Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.

A Biomechanical Comparison Of Four Different Cementless Press-fit Stems Used In Revision Surgery For Total Knee Replacements

R. Zdero, K. Saidi, Stephanie A. Mason, E. Schemitsch, D. Naudie
Published 2012 · Medicine, Materials Science

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
Few biomechanical studies exist on femoral cementless press-fit stems for revision total knee replacement (TKR) surgeries. The aim of this study was to compare the mechanical quality of the femur–stem interface for a series of commercially available press-fit stems, because this interface may be a ‘weak link’ which could fail earlier than the femur–TKR bond itself. Also, the femur–stem interface may become particularly critical if distal femur bone degeneration, which may necessitate or follow revision TKR, ever weakens the femur–TKR bond itself. The authors implanted five synthetic femurs each with a Sigma Short Stem (SSS), Sigma Long Stem (SLS), Genesis II Short Stem (GSS), or Genesis II Long Stem (GLS). Axial stiffness, lateral stiffness, ‘offset load’ torsional stiffness, and ‘offset load’ torsional strength were measured with a mechanical testing system using displacement control. Axial (range = 1047–1461 N/mm, p = 0.106), lateral (range = 415–462 N/mm, p = 0.297), and torsional (range = 115–139 N/mm, p > 0.055) stiffnesses were not different between groups. The SSS had higher torsional strength (863 N) than the other stems (range = 167–197 N, p < 0.001). Torsional failure occurred by femoral ‘spin’ around the stem’s long axis. There was poor linear correlation between the femur–stem interface area versus axial stiffness (R = 0.38) and torsional stiffness (R = 0.38), and there was a moderate linear correlation versus torsional strength (R = 0.55). Yet, there was a high inverse linear correlation between interfacial surface area versus lateral stiffness (R = 0.79), although this did not result in a statistical difference between stem groups (p = 0.297). These press-fit stems provide equivalent stability, except that the SSS has greater torsional strength.
This paper references
10.1016/j.injury.2007.08.026
Fixation of long bone segmental defects: a biomechanical study.
M. Talbot (2008)
10.1302/0301-620X.67B2.3980534
Stemmed revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening of total knee replacement.
K. Bertin (1985)
Selecting an implant: a comparison of revision implant systems. In: Engh GA and Rorabeck CH (eds) Revision total knee arthroplasty
PG Kirk (1997)
10.1302/0301-620X.72B2.2312565
The effect of a stem on the tibial component of knee arthroplasty. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric study of uncemented tibial components in the Freeman-Samuelson knee arthroplasty.
B. Albrektsson (1990)
10.1097/BOT.0b013e318229acca
Femoral Head Lag Screw Position for Cephalomedullary Nails: A Biomechanical Analysis
P. Kuzyk (2012)
10.1002/jor.1100060308
Strength reductions from metastatic cortical defects in long bones.
R. Mcbroom (1988)
10.1007/s11999-008-0621-9
Results of Press-fit Stems in Revision Knee Arthroplasties
Gavin C. Wood (2009)
10.1115/1.4004414
A preliminary biomechanical assessment of a polymer composite hip implant using an infrared thermography technique validated by strain gage measurements.
H. Bougherara (2011)
10.1115/1.2540926
Cortical screw pullout strength and effective shear stress in synthetic third generation composite femurs.
R. Zdero (2007)
The Influence of Tibial Component Intramedullary Stems and Implant‐Cortex Contact on the Strain Distribution of the Proximal Tibia Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: An In Vitro Study
R. Bourne (1986)
10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2003.10.067
Enhancement of initial stability of press-fit femoral stems using injectable calcium phosphate cement: an in vitro study in dog bones.
E. Ooms (2004)
10.1016/S0883-5403(98)90009-2
The forces in the distal femur and the knee during walking and other activities measured by telemetry.
S. J. Taylor (1998)
10.1115/1.2133766
Cortical bone viscoelasticity and fixation strength of press-fit femoral stems: an in-vitro model.
T. L. Norman (2006)
10.1097/00003086-198404000-00049
Tibial Component Fixation in Deficient Tibial Bone Stock
P. Brooks (1984)
10.1097/00003086-200009000-00039
The Role of Femoral Stem Extension in Total Knee Arthroplasty
C. V. van Loon (2000)
10.1016/J.ARTH.2004.06.009
The effect of stem design on end-of-stem pain in revision total knee arthroplasty.
R. Barrack (2004)
Selecting an implant : a comparison of revision implant systems
PG Kirk
10.1115/1.3194755
Cortical screw purchase in synthetic and human femurs.
Rad Zdero (2009)
10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.02.012
Biomechanical stress maps of an artificial femur obtained using a new infrared thermography technique validated by strain gages.
S. Shah (2012)
10.1243/09544119JEIM501
The biomechanics of the T2 femoral nailing system: A comparison of synthetic femurs with finite element analysis
H. Bougherara (2009)
10.1097/01.blo.0000093032.56370.4b
Stem Fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative Analysis
T. Fehring (2003)
Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty.
A. Whaley (1994)
10.1097/00003086-199712000-00008
The effect of tibial stem design on component micromotion in knee arthroplasty.
S. Stern (1997)
10.1243/09544119JEIM742
The effect of load application rate on the biomechanics of synthetic femurs
R. Zdero (2010)
Machine Design: An Integrated Approach
R. L. Norton (1996)
10.1016/0021-9290(95)00084-4
Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models.
L. Cristofolini (1996)
10.1054/ARTH.2001.25507
The effect of stem modularity and mode of fixation on tibial component stability in revision total knee arthroplasty.
L. Jazrawi (2001)
10.1016/j.knee.2008.12.008
Revision total knee arthroplasty: the influence of femoral stems in load sharing and stability.
António Completo (2009)
10.1097/TA.0b013e31811ea244
Cyclic loading of periprosthetic fracture fixation constructs.
M. Talbot (2008)
Selecting an implant: a comparison of revision implant systems. In: Engh GA and Rorabeck CH (eds) Revision total knee arthroplasty
PG Kirk (1997)
10.1097/TA.0b013e3182170823
A biomechanical comparison of static versus dynamic lag screw modes for cephalomedullary nails used to fix unstable peritrochanteric fractures
Paul R. T. Kuzyk (2011)
10.1016/J.JBIOMECH.2007.10.006
Strain shielding in proximal tibia of stemmed knee prosthesis: experimental study.
A. Completo (2008)
Revision total
A Completo
arthroplasty : the influence of femoral stems in load sharing and stability
HJ Meijerink (2009)
10.1177/0954411911420004
The biomechanical effect of changes in cancellous bone density on synthetic femur behaviour
B. Nicayenzi (2011)
10.2106/JBJS.F.01561
Biomechanical evaluation of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation.
Rad Zdero (2008)
10.2106/00004623-200300001-00010
Strategies of Stem Fixation and the Role of Supplemental Bone Graft in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
C. Nelson (2003)
10.3109/17453670209178027
Stemmed femoral knee prostheses
G. H. van Lenthe (2002)
10.1016/0021-9290(93)90058-M
Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients.
G. Bergmann (1993)
10.1177/0954411911413060
The biomechanics of plate fixation of periprosthetic femoral fractures near the tip of a total hip implant: cables, screws, or both?
S. Shah (2011)
10.1097/TA.0b013e3181efb1d1
A biomechanical comparison of two triple-screw methods for femoral neck fracture fixation in a synthetic bone model.
Rad Zdero (2010)
The influence of tibial component intramedullary stems and implant - cortex on the strain distribution of the proximal tibia following total knee arthroplasty
RB Bourne (1986)
10.1177/0954411911410642
The biomechanics of plate repair of periprosthetic femur fractures near the tip of a total hip implant: the effect of cable-screw position
A. Dubov (2011)
10.1016/j.arth.2010.12.005
A biomechanical evaluation of press-fit stem constructs for tumor endoprosthetic reconstruction of the distal femur.
Peter Ferguson (2011)
10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00301-2
Revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented components and uncemented intramedullary stems.
Brian D. Shannon (2003)
Biomechanics in Orthopedic Trauma: Bone Fracture and Fixation
A. Tencer (1994)
10.3109/17453674.2010.483991
A sliding stem in revision total knee arthroplasty provides stability and reduces stress shielding
Huub J Meijerink (2010)
10.1115/1.2401178
The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
M. Papini (2007)
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.01.010
Analysis of biomechanical effect of stem-end design in revision TKA using Digital Korean model.
Y. Kim (2008)
10.1080/000164702321039589
Stemmed femoral knee prostheses: effects of prosthetic design and fixation on bone loss.
G. H. van Lenthe (2002)
10.1243/09544119JEIM409
Cancellous bone screw purchase: A comparison of synthetic femurs, human femurs, and finite element analysis
R. Zdero (2008)
10.1243/09544119JEIM702
The effect of cortex thickness on intact femur biomechanics: A comparison of finite element analysis with synthetic femurs
R. Zdero (2010)



This paper is referenced by
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar