Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Revival Of Bone Strength: The Bottom Line

T. Järvinen, H. Sievänen, J. Jokihaara, T. Einhorn
Published 2005 · Biology, Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
The continual innovation and proliferation of new research tools for the evaluation and characterization of the skeleton has greatly broadened our understanding of bone physiology and pathology. As the introduction of bone densitometry some 40 years ago was claimed to revolutionize skeletal research—through enabling a quick, precise, and easy noninvasive assessment of bone mineral in vivo—it is quite impossible to predict the potential of the most recent methodological advances in imaging techniques and molecular biology. Today, we are not only able to characterize complex microstructural features of even individual trabeculae, but also to evaluate activities of different bone cells within bone. Unfortunately, it seems at times that the methodological surge has occurred at the cost of studies becoming method-driven, instead of being hypothesis-driven— seeking the true biological mechanisms and relationships. Although whole bone strength testing is among the first methods used to evaluate bone mechanical characteristics, it has not become obsolete. (Whole bone strength test pertains to single mechanical testing of whole bones or excised, complete anatomic bone structures [e.g., proximal femur region] until failure and includes threeor four-point bending tests of long bones and compression tests of proximal femur or vertebrae or columns of vertebrae. The main focus of this analysis is solely on the failure load [strength] of the given bone, whereas structural rigidity [stiffness], postyield behavior, and fatigue characteristics are considered secondary in this respect.) Despite the fact that the nonmechanical functions of the skeleton—hematopoiesis and participation in mineral homeostasis—are chiefly attracting the researchers in the field of osteoporosis, we should never forget that the primary function of the skeleton is locomotion of the body and that only adequately rigid and strong bones make this vital function feasible. It is well established that bones somehow perceive loading-induced strains within the structure and gradually adapt the structure through changes in size, shape, or internal architecture to the prevalent loading environment. Whereas the precise spatial location of each bone element is apparently quite trivial to the above noted subsidiary functions, it can be critical in terms of whole bone strength, “the bottom line.” If we do not know whether the bone as an organ has truly strengthened, we have no certainty of knowing whether the possible changes in any of the intermediate or surrogate measures of bone strength denote only a transient phenomenon–like a “snapshot” of a dynamic movement eventually fading away—or actually a strengthened bone structure as a response to the stimulus of interest. This notion necessitates one to broaden the scope from the mere cellular or tissue-level inspection to the evaluation of bones as structures. The following example from sports shows our concern regarding what we consider the somewhat skewed focus of current experimental skeletal research. We all know that the current technology allows us to measure virtually any imaginable physical characteristic during the course of a long jump (e.g., the length and frequency of the stride of the jumper, athlete’s acceleration or velocity at any given phase during the jump, the height of the jump, or even the oxygen consumption of the muscle activity). However, none of these measures separately or in conjunction tell us the absolute final length of the jump, which is the “bottom line” regarding the athletic performance. Analogous to this, with modern devices, we can readily determine the mineral content, volumetric density, size, shape, and an arsenal of other characteristics of whole bones or even individual bone trabeculae at reasonable precision and accuracy, but at the end, what do we know about the whole bone strength with this information alone? There are infinite ways to construct a bone that has a similar strength but a discernible structure. Needless to say, any change in the rate of bone formation or resorption, irrespective of the underlying cause, ultimately translates into microscopic or macroscopic changes in the bone structure, and possibly, but not necessarily, into the mechanical competence of the whole bone. In the end, it is the whole bone strength that effectively covers virtually all of the individual variability that may be instantaneously, sporadically or permanently present in dynamic/static histomorphometry or in structural particulars (size and shape of the bone, cortical thickness and specific cortical geometry, trabecular architecture, etc.), providing the ultimate assay on bone functional capacity. In 2001, van der Meulen et al. stated persuasively that “the skeletal functional integrity can only be assessed by structural strength tests that measure how well the whole bone can bear load—there is no alternative to testing whole
This paper references
strength : Size isn ’ t everything
P Augat (1996)
Predicting the failure load of the distal radius
M. Muller (2003)
Can geometry-based parameters from pQCT and material parameters from quantitative ultrasound (QUS) improve the prediction of radial bone strength over that by bone mass (DXA)?
M. Hudelmaier (2003)
Mechanical consequences of different scenarios for simulated bone atrophy and recovery in the distal radius.
W. Pistoia (2003)
Hierarchical relationship between bone traits and mechanical properties in inbred mice
Karl J. Jepsen (2003)
Bone's mechanostat: a 2003 update.
H. Frost (2003)
This Is Biology: The Science of the Living World
E. Mayr (1997)
On measuring bone to predict osteoporotic fracture: moving beyond statistical inference.
T. J. Beck (1996)
Structure of the Femoral Neck in Hip Fracture: Cortical Bone Loss in the Inferoanterior to Superoposterior Axis
K. L. Bell (1999)
Intracapsular Hip Fracture and the Region‐Specific Loss of Cortical Bone: Analysis by Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography
N. Crabtree (2001)
A Structural Approach to Renal Bone Disease
A. Parfitt (1998)
Understanding bone strength: size isn't everything.
M. V. D. van der Meulen (2001)
From Density to Structure: Growing Up and Growing Old on the Surfaces of Bone
E. Seeman (1997)
How Well Are Bones Designed to Resist Fracture?
J. Currey (2003)
Colorful pebbles and Darwin's dictum.
M. Shermer (2001)
Bone Strength: What are We Trying to Measure?
J. Currey (2001)
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in predicting mechanical characteristics of rat femur.
T. Järvinen (1998)
Determinants of the mechanical properties of bones.
R. B. Martin (1991)
Measurement of Bone Mineral in vivo: An Improved Method
J. Cameron (1963)
On Our Age‐Related Bone Loss: Insights from a New Paradigm
H. Frost (1997)
Some Causes of coming Improvements in Skeletal Physiology, its Research, and the Diagnosis, Study and Management of its Disorders.
H. Frost (2003)
Relationship Between Structural Parameters, Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Load in Lumbar Vertebrae, Based on High-Resolution Computed Tomography, Quantitative Computed Tomography and Compression Tests
M. A. Haidekker (1999)
Bone strength: The bottom line
T. Einhorn (2004)
Andra C. Buxkemper (2003)
Muscle Strength, Bone Mass, and Age‐Related Bone Loss
D. Burr (1997)
Prediction of fracture load at different skeletal sites by geometric properties of the cortical shell
P. Augat (1996)

This paper is referenced by
Bone mineral density discordance and exploration of one of its causes.
R. Heaney (2011)
Phosphate Binding with Sevelamer Preserves Mechanical Competence of Bone Despite Acidosis in Advanced Experimental Renal Insufficiency
J. Jokihaara (2016)
Does a novel school-based physical activity model benefit femoral neck bone strength in pre- and early pubertal children?
H. M. Macdonald (2008)
Prediction of femoral strength using 3D finite element models reconstructed from DXA images: validation against experiments
L. Grassi (2017)
Lessons Learned from Clinical Research Using QCT, pQCT, and HR-pQCT
H. Macdonald (2016)
Clinical and basic research papers - August 2005 selections
E. Seeman (2005)
Cortical Bone Histomorphometry of the Iliac Crest in Normal Black and White South African Adults
C. Schnitzler (2006)
Four-month treatment with GLP-2 significantly increases hip BMD: a randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study in postmenopausal women with low BMD.
D. Henriksen (2009)
Bone geometry, strength, and muscle size in runners with a history of stress fracture.
K. Popp (2009)
Paricalcitol [19‐Nor‐1,25‐(OH)2D2] in the Treatment of Experimental Renal Bone Disease
J. Jokihaara (2006)
Histomorphometric Comparison of 3 Osteotomy Techniques
Frederic B Slete (2018)
Changes in proximal femur bone properties following ovariectomy and their association with resistance to fracture
H. Fonseca (2011)
The effects of lean mass and hormonal characteristics on bone geometry and bone strength in young adult women
B. Kaufman (2008)
A Novel Osseous Densification Approach in Implant Osteotomy Preparation to Increase Biomechanical Primary Stability, Bone Mineral Density, and Bone-to-Implant Contact.
Salah Huwais (2017)
Effect of strain rate and bone quality on the bending behaviour of whole bone
R. Wallace (2012)
Exercise loading and bone structure
R. Nikander (2009)
Treatment of experimental renal osteodystrophy with pamidronate.
J. Jokihaara (2008)
Bone mineral accrual from 8 to 30 years of age: An estimation of peak bone mass
A. Baxter-Jones (2011)
Oral ibandronate preserves trabecular microarchitecture: micro-computed tomography findings from the oral iBandronate Osteoporosis vertebral fracture trial in North America and Europe study.
R. Recker (2009)
Bone Mass and Strength in Older Men With Type 2 Diabetes: The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study
M. Petit (2010)
Bone quality: what is it and how is it measured?
J. Compston (2006)
Leptin and bone: A consensus emerging?
M. Hamrick (2007)
Effects of high-impact training and detraining on femoral neck structure in premenopausal women: a hip structural analysis of an 18-month randomized controlled exercise intervention with 3.5-year follow-up.
A. Heinonen (2012)
Bone Mineral Density and Singh Index Predict Bone Mechanical Properties of Human Femur
P. D’Amelio (2008)
Bone health and risk of stress fracture in female endurance athletes
R. Duckham (2011)
Impaired geometric properties of tibia in older women with hip fracture history
T. Mikkola (2007)
Age-Related Changes in Trabecular Architecture Differ in Female and Male C 57 BL / 6 J Mice *
V. Glatt (2007)
Primärpräventiver Nutzen regelmäßiger körperlicher Aktivität
G. Samitz (2017)
Biomechanical testing in experimental bone interventions--May the power be with you.
O. Leppänen (2008)
Calcium and Vitamin-D supplementation on bone structural properties in young male Jockeys: A randomised controlled trial
Leslie N. Silk (2016)
Three‐Point Bending of Rat Femur in the Mediolateral Direction: Introduction and Validation of a Novel Biomechanical Testing Protocol
O. Leppänen (2006)
A biomechanical perspective on bone quality.
C. Hernandez (2006)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar