Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.

A Randomized Prospective Multicenter Trial Of Pancreaticoduodenectomy With And Without Routine Intraperitoneal Drainage?

Tanka Prasad Bohara
Published 2016 · Medicine
Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
To the Editor: I would like to congratulate George Van Buren and colleague for presenting level I evidence on the controversial topic of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). With a randomized prospective multicenter trial they concluded that omission of intraperitoneal drainage in all cases of PD increases the frequency and severity of all complications. Omitting intraperitoneal drainage after PD is well described in retrospective studies and a single-center randomized controlled trial (RCT). Soft pancreas, small pancreatic duct diameter, prolonged operative time, blood loss more than 1000 mL, ampullary, duodenal, and bile duct pathology are known risk factors for the development of postoperative pancreatic fistula and other complications. The retrospective studies are prone to have selection bias and there is a high probability that the patients without these high-risk factors for pancreatic leak were the ones in whom the intraperitoneal drain was avoided. The only other prospective RCT had concluded that the trial failed to show a reduction in the number of death or complications with the addition of intraperitoneal closed suction drainage after pancreatic resection and therefore routine placement of drain is unnecessary. However, in the results there is no mention of the distribution of risk factors (texture of pancreas, pancreatic duct diameter) between 2 groups. My question to the authors is ‘‘how ethical is it to conduct an RCT and place the patients with known risk factors for postoperative complications at risk of developing postoperative morbidity and mortality?’’ The first step in management of pancreaticoenteric anastomosis leak is drainage. We all are aware that intraoperatively placed intraperitoneal drain does drain the high amylase containing fluid most of the time though drains fail sometimes. An experienced pancreatic surgeon would know during operation that this patient is likely to develop pancreatic leak and other complications. I am not
This paper references

This paper is referenced by
The drain fluid amylase level on the first postoperative day predicts pancreatic fistula in chronic pancreatitis patients undergoing Frey procedure
Vijayaraj Pavankumar (2019)
Canadian practice patterns for pancreaticoduodenectomy.
D. P. Cyr (2015)
Perioperative aspects of pancreaticoduodenectomy
C Williamsson (2017)
Value of Peritoneal Drain Placement After Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Multi-institutional Analysis from the US Gastric Cancer Collaborative
Gregory C. Dann (2015)
Pancreaticoduodenectomy Without Drains : Interpretation of the Evidence Reply
Results of a randomized controlled trial comparing closed‐suction drains versus passive gravity drains after pancreatic resection☆, ☆☆
F. Čečka (2018)
A Normal Preoperative Lipase Serum Level Is an Easy and Objective Risk Factor of Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Johan Gagnière (2017)
Surgical Therapy for Pancreatic and Periampullary Cancer.
John B Ammori (2016)
Risk of pancreatic fistula after enucleation of pancreatic tumours.
Oliver Strobel (2015)
Advantages and Disadvantages of Prophylactic Abdominal Drainage in Distal Pancreatectomy
Suguru Yamashita (2015)
Evolution of oncosurgical management of pancreatic cancer
U Klaiber (2019)
Fifty consecutive pancreatectomies without mortality
Lio (2016)
A novel risk scoring system reliably predicts readmission after pancreatectomy.
V. Valero (2015)
Does more than a single chest tube for mediastinal drainage affect outcomes after cardiac surgery?
Jeffrey Le (2015)
The Combination of Pancreas Texture and Postoperative Serum Amylase in Predicting Pancreatic Fistula Risk
Crystal B Chen (2018)
Techniques of Pancreatic Resection for Cancer
K. Soares (2019)
Enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review of the evidence.
Daniel Jonathan Kagedan (2015)
Advances in Gastrointestinal Surgery
Tapan Chattopadhyay (2015)
Abdominal drainage versus no drainage after distal pancreatectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Joni Kaiser (2019)
The challenge of post-operative peritonitis after gastrointestinal surgery
M. Sartelli (2015)
Is peritoneal drainage essential after pancreatic surgery?
Lu Huan (2017)
Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Pancreatoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Recommendations 2019
E. Melloul (2020)
The Value of Drains as a Fistula Mitigation Strategy for Pancreatoduodenectomy: Something for Everyone? Results of a Randomized Prospective Multi-institutional Study
M. McMillan (2014)
Serum amylase and C-reactive protein in risk stratification of pancreas-specific complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Lavanniya K Palani Velu (2016)
Surgery for Pancreatic and Periampullary Carcinoma
Abhishek Mitra (2015)
Early biliary complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy: prevalence and risk factors.
Brice Malgras (2016)
Predicting Post-Pancreatoduodenectomy Complications - Is it Possible?
Savio George Barreto (2016)
What are the predictors that can help identify safe removal of drains following pancreatectomy?
Emanuel Eguia (2018)
Orlando Jorge Martins Torres (2017)
Pancreatic Fistula and Delayed Gastric Emptying After Pancreatectomy: Where do We Stand?
A. Javed (2015)
Clinical significance of drain fluid culture after pancreaticoduodenectomy
Feng Yang (2018)
Anastomotic Leakage after Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery: Surgical Treatment
Richard J. Hummel (2017)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar