Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

School Leaders' Innovation Managements And Organizational Stress: A Relational Model Study.

E. Toytok
Published 2016 · Psychology

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
This century is a century in which vertiginous rapid change is experienced. In each day, new innovations are being part of our lives. For this reason, innovation term is a dynamic concept that emerges in every field and it is inside of life. “Innovation” is an English term but it is adopted in daily life in Turkish as “inovasyon” with the same meaning. The world is rapidly changing and developing, so the understanding of innovation term as a dynamic continuum should be guided and managed in a correct way. Schools are also affected from this situation both directly and indirectly. School leaders have some duties and responsibilities to gain the positive aspects of the influence and to avoid from negative aspects. While school leaders provide this interaction that is based upon innovation, they should preserve their schools’ existing balance, and they should carry out innovations in a correct proportion, shape and time. Otherwise, they may harm their schools’ organizations or functions. Another variable that may harm schools’ organizations or functions is organizational stress. Organizational stress is termed as a situation that may supply divergence from normal functions of people. It may differ with respect to people and is caused by the relations between person and organization. In any organization, the increase in the organizational stress level may result with divergence of workers from normal functions. The cause of this is the psychological and physiological fatigue of workers. Under this circumstance, behaviors of the person may be affected both negatively and directly. The aim of this study is to investigate the level of relationship between school leaders’ innovation management approaches and organizational stress. Descriptive relational screening model is used throughout the study. The population of the study consist of 940 elementary, 911 middle, and 649 high school teachers in Kocasinan province of Kayseri city. Stratified sampling procedure is used and nearly 1000 inventory is distributed to all school levels. 171 elementary, 178 middle and 164 high school teachers replied the data collection tool. Data are analyzed using R 3.2.4 and SPSS 21.00. In the light of the results, significant but small relationships in the negative direction are observed across organizational culture and structure factor of school leaders’ innovation management behaviors and (i) clustering structure, (ii) role structure, and (iii) cultural structure factors of organizational stress. In addition, again small but significant relationship in the negative direction is observed across project management factor of school leaders’ innovation management behaviors and cultural structure factor of organizational stress.
This paper references
Eğitim Yönetiminde Stres Kaynakları. Doktora Tezi
İ Pehlivan (1993)
Developing a Scale for Innovation Management at Schools: A Study of Validity and Reliability.
T. Bülbül (2012)
10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.10.107
Linking Person-job Fit to Job Stress: The Mediating Effect of Perceived Person-organization Fit
N. Deniz (2015)
10.1177/01466216970212006
Estimation of Composite Reliability for Congeneric Measures
T. Raykov (1997)
10.1080/713698496
Innovation and Organizational Change: Developments Towards an Interactive Process Perspective
T. Edwards (2000)
İlköğretim Okul Yöneticilerinin Görüşlerine Göre Öğretmenlerin Sosyalleşmesinde Kullandıkları Örgütsel Sosyalleşme Strateji ve Taktikleri
Z Uğurlu (2011)
10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2015.07.004
How dynamic capabilities affect adoption of management innovations
Hai-Fen Lin (2016)
10.1002/J.2158-1592.2005.TB00196.X
Logistics Innovation: A customer Value-Oriented Social Process
D. Flint (2005)
The relation between organizational stress and organizational commitment of school principals which work in Public and Private Primary Schools
B Bertan (2012)
10.1016/J.BUSHOR.2016.03.002
Art of the possible or fool's errand? Diffusion of large-scale management innovation
M. Douglas (2016)
Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (Third edition)
R. B. Kline (2011)
10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00119.x
Innovation Management Measurement: A Review
R. Adams (2006)
Educational Administration and Supervision Master's Program
M A Thesis
How management innovation happens
J. Birkinshaw (2006)
İlköğretim Okul Yöneticilerinin Görüşlerine Göre Öğretmenlerin Sosyalleşmesinde Kullandıkları Örgütsel Sosyalleşme Strateji ve Taktikleri. Ankara: Siyasal Kitapevi
Z. Uğurlu (2011)
Prımary Schools’ Managers’ Organızatıonal Stress Sources And Keys For Solutıon (Istanbul Cıty Sultanbeylı Dıstrıct Sample)
A. Yılmaztürk (2013)
İş Yaşamında Stres. Ankara: Pegem Yayınları
İ. Pehlivan (2002)
Eğitimde örgütsel yenileşme ve karara katılma
S. Özdemir (2000)
10.18637/JSS.V048.I02
lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling
Y. Rosseel (2012)
10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.11.239
Innovation in the Management of Educational Institutions
A. Manea (2015)
10.1080/09720073.2016.11891993
Environmental Conditions of the City in which Teachers Serve and their Organizational Commitment Perception Levels
E. Toytok (2016)
The Relationship Between Teachers' Perceptions on School Principals' Management Styles and The Schools Corporate Reputation
T. Argon (2014)
Effects Of Leadership Styles and Emotions on Teachers
M. Korkmaz (2005)
Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming
B. Byrne (1998)
Eğitim Yönetiminde Stres Kaynakları. Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, ss.4-63
İ. Pehlivan (1993)
Justice İn Education Organizations: A Conceptual Analysis
F. Töremen (2010)
R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
R. Team (2014)
The level of organizational justice in schools according to school types
Osman Titrek (2009)
Opinions Of Primary And Secondary School Teachers And Administrators On The 4 +4 +4 Education System
C Epçaçan (2014)
Stress and Coping Ways
Baltaş (2006)
Innovation Management And New Product Development
Paul W. Trott (2004)
10.1111/JBL.12027
The Case of the C-TPAT Border Security Initiative: Assessing the Adoption/Persistence Decisions When Dealing With a Novel, Institutionally Driven Administrative Innovation
S. A. Melnyk (2013)
2009).The level of organizational justice in schools according to school
O. Titrek (2009)
10.1080/10705519909540118
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives
Li-tze Hu (1999)
10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.03.153
The Relationship between Job Satisfaction, Occupational Stress and Coping Mechanism in Educational and Technical Organizations☆
A. Mateescu (2015)
10.1177/0049124192021002005
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
M. Browne (1992)
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
R. Kline (1998)
The level of teachers’ knowing, application and training need on alternative assessment and evaluation techniques
A. Kaya (2012)
The Perceptions of the Teachers Regarding the Innovation Management Effıcacies of the Primary School Administrators
E. Göl (2012)
Effects Of Leadership Styles and Emotions on Teachers' Performance. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice
M Korkmaz (2005)
Opinions Of Primary And Secondary School Teachers And Administrators On The 4 +4 +4 Education System (Siirt Sample)
C. Epçaçan (2014)
Metaphors That Parents Assıng To The Concept Of “Chıld
A. Pesen (2015)
A Qualitative Research About Perspectives Related To Master Education Of School Principals Serving In Siirt
E. H. Toytok (2016)
10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80041-8
Behavioral scale reliability and measurement invariance evaluation using latent variable modeling
T. Raykov (2004)
10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70059-4
The leadership of innovation.
R. Blumberg (1999)



This paper is referenced by
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar