Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Informants In Organizational Marketing Research: Why Use Multiple Informants And How To Aggregate Responses

G. H. van Bruggen, G. Lilien, M. Kacker
Published 2002 · Business

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
Organizational research frequently involves seeking judgmental response data from informants within organizations. This article discusses why using multiple informants improves the quality of response data and thereby the validity of research findings. The authors show that when there are multiple informants who disagree, responses aggregated with confidence- or competence-based weights outperform those with response data-based weights, which in turn provide significant gains in estimation accuracy over simply averaging informant reports. The proposed methods are effective, inexpensive, and easy to use in organizational marketing research.
This paper references
10.1016/0749-5978(89)90055-1
Accuracy and confidence in group judgment
J. A. Sniezek (1989)
10.1287/MNSC.23.7.679
Combining Expert Judgments: A Bayesian Approach
P. Morris (1977)
Multiple Probability Assessments
Agnew (1985)
10.1177/002224379803500406
Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize
R. Chandy (1998)
10.2307/2094155
On Using Informants: A Technique for Collecting Quantitative Data and Controlling Measurement Error in Organization Analysis
J. Seidler (1974)
10.1287/MNSC.27.4.479
Combining Probability Distributions from Dependent Information Sources
R. Winkler (1981)
10.1509/jmkr.37.4.449.18786
A Multiple-Layer Model of Market-Oriented Organizational Culture: Measurement Issues and Performance Outcomes
C. Homburg (2000)
10.1016/0030-5073(75)90044-6
Unit weighting schemes for decision making
H. Einhorn (1975)
10.1080/01621459.1985.10478120
Multiple Probability Assessments by Dependent Experts
C. Agnew (1985)
Group Versus Individual Performance: Are
Saddle River (1982)
Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives.
D. Rousseau (1985)
Combining Expert Judgments: A Bayesian
P. A. Morris (1977)
10.1177/002224378201900412
The Reliability and Validity of Key Informant Data from Dyadic Relationships in Marketing Channels
G. John (1982)
10.1177/002224378502200109
A Measurement Model to Assess Measure-Specific Factors in Multiple-Informant Research
J. C. Anderson (1985)
10.1007/978-0-585-34290-0_8
Perspectives on Expertise in the Aggregation of Judgments
Gene Rowe (1992)
10.1287/MNSC.44.2.149
Combining Expert Judgment by Hierarchical Modeling: An Application to Physician Staffing
J. Lipscomb (1998)
10.1037/0033-2909.84.1.158
Quality of Group Judgment
H. Einhorn (1977)
10.1037/0021-9010.67.2.219
Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement.
L. James (1982)
10.1287/MNSC.39.4.501
Aggregating Point Estimates: A Flexible Modeling Approach
R. Clemen (1993)
10.1177/002224378101800401
Assessing Measurement Error in Key Informant Reports: A Methodological Note on Organizational Analysis in Marketing
L. Phillips (1981)
10.1016/0030-5073(78)90037-5
A note on aggregating opinions
R. Hogarth (1978)
10.1177/002224379202900304
The Overconfidence Effect in Marketing Management Predictions
J. Mahajan (1992)
10.1287/MNSC.33.4.525
An approach for confirmatory measurement and structural equation modeling of organizational properties
J. Anderson (1987)
10.1007/978-1-4613-2391-4_6
Combining Individual Judgments
W. R. Ferrell (1985)
10.1287/MNSC.38.2.212
Locally Rational Decision Making: The Distracting Effect of Information on Managerial Performance
R. Glazer (1992)
10.1086/209137
Measurement Error and Theory Testing in Consumer Research: An Illustration of the Importance of Construct Validation
Joseph A. Cote (1988)
10.1016/0030-5073(78)90044-2
Performance of a composite as a function of the number of judges
R. Libby (1978)
A Measurement Model to Assess
Anderson (1985)
10.1287/INTE.16.1.89
The Ombudsman: Research on Forecasting: A Quarter-Century Review, 1960--1984
J. S. Armstrong (1986)
10.2307/3151850
Interdependence, Punitive Capability, and the Reciprocation of Punitive Actions in Channel Relationships:
N. Kumar (1998)
10.1177/002224378101800101
A Model and Measurement Methodology for Predicting Individual Consumer Choice
R. R. Batsell (1981)
10.5465/256824
Conducting Interorganizational Research Using Key Informants
N. Kumar (1993)
10.1177/002224378302000202
Managerial Judgment in Marketing: The Concept of Expertise
Jean-Claude Larréché (1983)
10.1177/002224378201900201
Measuring Influence in Organizational Purchase Decisions
Alvin J. Silk (1982)
10.1177/002224378702400308
Estimating Trait, Method, and Error Variance: Generalizing across 70 Construct Validation Studies
Joseph A. Cote (1987)
The O mbudsman: Research on Forecasting: A Quarter-Century Review, 1960-1984
J. Scott (1986)
10.1086/314317
Knowledge Calibration: What Consumers Know and What They Think They Know
J. Alba (2000)
10.1016/0169-2070(89)90012-5
Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography
R. Clemen (1989)
10.1037//0021-9010.71.2.354
Assessment of a consensus-based multiple information source job evaluation system.
D. Schwab (1986)
Assessing Measurement Error in Key
Philips (1981)
10.1287/MNSC.31.12.1499
Aggregating Subjective Forecasts: Some Empirical Results
A. M. Ashton (1985)
10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.517
Group versus individual performance: are n + 1 heads better than one?" psychological bulletin
G. W. Hill (1982)
10.1177/002224378101800201
Construct Validity: A Review of Basic Issues and Marketing Practices
J. Peter (1981)



This paper is referenced by
10.1108/JOPP-13-02-2013-B002
UNWRITTEN GROUND RULES (UGRS) IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
S. Khan (2013)
The Impact of CRM System Development on CRM Acceptance
Samppa Suoniemi (2013)
10.2139/ssrn.1598394
Aggregating Experts: Reducing Error and Assessing Reliability
Cherie D. Maestas (2008)
NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT 2.0: Preference Markets How Scalable Securities Markets Identify Winning Product Concepts & Attributes
E. Dahan (2009)
Understanding the Additional Value Created by Customer Solutions and How it is Contingent upon Solution Complexity
Wolfgang Ulaga (2009)
10.1007/S11573-006-0038-4
Der Einfluss von Meinungsführern auf den Erfolg von hedonischen Produkten
M. Clement (2006)
10.1016/J.IBUSREV.2017.07.006
Addressing the cross-boundary missing link between corporate political activities and firm competencies: The mediating role of institutional capital
Yu Gao (2018)
10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00308.x
Letting Go to Grow: Empirical Findings on a Hearsay
M. Brettel (2010)
The Role of Attractive Employers and Perceived Organizational Support on Employee Motivation and Engagement
Sophia Chiovitti (2019)
10.1111/J.1540-5885.2010.00763.X
New Product Development 2.0: Preference Markets—How Scalable Securities Markets Identify Winning Product Concepts and Attributes*
E. Dahan (2010)
10.1111/J.1540-5885.2010.00736.X
Subjective Performance Assessment of Innovation Projects
F. Blindenbach-Driessen (2010)
10.1111/J.0033-3298.2004.00417.X
Multiple Voices of Modernization: Some Methodological Implications
G. Enticott (2004)
An Organizational Attachment Model: Lmx-Social Comparison, Job Embeddedness And Psychological Ownership
Saul R. Valdiviezo (2017)
10.1007/S11846-014-0137-5
Success factors of management consulting
Matias Bronnenmayer (2016)
10.1509/jim.14.0026
Exploring Subsidiary Desire for Autonomy: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Findings
C. Homburg (2014)
UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL ESCOLA DE ADMINISTRAÇÃO PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ADMINISTRAÇÃO
Tese de Doutorado (2009)
10.1177/0092070304270729
Contractual governance, relational governance, and the performance of interfirm service exchanges: The influence of boundary-spanner closeness
R. J. Ferguson (2005)
10.1007/978-3-8349-9069-3_14
Stand der Integrierten Kommunikation in österreichischen Unternehmen
M. Bruhn (2006)
10.1111/J.1540-5885.2012.01010.X
Improving Marketing's Contribution to New Product Development
Wenzel Drechsler (2011)
10.1093/jopart/muz034
Pathways to Implementation: Evidence on How Participation in Environmental Governance Impacts on Environmental Outcomes
Nicolas Wilhelm Jager (2020)
10.2196/mhealth.9836
Assessing the Quality of Mobile Phone Apps for Weight Management: User-Centered Study With Employees From a Lebanese University
Marco Bardus (2019)
10.2139/SSRN.1993207
Organizational Buying Behavior: Where We Have Been and Where We Need to Go
Robert E. Spekman (2011)
10.1111/EMRE.12327
Investigating key antecedents and outcomes of employee-based brand equity
Achilleas Boukis (2020)
Corporate governance, auditor quality and the reliability of audited financial statements in Libyan banking sector
Abdelfatah M. Alrshah (2014)
10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00956.x
Behavioural Orientations of Non-Profit Boards as a Factor in Entrepreneurial Performance: Does Governance Matter?
S. Coombes (2011)
10.1007/S11205-016-1342-1
An Institutional Perspective on Individual Work Well-Being: Evidence from China
Wei Li (2017)
10.1016/J.INDMARMAN.2011.12.002
When 3 + 3 does not equal 5 + 1—New insights into the measurement of industrial customer satisfaction
Viola Austen (2012)
10.1007/S11747-012-0306-5
Linking multiple layers of innovation-oriented corporate culture, product program innovativeness, and business performance: a contingency approach
R. Stock (2013)
10.1509/jmkg.70.2.067
Cross-Functional “Coopetition”: The Simultaneous Role of Cooperation and Competition within Firms
Xueming Luo (2006)
10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00793.x
Small Steps that Matter: Incremental Learning, Slack Resources and Organizational Performance
T. Salge (2013)
10.2307/20650304
Minimizing Method Bias Through Programmatic Research
Andrew Burton-Jones (2009)
10.1016/J.INDMARMAN.2016.09.007
Strategic orientation and new product development performance: The role of networking capability and networking ability
Jifeng Mu (2017)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar