Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies In Epidemiology: A Proposal For Reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies In Epidemiology (MOOSE) Group.

D. Stroup, J. Berlin, S. Morton, I. Olkin, G. Williamson, D. Rennie, D. Moher, B. Becker, T. Sipe, S. Thacker
Published 2000 · Medicine

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
OBJECTIVE Because of the pressure for timely, informed decisions in public health and clinical practice and the explosion of information in the scientific literature, research results must be synthesized. Meta-analyses are increasingly used to address this problem, and they often evaluate observational studies. A workshop was held in Atlanta, Ga, in April 1997, to examine the reporting of meta-analyses of observational studies and to make recommendations to aid authors, reviewers, editors, and readers. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-seven participants were selected by a steering committee, based on expertise in clinical practice, trials, statistics, epidemiology, social sciences, and biomedical editing. Deliberations of the workshop were open to other interested scientists. Funding for this activity was provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. EVIDENCE We conducted a systematic review of the published literature on the conduct and reporting of meta-analyses in observational studies using MEDLINE, Educational Research Information Center (ERIC), PsycLIT, and the Current Index to Statistics. We also examined reference lists of the 32 studies retrieved and contacted experts in the field. Participants were assigned to small-group discussions on the subjects of bias, searching and abstracting, heterogeneity, study categorization, and statistical methods. CONSENSUS PROCESS From the material presented at the workshop, the authors developed a checklist summarizing recommendations for reporting meta-analyses of observational studies. The checklist and supporting evidence were circulated to all conference attendees and additional experts. All suggestions for revisions were addressed. CONCLUSIONS The proposed checklist contains specifications for reporting of meta-analyses of observational studies in epidemiology, including background, search strategy, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. Use of the checklist should improve the usefulness of meta-analyses for authors, reviewers, editors, readers, and decision makers. An evaluation plan is suggested and research areas are explored.
This paper references
Heterogene - ity in meta - analysis of data from epidemiologic stud
GA Colditz (1995)
Depression in elderly medi - cal inpatients
MG Cole (1997)
pirical evidence of bias
KF Schulz (1995)
10.1016/S0140-6736(98)01085-X
Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
D. Moher (1998)
Depression in elderly medical inpatients. CMAJ
MG Cole (1997)
Retrospective and prospective identification of unpublishedcontrolledtrials.Pediatrics.1989;84:374-380
J Hetherington (1989)
10.1016/S0140-6736(05)62352-5
Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? University of Pennsylvania Meta-analysis Blinding Study Group.
Berlin Ja (1997)
10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.EPIREV.A036298
Quantitative methods in the review of epidemiologic literature.
S. Greenland (1987)
Synthesis of environmental evidence
V Hasselblad (1992)
10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.AJE.A117324
Meta-analysis/Shmeta-analysis.
S. Shapiro (1994)
Benefits of low-dose corticosteroids in rheumatoid arthritis.
M. Cohen (1997)
Retrospective and prospective identification of un - publishedcontrolledtrials
J Hetherington (1989)
10.1136/BMJ.317.7172.1562
Review of the usefulness of contacting other experts when conducting a literature search for systematic reviews
R. McManus (1998)
10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement
D. Moher (1999)
10.1093/IJE/28.1.1
Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology.
M. Blettner (1999)
10.1126/SCIENCE.7973676
Can meta-analysis make policy?
C. Mann (1994)
10.1001/JAMA.281.9.830
The role of meta-analysis in the regulatory process for foods, drugs, and devices.
J. Berlin (1999)
10.1093/HUMREP/12.9.1851
Risk of endometrial cancer in relation to use of combined oral contraceptives. A practitioner's guide to meta-analysis.
J. Schlesselman (1997)
NIH clinical trials and publication bias.
K. Dickersin (1993)
10.1038/nm0697-692
How to Report Statistics in Medicine
E. Franssen (1997)
10.1016/S0140-6736(05)62082-X
Does blinding of readers affect results of meta-analyses?
R. West (1997)
10.1001/JAMA.282.11.1054
The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis.
P. Jüni (1999)
Cochrane Collaboration helping unravel tangled web woven by international research.
P. Huston (1996)
Measuring the quality of trials
JA Berlin (1999)
Statistical Methods for Metaanalysis
LV Hedges (1985)
Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data? Lancet
LA Stewart (1993)
10.1016/S0883-0355(96)80001-2
A meta-synthesis of factors related to educational achievement: a methodological approach to summarizing and synthesizing meta-analyses
T. Sipe (1996)
10.7326/0003-4819-127-1-199707010-00007
How Consumers and Policymakers Can Use Systematic Reviews for Decision Making
L. Bero (1997)
10.4135/9781412952644.n318
Observational studies.
J. Peipert (1998)
Patients’ preferences for Turbuhaler or pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) in the treatment
A Jadad (2000)
10.7326/0003-4819-126-11-199706010-00006
Using Systematic Reviews in Clinical Education
R. Badgett (1997)
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. QUOROM Group.
D. Moher (2000)
How consumers and policy - makers can use systematic reviews for decision mak
LA Bero (1997)
10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results
R. Rosenthal (1979)
University of Pennsylvania Metaanalysis Blinding Study Group. Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? Lancet
JA Berlin (1997)
Retrospective and prospective identification of unpublishedcontrolledtrials
J Hetherington (1989)
10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.AJE.A009051
Comparison of effect estimates from a meta-analysis of summary data from published studies and from a meta-analysis using individual patient data for ovarian cancer studies.
K. Steinberg (1997)
10.1016/0140-6736(93)93004-K
Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference?
L. Stewart (1993)
10.1017/S0266462300010278
How should we research unconventional therapies? A panel report from the Conference on Complementary and Alternative Medicine Research Methodology, National Institutes of Health.
A. Vickers (1997)
Pooling research results
JP Ioannidis (1999)
Can meta-analysis make policy? Science. 1999;266:960-962
CC Mann (1999)
10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.AJE.A117645
Invited commentary: benefits of heterogeneity in meta-analysis of data from epidemiologic studies.
J. Berlin (1995)
10.1016/0010-7824(91)90005-Z
Oral contraceptives and cervical neoplasia.
L. Brinton (1991)
Oral contraceptives and cervical neoplasia. Tumori
S Franceschi (1986)
Characteristics of meta-analyses submitted to a medical journal
DF Stroup (1997)
Measuring the quality of tri
JA Berlin (1999)
10.1016/0895-4356(94)00172-M
Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the Potsdam Consultation on Meta-Analysis.
D. Cook (1995)
Meta - analysis / shmetaanalysis
S Shapiro (1994)
Summing up evidence
J Lau (1998)
10.1002/AJIM.4700140110
Asbestos exposure and gastrointestinal malignancy review and meta-analysis.
H. Frumkin (1988)
10.1016/0197-2456(90)90175-2
An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores in controlled randomized clinical trials.
J. Emerson (1990)
10.2105/AJPH.89.7.1009
Occupational exposure to diesel exhaust and lung cancer: a meta-analysis.
M. Lipsett (1999)
10.1097/00001648-199401000-00011
INFLUENCE OF METHODOLOGIC FACTORS IN A POOLED ANALYSIS OF 13 CASE‐CONTROL STUDIES OF COLORECTAL CANCER AND DIETARY FIBER
C. Friedenreich (1994)
10.1177/096228029300200204
Meta-analytic stimulus for changes in clinical trials
TC Chalmers Harvard (1993)
10.1002/HEP.1840210146
Meta-analysis, decision analysis, and cost-effectiveness analysis. Methods for quantitative synthesis in medicine
R. Koff (1995)
Does the quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet
D Moher (1998)
Petitti D. Meta-Analysis, Decision Analysis, and Cost Effectiveness Analysis
Sb Thacker (1988)
10.1097/00043764-199711000-00008
Occupational electric and magnetic field exposure and leukemia. A meta-analysis.
L. Kheifets (1997)
10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-Y
Publication bias in clinical research
P. Easterbrook (1991)
10.2307/2289186
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis
L. Hedges (1985)



This paper is referenced by
10.1002/dmrr.749
Self‐monitoring of blood glucose in type‐2 diabetes: what is the evidence?
G. McGeoch (2007)
10.3233/DMA-130984
Prognostic Role of microRNA-155 in Various Carcinomas: Results from a Meta-Analysis
Jing He (2013)
10.1002/ijc.28840
Calcium intake and colorectal cancer risk: Dose–response meta‐analysis of prospective observational studies
N. Keum (2014)
10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01078.x
Basic concepts in meta‐analysis: a primer for clinicians
A. Khoshdel (2006)
10.2215/CJN.09650917
Neurocognitive and Educational Outcomes in Children and Adolescents with CKD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
K. Chen (2018)
10.1007/s11695-019-03842-3
Mid-long-term Revisional Surgery After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Bingsheng Guan (2019)
10.1002/hep.26474
Regional and global summary estimates of antibody to hepatitis C virus prevalence in detainee populations: Seeing the forest and the trees?
A. J. Harzke (2013)
10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.965848
Open science and data sharing in clinical research: basing informed decisions on the totality of the evidence.
H. Krumholz (2012)
10.1183/09031936.00147813
Computed tomography to assess risk of death in acute pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis
C. Becattini (2014)
10.1042/BSR20182441
Short-term and long-term prognostic value of circulating soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 concentration in acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis
Linlin Gu (2019)
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034135
Anxiety and clinical outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis
J. Li (2020)
10.1002/bjs.11759
Safe, selective histopathological examination of gallbladder specimens: a systematic review
V. P. Bastiaenen (2020)
10.1016/j.reprotox.2015.03.005
The relationship between preterm birth and underweight in Asian women.
Y. Neggers (2015)
10.1007/s10803-017-3412-x
Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Kaori Maeyama (2018)
10.1093/epirev/mxx019
Health Outcomes for Clients of Needle and Syringe Programs in Prisons
J. Lazarus (2018)
10.15171/JARCM.2015.018
Comparison of levetiracetam versus phenytoin for seizure prophylaxis in patients with traumatic brain injury: A meta-analysis
A. Meshkini (2015)
10.1016/j.jcms.2018.06.012
Lateral sinus floor elevation without grafting materials. Individual- and aggregate-data meta-analysis.
V. Dongo (2018)
10.1016/j.jogc.2018.05.020
Pregnancy Outcomes Following Ulipristal Acetate for Uterine Fibroids: A Systematic Review.
Cassandra De Gasperis-Brigante (2018)
10.1111/ene.14470
Cerebrospinal and blood levels of amino acids as potential biomarkers for Parkinson’s disease: review and meta‐analysis
F. Jiménez-Jiménez (2020)
10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.069
The prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer's disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Qing-Fei Zhao (2016)
10.1007/s10157-015-1204-1
The value of serum creatine kinase in predicting the risk of rhabdomyolysis-induced acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
S. Safari (2015)
10.1111/1753-6405.12762
Socioeconomic status and multimorbidity: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
T. Pathirana (2018)
10.1007/s11356-020-11269-y
Association between postnatal second-hand smoke exposure and ADHD in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Anyan Huang (2020)
10.1016/j.joen.2019.06.006
Association between Pulp Stones and Kidney Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
M. Gabardo (2019)
10.1016/j.arr.2019.100914
Telomere length and frailty in older adults—A systematic review and meta-analysis
A. A. Carvalho (2019)
10.1177/0003319719863174
Deferral Versus Performance of Revascularization for Coronary Stenosis With Grey Zone Fractional Flow Reserve Values: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Y. Du (2019)
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8398
Global Incidence of Frailty and Prefrailty Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults
R. Ofori-Asenso (2019)
10.1016/j.cjca.2017.07.015
Association Between Circulating Oxidized LDL and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.
S. Gao (2017)
10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.031
Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Patients With Acute Diverticulitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.
J. Meyer (2019)
10.1093/geront/gnz009
Hearing Loss and Depression in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Blake J Lawrence (2019)
10.1016/J.CTIM.2019.02.010
The effect of exercise, yoga and physiotherapy on the quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Khrisha B Alphonsus (2019)
10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.02.014
Erectile Dysfunction and Premature Ejaculation in Homosexual and Heterosexual Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.
A. Barbonetti (2019)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar