Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

What Is The "true" Prevalence Of Female Sexual Dysfunctions And Does The Way We Assess These Conditions Have An Impact?

R. Hayes, L. Dennerstein, C. Bennett, C. Fairley
Published 2008 · Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
INTRODUCTION A wide range of prevalence estimates of female sexual dysfunctions (FSD) have been reported. AIM Compare instruments used to assess FSD to determine if differences between instruments contribute to variation in reported prevalence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Sexual Function Questionnaire combined with Female Sexual Distress Scale (SFQ-FSDS) was our gold standard, validated instrument for assessing FSD. Alternatives were SFQ alone and two sets of simple questions adapted from Laumann et al. 1994. Methods. A postal survey was administered to a random sample of 356 Australian women aged 20 to 70 years. RESULTS When assessed by SFQ-FSDS, prevalence estimates (95% confidence intervals) of hypoactive sexual desire disorder, sexual arousal disorder (lubrication), orgasmic disorder, and dyspareunia were 16% (12% to 20%), 7% (5% to 11%), 8% (6% to 12%), and 1% (0.5% to 3%), respectively. Prevalence estimates varied across alternative instruments for these disorders: 32% to 58%, 16% to 32%, 16% to 33%, and 3% to 23%, respectively. Compared with SFQ-FSDS alternative instruments produced higher estimates of desire, arousal and orgasm disorders and displayed a range of sensitivities (0.25 to 1.0), specificities (0.48 to 0.99), positive predictive values (0.01 to 0.56), and negative predictive values (0.95 to 1.0) across the disorders investigated. Kappa statistics comparing SFQ-FSDS and alternative instruments ranged from 0 to 0.71 but were predominantly 0.44 or less. Changing recall from previous month to 1 month or more in the previous year produced higher estimates for all disorders investigated. Including sexual distress produced lower estimates for desire, arousal, and orgasm disorders. CONCLUSIONS Prevalence estimates of FSD varied substantially across instruments. Relatively low positive predictive values and kappa statistics combined with a broad range of sensitivities and specificities indicated that different instruments identified different subgroups. Consequently, the instruments researchers choose when assessing FSD may affect prevalence estimates and risk factors they report.
This paper references
10.1136/BMJ.325.7361.444
Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires
C. Iglesias (2002)
10.1111/J.1743-6109.2006.00210.X
Sexual activity, prevalence of sexual problems, and associated help-seeking patterns in men and women aged 40-80 years in Korea: data from the Global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors (GSSAB).
E. D. Moreira (2006)
10.1111/J.1743-6109.2007.00609.X
Epidemiology and neurobiology of female sexual dysfunction.
A. Clayton (2007)
10.1111/J.1743-6109.2007.00606.X
The prevalence and causes of sexual problems among premenopausal Turkish women.
A. Oniz (2007)
10.1111/J.1743-6109.2007.00476.X
The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): validation of the Malay version.
H. Sidi (2007)
10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183
Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review
P. Edwards (2002)
10.1001/JAMA.1995.03530070033019
The social organization of sexuality.
H. Haverkos (1995)
10.1159/000075273
The Prevalence of Female Sexual Dysfunction and Potential Risk Factors That May Impair Sexual Function in Turkish Women
S. Çayan (2004)
10.1080/00224490109552090
Sexual function and the menopausal woman: The importance of age and partner's sexual functioning
A. Deeks (2001)
10.1111/J.1743-6109.2007.00485.X
Continuing Medical Education: Key Methodological Issues in Sexual Medicine Research (CME)
L. Derogatis (2007)
10.1097/01.gme.0000172596.76272.06
Hypoactive sexual desire disorder in postmenopausal women: US results from the Women's International Study of Health and Sexuality (WISHeS)
S. Leiblum (2006)
10.1080/00926230290001529
Systematic Review of Sexual Problems: Epidemiology and Methodology
K. Dunn (2002)
10.1111/j.1467-842X.2003.tb00804.x
Sex in Australia: Sexual difficulties in a representative sample of adults
J. Richters (2003)
10.1089/152460902753668475
Development of a sexual function questionnaire for clinical trials of female sexual dysfunction.
F. Quirk (2002)
10.1111/j.1742-1241.2005.00382.x
Help‐seeking behaviour for sexual problems: the Global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors
E. D. Moreira (2005)
10.5860/choice.32-4802a
The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States
E. Laumann (1994)
10.1038/sj.ijir.3901178
Serum androgen levels in healthy premenopausal women with and without sexual dysfunction: Part A. Serum androgen levels in women aged 20–49 years with no complaints of sexual dysfunction
A. Guay (2004)
10.1136/BMJ.327.7412.426
Sexual function problems and help seeking behaviour in Britain: national probability sample survey
C. Mercer (2003)
10.1007/BF01542662
Sexual interest and behavior in healthy 80- to 102-year-olds
J. Bretschneider (1988)
10.1001/JAMA.281.6.537
Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors.
E. Laumann (1999)
10.1080/00926230290001448
The Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS): Initial Validation of a Standardized Scale for Assessment of Sexually Related Personal Distress in Women
L. Derogatis (2002)
10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00455.x
Proposal for changes in diagnostic criteria for sexual dysfunctions.
R. Segraves (2007)
10.1097/01.GME.0000138542.65917.FB
Recent advances in women’s sexual function and dysfunction
R. Basson (2004)
10.1080/00224499009551558
Sexual expression among 60–80-year-old men and women: A sample from Stockholm, Sweden.
Maj‐Briht Bergström‐Walan (1990)
10.2105/AJPH.82.11.1506
Responses to anonymous questionnaires concerning sexual behavior: a method to examine potential biases.
R. Biggar (1992)
10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00241.x
What can prevalence studies tell us about female sexual difficulty and dysfunction?
R. Hayes (2006)
10.1111/J.1743-6109.2005.00076.X
The use of the sexual function questionnaire as a screening tool for women with sexual dysfunction.
F. Quirk (2005)
10.1038/sj.ijir.3901250
Sexual problems among women and men aged 40–80 y: prevalence and correlates identified in the Global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors
E. O. Laumann (2005)
10.1007/s00345-005-0035-1
Sexual activity, sexual dysfunction and associated help-seeking behaviours in middle-aged and older adults in Spain: a population survey
E. D. Moreira (2005)
10.1016/J.FERTNSTERT.2006.05.071
Relationship between hypoactive sexual desire disorder and aging.
R. Hayes (2007)
10.1111/J.1743-6109.2005.20356.X
The impact of aging on sexual function and sexual dysfunction in women: a review of population-based studies.
R. Hayes (2005)
10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00496.x
Women's endorsement of models of female sexual response: the nurses' sexuality study.
Michael L. Sand (2007)
10.1080/1468199031000061308
Biopsychosocial models of women's sexual response: applications to management of ‘desire disorders’
R. Basson (2003)
10.1111/J.1743-6109.2007.00433.X
Modeling response rates in surveys of female sexual difficulty and dysfunction.
R. Hayes (2007)
10.1111/J.1743-6109.2006.00319.X
The prevalence of sexual dysfunction and potential risk factors that may impair sexual function in Malaysian women.
H. Sidi (2007)
10.1111/J.1743-6109.2005.20226.X
ORIGINAL RESEARCH—PSYCHOLOGY: On Swedish Women's Distressing Sexual Dysfunctions: Some Concomitant Conditions and Life Satisfaction
K. Öberg (2005)



This paper is referenced by
10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.12.007
Deep Dyspareunia: Review of Pathophysiology and Proposed Future Research Priorities.
N. Orr (2019)
Female sexual dysfunction and its relationship with marital satisfaction in Indian women
JMSCR Vol06Issue02Page (2012)
10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.01.001
Ignorance Is Not Bliss: If We Don't Understand Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder, How Can Flibanserin Treat It? Commentary.
Ryan C. Anderson (2018)
10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01440.x
The NIH and beyond-turning baby steps into giant steps.
Sue W. Goldstein (2009)
10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01778.x
Definitions/epidemiology/risk factors for sexual dysfunction.
R. Lewis (2010)
10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01157.x
Extraction and microencapsulation of khat: effects on sexual motivation and estradiol level in female rats.
H. A. Aziz (2009)
10.1159/000328810
Management of female sexual pain disorders.
S. Boyer (2011)
10.1007/s10389-018-0896-6
Female sexual dysfunction in Egyptian women with anxiety: prevalence and patterns
A. Arafa (2018)
10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.04.673
Perceived Sexual Difficulties and Sexual Counseling in Men and Women Across Heart Diagnoses: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.
L. Rundblad (2017)
The Prevalence and Risk Factors of Sexual Dysfunction amongst Czech Women
Kateřina Hollá (2012)
Efeito de um programa de exercícios cinesioterapêuticos sobre a contratilidade do assoalho pélvico de mulheres com disfunção de orgasmo : avaliação eletromiográfica
Ana Helena Lanza (2011)
10.1080/13691058.2014.924557
Coming to power: women's fake orgasms and best orgasm experiences illuminate the failures of (hetero)sex and the pleasures of connection
Breanne Fahs (2014)
10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01167.x
Genito-sensory analysis in women with arousal and orgasmic dysfunction.
L. Helpman (2009)
10.1007/BF02600070
Continuing medical education
Eric Dyer (2007)
10.1111/jsm.12450
Clitoral size and location in relation to sexual function using pelvic MRI.
Susan H. Oakley (2014)
Coping with Sexual Difficulties: The Lived Experience of Women Taking Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) Medication
Catherine. O'Mullan (2015)
Changes in Body Image and Sexuality in Rural Breast Cancer Survivors During a Weight Loss and Weight Maintenance Intervention
Rebecca K. Hunter (2015)
10.1007/S11934-008-0081-5
Sexual dysfunction in women: What can urologists contribute?
I. Goldstein (2008)
10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01498.x
Female sexual arousal disorder with and without a distress criterion: prevalence and correlates in a representative Czech sample.
P. Weiss (2009)
10.1007/s10508-009-9542-2
The DSM Diagnostic Criteria for Female Orgasmic Disorder
C. Graham (2010)
10.1080/0092623X.2013.811450
The Conditional Importance of Sex: Exploring the Association Between Sexual Well-Being and Life Satisfaction
K. Stephenson (2015)
10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.01.014
Genital Pain and Sexual Functioning: Effects on Sexual Experience, Psychological Health, and Quality of Life.
F. Nimbi (2020)
10.1590/S1679-45082010AO1836
Sexuality in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a pilot study.
Jucilene Sales da Paixão Silva (2010)
10.1111/jsm.12709
The role of psychopathological and personality covariates in orgasmic difficulties: a prospective longitudinal evaluation in a cohort of women from age 30 to 50.
B. Leeners (2014)
10.1007/978-1-4939-3100-2_26
New Concepts in the Understanding of Female Sexual Dysfunction
M. McCabe (2016)
10.1007/978-1-60761-916-1_8
Classifying Female Sexual Dysfunction
Annamaria Giraldi (2011)
10.1007/s11930-017-0115-4
Sexual Problems and Distress in Lesbian Women
Maria Manuela Peixoto (2017)
10.1097/GME.0b013e31828b2fd5
Androgen use for low sexual desire in midlife women
Susan R Davis (2013)
Internal Structure and Consistency of the Spanish Version of the Six-Item Female Sexual Function Index
Alvaro Monterrosa-Castro (2019)
10.1080/13697130802607727
Assessment of sexuality among middle-aged women using the Female Sexual Function Index
P. Chedraui (2009)
10.1016/j.purol.2012.09.019
[Sexual desire disorders in women].
F. Cour (2013)
10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.09.015
Childhood sexual abuse moderates the association between sexual functioning and sexual distress in women.
K. Stephenson (2012)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar