/1366987042000171276
Some principles for siting controversy decisions: lessons from the US experience with high level nuclear waste
James F. Short, Jr. (2003)
European Governance: a white paper
(2001)
Participatory Technology Assessment: European Perspectives (London: Centre for the Study of Democracy, University of Westminster in association with TA Swiss)
S. Joss (2002)
10.1017/CBO9780511490972
Public Participation in Sustainability Science: A Handbook
W. Clark (2003)
10.1016/S0306-2619(99)00069-0
Nuclear power and the environment: comparative assessment of environmental and health impacts of electricity-generating systems
S. Rashad (2000)
Public Participation in Sustainability Science.
B. Kasemir (2003)
10.1177/0963662505056611
Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? public debate about transgenic crops
Gene Rowe (2005)
10.1126/SCIENCE.3563507
Perception of risk.
P. Slovic (1987)
Managing Radioactive Waste Safely: Proposals for Developing a Policy for Managing Radioactive Waste in the UK
Defra (2001)
Designing an Analytic Deliberative Process for Environmental Health Policy Making in the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Complex
S. Tuler (1999)
Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science
S. Funtowicz (1992)
Public participation in science : the role of consensus conferences in Europe
S. Joss (1995)
10.1017/S0020818300001442
Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination
P. M. Haas (1992)
10.1016/0025-326X(70)90168-2
Nuclear power and the environment
G. P. Howells (1970)
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00603.x
Using Surveys in Public Participation Processes for Risk Decision Making: The Case of the 2003 British GM Nation? Public Debate
Nick F. Pidgeon (2005)
10.4135/9781446219539.n4
Nuclear risks: three problematics
A. Irwin (2000)
Risk Society (London: Sage)
U. Beck (1992)
Radioactive Waste -Where Next?
(1997)
PCCRARM (Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management) (1997) Framework for Environmental Health Risk Management
10.3197/096327103129341298
Uncertainty and Participatory Democracy
L. Pellizzoni (2003)
Project ISOLUS Front End Consultation: Final Report (Lancaster: Centre for the Study of Environmental Change
(2001)
10.1016/S0040-1625(97)00075-9
Nuclear waste and future societies: A look into the deep future
S. Hora (1997)
10.1016/0195-9255(95)00043-E
Public Participation in Impact Assess-ment: A Social Learning Perspective
T. Webler (1986)
Public Deliberation: Pluralism
J Bohman (2000)
10.1007/S002670010160
What Is a Good Public Participation Process? Five Perspectives from the Public
T. Webler (2001)
Designing an analytic-deliberative process for environmental health policy making in the US nuclear weapons complex, Risk: Health
S. Tuler (1999)
10.1111/J.1539-6924.1999.TB00452.X
Performance assessments of nuclear waste repositories: a dialogue on their value and limitations.
R. Ewing (1999)
10.1068/c12s
Representing People, Representing Nature, Representing the World
J. O'Neill (2001)
Democratising science in the UK: The case of radioactive waste management
J. Chilvers (2005)
Participation: The New Tyranny? (London: Zed Books)
B. Cooke (2001)
Designing an Analytic-Deliberative Process for Environmental Health Policy Making: An Illustration from the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Complex
T. Webler (1999)
Participatory environmental risk policy-making in an age of uncertainty: UK actornetworks, social learning and effective practice, Unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of London
J. Chilvers (2004)
10.1177/03063127030333005
Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism
B. Wynne (2003)
10.1080/0964056022000024370
The Potential of Public Participation Geographic Information Systems in UK Environmental Planning: Appraisals by Active Publics
C. Harrison (2002)
10.1016/S0304-3894(01)00256-4
Prospects for public participation on nuclear risks and policy options: innovations in governance practices for sustainable development in the European Union.
M. O'Connor (2001)
10.1038/322768b0
Risk analysis
R. Wilson (1986)
10.1080/1366987042000171924
On the right track? Technology, geology and society in Swedish nuclear waste management
R. Lidskog (2004)
Citizen Science (London: Routledge)
A. Irwin (1995)
10.1177/030631299029006002
Computer Models and the Public's Understanding of Science
S. Yearley (1999)
Participatory Technology Assessment: European Perspectives (London: Centre for the Study of Democracy
S Joss (2002)
10.1080/136698798377321
Three decades of risk research: accomplishments and new challenges
O. Renn (1998)
10.1080/1366987042000158695
Barriers to participation and deliberation in risk decisions: evidence from waste management
J. Petts (2004)
Risk perception and communication unplugged
B. Fischhoff (1995)
10.1016/0959-3780(92)90017-2
Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm.
B. Wynne (1992)
10.1080/09640560120033713
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deliberative Processes: Waste Management Case-studies
J. Petts (2001)
Democratic Science: Enhancing the Role of Science in Stakeholder-Based Risk Management Decision-Making, a report for the American Industrial Health Council and the American Chemistry Council
G Charney (2000)
Partitioning and Transmutation Citizens' Panel, a report to UK Nirex Ltd (Lancaster: Centre for the Study of Environmental Change
J Hunt (2001)
BNFL National Stakeholder Dialogue: Spent Fuel Management Option Working Group
(2002)
Management of nuclear waste
L. Tombs (2000)
10.1111/1539-6924.00307
Evaluating citizen advisory boards: the importance of theory and participant-based criteria and practical implications.
S. Santos (2003)
10.1023/B:RIAN.0000005936.45310.22
Deliberation: Integrating Analytical Results into Environmental Decisions Involving Multiple Stakeholders
G. Apostolakis (1998)
Partitioning and Transmutation Citizens’ Panel, a report to UK Nirex Ltd (Lancaster: Centre for the Study of Environmental Change, Lancaster University)
J. Hunt (2001)
10.1177/0011392102050003010
Risk and Environment as Legitimatory Discourses of Technology: Reflexivity Inside Out?
B. Wynne (2002)
10.1068/a39279
Environmental Risk, Uncertainty, and Participation: Mapping an Emergent Epistemic Community
J. Chilvers (2008)
10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00014-X
The need for integration: risk policies require the input from experts, stakeholders and the public at large
O. Renn (2001)
10.3152/147154306781778551
Upping the ante: A conceptual framework for designing and evaluating participatory technology assessments
J. Burgess (2006)
10.1088/0963-6625/6/4/004
The public—expert interface in local waste management decisions: expertise, credibility and process
J. Petts (1997)
10.1007/BF00999716
Public participation in decision making: A three-step procedure
O. Renn (1993)
10.1111/0272-4332.T01-1-00008
A procedural evaluation of an analytic-deliberative process: the Columbia River Comprehensive Impact Assessment.
Aimee Guglielmo Kinney (2002)
Fairness and competence in citizen participation : evaluating models for environmental discourse
O. Renn (1995)
10.1080/13669870110051534
Communication and information in France's underground laboratory siting process: clarity of procedure, ambivalence of effects
Yannick Barthe (2001)
10.1068/c8s
A Novel Approach to the Appraisal of Technological Risk: A Multicriteria Mapping Study of a Genetically Modified Crop
A. Stirling (2001)
Participatory Risk Assessment: Involving Lay Audiences in Environmental Decisions on Risk
J Petts (2003)
10.1016/J.HEALTHPLACE.2004.08.005
Challenging the 'view from nowhere': citizen reflections on specialist expertise in a deliberative process.
G. Davies (2004)
Popular epidemiology: Community response to toxic waste-induced disease in Woburn, Massachusetts
P. Brown (1987)
10.1088/0963-6625/10/1/301
Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences
A. Irwin (2001)
10.4135/9781446221983.n3
May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide.
B. Wynne (2004)
10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00116-6
Facts and values in risk assessment
F. Cross (1998)
Managing Scientific and Technical Information In Environmental Cases
P. Adler (2000)
What is a good participation process? Five perspectives from the public
T. Webler (2001)
Benchmarking Public Opinion on the Management of Radioactive Waste, Defra report no DEFRA/RAS/02.012 (London: Defra)
J. Kelly (2002)
10.1177/016224399001500204
Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms
Daniel J. Fiorino (1990)
Science and Innovation Investment Framework
Hm Treasury (2004)
10.2307/589151
Science and Society
H. Rose (1969)
Benchmarking Public Opinion on the Management of Radioactive Waste
J Kelly (2002)
Participatory environmental risk policy-making in an age of uncertainty : UK actor-networks, social learning and effective practice
J. Chilvers (2004)
10.1080/1366987042000176235
A ‘post‐foundational’ interpretation of risk: risk as ‘performance’
S. Healy (2004)
10.1177/1075547004273091
Report: UK GM Dialogue
F. Barbagallo (2005)
10.5860/choice.34-5341
Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy
J. Bohman (1996)
Risk As Globalising "Democratic" Discourse? Framing Subjects And Citizens
B. Wynne (2006)
Participatory Risk Assessment: Involving Lay Audiences in Environmental Decisions on Risk, R&D Technical Report E2-043/TR01 (Bristol: Environment Agency)
J. Petts (2003)
10.1111/J.1539-6924.1995.TB00308.X
Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process.
B. Fischhoff (1995)
10.1080/136698799376989
The craft and theory of public participation: a dialectical process
Thomas Webler (1999)
Public Participation in Sustainability Science (Cambridge
B. Kasemir (2003)
10.1353/CJS.2006.0048
Science and citizens : globalization and the challenge of engagement
M. Leach (2006)
Participatory technology assessment: European perspectives
S. Joss (2002)
10.4135/9781452231389.N10
Joint Fact-Finding and the Use of Technical Experts
John R. Ehrmann (1999)
Radioactivity Monitoring at Brent Yard Railway Sidings, Willesden (London: The Environment Council)
(2001)



This paper is referenced by
10.1007/978-981-13-8600-8
Resilient Policies in Asian Cities: Adaptation to Climate Change and Natural Disasters
M. Tanaka (2020)
10.2202/1944-4079.1044
Opening up or Closing Down Radioactive Waste Management Policy? Debates on Reversibility and Retrievability in Finland, France, and the United Kingdom
M. Lehtonen (2010)
10.1068/a39279
Environmental Risk, Uncertainty, and Participation: Mapping an Emergent Epistemic Community
J. Chilvers (2008)
10.1080/13669870802519455
Ethical assessment in radioactive waste management: a proposed reflective equilibrium‐based deliberative approach
M. Cotton (2009)
10.1080/17597269.2014.913902
Acceptance of Brazilian ethanol fuel and the role of expertise
M. Lehtonen (2014)
Improving participation of the public in coastal flood management : a case study from the Suffolk coast, UK
Jacqueline Smith (2013)
Chapter 15: Designing an effective sustainability assessment process
Alan Bond (2013)
Governing a nuclear megainvestment : a multi-scalar ethnography of Wylfa Newydd
M. Fabók (2016)
10.1080/09505430902870591
Doing Dialogue: Genre and Flexibility in Public Engagement with Science
S. R. Davies (2009)
10.1080/13669877.2011.587886
The practice of risk governance: lessons from the field
Åsa Boholm (2012)
10.1111/RISA.12977
Risk Assessment and Risk Governance of Liquefied Natural Gas Development in Gladstone, Australia
R. V. D. Vegt (2018)
A Dynamic Typology of Stakeholder Engagement within Climate Change Research:Tyndall Working paper 128
S. Carney (2008)
Capturing public views on complex and unfamiliar goods : chemical water pollution in England and Wales
J. Atherton (2019)
10.1007/978-981-13-8600-8_10
Knowledge Co-production Processes for Building Disaster Resilience of Communities in Coastal Areas: A Case Study of Baler, Aurora, Philippines
P. Orencio (2020)
Cruise infrastructure development networks: power, politics and cohesion
W. London (2017)
10.1016/j.wasman.2017.04.022
A conceptual framework for negotiating public involvement in municipal waste management decision-making in the UK.
K. Garnett (2017)
10.1177/0309132507084403
Qualitative methods II: minding the gap
G. Davies (2008)
10.1177/0270467618824027
Assessing Quality of Stakeholder Engagement: From Bureaucracy to Democracy
Y. Tomkiv (2017)
10.1080/13669871003703252
Functional‐dynamic public participation in technological decision‐making: site selection processes of nuclear waste repositories
P. Krütli (2010)
10.1111/J.1365-2664.2009.01623.X
A novel, integrated approach to assessing social, economic and environmental implications of changing rural land-use: A case study of perennial biomass crops
A. Haughton (2009)
10.1177/0309133311420941
Environmental decision making and an ecosystems approach
R. Fish (2011)
10.1080/00343404.2010.485181
Learning How to Deal with Values, Frames and Governance in Sustainability Appraisal
A. Bond (2011)
10.1177/01622439073075941
Deliberating Competence
Jason Chilvers (2008)
Let them brew! Reflexivity, and division of labour in deliberation for science and technology governance
Yun Jeong Lee (2014)
10.1068/a40334
Power Relations: The Politics of Risk and Procedure in Nuclear Waste Governance
J. Chilvers (2008)
Citizen Science: Framing the Public, Information Exchange, and Communication in Crowdsourced Science
Todd Suomela (2014)
10.1080/13669877.2017.1351466
A literature review on the relationship between risk governance and public engagement in relation to complex environmental issues
R. G. van der Vegt (2018)
10.1080/13669877.2017.1351466
A literature review on the relationship between risk governance and public engagement in relation to complex environmental issues
R. V. D. Vegt (2018)
10.1177/0162243907307594
Deliberating Competence
J. Chilvers (2008)
10.1556/TARSKUT.26.2008.2.4
A Víz Keretirányelv bevezetése Magyarországon: Mintaprojekt a Felső-Tisza-régióban
A. Vari (2008)
10.1177/0095399720944064
Administration of Community Participation in Small-Scale Projects: Brownfield Remediation in Los Angeles:
H. Campbell (2020)
10.1007/S11213-008-9107-7
Analytic and Dynamic Approach to Collaboration: A Transdisciplinary Case Study on Sustainable Landscape Development in a Swiss Prealpine Region
M. Stauffacher (2008)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar