Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.

Relaparoscopy In Minor Bile Leakage After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Alternative Approach?

A. R. Barband, F. Kakaei, A. Daryani, M. B. A. Fakhree
Published 2011 · Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
Purpose: Bile leakage is one of the most important complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and it has been recognized as a major clinical challenge during the last 2 decades. Although endoscopic and percutaneous interventions are widely accepted in the management of bile leakage, relaparoscopy permits the bile drainage adequately and gives direct control of bile leakage site in selected patients. Methods: Data for patients with minor bile leakage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy were collected from January 2001 to January 2010. Patients were categorized in 2 groups, nonoperative and relaparoscopy. Clinical presentation, kind of management, and outcomes were evaluated in 2 groups. Results: After a total of 2652 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, postoperative minor bile leakage occurred in 17 (0.64%) patients. Four patients with minimal leakage were managed by percutaneous drainage alone. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was applied to 4 patients with jaundice, high output bile fistula, and a patient with retained common bile duct stone. Bile leakage was controlled in 3 of the 4 patients. There were 9 patients in the relaparoscopic group to which 1 patient was added after unsuccessful endoscopic intervention. The source of bile leakage in the relaparoscopic cases was defined as 50% from cystic duct stump and 50% from Luschka or accessory ducts. The success rate of bile leakage control after relaparoscopy was 90%. The mean of hospital stay after relaparoscopy was 3 days (range, 2–10 d) and after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography intervention or percutaneous drainage was 10 days (range, 3–28 d). Conclusions: Relaparoscopy is an effective procedure in the management of minor bile leakage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and can be an alternative approach in selected situations.
This paper references
10.1016/S0016-5107(04)02799-3
Postcholecystectomy bile leak: what is the optimal treatment?
Christopher S. Huang (2005)
10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181685834
An Experience With 1000 Consecutive Cystic Duct Ligation in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
V. Golash (2008)
The Southern Surgeons Club: A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies
(1991)
10.1002/bjs.5266
Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
S. Connor (2006)
10.1007/s00268-004-7652-5
Heterogeneity of Subvesical Ducts or the Ducts of Luschka: A Study Using Drip-infusion Cholangiography-Computed Tomography in Patients and Cadaver Specimens
M. Kitami (2004)
Laparoscopic electrosugery
RC Odell (1993)
10.1136/gut.38.1.141
Treatment of bile duct lesions after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
J. Bergman (1996)
10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00345-7
Relaparoscopy for the detection and treatment of complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
S. Dexter (2000)
10.1016/S0016-5107(04)01892-9
Endoscopic therapy for bile leak based on a new classification: results in 207 patients.
G. Sandha (2004)
Minimaly invasive management of bile leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
G Tzovaras (2001)
10.1016/S0016-5107(97)70270-0
Postcholecystectomy biliary leaks in the laparoscopic era: risk factors, presentation, and management. McGill Gallstone Treatment Group.
A. Barkun (1997)
10.1056/nejm199111213252117
Correction: A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies.
J. Barone (1991)
10.1016/S0016-5107(98)70324-4
Endoscopic intervention for biliary leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter review.
M. E. Ryan (1998)
10.1007/s004649900256
Bile leakage following laparoscopic cholecystectomy
R. Cohen (1996)
10.1055/S-2007-1004193
Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: a review.
M. Freeman (1997)
10.1097/01.sla.0000161029.27410.71
Surgical Management of Bile Duct Injuries Sustained During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Perioperative Results in 200 Patients
J. Sicklick (2005)
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.10.019
Laparoscopic diagnosis and treatment of postoperative complications.
B. Kirshtein (2009)
10.1046/J.1365-2168.2000.01679-2.X
Role of relaparoscopy in the management of minor bile leakage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
M. Saad (2000)
An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
S. Strasberg (1995)
10.1080/136518201317077189
Minimally invasive management of bile leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
G. Tzovaras (2001)
10.1001/JAMA.289.13.1639
Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy.
D. Flum (2003)
10.1016/S0016-5107(04)02468-X
Impact of endoscopic intervention in 100 patients with suspected postcholecystectomy bile leak.
A. Kaffes (2005)
10.1007/s00464-004-2253-9
An audit of cystic duct closure in laparoscopic cholecystectomies
A. Rohatgi (2004)
10.1016/S0016-5107(04)02169-8
Complications of ERCP: a prospective study.
M. Christensen (2004)
Identification of accessory bile ducts at cholecystectomy.
B A de Sousa (1984)
Introduction of a "safety zone" for the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Y. Taniguchi (1993)
Is ischaemia a possible factor in the aetiology of bile duct stricture?
E. Benson (1981)
10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80397-6
Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases.
D. Deziel (1993)



This paper is referenced by
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar