Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Meeting US Biofuel Goals With Less Land: The Potential Of Miscanthus

E. Heaton, F. Dohleman, S. Long
Published 2008 · Biology

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
Biofuels from crops are emerging as a Jekyll & Hyde - promoted by some as a means to offset fossil fuel emissions, denigrated by others as lacking sustainability and taking land from food crops. It is frequently asserted that plants convert only 0.1% of solar energy into biomass, therefore requiring unacceptable amounts of land for production of fuel feedstocks. The C4 perennial grass Miscanthusgiganteus has proved a promising biomass crop in Europe, while switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) has been tested at several locations in N. America. Here, replicated side-by-side trials of these two crops were established for the first time along a latitudinal gradient in Illinois. Over 3 years of trials, Miscanthusgiganteus achieved average annual conversion efficiencies into harvestable biomass of 1.0% (30 t ha � 1 ) and a maximum of 2.0% (61 t ha � 1 ), with minimal agricultural inputs. The regionally adapted switchgrass variety Cave-in-Rock achieved somewhat lower yields, averaging 10 t ha � 1 . Given that there has been little attempt to improve the agronomy and genetics of these grasses compared with the major grain crops, these efficiencies are the minimum of what may be achieved. At this 1.0% efficiency, 12 million hectares, or 9.3% of current US cropland, would be sufficient to provide 133 � 10 9 Lo f ethanol, enough to offset one-fifth of the current US gasoline use. In contrast, maize grain from the same area of land would only provide 49 � 10 9 L, while requiring much higher nitrogen and fossil energy inputs in its cultivation.
This paper references
10.1016/J.JPOWSOUR.2007.05.030
The Advanced Energy Initiative
J. Milliken (2007)
10.1002/J.1537-2197.1995.TB11567.X
Interannual variability in primary production in tallgrass prairie: climate, soil moisture, topographic position, and fire as determinants of aboveground biomass
J. M. Briggs (1995)
10.2307/4117709
Nomenclature of Miscanthus x giganteus (Poaceae)
T. Hodkinson (2001)
10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2004.05.006
Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States.
S. Mclaughlin (2005)
Planting and harvesting Miscanthus giganteus
M. Bullard (1996)
10.1073/PNAS.0604600103
Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels.
Jason D Hill (2006)
10.1080/00103628409367568
Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: A modification of Mehlich 2 extractant
A. Mehlich (1984)
10.1111/J.1365-3040.2005.01460.X
Low growth temperatures modify the efficiency of light use by photosystem II for CO2 assimilation in leaves of two chilling-tolerant C4 species, Cyperus longus L. and Miscanthus x giganteus.
P. Farage (2006)
Miscanthus productivity. In: Miscanthus for Energy and Fibre (eds Jones MB
JC Clifton-Brown (2001)
10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2003.10.005
A quantitative review comparing the yields of two candidate C4 perennial biomass crops in relation to nitrogen, temperature and water
E. Heaton (2004)
10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_10
Environmental costs and benefits of transportation biofuel production from food-and lignocellulose-based energy crops
J. Hill (2009)
10.1080/09064710310017605
Establishment, Development and Yield Quality of Fifteen Miscanthus Genotypes over Three Years in Denmark
U. Jørgensen (2003)
Planting and harvesting of Miscanthus giganteus
W. Huisman (1996)
10.1111/J.1529-8817.2003.00749.X
Miscanthus biomass production for energy in Europe and its potential contribution to decreasing fossil fuel carbon emissions
J. Clifton-Brown (2004)
Ethanol Can Contribute to Energy and Environmental Goals
C. Andreoli (2007)
10.1016/S0926-6690(00)00042-X
The modelled productivity of Miscanthus×giganteus (GREEF et DEU) in Ireland.
J. Clifton-Brown (2000)
10.1023/A:1004244614537
Cultivation of Miscanthus under West European conditions: Seasonal changes in dry matter production, nutrient uptake and remobilization
M. Himken (2004)
10.1007/978-94-011-1566-7_6
Canopy structure and light interception
P. Nobel (1993)
10.1111/J.1365-3040.1995.TB00565.X
Can perennial C4 grasses attain high efficiencies of radiant energy conversion in cool climates
C. V. Beale (1995)
10.1016/S0961-9534(97)10074-5
A review of carbon and nitrogen balances in switchgrass grown for energy
D. I. Bransby (1998)
10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00030-8
The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe
I. Lewandowski (2003)
10.1016/0960-1481(94)90083-3
Quantifying the yield of perennial grasses grown as a biofuel for energy generation
D. Christian (1994)
10.1016/0960-8524(95)00176-X
Switchgrass as a sustainable bioenergy crop
M. Sanderson (1996)
New switchgrass biofuels research program for the Southeast
Mclaughlin (1992)
10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2005.11.003
Steps towards the development of a certification system for sustainable bio-energy trade
I. Lewandowski (2006)
Miscanthus productivity
SP Long (2001)
10.1080/07352680500316508
The Potential of C4 Perennial Grasses for Developing a Global BIOHEAT Industry
R. Samson (2005)
10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[875:GPFFAN]2.0.CO;2
Green Plants, Fossil Fuels, and Now Biofuels
D. Pimentel (2006)
10.2134/AGRONJ1999.914696X
Switchgrass biomass and chemical composition for biofuel in Eastern Canada.
I. Madakadze (1999)
10.2135/CROPSCI2006.06.0406
Potential for enhanced nutrient cycling through coupling of agricultural and bioenergy systems
R. Anex (2007)
10.1126/science.1133306
Carbon-Negative Biofuels from Low-Input High-Diversity Grassland Biomass
D. Tilman (2006)
10.1111/J.1469-8137.2005.01549.X
A changing climate for grassland research.
M. Humphreys (2006)
10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00036-7
Radiation use efficiency and leaf CO2 exchange for diverse C4 grasses.
J. Kiniry (1999)
Miscanthus productivity
MB Jones (2001)
10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2006.07.002
Invertebrate populations in miscanthus (Miscanthus×giganteus) and reed canary-grass (Phalaris arundinacea) fields
T. Semere (2007)
10.1126/SCIENCE.1114736
The Path Forward for Biofuels and Biomaterials
A. Ragauskas (2006)
10.2172/885984
Biomass as Feedstock for A Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply
R. D. Perlack (2005)
Long SP (2004b) A quantitative review comparing the yields of two candidate C-4 perennial biomass crops in relation to nitrogen, temperature and water
EA Heaton (2004)
Management Guide for the Production of Switchgrass for Biomass Fuel in Southern Iowa. Pm-1710
A Teel (1997)
Convergence of Agriculture and Energy: II. Producing Cellulosic Biomass for Biofuels
S. L. Fales (2007)
10.1111/J.1365-2486.2007.01438.X
Carbon mitigation by the energy crop, Miscanthus
J. Clifton-Brown (2007)
What drives tropical deforestation?: a meta-analysis of proximate and underlying causes of deforestation based on subnational case study evidence
H. Geist (2001)
EUROPEAN ENERGY CROPS : A SYNTHESIS
Flax Zerr (2002)
10.1126/science.1151861
Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change
T. Searchinger (2008)
Maintenance inputs to Miscanthus and switchgrass trials established at three locations in Illinois
Ames (2002)
10.2135/CROPSCI2005.07-0223
Modern Biotechnology as an Integral Supplement to Conventional Plant Breeding: The Prospects and Challenges
P. Jauhar (2006)
Glyphosate3 (4 l ha), switchgrass only North 16-Apr. Alachlor4 (3.4 kg ha), switchgrass only 1 HiDep Broadleaf Herbicide PBI/Gordon Corp
North 19-Mar (2004)
Potential mechanisms of low-temperature tolerance of C-4 photosynthesis in Miscanthus giganteus: an in vivo
SL Naidu (2004)
10.21949/1404021
Transportation energy data book
S. Davis (2008)
10.1111/J.1601-5223.1993.00297.X
Cytogenetic Analysis of Miscanthus‘Giganteus’, an Interspecific Hybrid
I. Linde-Laursen (2004)
10.4324/9781315067162
Miscanthus : For Energy and Fibre
M. Jones (2009)
10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00102-8
Carbon sequestration in soil beneath long-term Miscanthus plantations as determined by 13C abundance
E. M. Hansen (2004)
10.1007/978-94-011-1566-7_1
Measurement of plant biomass and net primary production of herbaceous vegetation
M. Roberts (1993)
Agronomy of Miscanthus
JC Clifton-Brown (2001)
lllinois Climate Network Water and Atmospheric Resources Monitoring Program
J Angel (2007)
10.1111/J.1365-3040.2005.01493.X
Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields?
S. Long (2006)
10.1023/B:MITI.0000038848.94134.BE
Miscanthus for Renewable Energy Generation: European Union Experience and Projections for Illinois
E. Heaton (2004)
10.1111/J.1469-8137.2004.01201.X
Carbon sequestration in temperate grassland ecosystems and the influence of management, climate and elevated CO2
M. Jones (2004)
10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00273-5
Carbon sequestration in perennial bioenergy, annual corn and uncultivated systems in southern Quebec
Claudia S Zan (2001)
Convergence of Agriculture and Energy: Implications for Research and Policy
K. Cassman (2006)
10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00073-9
Biomass yield and quality of 20 switchgrass populations in southern Iowa, USA.
R. Lemus (2002)
10.1098/RSTB.1977.0140
Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain
J. Monteith (1977)
10.1126/SCIENCE.1072357
Advanced Technology Paths to Global Climate Stability: Energy for a Greenhouse Planet
M. Hoffert (2002)
lllinois Climate Network Water and Atmospheric Resources Monitoring Program. http://www.sws.uiuc.edu/ warm/datalist.asp
J Angel (2007)
10.1016/0144-4565(85)90022-8
Photosynthesis — is it limiting to biomass production?
C. L. Beadle (1985)
Agronomy of Miscanthus. In: Miscanthus for Energy and Fibre (eds Jones MB
DG Christian (2001)
10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00008-3
Impact of row spacing, nitrogen rate, and time on carbon partitioning of switchgrass
Z. Ma (2001)
10.1016/S0961-9534(97)00029-9
European energy crops: a synthesis
R. Venendaal (1997)
10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2007.11.003
Costs of producing miscanthus and switchgrass for bioenergy in Illinois
M. Khanna (2008)
10.2134/AGRONJ2001.9351013X
Performance of 15 Miscanthus genotypes at five sites in Europe
J. Clifton-Brown (2001)
10.1111/J.1744-7348.1995.TB05372.X
Shoot growth, radiation interception and dry matter production and partitioning during the establishment phase of Miscanthus sinensis‘Giganteus’ grown at two densities in the UK
M. Bullard (1995)
Miscanthus : European experience with a novel energy crop
I. Lewandowskia
10.2172/1218382
Breaking the Biological Barriers to Cellulosic Ethanol: A Joint Research Agenda
J. Houghton (2006)
10.1126/SCIENCE.1121416
Ethanol Can Contribute to Energy and Environmental Goals
A. E. Farrell (2006)
10.2135/CROPSCI2006.09.0581
Nutrient Cycling in Warm‐Climate Grasslands
J. Dubeux (2007)
CRP increases soil organic carbon
R. Gebhart (1994)
10.1017/S0021859606005867
Impacts of breeding on international collaborative wheat improvement
M. Reynolds (2006)
10.1126/science.309.5734.548
Is It Time to Shoot for the Sun?
R. Service (2005)
10.1016/S0961-9534(97)00016-0
Seasonal dynamics of nutrient accumulation and partitioning in the perennial C4-grasses Miscanthus × giganteus and Spartina cynosuroides
C. V. Beale (1997)
Phalaris arundinacea) fields
A Teel (2005)
10.1002/JPLN.200625111
Carbon sequestration under Miscanthus in sandy and loamy soils estimated by natural 13C abundance
K. Schneckenberger (2007)
10.1046/J.1469-8137.2000.00764.X
Overwintering problems of newly established Miscanthus plantations can be overcome by identifying genotypes with improved rhizome cold tolerance
J. Clifton-Brown (2000)
10.1007/s00425-004-1322-6
Potential mechanisms of low-temperature tolerance of C4 photosynthesis in Miscanthus × giganteus: an in vivo analysis
S. Naidu (2004)



This paper is referenced by
MULTIPLE-HARVEST SORGHUMS TOWARD IMPROVED FOOD SECURITY
Andrew H. Paterson (2014)
Evaluation of Miscanthus Winter Hardiness and Yield Potential in Ontario
Ben Rosser (2012)
10.4141/CJPS2012-143
Impact of land classification on potential warm season grass biomass production in Ontario, Canada
KludzeHilla (2013)
10.5423/PPJ.NT.04.2015.0051
Ultrastructure of the Rust Fungus Puccinia miscanthi in the Teliospore Stage Interacting with the Biofuel Plant Miscanthus sinensis
Ki Woo Kim (2015)
10.1016/J.INDCROP.2015.12.040
Impact of rhizome quality on Miscanthus establishment in claypan soil landscapes
Bryan K. Randall (2016)
10.4161/gmcr.1.4.13173
Towards much more efficient biofuel crops - can sugarcane pave the way?
J. Tammisola (2010)
Climate Intervention: Carbon Dioxide Removal and Reliable Sequestration
Division on Earth (2015)
10.1016/J.AGRFORMET.2010.08.009
Testing the performance of a novel spectral reflectance sensor, built with light emitting diodes (LEDs), to monitor ecosystem metabolism, structure and function
Youngryel Ryu (2010)
10.1155/2014/501016
Phenotypic Characterization of Transgenic Miscanthus sinensis Plants Overexpressing Arabidopsis Phytochrome B
Ok-Jin Hwang (2014)
10.1007/s12355-015-0377-y
Management of Sweet Sorghum for Biomass Production
Catherine L. Bonin (2015)
10.1111/gcbb.12039
Miscanthus × giganteus and Arundo donax shoot and rhizome tolerance of extreme moisture stress
J. Jeremiah Mann (2013)
10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2010.04.014
Effects of rhizome size, depth of planting and cold storage on Miscanthus x giganteus establishment in the Midwestern USA
Richard J. Pyter (2010)
10.1093/jxb/erw104
Temperature response of bundle-sheath conductance in maize leaves
X. Yin (2016)
10.31274/ETD-180810-5695
Scaling understanding of biochar aging impacts on soil water and crop yields
D. M. Aller (2017)
10.1653/024.093.0123
First Report of Field Populations of Two Potential Aphid Pests of the Bioenergy Crop Miscanthus × Giganteus
J. D. Bradshaw (2010)
10.4236/ABB.2010.13023
A New Form of Miscanthus (Chinese Silver Grass, Miscanthus sinensis-Andersson) as a Promising Source of Cellulosic Biomass
V. K. Shumny (2010)
10.1007/978-1-4939-6658-5_15
CSGRqtl: A Comparative Quantitative Trait Locus Database for Saccharinae Grasses.
Dong Zhang (2017)
10.2495/ESUS090131
Renewable energy from restored prairie plots in southeastern Minnesota, USA
B. Borsari (2009)
10.3389/fpls.2013.00107
The potential of C4 grasses for cellulosic biofuel production
Tim van der Weijde (2013)
10.1007/s12155-018-9951-y
Sugarcane Biomass, Dry Matter, and Sucrose Availability and Variability When Grown on a Bioenergy Feedstock Production Cycle
P. M. White (2018)
10.1007/978-90-481-9407-0_10
Chapter 10 C4 Photosynthesis and Temperature
R. Sage (2010)
10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2014.10.007
The biophysical link between climate, water, and vegetation in bioenergy agro-ecosystems.
Justin E. Bagley (2014)
10.1007/s12155-016-9768-5
QTL and Drought Effects on Leaf Physiology in Lowland Panicum virgatum
S. H. Taylor (2016)
10.1111/gcbb.12384
Evaluation of Agricultural Production Systems Simulator as yield predictor of Panicum virgatum and Miscanthus x giganteus in several US environments
J. Ojeda (2017)
10.1093/jxb/erv183
How cell wall complexity influences saccharification efficiency in Miscanthus sinensis
A. D. De Souza (2015)
10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2014.01.001
Will energy crop yields meet expectations
S. Searle (2014)
10.5194/ESSD-12-789-2020
Mapping the yields of lignocellulosic bioenergy crops from observations at the global scale
W. Li (2020)
10.1007/s11240-013-0419-7
Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of Miscanthus sinensis
Ok-Jin Hwang (2013)
10.1007/s10021-012-9628-x
Altered Belowground Carbon Cycling Following Land-Use Change to Perennial Bioenergy Crops
Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira (2012)
10.1093/aob/mcy161
Population structure of Miscanthus sacchariflorus reveals two major polyploidization events, tetraploid-mediated unidirectional introgression from diploid M. sinensis, and diversity centred around the Yellow Sea.
L. Clark (2018)
10.3389/fpls.2017.00544
Nitrogen Fertilization Effects on Biomass Production and Yield Components of Miscanthus ×giganteus
Moon-Sub Lee (2017)
Modeling the profitability of Camelina sativa as a biofuel feedstock in eastern Colorado
Andrew Brandess (2012)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar