Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
Please confirm you are human
(Sign Up for free to never see this)
← Back to Search

Improving Patient Satisfaction In The Orthopaedic Trauma Population

B. Morris, Justin E. Richards, K. Archer, Melissa Lasater, Denise Rabalais, M. Sethi, A. A. Jahangir
Published 2014 · Medicine

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Objectives: Patient satisfaction is a key determinant of the quality of care and an important component of pay for performance metrics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a simple intervention aimed to increase patients' understanding of their orthopaedic trauma surgeon and improve patient satisfaction with the overall quality of inpatient care delivered by the attending surgeon. Design: Prospective quality improvement initiative using a randomized intervention. Setting: Level 1 academic trauma center. Patients/Participants: Two hundred twelve patients were eligible; 100 patients were randomized to the intervention group, and 112 patients were randomized to the control group. Overall, 76 patients could be reached for follow-up satisfaction survey, including 34 patients in the intervention group and 42 patients in the control group. Intervention: Patients randomized to the intervention group received an attending biosketch card, which included a picture of the attending orthopaedic surgeon with a brief synopsis of his educational background, specialty, surgical interests, and research interests. Main Outcome Measures: Our primary outcome measure was a patient satisfaction survey assessing patients’ rating of the overall quality of inpatient care delivered by the attending surgeon. Results: Overall, 25 (74%) of 34 patients who received an attending biosketch card reported “excellent overall quality of doctor care,” whereas only 22 (52%) of 42 patients in the control group reported “excellent overall quality of doctor care” (P = 0.05). Age, gender, race, education, insurance status, primary injury type, and the length of hospital stay were not significant with reference to “excellent” outcome. Conclusions: Clinically significant improvements in satisfaction with the overall quality of inpatient care by the attending surgeon were identified in patients who received a biosketch card of his or her attending orthopaedic surgeon. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
This paper references
Correction: Patients' Global Ratings of Their Health Care Are Not Associated with the Technical Quality of Their Care
J. Chang (2006)
Hospital care quality information from the consumer perspective.
Rosiland Harrington (2013)
CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials
K. Schulz (2010)
Ability of hospitalized patients to identify their in-hospital physicians.
V. Arora (2009)
Predictors of patient and surgeon satisfaction after orthopaedic trauma.
I. Harris (2009)
Increasing a patient's ability to identify his or her attending physician using a patient room display.
M. Maniaci (2010)
Factors That Influence Provider Selection for Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty
K. Bozic (2013)
Patient satisfaction associated with correct identification of physician's photographs.
J. J. Francis (2001)
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
K. Schulz (2010)
Communication discrepancies between physicians and hospitalized patients.
Douglas P. Olson (2010)
Lewis Blackman Hospital Patient Safety Act.
J. Raymond (2009)
The effects of physician communications skills on patient satisfaction; recall, and adherence.
E. Bartlett (1984)
Department of Health and Environmental Control. Lewis Blackman Hospital Patient Safety Act [Web site
South Carolina (2012)
Hospital inpatient valuebased purchasing program [Web site
Medicare amp Medicaid Centers For

This paper is referenced by
Patient comprehension of hip arthroscopy: an investigation of health literacy
G. Waryasz (2020)
Understanding and Improving Patient Satisfaction in Orthopaedic Surgical Procedures: A Review
P. J. Johnson (2019)
CORR Insights(®): do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures?
J. Shantz (2015)
Responsiveness and Internal Validity of Common Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
A. Sciascia (2017)
On the Growing Opportunity to Use Sentiment Analysis to Support Artificial Intelligence Applications in Healthcare
David B. Fogel (2019)
Satisfaction with spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section at Tembisa Hospital, South Africa: a cross-sectional study
U. M. Makoko (2019)
Is Satisfaction Among Orthopaedic Trauma Patients Predicted by Depression and Activation Levels?
Elisa J Knutsen (2015)
Managing Emergency Department Risk Through Communication and Documentation.
Omar Z Maniya (2020)
CORR Insights®: Do 360-degree Feedback Survey Results Relate to Patient Satisfaction Measures?
J. S. Slade Shantz (2015)
Quality and Patient Safety Indicators in Trauma and Emergency Surgery: National and Global Considerations
J. Bohnen (2018)
Factors associated with clinical trials that fail and opportunities for improving the likelihood of success: A review
D. Fogel (2018)
Development and Validation of a Survey to Evaluate Patient Satisfaction with Clinical Orthopaedic Assessment
Stuart Waters (2017)
Patient Comprehension of Carpal Tunnel Surgery
G. Waryasz (2017)
Novel approach to improve patient satisfaction in the outpatient clinic setting.
C. Donnally (2019)
Multimedia Campaign Enhances Orthopaedic Patient Perceptions of Health Care Quality: A Prospective Analysis of Effect at a Military Treatment Facility.
Andrew J Sheean (2017)
Pay-for-performance in orthopedics: how we got here and where we are going
Ashton H. Goldman (2017)
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar