Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Development And Reliability Of A Structured Interview Guide For The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (SIGMA)

Janet B. W. Williams, Kenneth A. Kobak

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy Visualize in Litmaps
Share
Reduce the time it takes to create your bibliography by a factor of 10 by using the world’s favourite reference manager
Time to take this seriously.
Get Citationsy
BackgroundThe Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is often used in clinical trials to select patients and to assess treatment efficacy. The scale was originally published without suggested questions for clinicians to use in gathering the information necessary to rate the items. Structured and semi-structured interview guides have been found to improve reliability with other scales.AimsTo describe the development and test-retest reliability of a structured interview guide for the MADRS (SIGMA).MethodA total of 162 test-retest interviews were conducted by 81 rater pairs. Each patient was interviewed twice, once by each rater conducting an independent interview.ResultsThe intraclass correlation for total score between raters using the SIGMA was r = 0.93, P < 0.0001. All ten items had good to excellent interrater reliability.ConclusionsUse of the SIGMA can result in high reliability of MADRS scores in evaluating patients with depression.