Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

A Comparative Study Of 70 Cases Of Inter-trochanteric Fracture Femur Treated With Dynamic Hip Screw And Proximal Femoral Nailing

Gaurav Singla
Published 2017 · Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Background: Inter-trochanteric fracture femur is a common and grievous injury, mostly suffered in elderly people. It accounts for approximately half of hip fractures in elderly and out of this, more than 50% of fractures are unstable. In old age, it occurs mostly due to trivial trauma. Various procedures of internal fixation had been proposed as a treatment. DHS considered to be the standard procedure for comparison of outcomes. The advantage of proximal femur nailing fixation is that it provides a more biomechanically stable construct by reducing the distance between hip joint and implant. The goal of this study is to compare the clinical and radio-graphical results of the DHS and PFN for the treatment of Intertrochanteric hip fractures (load bearing vs. load sharing). Methods: Seventy patients (more than 55 years old) presented to Adesh Hospital from March 2015 to November 2015 with trochanteric fracture femur. Patients were treated with osteosynthesis with dynamic hip screw (DHS) and proximal femoral nailing (PFN). The clinical results were compared between the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nailing groups of 35 patients each. All surgeries done on traction table and were followed up at regular intervals of 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and at 1 year. Results: We observed no statistically significant difference between two groups in view of late & early complications and time to union. We observed significantly better outcomes in PFN group for unstable inter-trochanteric fractures and in unstable fractures reduction loss is significantly lower in PFN group. Conclusions: We concluded that PFN may be the better fixation device for most unstable inter-trochanteric fractures.
This paper references
Management of subtrochanteric femoral fractures and metastases using long proximal femoral nail.
M. Ramakrishnan (2004)
Trochanteric Fractures. The best method of treatment
I Khaled (2008)
The use of PFNA in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Folia Traumatologica
A Sermon (2007)
Fractures and dislocations of the hip. In: Canale ST, editor. Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics
G. David Lavelle (2008)
The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure.
D. Carter (1977)
Full weight bearing after unstable per and subtrochanteric fracture using proximal femur nail
B Kish (2001)
I. Khan (2004)
The use of PFNA in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures
A Sermon (2007)
A comparative study of 70 cases of inter-trochanteric fracture femur treated with dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nailing
Gaurav Singla (2017)
Management of trochanteric fracture
SS Babhulkar (2006)
Fractures and dislocations of the hip.
Colin F. Moseley (1992)
The proximal femoral nail - a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures
B. Christian (2003)
The future of hip fractures in the United States. Numbers, costs, and potential effects of postmenopausal estrogen.
S. Cummings (1990)
Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults
C. Rockwood (1991)
Extramedullary fixation of 569 unstable intertrochanteric fractures: A randomized multicenter trial of the Medoff sliding plate versus three other screw-plate systems
K. Lunsjö (2001)
Pertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with a dynamic hip screw or a proximal femoral nail. A randomised study comparing post-operative rehabilitation.
J. Pajarinen (2005)
Stabilization of unstable trochanteric femoral fractures: dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilization plate vs Proximal femoral nail
S Nuber (2003)
The fixion proximal femur nailing system: biomechanical properties of the nail and a cadaveric study.
E. Steinberg (2005)

This paper is referenced by
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar