Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.

Sexual Dimorphism In Buccolingual Diameter Of Canines In North Indian Population

Bindu Aggarwal, R. K. Gorea
Published 2015 · Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
Introduction: Teeth are the most durable part of the skeleton. Under most conditions occurring in nature like putrefaction, mutilation, fire and prolonged immersion in water, teeth are the least destructible part of the body as these may readily survive all these changes. Teeth are useful in determination of the gender by using different odontometric techniques. Among all the teeth, the canines are found to exhibit greatest sexual dimorphism. Materials and Methods: In the present study, 53 male and 56 female volunteers of North Indian origin; in the age group of 18‑25 years were selected to observe the sexual dimorphism in the buccolingual crown diameter of the maxillary and mandibular canines. Dental casts of the volunteers were made after getting their written consent. The buccolingual diameter of the canines was measured on the study casts as the greatest distance between the buccal and lingual surface of the canine crown with a digital vernier calipers. Results: It was found that the buccolingual diameter was significantly larger in the males as compared to the females and the difference was highly statistically significant. The sexual dimorphism in the buccolingual diameter of maxillary canines was found to be 8.88% on the right side and 7.78% on the left side. In the mandibular canines, the sexual dimorphism was 9.26% on the right side and 8.94% on the left side. Conclusion: The study defines the morphometric criteria for canines in North Indian population and the results indicate that the dimorphism in canines can be of immense medico‑legal use in identification and gender determination. Original Article
This paper references
10.1002/ajpa.1330460305
Analysis of developmental processes possibly related to human dental sexual dimorphism in permanent and deciduous canines.
M. Moss (1977)
47,XXY males: sex chromosomes and tooth size.
L. Alvesalo (1980)
10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.02.001
Sexual dimorphism in permanent teeth of modern Greeks.
Eleni Zorba (2011)
Gender determination by odontometrics in a Swedish population.
H. Lund (1999)
10.1043/0003-3219(1967)037<0186:BSAAID>2.0.CO;2
Buccolingual size asymmetry and its developmental meaning.
S. Garn (1967)
An introduction to forensic dentistry.
Whittaker Dk (1994)
10.1177/00220345730520030701
Interrelationships and Sex Differences of Dental and Skeletal Measurements
D. Anderson (1973)
A study of prevalence of periodontal disease using Remfjord's technique.
Vacher Br (1966)
10.1016/0889-5406(89)90326-0
Comparisons of mesiodistal and buccolingual crown dimensions of the permanent teeth in three populations from Egypt, Mexico, and the United States.
S. Bishara (1989)
Odontometric data of Indian teeth. I. Anterior teeth.
A T Biiji (1967)
10.4103/0974-2948.60380
Bucco-lingual dimension of teeth - An aid in sex determination
Rm Prathibha Rani (2009)
10.1177/00220345670460053501
Environment, Tooth Form, and Size in the Pleistocene
C. Brace (1967)
Significance of Mesiodistal diameter of the Mandibular permanent canine in Sexual dimorphism
S. Kaushal (2008)
10.3109/00016358309162321
Crown size of permanent teeth in Icelanders.
G. Axelsson (1983)
10.1111/j.1365-2842.2000.00583.x
Erosion of dentine and enamel in vitro by dietary acids: the effect of temperature, acid character, concentration and exposure time.
N. West (2000)



This paper is referenced by
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar