Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Diagnostically Significant Variations In Pleural Fluid PH In Loculated Parapneumonic Effusions.

N. Maskell, F. Gleeson, M. Darby, R. Davies
Published 2004 · Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
STUDY OBJECTIVES Parapneumonic effusions are common, and measurement of pleural pH is one of the most useful measurements in assessing the need for tube drainage. Use of pleural pH assumes that a single measurement conveys a representative picture of pH throughout the effusion. Often effusions are multiloculated, and varying concentrations of nondiffusible acids such as lactic acid, if present in different concentrations, could mean clinically significant variations in pH between locules. If these differences were large, a single pH measurement could misrepresent the "stage" that the parapneumonic effusion had reached. We therefore set out to test the hypothesis that pH varies significantly between locules in complicated parapneumonic effusions. DESIGN The study was performed in seven consecutive patients presenting to our institution with complicated parapneumonic effusions. INTERVENTIONS In each case, pleural pH was measured in several separate pleural fluid locules, using ultrasound-guided pleural fluid sampling. RESULTS Significant variations were found in pleural fluid visual appearance, pH, and lactate dehydrogenase between locules in four of seven patients. Three of seven patients had variations, resulting in pH levels both above and below 7.2, which is the threshold used in our institution to indicate the need for tube drainage. CONCLUSIONS This is the first reported series of variation in pleural pH between different locules in complicated parapneumonic effusions. These variations are clinically important and cast light on the mechanisms responsible for the acidosis seen in infected effusions. Physicians should be aware of this when making drainage decisions in these patients using the clinical picture and a single pH result alone.
This paper references



This paper is referenced by
10.1016/S1877-1203(13)70352-5
Pneumopathie compliquée de pleurésie
Philippe Astoul (2013)
New trends in the diagnosis and treatment in parapneumonic effusion and empyema.
M. J. Na (2008)
10.5152/pb.2011.02
ERİŞKİNLERDEKİ TEK TARAFLI PLEVRAL EFÜZYONLARIN ARAŞTIRILMASI: BRİTANYA TORAKS DERNEĞİ PLEVRAL HASTALIKLAR KILAVUZU 2010
C. Hooper (2011)
10.1016/J.CCM.2006.02.001
Imaging of pleural disease.
N. R. Qureshi (2006)
10.1111/resp.13081
Pleural infection: To drain or not to drain?
Deirdre B Fitzgerald (2017)
10.1183/09059180.00005610
Empyema thoracis: new insights into an old disease
F. Brims (2010)
Consensus Guidelines for Management of Empyema
K. Shen (2017)
10.1183/2312508x.10023219
Thoracic ultrasound: a key tool beyond procedure guidance
R. Banka (2020)
10.1164/rccm.200801-062OC
Clinically important factors influencing the diagnostic measurement of pleural fluid pH and glucose.
N. Rahman (2008)
10.1016/B978-0-7020-3131-1.00050-X
CHAPTER 50 – Lung, pleura and chest wall
N. Rahman (2011)
10.3390/diagnostics10100829
Diagnostic Value of C-Reactive Protein in Discrimination between Uncomplicated and Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion
Yana Kogan (2020)
10.1259/IMAGING/32826956
Imaging of pleural disease
D. Warakaulle (2004)
10.1016/J.CCM.2005.12.005
The approach to the patient with a parapneumonic effusion.
N. Rahman (2006)
10.1183/16000617.0136-2019
Thoracic ultrasound in the modern management of pleural disease
Maged Hassan (2020)
Título artigo em duas linhas, titulo do artigo em duas linhas em duas linhas
Gomes da Silva (2013)
10.1371/journal.pone.0049894
Ability of Procalcitonin to Discriminate Infection from Non-Infective Inflammation Using Two Pleural Disease Settings
F. McCann (2012)
Serum C-Reactive Protein as an Adjunct for Identifying Complicated Parapneumonic Effusions
Pleural D Isease (2014)
10.20452/PAMW.73
[Parapneumonic pleural effusion: difficulties in making therapeutic decisions].
A. Chudzicka (2007)
Parapneumonic pleural effusions and empyema in adults : current practice
J. Perez (2017)
10.1016/s1579-2129(06)60545-4
[Diagnosis and treatment of pleural effusion].
V. Villena Garrido (2006)
Clinical aspects of pleural fluid pH October 2009
C. Higgins (2016)
10.1542/peds.2005-2719
Therapy of Parapneumonic Effusions in Children: Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Versus Conventional Thoracostomy Drainage
B. Kurt (2006)
10.1136/thx.2010.137000
Management of pleural infection in adults: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010
H. E. Davies (2010)
10.7861/clinmedicine.19-3-213
Interpreting pleural fluid results .
Rachel M Mercer (2019)
angiography Branch retinal artery occlusion during coronary
A. Medford (2005)
10.1007/s00408-014-9606-5
Serum C-Reactive Protein as an Adjunct for Identifying Complicated Parapneumonic Effusions
S. Bielsa (2014)
10.1097/MCP.0000000000000164
Distinguishing complicated from uncomplicated parapneumonic effusions
J. M. Porcel (2015)
10.1157/13124099
Indicación de tratamiento con tubo de drenaje endotorácico en derrames pleurales paraneumónicos, según la presión parcial de anhídrido carbónico de líquido pleural
J. D. Santotoribio (2008)
Thoracoscopic Management of Complicated Parapneumonic Effusions in Young Children
S. A. Hindi (2009)
10.1136/thx.2010.136978
Investigation of a unilateral pleural effusion in adults: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010
C. Hooper (2010)
10.1055/S-0030-1255679
Pneumonie – Geschichtliche Entwicklung, Status quo und Ausblick
T. Welte (2010)
10.1097/01.mcp.0000166493.77412.2d
Lung cancer: genetics of risk and advances in chemoprevention
R. Keith (2005)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar