Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Reduced Postoperative Pain In Total Hip Arthroplasty After Minimal-invasive Anterior Approach

S. Goebel, A. Steinert, Judith Schillinger, J. Eulert, J. Broscheit, M. Rudert, U. Nöth
Published 2012 · Medicine

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy Visualize in Litmaps
Share
Reduce the time it takes to create your bibliography by a factor of 10 by using the world’s favourite reference manager
Time to take this seriously.
Get Citationsy
PurposeThe development of minimal-incision techniques for total hip replacement with preservation of soft tissue is generally associated with faster rehabilitation, reduction of postoperative pain and increased patient comfort. The aim of this study was to compare a minimal-incision anterior approach with a transgluteal lateral technique for hip replacement surgery with respect to postoperative pain, consumption of rescue medication, length of hospital stay and time to reach a defined range of motion.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study we investigated 100 patients with a minimal-incision anterior approach (group I) and 100 patients with a transgluteal lateral approach (group II) retrospectively undergoing unilateral hip replacement. The study variables were pain at rest and during physiotherapy, amount of rescue medication, the time to reach a defined flexion and time in hospital.ResultsThe patients of group I consumed less rescue medication (19.6 ± 6.9 mg vs. 23.6 ± 11.3 mg;  p = 0.005) and experienced less pain on the day of surgery (1.3 ± 1 vs. 2.3 ± 1.3, p = 0.0001) and the first postoperative day (0.41 ± 0.8 vs. 0.66 ± 1.1, p = 0.036). The time to reach the defined range of motion (6.4 ± 2 days vs. 7.4 ± 2.1 days; p = 0.001) and the length of hospital stay were shorter (10.2 ± 1.9 days vs. 13.4 ± 1.6 days; p = 0.0001) for group I. However, pain during physiotherapy was higher on the third and sixth through ninth days after surgery in comparison to group II (p = 0.001–0.013).ConclusionThe implantation of a hip prosthesis through a minimal-incision anterior approach is successful in reducing postoperative pain and consumption of pain medication. Time to recovery and length of hospital stay are also influenced positively. Pain increases during physiotherapy, and may be mitigated by adopting limited weight bearing during the early postoperative period.
This paper references
10.1097/00000542-199506000-00019
Epidural Anesthesia and Analgesia: Their Role in Postoperative Outcome
Spencer Liu (1995)
10.1016/S1098-7339(99)90167-0
Spinal mechanisms of acute and persistent pain.
A. Basbaum (1999)
10.1053/rapm.2000.8656
Reversing Tissue Injury-Induced Plastic Changes in the Spinal Cord: The Search for the Magic Bullet
S. Raja (2000)
10.1097/00000542-200010000-00038
Chronic Pain as an Outcome of Surgery: A Review of Predictive Factors
F. Perkins (2000)
10.1097/01.blo.0000096828.67494.95
Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Minimally Invasive Two-Incision Approach
R. Berger (2003)
10.1054/ARTH.2003.50025
Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation.
A. DiGioia (2003)
10.1055/S-2004-832447
[Advantages of minimal invasive total hip replacement in the early phase of rehabilitation].
D. Wohlrab (2004)
10.1016/J.ARTH.2003.12.070
Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation.
J. Wright (2004)
10.2106/00004623-200407000-00001
Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision.
S. Woolson (2005)
10.1007/s00264-004-0539-0
Capsular neuronal elements and their relation to pain reduction and functional improvement following total hip replacement
L. Gáspár (2004)
10.1016/J.ARTH.2004.09.061
Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study.
G. Chimento (2004)
10.1191/0269215505cr890oa
Comparison of early postoperative functional levels following total hip replacement using minimally invasive versus standard incisions. A prospective randomized blinded trial
M. Lawlor (2005)
10.2106/JBJS.D.02645
A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
L. Ogonda (2005)
10.1007/S00064-008-1306-Y
[Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach].
F. Rachbauer (2008)
10.1007/S00132-006-0969-Z
[Conventional vs minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study of rehabilitation and complications].
S. Murphy (2006)
10.1007/S00132-006-0964-4
[Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Anterior approach].
F. Rachbauer (2006)
10.1016/J.ARTH.2006.04.017
The effect of a new multimodal perioperative anesthetic regimen on postoperative pain, side effects, rehabilitation, and length of hospital stay after total joint arthroplasty.
C. Peters (2006)
10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60177-7
Factors affecting patient-controlled analgesia requirements.
Kuang-Yi Chang (2006)
10.2106/JBJS.F.00940
Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study.
L. Dorr (2007)
10.1302/0301-620X.89B7.19053
The internervous safe zone for incision of the capsule of the hip. A cadaver study.
R. Kampa (2007)
10.1016/J.ARTH.2006.02.173
Comparison of immediate postoperative walking ability in patients receiving minimally invasive and standard-incision hip arthroplasty: a prospective blinded study.
D. Bennett (2007)
10.1007/s00064-008-1306-y
Minimalinvasive Hüftendoprothetik über den anterioren Zugang
F. Rachbauer (2008)
A CADAVER STUDY
Z. Ling (2008)
10.1007/s00482-007-0577-9
[Postoperative pain after ambulatory surgery].
E. Lux (2008)
10.1007/s00264-008-0708-7
Which is more invasive—mini versus standard incisions in total hip arthroplasty?
T. Shitama (2009)
10.1007/s00402-009-1035-1
Minimally invasive primary THA: anterolateral intermuscular approach versus lateral transmuscular approach
T. Bernasek (2010)
10.1007/s00402-009-0870-4
Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled prospective trial
F. Mazoochian (2009)
10.1007/s00264-009-0743-z
Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review
T. Cheng (2009)
10.1007/s00264-010-1166-6
Age-related appearance of muscle trauma in primary total hip arthroplasty and the benefit of a minimally invasive approach for patients older than 70 years
Michael Müller (2011)
10.2106/JBJS.H.01086
Minimally invasive compared with traditional transgluteal approach for total hip arthroplasty: a comparative gait analysis.
M. Pospischill (2010)
10.1007/s00264-010-1075-8
Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes
T. Smith (2011)
10.1007/s00482-011-1022-7
Postoperative Schmerztherapie nach ambulanten Operationen
E.A. Lux (2008)
Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty.
Mel S Lee (2012)
a prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation
JM Wright (2012)



This paper is referenced by
10.1007/s00132-021-04071-2
Fast-Track in der Hüft- und Kniegelenkendoprothetik
F. Greimel (2021)
10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00082
Postoperative Patient-reported Pain and Opioid Consumption After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison of the Direct Anterior and Posterior Approaches.
P. Bovonratwet (2021)
10.5312/wjo.v12.i11.877
Direct anterior approach vs Hardinge in obese and nonobese osteoarthritic patients: A randomized controlled trial
(2021)
10.1007/s00264-021-04986-7
The learning curve for the direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review
L. Nairn (2021)
10.1186/s40634-020-00318-7
Minimizing complications in bikini incision direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: A single surgeon series of 865 cases
A. Alva (2021)
10.1177/11795441211031340
Changes in Invasiveness and Latent Infection Rate Associated with Switching the Approach in Total Hip Replacement
H. Kijima (2021)
10.1007/s00402-021-03920-1
Comparison between freehand technique and computed tomography-based navigation in acetabular cup placement through direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty
S. Nishihara (2021)
10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.016
Direct Anterior Approach to the Hip Does Not Increase the Risk for Subsequent Periprosthetic Joint Infection.
N. Shohat (2021)
10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102937
Do serum markers correlate with invasiveness of the procedure in THA? A prospective randomized study comparing direct anterior and lateral approaches.
R. Iorio (2021)
10.1007/s00264-020-04596-9
A retrospective analysis of surgical outcomes following direct anterior hip arthroplasty with or without a surgical extension table
Christoph Knoth (2020)
10.1007/s00590-020-02655-w
Total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior approach in the lateral position for the treatment of ankylosed hips
Han Wu (2020)
10.1186/s13018-020-01716-4
Natural outcome of hemoglobin and functional recovery after the direct anterior versus the posterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized study
Jia-jun Cao (2020)
10.3390/jcm9093031
Revision Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach Using an Asymmetric Acetabular Component
P. Prodinger (2020)
10.2106/JBJS.RVW.19.00144
Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Revisited.
Dimitrios A. Flevas (2020)
10.5114/aoms.2020.97277
Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between the direct anterior approach and the posterolateral approach for primary total hip arthroplasty
P. Skowronek (2020)
10.4081/or.2020.8399
Are physical therapy pain levels affected by surgical approach in total hip arthroplasty? A randomized controlled trial
D. Nistor (2020)
Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Review of the Current Stance and Future Direction.
Michael Mariorenzi (2020)
10.1177/1120700019900987
Traction table versus standard table total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach: a systematic review
Mohamed Sarraj (2020)
10.5114/aoms.2018.78653
Heterotopic ossification and clinical results after total hip arthroplasty using the anterior minimally invasive and anterolateral approaches
Paweł Łęgosz (2018)
10.1177/2210491719890883
Functional outcomes of direct anterior approach hip arthroplasty: Oblique ‘bikini’ versus longitudinal skin incision
R. Menzies-Wilson (2020)
10.1007/s12306-020-00657-9
Hospitalization length, surgical duration, and blood lost among the approaches for total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis
F. Migliorini (2020)
10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.047
Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Traditional Longitudinal Incision and Bikini Incision in Total Hip Arthroplasty via Direct Anterior Approach: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Qiuru Wang (2020)
10.1016/j.artd.2020.07.015
A Crossover Cohort of Direct Anterior vs Posterolateral Approach in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: What Does the Patient Prefer?
E. Rhea (2020)
10.1177/2309499020923093
Use of traction table did not increase complications in total hip arthroplasty through direct anterior approach performed by novice surgeon
Sammy Banno (2020)
10.1016/j.aanat.2020.151566
Surgical Anatomy of the Lateral Circumflex Femoral Artery Branches: Contribution to the Blood Loss Control during Hip Arthroplasty.
T. Totlis (2020)
10.1007/s12306-020-00662-y
Nerve palsy, dislocation and revision rate among the approaches for total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis
F. Migliorini (2020)
10.1016/j.injury.2019.05.008
Weight bearing in patients with femoral neck fractures compared to pertrochanteric fractures: A postoperative gait analysis.
D. Pfeufer (2019)
10.1097/CORR.0000000000000439
Do Postoperative Results Differ in a Randomized Trial Between a Direct Anterior and a Direct Lateral Approach in THA?
K. E. Mjaaland (2018)
10.1007/s00590-019-02516-1
Comparative outcomes between collared versus collarless and short versus long stem of direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and indirect meta-analysis
P. Panichkul (2019)
10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1474.R1
Surgical approach significantly affects the complication rates associated with total hip arthroplasty.
V. Aggarwal (2019)
10.1016/j.arth.2019.05.057
Postoperative Opioid Consumption After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Three Surgical Approaches.
S. Seah (2019)
10.1177/1120700018812717
Short-term outcomes of the supine muscle-sparing anterolateral versus direct lateral approach to primary total hip arthroplasty
N. George (2019)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar