Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.

Specimen-Specific Nonlinear Finite Element Modeling To Predict Vertebrae Fracture Loads After Vertebroplasty

Y. Matsuura, H. Giambini, Y. Ogawa, Z. Fang, A. Thoreson, M. Yaszemski, L. Lu, K. An
Published 2014 · Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
Study Design. Vertebral fracture load and stiffness from a metastatic vertebral defect model were predicted using nonlinear finite element models (FEM) and validated experimentally. Objective. The study objective was to develop and validate an FEM-based tool for predicting polymer-augmented lytic vertebral fracture load and stiffness and the influence of metastatic filling materials. Summary of Background Data. Percutaneous vertebroplasty has the potential to reduce vertebral fracture risk affected with lytic metastases by providing mechanical stabilization. However, it has been shown that the mismatch in mechanical properties between poly(methyl-methacrylate) (PMMA) and bone induces secondary fractures and intervertebral disc degeneration. A biodegradable copolymer, poly(propylene fumarate-co-caprolactone) (P(PF-co-CL)), has been shown to possess the appropriate mechanical properties for bone defect repair. Methods. Simulated metastatic lytic defects were created in 40 cadaveric vertebral bodies, which were randomized into 4 groups: intact vertebral body (intact), simulated defect without treatment (negative), defect treated with P(PF-co-CL) (copolymer), and defect treated with PMMA (PMMA). Spines were imaged with quantitative computed tomography (QCT), and QCT/FEM-subject-specific, nonlinear models were created. Predicted fracture loads and stiffness were identified and compared with experimentally measured values using Pearson correlation analysis and paired t test. Results. There was no significant difference between the measured and predicted fracture loads and stiffness for each group. Predicted fracture loads were larger for PMMA augmentation (3960 N [1371 N]) than that for the copolymer, negative and intact groups (3484 N [1497 N], 3237 N [1744 N], and 1747 N [702 N]). A similar trend was observed in the predicted stiffness. Moreover, predicted and experimental fracture loads were strongly correlated (R2 = 0.78), whereas stiffness showed moderate correlation (R2 = 0.39). Conclusion. QCT/FEM was successful for predicting fracture loads of metastatic, polymer-augmented vertebral bodies. Overall, we have demonstrated that QCT/FEM may be a useful tool for predicting in situ vertebral fracture load resulting from vertebroplasty. Level of Evidence: N/A
This paper references
10.1016/0021-9290(94)90056-6
Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone.
T. Keller (1994)
10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2005.07.013
Synthesis and characterizations of biodegradable and crosslinkable poly(epsilon-caprolactone fumarate), poly(ethylene glycol fumarate), and their amphiphilic copolymer.
Shanfeng Wang (2006)
10.1115/1.2835085
Finite element analysis of vertebral body mechanics with a nonlinear microstructural model for the trabecular core.
D. Overaker (1999)
10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00128-3
An in vitro biomechanical evaluation of bone cements used in percutaneous vertebroplasty.
S. Belkoff (1999)
10.1021/bm7012313
Photo-cross-linked hybrid polymer networks consisting of poly(propylene fumarate) and poly(caprolactone fumarate): controlled physical properties and regulated bone and nerve cell responses.
Shanfeng Wang (2008)
10.1007/s00198-008-0750-8
Assessment of vertebral fracture risk and therapeutic effects of alendronate in postmenopausal women using a quantitative computed tomography-based nonlinear finite element method
K. Imai (2008)
10.1016/j.ejmp.2009.08.002
Noninvasive prediction of vertebral body compressive strength using nonlinear finite element method and an image based technique.
Ahad Zeinali (2010)
10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00086-0
Parametric finite element analysis of vertebral bodies affected by tumors.
C. Whyne (2001)
10.2106/00004623-197759070-00021
The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure.
D. Carter (1977)
[Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty].
P. Galibert (1987)
10.1163/092050610X487765
Cross-linking Characteristics and Mechanical Properties of an Injectable Biomaterial Composed of Polypropylene Fumarate and Polycaprolactone Co-polymer
Jun Yan (2011)
10.1097/00007632-200107150-00008
An Ex Vivo Biomechanical Evaluation of a Hydroxyapatite Cement for Use With Vertebroplasty
S. Belkoff (2001)
10.3322/caac.21166
Cancer statistics, 2013
R. Siegel (2013)
10.1097/01.bsd.0000172362.15103.e8
Stability of the Metastatic Spine Pre and Post Vertebroplasty
H. Ahn (2006)
Does vertebroplasty cause incident vertebral fractures? A review of available data.
A. Trout (2006)
10.1016/J.SPINEE.2005.03.011
Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty with calcium sulfate cement in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model.
A. Perry (2005)
10.1097/SPC.0b013e32833d2fdd
Management of metastatic spine disease
Mohammed Eleraky (2010)
Subsequent vertebral fractures after vertebroplasty: association with intraosseous clefts.
A. Trout (2006)
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31811ea2ee
A Biomechanical Investigation of Vertebroplasty in Osteoporotic Compression Fractures and in Prophylactic Vertebral Reinforcement
N. Furtado (2007)
10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.08.002
Current and emerging concepts in non-invasive and minimally invasive management of spine metastasis.
A. Bhatt (2013)
10.1097/BRS.0b013e318074d4b9
The Influence of Endplate-to-Endplate Cement Augmentation on Vertebral Strength and Stiffness in Vertebroplasty
J. Steens (2007)
New fractures after vertebroplasty: adjacent fractures occur significantly sooner.
A. Trout (2006)
10.1097/00007632-199001000-00001
Spinal Metastases: The Obvious, the Occult, and the Impostors
D. Wong (1990)
10.1097/01.brs.0000225993.57349.df
Nonlinear Finite Element Model Predicts Vertebral Bone Strength and Fracture Site
K. Imai (2006)
10.1007/s005860000204
Augmentation of mechanical properties in osteoporotic vertebral bones – a biomechanical investigation of vertebroplasty efficacy with different bone cements
P. Heini (2001)
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a55636
Prediction of Vertebral Strength Under Loading Conditions Occurring in Activities of Daily Living Using a Computed Tomography-Based Nonlinear Finite Element Method
T. Matsumoto (2009)
10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0275
Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable and biodegradable copolymer P(PF-co-CL) in a cadaveric vertebral body defect model.
Z. Fang (2014)
10.1227/NEU.0b013e31821cc499
Premature Adjacent Vertebral Fracture After Vertebroplasty: A Biomechanical Study
D. Fahim (2011)
10.1097/00007632-199909010-00004
Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures.
A. G. Tohmeh (1999)
10.1002/JOR.1100160305
Computed tomography‐based finite element analysis predicts failure loads and fracture patterns for vertebral sections
M. Silva (1998)
10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00185-1
Quantitative computed tomography estimates of the mechanical properties of human vertebral trabecular bone
D. Kopperdahl (2002)
10.1097/BSD.0b013e318040ad73
Biomechanical Evaluation of an Injectable Radiopaque Polypropylene Fumarate Cement for Kyphoplasty in a Cadaveric Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture Model
C. Kim (2007)
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3993
In Vivo Assessment of Lumbar Vertebral Strength in Elderly Women Using Computed Tomography-Based Nonlinear Finite Element Model
K. Imai (2008)
10.1097/00007632-199908010-00004
The use of an injectable, biodegradable calcium phosphate bone substitute for the prophylactic augmentation of osteoporotic vertebrae and the management of vertebral compression fractures.
B. Bai (1999)
10.1126/science.996549
Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate.
D. Carter (1976)
10.1016/S8756-3282(03)00210-2
Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography.
R. Crawford (2003)
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.04.042
On prediction of the strength levels and failure patterns of human vertebrae using quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-based finite element method.
Majid Mirzaei (2009)
10.1016/j.spinee.2011.02.012
An ex vivo exothermal and mechanical evaluation of two-solution bone cements in vertebroplasty.
D. C. Rodrigues (2011)
10.1097/00007632-200101150-00008
An Ex Vivo Biomechanical Evaluation of an Inflatable Bone Tamp Used in the Treatment of Compression Fracture
S. Belkoff (2001)
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181abc150
Adjacent Vertebral Body Fracture Following Vertebroplasty With Polymethylmethacrylate or Calcium Phosphate Cement: Biomechanical Evaluation of the Cadaveric Spine
Shinya Nouda (2009)



This paper is referenced by
10.1007/s11517-015-1348-x
Specimen-specific vertebral fracture modeling: a feasibility study using the extended finite element method
H. Giambini (2015)
10.1007/s10439-017-1883-8
Methodology to Produce Specimen-Specific Models of Vertebrae: Application to Different Species
Fernando Y. Zapata-Cornelio (2017)
10.1007/978-3-319-20777-3_4
Finite Element Analysis
Mehmet Yetmez (2016)
10.1080/10255842.2020.1754808
Effect of metastatic lesion size and location on the load-bearing capacity of vertebrae using an optimized ash density-modulus equation
S. Saldarriaga (2020)
10.4236/JBISE.2017.1010034
Use of Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Bone Density to Investigate the Biomechanical Effect in the Bone around Intervertebral Cages in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Tatsuya Sato (2017)
10.1186/s13018-018-0898-7
Finite element analysis of the femoral diaphysis of fresh-frozen cadavers with computed tomography and mechanical testing
Yasushi Wako (2018)
10.1115/1.4034172
Quantitative Computed Tomography Protocols Affect Material Mapping and Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Finite-Element Analysis Predicted Stiffness.
H. Giambini (2016)
10.1007/s10439-020-02595-w
Density-Dependent Material and Failure Criteria Equations Highly Affect the Accuracy and Precision of QCT/FEA-Based Predictions of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture Properties
M. Prado (2020)
10.1117/12.2244610
Lumbar spinal finite element analysis in a gravity environment
Kerun Li (2016)
10.1089/ten.TEC.2016.0078
Noninvasive Failure Load Prediction of Vertebrae with Simulated Lytic Defects and Biomaterial Augmentation.
H. Giambini (2016)
10.4236/jbise.2018.114005
Biomechanical Effects of Implant Materials on Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Polyetheretherketone and Titanium Spacers Using Finite Element Analysis and Considering Bone Density
Tatsuya Sato (2018)
10.1186/s12891-018-1953-6
Biomechanical effects of metastasis in the osteoporotic lumbar spine: A Finite Element Analysis
G. Salvatore (2018)
10.1007/978-3-319-95708-1
Rehabilitation Science in Context
M. Pokorski (2018)
10.1007/s00701-016-2705-8
Biomechanical evaluation of fixation strength among different sizes of pedicle screws using the cortical bone trajectory: what is the ideal screw size for optimal fixation?
Keitaro Matsukawa (2016)
10.1142/S021951941750107X
A REVIEW ON BIOMECHANICAL ASPECTS OF VERTEBROPLASTY AND KYPHOPLASTY USING FINITE ELEMENT MODELING-BASED METHODS
Nima Jamshidi (2017)
10.1007/5584_2018_192
Effects of Breast and Prostate Cancer Metastases on Lumbar Spine Biomechanics: Rapid In Silico Evaluation.
Jacek Lorkowski (2018)
10.1016/j.bone.2019.115100
Dual-energy estimates of volumetric bone mineral densities in the lumbar spine using quantitative computed tomography better correlate with fracture properties when compared to single-energy BMD outcomes.
Simon Cataño Jimenez (2019)
10.3390/medicina56020056
Development of a Knee Joint CT-FEM Model in Load Response of the Stance Phase During Walking Using Muscle Exertion, Motion Analysis, and Ground Reaction Force Data
Kunihiro Watanabe (2020)
10.1002/jor.24117
Case‐specific non‐linear finite element models to predict failure behavior in two functional spinal units
Karlijn H J Groenen (2018)
10.1155/2017/5707568
Effects of Scan Resolutions and Element Sizes on Bovine Vertebral Mechanical Parameters from Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Finite Element Analysis
Meng Zhang (2017)
The Experimental Assessment of Hexagonal Porous Structure in Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty
Seyed Aref Hosseini Faradonbeh (2015)
Prediction of the risk of vertebral fracture in patients with metastatic bone lesions as a tool for more effective patients' management
Ferreira Costa (2018)
10.1007/s11517-018-1844-x
Optimizing bone cement stiffness for vertebroplasty through biomechanical effects analysis based on patient-specific three-dimensional finite element modeling
Yi Peng (2018)
Spinal (in)stability in metastatic bone disease. Experimental, computational, and clinical perspectives
K.H.J. Groenen (2018)
Simulation of the Fatigue Performance of Spinal Vertebrae
Ruth Helen Coe (2018)
10.1053/J.SEMSS.2017.09.008
What is the future of patient-specific vertebral fracture prediction?
Hugo Giambini (2017)
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103399
Mechanical testing setups affect spine segment fracture outcomes.
A. Rezaei (2019)
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar