Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.

Hydrophilicity, Viscoelastic, And Physicochemical Properties Variations In Dental Bone Grafting Substitutes

B. Trajkovski, M. Jaunich, W. Müller, F. Beuer, G. Zafiropoulos, A. Houshmand
Published 2018 · Materials Science, Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
The indication-oriented Dental Bone Graft Substitutes (DBGS) selection, the correct bone defects classification, and appropriate treatment planning are very crucial for obtaining successful clinical results. However, hydrophilic, viscoelastic, and physicochemical properties’ influence on the DBGS regenerative potential has poorly been studied. For that reason, we investigated the dimensional changes and molecular mobility by Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) of xenograft (cerabone®), synthetic (maxresorb®), and allograft (maxgraft®, Puros®) blocks in a wet and dry state. While no significant differences could be seen in dry state, cerabone® and maxresorb® blocks showed a slight height decrease in wet state, whereas both maxgraft® and Puros® had an almost identical height increase. In addition, cerabone® and maxresorb® blocks remained highly rigid and their damping behaviour was not influenced by the water. On the other hand, both maxgraft® and Puros® had a strong increase in their molecular mobility with different damping behaviour profiles during the wet state. A high-speed microscopical imaging system was used to analyze the hydrophilicity in several naturally derived (cerabone®, Bio-Oss®, NuOss®, SIC® nature graft) and synthetic DBGS granules (maxresorb®, BoneCeramic®, NanoBone®, Ceros®). The highest level of hydrophilicity was detected in cerabone® and maxresorb®, while Bio-Oss® and BoneCeramic® had the lowest level of hydrophilicity among both naturally derived and synthetic DBGS groups. Deviations among the DBGS were also addressed via physicochemical differences recorded by Micro Computed Tomography, Scanning Electron Microscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy, X-ray powder Diffractometry, and Thermogravimetric Analysis. Such DBGS variations could influence the volume stability at the grafting site, handling as well as the speed of vascularization and bone regeneration. Therefore, this study initiates a new insight into the DBGS differences and their importance for successful clinical results.
This paper references
10.1002/adhm.201200159
Geometry as a factor for tissue growth: towards shape optimization of tissue engineering scaffolds.
C. M. Bidan (2013)
10.1097/01.id.0000042239.45701.74
The European market for dental bone graft substitutes.
(2003)
European Market for Dental Bone Graft Substitutes and Other Biomaterials; iData Research: Burnaby
iData Research (2013)
10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00091
Eight-year results of site retention of anorganic bovine bone and anorganic bovine matrix.
M. Degidi (2013)
10.1007/s12018-015-9194-9
Evolution of Bone Grafting: Bone Grafts and Tissue Engineering Strategies for Vascularized Bone Regeneration
K. Griffin (2015)
10.1016/j.addr.2012.05.016
Intra-operatively customized implant coating strategies for local and controlled drug delivery to bone.
Branko Trajkovski (2012)
10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00621-5
A thorough physicochemical characterisation of 14 calcium phosphate-based bone substitution materials in comparison to natural bone.
D. Tadic (2004)
Comparison of mineralized cancellous bone allograft (Puros) and anorganic bovine bone matrix (Bio-Oss) for sinus augmentation: histomorphometry at 26 to 32 weeks after grafting.
S. Froum (2006)
10.1186/s40729-014-0002-y
Evaluation of implant-materials as cell carriers for dental stem cells under in vitro conditions
M. Gosau (2015)
10.21823/2311-2905-2017-23-4-92-100
АЛЛОГЕННЫЕ КОСТНОПЛАСТИЧЕСКИЕ МАТЕРИАЛЫ: СОВРЕМЕННОЕ СОСТОЯНИЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ // ALLOGENEIC BONE GRAFTING MATERIALS – UPDATE OF THE CURRENT SCIENTIFIC STATUS
Denis Rimashevskiy (2017)
10.1155/2012/737262
Influence of Material Properties on Rate of Resorption of Two Bone Graft Materials after Sinus Lift Using Radiographic Assessment
Fawzi Riachi (2012)
10.1016/j.ijom.2013.10.017
Bone substitute material composition and morphology differentially modulate calcium and phosphate release through osteoclast-like cells.
Anna Konermann (2014)
10.1563/0.693.1
Human histologic analysis of mineralized bone allograft (Puros) placement before implant surgery.
J. Minichetti (2004)
10.1007/978-94-010-0305-6_10
Dynamic Mechanical Analysis in Polymers for Medical Applications
J. F. Mano (2002)
10.1038/bdj.2007.74
Failures in implant dentistry
W. Chee (2007)
10.1007/978-3-642-18225-9_2
Bone Grafts and Bone Graft Substitutes in Periodontal Therapy
Alexandrina Lizica Dumitrescu (2011)
10.1002/JBM.A.10148
Preparation, degradation, and calcification of biodegradable polyurethane foams for bone graft substitutes.
K. Gorna (2003)
Cologne Classification of Alveolar Ridge Defects (CCARD)
BDIZ EDI (2013)
10.1016/j.actbio.2014.04.017
Potential lack of "standardized" processing techniques for production of allogeneic and xenogeneic bone blocks for application in humans.
S. Ghanaati (2014)
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license
10.1016/j.jcms.2012.01.002
Current trends and future perspectives of bone substitute materials - from space holders to innovative biomaterials.
A. Kolk (2012)
10.1615/JLONGTERMEFFMEDIMPLANTS.V20.I4.20
The effects of various cleaning and sterilization processes on allograft bone incorporation.
Jordan Kattz (2010)
10.14573/ALTEX.2010.2.97
Investigation of bone allografts representing different steps of the bone bank procedure using the CAM-model.
P. Holzmann (2010)
10.1097/SCS.0000000000002393
Evaluation of Volumetric Changes of Augmented Maxillary Sinus With Different Bone Grafting Biomaterials
B Alper Gultekin (2016)
10.1016/j.addr.2012.06.008
Demineralized bone matrix in bone repair: History and use☆
Elliott Gruskin (2012)
10.1089/ten.TEA.2011.0514
The impact of substrate stiffness and mechanical loading on fibroblast-induced scaffold remodeling.
A. Petersen (2012)
10.1002/jbm.b.31195
Demineralized bone matrix as an osteoinductive biomaterial and in vitro predictors of its biological potential.
Jordan M Katz (2009)
Bone replacement
Z. Sheikh
10.1002/MAWE.200400734
Cerabone® – eine Spongiosa‐Keramik bovinen Ursprungs
P. Seidel (2004)
10.1016/j.joen.2011.10.002
Effect of guided tissue regeneration on newly formed bone and cementum in periapical tissue healing after endodontic surgery: an in vivo study in the cat.
Zvi Artzi (2012)
10.1002/CRAT.200510572
Thermal behavior of biogenic apatite crystals in bone: An X‐ray diffraction study
S. Danilchenko (2006)
10.3390/ma8041778
Bone Regeneration Using Bone Morphogenetic Proteins and Various Biomaterial Carriers
Z. Sheikh (2015)
Dynamic Mechanical Analysis in Polymers for Medical Applications. In Polymer Based Systems on Tissue Engineering, Replacement and Regeneration SE—10
J. F. Mano (2002)
Biomaterials in Maxillofacial Surgery: Membranes and Grafts
L. Rodella (2011)
Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study.
T. Oates (2007)
10.1111/J.1600-0501.2006.01303.X
Clinical evaluation of demineralized bone allograft in a hyaluronic acid carrier for sinus lift augmentation in humans: a computed tomography and histomorphometric study.
Z. Schwartz (2007)
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02083.x
Vertical ridge augmentation of atrophic posterior mandible using an inlay technique with a xenograft without miniscrews and miniplates: case series.
Antonio Scarano (2011)
Pore Size Distribution of Human Trabecular Bone—Comparison of Intrusion Measurements with Image Analysis
T. Doktor (2011)
10.1016/j.jcms.2016.03.005
Maxillary sinus grafting with fresh frozen allograft versus bovine bone mineral: A tomographic and histological study.
S. Xavier (2016)
10.1186/1746-160X-5-12
A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials
J. Handschel (2009)
10.3390/ma8062953
Bone Replacement Materials and Techniques Used for Achieving Vertical Alveolar Bone Augmentation
Zeeshan Sheikh (2015)
10.1002/adhm.201600052
Controlling Bone Graft Substitute Microstructure to Improve Bone Augmentation.
Zeeshan Sheikh (2016)
10.1007/978-3-642-03891-4_69
Impact of Citric Acid Etching on Biocompatibility and Osseous Organisation of a Natural Bovine Bone Mineral: Preliminary Results of an In-Vitro/In-Vivo Study
Daniel Rothamel (2009)
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02193.x
Histomorphometric and mineral degradation study of Ossceram: a novel biphasic B-tricalcium phosphate, in critical size defects in rabbits.
J. L. Calvo-Guirado (2012)
10.1007/S00113-003-0611-Z
[Influence of processing and sterilization on the mechanical properties of pins made from bovine cortical bone].
C. Hofmann (2003)
10.1177/154405910408300704
Enhanced Bone Apposition to a Chemically Modified SLA Titanium Surface
D. Buser (2004)



This paper is referenced by
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar