Please confirm you are human (Sign Up for free to never see this)
← Back to Search
Differential Impairments In Reaching And Grasping Produced By Local Inactivation Within The Forelimb Representation Of The Motor Cortex In The Cat
Published 2004 · Biology, Medicine
This study analyzed changes in the performance of a reaching task and its adaptive modification produced by reversible inactivation of three sites within the forelimb representation of the motor cortex (MCx, area 4γ) in five cats by microinjections of muscimol. Two sites were located in the lateral MCx, rostral (RL-MCx) and caudal (CL-MCx) to the end of the cruciate sulcus, where intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) produced contraction of the most distal muscles. The third site was located more medially, in the anterior sigmoid gyrus (RM-MCx) where ICMS primarily produced contraction of more proximal muscles. The task required the animals to reach into a horizontal target well, located in front of them at one of three possible heights, to grasp and retrieve a small piece of food. The height of the reach was primarily achieved by elbow flexion. Grasping consisted primarily of digit flexion, and food retrieval consisted of forearm supination and shoulder extension. In some blocks of trials, an obstacle was placed in the path of the limb to assess the animal's ability to adaptively adjust the kinematic characteristics of their response trajectory. In normal animals, contact with the bar on the first trial triggered a corrective response at short latency that allowed the paw to circumvent the bar. On all subsequent trials, the trajectory was adapted to prevent contact with the obstacle, with a safety margin of about 1 cm. Inactivation at all sites produced a slowing of movement, a protracted and extended forelimb posture, and increased variability of initial limb position. In addition, inactivation of RL-MCx immediately produced systematic reaching errors, consisting of hypermetric movements, as well as impaired grasping and food retrieval. The degree of hypermetria was similar for all target heights and was not associated with alterations in trajectory control. During inactivation, animals did not compensate for the hypermetria by reducing paw path elevation, suggesting a defect in kinematic planning or in adaptive control. This was confirmed by finding that trajectory adaptation to avoid bar contact was impaired during RL-MCx inactivation. The short latency corrective response, triggered by contact of the limb with the obstacle was, however, preserved. Inactivation of CL-MCx did not impair aiming, grasping, or adaptation immediately after injection. However, impairments occurred after about 1 h postinjection, and at that time mimicked the effects of RL-MCx inactivation. This delay suggests that the drug was acting indirectly on the RL-MCx. Inactivation of RM-MCx did not impair the control of distal muscles, but the reaches became hypometric. The hypometria was greater for higher targets, suggesting that it resulted from weakness. Our results suggest that both rostral regions of the forelimb area of MCx play a more important role in the planning and execution of the prehension response than the caudal portion. We hypothesize that (1) the slowing of movement, forelimb postural changes, hypometria, and grasping and food retrieval impairments are due to defective control of muscles represented locally at each site in MCx and that (2) aiming and adaptation defects, which are produced only by RL-MCx inactivation, result from disruption of integrative mechanisms underlying sensorimotor transformations that normally assure movement accuracy.