Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

WITHDRAWN: Motivational Interviewing For Alcohol Misuse In Young Adults.

D. Foxcroft, L. Coombes, S. Wood, D. Allen, Nerissa M L Almeida Santimano
Published 2015 · Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
BACKGROUND: Globally, harmful use of alcohol results in approximately 2.5 million deaths each year. About 9% of these deaths are young people between the ages of 15 and 29 years (WHO 2011), mainly resulting from motor vehicle accidents, homicides, suicides and drownings. Hazardous drinking levels for men (consuming over 40 g/day alcohol on average, that is 5 units) double the risk of liver disease, raised blood pressure, some cancers and violent death (because some people who have this average alcohol consumption drink heavily on some days). For women, over 24 g/day average alcohol consumption (3 units) increases the risk for developing liver disease and breast cancer. Motivational interviewing (MI) is a popular technique for addressing excessive drinking in young adults but its effectiveness has not previously been examined in a Cochrane review. OBJECTIVES: The specific objectives were:(1) to summarise current evidence about the effects of MI intended to address alcohol and alcohol-related problems in young adults, compared with no intervention or a different intervention, on alcohol consumption and other substantive outcome measures;(2) to investigate whether the effects of MI are modified by the length of the intervention. SEARCH METHODS: Relevant evidence was identified from (1) Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (October 2013), (2) MEDLINE (January 1966 to October 2013), (3) EMBASE (January 1988 to October 2013), and (4) PsycINFO (1985 to October 2013). References of topic-related systematic reviews and the included studies were handsearched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials and cluster randomised controlled trials of young people up to the age of 25 years in college and non-college settings comparing MIs with no intervention or a different intervention for prevention of alcohol misuse and alcohol-related problems were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used the standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 66 randomised trials (17,901 participants) were included four of which were cluster randomised. Studies with longer-term follow-up (four plus months) were of more interest when considering the sustainability of intervention effects.At four or more months follow-up, effects were found for the quantity of alcohol consumed (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.14; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.20 to -0.08 or a reduction from 13.7 drinks/week to 12.2 drinks/week), moderate quality of evidence; frequency of alcohol consumption (SMD -0.11; 95% CI -0.19 to -0.03 or a reduction in the number of days/week alcohol was consumed from 2.74 days to 2.57 days), moderate quality of evidence; and peak blood alcohol concentration (BAC) (SMD -0.14; 95% CI -0.23 to -0.05 or a decrease in peak BAC from 0.144% to 0.129%), moderate quality of evidence. A marginal effect was found for alcohol problems (SMD -0.08; 95% CI -0.15 to 0.00 or a reduction in an alcohol problems scale score from 8.91 to 8.18), low quality of evidence. No effects were found for binge drinking (SMD -0.05; 95% CI -0.12 to 0.01), moderate quality of evidence; or average BAC (SMD -0.08; 95% CI -0.22 to 0.06), moderate quality of evidence. We also considered other outcomes and at four or more months follow-up we found no effects on drink-driving (SMD -0.11; 95% CI -0.31 to 0.09), moderate quality of evidence; or other alcohol-related risky behaviour (SMD -0.14; 95% CI -0.30 to 0.02), moderate quality of evidence.Further analyses showed that the type of control comparison (assessment only versus alternative intervention) did not predict the outcome in a clear or straightforward way; and there was no consistent relationship between the duration of the MI intervention (in minutes) and effect size. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review indicate that there are no substantive, meaningful benefits of MI interventions for the prevention of alcohol misuse. Although some significant effects were found, we interpret the effect sizes as being too small, given the measurement scales used in the studies included in the review, to be of relevance to policy or practice. Moreover, the statistically significant effects are not consistent for all misuse measures, heterogeneity was a problem in some analyses and bias cannot be discounted as a potential cause of these findings. Language: en
This paper references
Brief intervention for harm reduction with alcohol-positive older adolescents in a hospital emergency department.
P. Monti (1999)
Computerized versus motivational interviewing alcohol interventions: impact on discrepancy, motivation, and drinking.
J. Murphy (2010)
Motivational interviewing with adolescents and young adults for drug-related problems
J. Grenard (2006)
Brief motivational interviewing for teens at risk of substance use consequences: a randomized pilot study in a primary care clinic.
E. D’Amico (2008)
The efficacy of motivational interviewing as a brief intervention for excessive drinking: a meta-analytic review.
Eirini I Vasilaki (2006)
Effects of motivational interviewing for incarcerated adolescents on driving under the influence after release.
L. Stein (2006)
Methods for testing theory and evaluating impact in randomized field trials: intent-to-treat analyses for integrating the perspectives of person, place, and time.
C. H. Brown (2008)
Randomized controlled trial of proactive web-based alcohol screening and brief intervention for university students.
K. Kypri (2009)
Brief intervention for heavy-drinking college students: 4-year follow-up and natural history.
J. Baer (2001)
Motivational counseling reduces future police charges in court referred youth.
T. Nirenberg (2013)
Brief Motivational Interviewing Intervention for Peer Violence and Alcohol Use in Teens: One-Year Follow-up
R. Cunningham (2012)
Long-term effects of brief substance use interventions for mandated college students: sleeper effects of an in-person personal feedback intervention.
H. White (2007)
Short-term effects of a brief motivational intervention to reduce alcohol and drug risk among homeless adolescents.
P. L. Peterson (2006)
Preventing high-risk drinking in youth in the workplace: a web-based normative feedback program.
D. Doumas (2008)
Motivational Interviewing with Underage College Drinkers: A Preliminary Look at the Role of Empathy and Alliance
S. Feldstein (2007)
Clinical outcomes of a brief motivational intervention for heavy drinking mandated college students: a pilot study.
Meredith A. Terlecki (2010)
A randomized clinical trial evaluating a combined alcohol intervention for high-risk college students.
R. Turrisi (2009)
Efficacy of counselor vs. computer-delivered intervention with mandated college students.
N. Barnett (2007)
The efficacy of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.
Brian L. Burke (2003)
A randomized controlled trial of a brief intervention after alcohol-related facial injury.
A. J. Smith (2003)
Effects of a brief intervention for reducing violence and alcohol misuse among adolescents: a randomized controlled trial.
M. Walton (2010)
Evaluating a brief alcohol intervention with fraternities.
M. Larimer (2001)
An evaluation of a brief motivational intervention among young ecstasy and cocaine users: no effect on substance and alcohol use outcomes.
J. Marsden (2006)
Reducing Alcohol Use in College Students: A Controlled Trial of Two Brief Interventions
S. Walters (2000)
Randomized controlled trial of brief interventions to reduce college students' drinking and risky sex.
K. Dermen (2011)
Computer-based brief intervention a randomized trial with postpartum women.
S. Ondersma (2007)
Brief intervention in alcohol-positive traffic casualties: is it worth the effort?
A. R. Dauer (2006)
A systematic review of the effectiveness of brief interventions with substance using adolescents by type of drug.
R. Tait (2003)
Healthy choices: motivational enhancement therapy for health risk behaviors in HIV-positive youth.
S. Naar-King (2006)
Randomized trial comparing computer-delivered and face-to-face personalized feedback interventions for high-risk drinking among college students.
T. Wagener (2012)
Timeline Follow-Back A Technique for Assessing Self-Reported Alcohol Consumption
L. Sobell (1992)
Exploring the dose-response relationship between alcohol consumption and the risk of several alcohol-related conditions: a meta-analysis.
G. Corrao (1999)
Dismantling motivational interviewing and feedback for college drinkers: a randomized clinical trial.
S. Walters (2009)
Ethnicity as a moderator of motivational interviewing for incarcerated adolescents after release.
M. Clair (2013)
An overview of health risks and benefits of alcohol consumption.
K. D. Thakker (1998)
Randomized controlled trial of motivational interviewing compared with drug information and advice for early intervention among young cannabis users.
J. McCambridge (2008)
Using daily drinking data to characterize the effects of a brief alcohol intervention in an emergency room.
C. Gwaltney (2011)
An experimental test of three methods of alcohol risk reduction with young adults.
J. Baer (1992)
Mailed personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for at-risk college drinkers.
S. Collins (2002)
GENETIC STUDY: Do genetic and individual risk factors moderate the efficacy of motivational enhancement therapy? Drinking outcomes with an emerging adult sample
Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing (2009)
Brief motivational interview and educational brochure in emergency room settings for adolescents and young adults with alcohol-related problems: a randomized single-blind clinical trial.
Maria Luiza Segatto (2011)
Motivational interviewing + feedback intervention to reduce alcohol-exposed pregnancy risk among college binge drinkers: determinants and patterns of response
S. Ceperich (2010)
Two brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students.
B. Borsari (2005)
Group-based motivational interviewing for alcohol use among college students: An exploratory study.
K. Michael (2006)
Cost-effectiveness analysis of motivational interviewing with feedback to reduce drinking among a sample of college students.
Alexander J. Cowell (2012)
Alcohol and marijuana use outcomes in the Healthy Choices motivational interviewing intervention for HIV-positive youth.
D. Murphy (2012)
Adolescent Tobacco, Alcohol, and Drug Abuse: Prevention Strategies, Empirical Findings, and Assessment Issues
G. Botvin (1992)
Incapacitated Sexual Violence Involving Alcohol Among College Women: The Impact of a Brief Drinking Intervention
Monique Clinton-Sherrod (2011)
Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers.
B. Borsari (2000)
A randomized controlled trial of goal choice interventions for alcohol use disorders among men who have sex with men.
J. Morgenstern (2007)
Relative efficacy of a brief motivational intervention for college student drinkers.
J. Murphy (2001)
The Effectiveness of Intervention Studies to Decrease Alcohol Use in College Undergraduate Students: An Integrative Analysis
Judith Hunter Fager (2004)
Evaluation of a group-based substance abuse treatment program for adolescents.
R. Battjes (2004)
Assessing the effectiveness of peer-facilitated interventions addressing high-risk drinking among judicially mandated college students.
M. Cimini (2009)
A randomized clinical trial of a brief motivational intervention for alcohol-positive adolescents treated in an emergency department.
A. Spirito (2004)
Enhancing motivation for change in problem drinking: a controlled comparison of two therapist styles.
W. Miller (1993)
Brief report: maintenance of effects of motivational enhancement therapy to improve risk behaviors and HIV-related Health in a randomized controlled trial of youth living with HIV.
S. Naar-King (2008)
Evaluating two brief substance-use interventions for mandated college students.
H. White (2006)
The role of marijuana use in brief motivational intervention with young adult drinkers treated in an emergency department.
M. Magill (2009)
Individual and family motivational interventions for alcohol-positive adolescents treated in an emergency department: results of a randomized clinical trial.
A. Spirito (2011)
Moderators and mediators of two brief interventions for alcohol in the emergency department.
N. Barnett (2010)
Brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students: comparison of face-to-face counseling and computer-delivered interventions.
K. Carey (2011)
Randomized trial of group interventions to reduce HIV/STD risk and change theoretical mediators among detained adolescents.
S. Schmiege (2009)
Brief alcohol intervention for college drinkers: how brief is?
M. Kulesza (2010)
Motivational interviewing versus feedback only in emergency care for young adult problem drinking.
P. Monti (2007)
Motivational interviewing: a pilot test of active ingredients and mechanisms of change.
J. Morgenstern (2012)
Pilot randomized controlled trial of a brief alcohol intervention group for adolescents.
Kylie A. Bailey (2004)
Identification, prevention, and treatment revisited: individual-focused college drinking prevention strategies 1999-2006.
M. Larimer (2007)
Motivational interviewing: research, practice, and puzzles.
W. Miller (1996)
Project Towards No Drug Abuse: long-term substance use outcomes evaluation.
W. Sun (2006)
The use of brief interventions adapted from motivational interviewing across behavioral domains: a systematic review.
C. Dunn (2001)
Evaluating the effects of a brief motivational intervention for injured drinkers in the emergency department.
R. Longabaugh (2001)
How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies?
M. Fewtrell (2008)
Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking.
H. White (1989)
A comparison of personalized feedback for college student drinkers delivered with and without a motivational interview.
J. Murphy (2004)
Is brief motivational intervention effective in reducing alcohol use among young men voluntarily receiving it? A randomized controlled trial.
J. Gaume (2011)
Randomized controlled trial of web-based alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care.
K. Kypri (2008)
Motivational enhancement and other brief interventions for adolescent substance abuse: foundations, applications and evaluations.
T. Tevyaw (2004)
The efficacy of single-component brief motivational interventions among at-risk college drinkers.
M. Martens (2013)
Brief motivational interventions for heavy college drinkers: A randomized controlled trial.
K. Carey (2006)
Brief motivational and parent interventions for college students: a randomized factorial study.
M. Wood (2010)
Which heavy drinking college students benefit from a brief motivational intervention?
K. Carey (2007)
Brief physician advice for heavy drinking college students: a randomized controlled trial in college health clinics.
M. Fleming (2010)
Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: results from a 2-year follow-up assessment.
G. Marlatt (1998)
A randomized controlled trial of a behavioral economic supplement to brief motivational interventions for college drinking.
J. Murphy (2012)
Motivational interviewing for incarcerated adolescents: effects of depressive symptoms on reducing alcohol and marijuana use after release.
L. Stein (2011)
The efficacy of single-session motivational interviewing in reducing drug consumption and perceptions of drug-related risk and harm among young people: results from a multi-site cluster randomized trial.
J. Mccambridge (2004)
A brief motivational interview in a pediatric emergency department, plus 10-day telephone follow-up, increases attempts to quit drinking among youth and young adults who screen positive for problematic drinking.
J. Bernstein (2010)
Treatment may influence self-report and jeopardize our understanding of outcome.
T. Nirenberg (2013)
The Ethics of Motivational Interviewing Revisited
W. R. Miller (1995)
Brief intervention in substance-use among adolescent psychiatric patients: a randomized controlled trial
J. Goti (2009)
Motivational Interviewing with Problem Drinkers
W. R. Miller (1983)
A randomized trial of a DWI intervention program for first offenders: intervention outcomes and interactions with antisocial personality disorder among a primarily American-Indian sample.
W. G. Woodall (2007)
Effects of two types of brief intervention and readiness to change on alcohol use in hazardous drinkers.
S. Maisto (2001)
A Randomized Trial of Motivational Interviewing and Feedback with Heavy Drinking College Students
Patricia Juárez (2006)
A randomized motivational enhancement prevention group reduces drinking and alcohol consequences in first-year college women.
J. Labrie (2008)
HIV Risk Reduction Among Detained Adolescents: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
A. Bryan (2009)
Alcohol screening and brief intervention in a college student health center: a randomized controlled trial.
James F Schaus (2009)

This paper is referenced by
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar