← Back to Search
Effectiveness Of XP-endo Finisher, EndoActivator, And File Agitation On Debris And Smear Layer Removal In Curved Root Canals: A Comparative Study
A. Elnaghy, A. Mandorah, S. Elsaka
Published 2017 · Mathematics, Medicine
Save to my Library
Download via 🐼 PaperPanda Download via oaDOI Download via OAB Download via LibKey Download via Google Google ScholarAnalyze on Scholarcy Visualize in Litmaps
Reduce the time it takes to create your bibliography by a factor of 10 by using the world’s favourite reference manager
Time to take this seriously.
The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of the XP-endo Finisher (FKG Dentaire SA, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) file on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals in comparison to different irrigation regimens. Seventy-five freshly extracted human mandibular molar teeth with mesial root curved more than 20° were used in this study. The mesial root canals were mechanically prepared using the BT-Race rotary system (FKG Dentaire) and divided into five groups (n = 15) according to the following irrigation techniques: positive control, non-agitated, File agitation, XP-endo Finisher, and EndoActivator (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialities, Tulsa, OK, USA). Root canals were split longitudinally and evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Five-grade scoring system was used to assess the presence of debris and smear layer at the coronal, middle, and apical regions. The XP-endo Finisher and EndoActivator groups revealed significantly lower debris and smear layer scores than the other groups at the coronal, middle, and apical regions (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between XP-endo Finisher and EndoActivator groups (P > 0.05). The apical region had higher debris and smear layer scores compared with the coronal regions in all groups (P < 0.05), except for the positive control group; there was no significant difference between the three regions of the root canal (P > 0.05). Irrigation of curved root canals using XP-endo Finisher and EndoActivator methods appears to be more effective on debris and smear layer removal than the other tested groups.
This paper references
A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals.
S. W. Schneider (1971)
A preliminary scanning electron microscopic study of root canals after endodontic procedures.
D. Mccomb (1975)
Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy.
A. Byström (1981)
Smear layer removal effects on apical leakage.
W. Kennedy (1986)
The effectiveness of different endodontic irrigation procedures on the removal of the smear layer: a scanning electron microscopic study.
B. Ciucchi (1989)
Disinfection by endodontic irrigants and dressings of experimentally infected dentinal tubules.
D. Orstavik (1990)
The effect of smear layer upon the coronal leakage of gutta-percha fillings and a glass ionomer sealer.
W. Saunders (1992)
Effects of irrigation on debris and smear layer on canal walls prepared by two rotary techniques: a scanning electron microscopic study.
O. Peters (2000)
Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile--Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and instrumentation results in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
E. Schäfer (2002)
Comparison of the antimicrobial activity of six irrigants on primary endodontic pathogens.
K. Carson (2005)
The effects of temperature on sodium hypochlorite short-term stability, pulp dissolution capacity, and antimicrobial efficacy.
G. Sirtes (2005)
Root canal irrigants.
M. Zehnder (2006)
Determination of the minimum instrumentation size for penetration of irrigants to the apical third of root canal systems.
A. Khademi (2006)
Detection and eradication of microorganisms in root-filled teeth associated with periradicular lesions: an in vivo study.
J. F. Schirrmeister (2007)
Effect of smear layer on sealing ability of canal obturation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
A. Shahravan (2007)
Detection and eradication of microorganisms in Odontology root-filled teeth associated with periradicular lesions: an in vivo study
J F Schirrmeister (2007)
Detection and eradication of microorganisms in Odontology 123 root-filled teeth associated with periradicular lesions: an in vivo study
JF Schirrmeister (2007)
Detection and eradication of microorganisms
JF Schirrmeister (2007)
Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
G. Yang (2008)
Comparison of the efficacy of three chelating agents in smear layer removal.
S. Khedmat (2008)
Effect of EDTA, sonic, and ultrasonic activation on the penetration of sodium hypochlorite into simulated lateral canals: an in vitro study.
C. de Gregorio (2009)
Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices.
L. Gu (2009)
The effect of EDTA with and without ultrasonics on removal of the smear layer.
H. Kuah (2009)
Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
Gregory Caron (2010)
The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 3: removal of debris and smear layer-A scanning electron microscope study.
Z. Metzger (2010)
Evaluation of smear layer removal after use of a canal brush: an SEM study.
Y. Garip (2010)
Effects of concentrations and exposure times of sodium hypochlorite on dentin deproteination: attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy study.
X. Hu (2010)
Effectiveness of different irrigant agitation techniques on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a scanning electron microscopy study.
T. Rödig (2010)
Effectiveness of the EndoActivator System in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation.
D. Uroz-Torres (2010)
Part 3: removal of debris and smear layer-A scanning electron microscope study
Z Metzger (2010)
Efficacy of smear layer removal at the root tip by using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and erbium, chromium: yttrium, scandium, gallium garnet laser.
H. Peeters (2011)
Qualitative analysis of the removal of the smear layer in the apical third of curved roots: conventional irrigation versus activation systems.
Luciana Magrin Blank-Gonçalves (2011)
In vivo efficacy of three different endodontic irrigation systems for irrigant delivery to working length of mesial canals of mandibular molars.
H. Munoz (2012)
Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study.
M. Mancini (2013)
Effect of smear layer against disinfection protocols on Enterococcus faecalis-infected dentin.
Z. Wang (2013)
Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Wael H. Kamel (2014)
Comparison of smear layer removal using the Nd:YAG laser, ultrasound, ProTaper Universal system, and CanalBrush methods: an in vitro study.
Grasiele Assis da Costa Lima (2015)
XP - 3 D FinisherTM file — the next step in restorative endodontics
M Trope (2015)
XP-3D Finisher file—the next step in restorative endodontics
M Trope (2015)
This paper is referenced by
Efficacy of Chitosan as Final Irrigating Solution on TGF-β1 Release from Root Canal Dentin and its Effect on Dental Pulp Stem Cells Response
A. Abd El-Hady (2021)
Effectiveness of XP-Endo Finisher and passive ultrasonic irrigation on intracanal medicament removal from root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Jiani Zhou (2021)
Contribution of XP-Endo files to the root canal filling removal: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.
Emel Uzunoğlu-Özyürek (2021)
Effectiveness of XP-Endo Finisher and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation in the Removal of the Smear Layer Using two Different Chelating Agents
Ismael Espinoza (2021)
Influence of different irrigation regimens on the dentinal tubule penetration of a bioceramic-based root canal sealer: a confocal analysis study
A. Ateş (2021)
Two diode lasers versus ultrasonic activation of EDTA: push-out analysis and penetrability by confocal analysis
Jéssica Arielli Pradelli (2021)
Clinical Approach to Regenerative Endodontics
O. Dianat (2021)
EFFICACY OF NEW ROOT CANAL IRRIGANT ACTIVATION SYSTEMS ON REMOVAL OF SMEAR LAYER
Nehal F. Sharaf (2020)
Influence of Final Apical Width on Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Xp Endo Finisher and Endodontic Needle: An Ex Vivo Study
Divya Nangia (2020)
Evaluation of smear layer and debris removal by stepwise intraoperative activation (SIA) of sodium hypochlorite
G. Plotino (2020)
Debris and Smear Layer Removal in Curved Root Canals Using the Dual Wavelength Er,Cr:YSGG/Diode 940 nm Laser and the XP-Endoshaper and Finisher Technique.
Riman Nasher (2020)
In Vitro Evaluation of Different Irrigation Protocols on Intracanal Smear Layer Removal in Teeth with or without Pre-Endodontic Proximal Wall Restoration
N. Kharouf (2020)
Preparation of the lingual canal in mandibular first premolar with canal bifurcation
Yaqian Lu (2020)
Emerging Research Information
G. Oliveira (2020)
Cleanliness and erosion of root canal walls after irrigation with a new HEDP-based solution vs. traditional sodium hypochlorite followed by EDTA. A scanning electron microscope study
A. Kfir (2020)
XP endo® file: An update review
H. Baranwal (2020)
Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation for the Ability of Endovac and EnoActivator in Cleaning Root Canal Space Using EDTA and QMix
M. M. Abdelhafeez (2020)
Comparison of the Effect of XP-Endo Finisher File and EndoActivator in Debridement of the Root Canals Infected with Candida albicans: An In-vitro Study
Fatemeh Esmati (2020)
Preparation Ability of ProTaper Next and XP-endo Shaper Instruments in Isthmus-containing Root Canal System
Mustafa Sarıkahya (2021)
Effect of Various Irrigating Devices on the Removal of Two Different Forms of Calcium Hydroxide from Internal Resorption Cavities
Nima Mousavi Nasab Mobarakeh (2020)
Efficacy of Apple vinegar as Final Irrigating Solution in Removing Smear Layer Using XP-Endo Finisher File
M. E. Abdelghany (2020)
Effect of XP-endo Finisher on Microbial Root Canal Flora After Using Single-File or Multiple-File Rotary Systems
HebatAllah A. Fath-Allah (2020)
Debris and Smear Layer Removal from Oval Root Canals Comparing XP-Endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and Manual Irrigation: A SEM Evaluation
Asmaa Alakshar (2020)
The Effects of Different Agitation Techniques of Canal Irrigant on Tubular Penetration of a Bioceramic Sealer
V. Zand (2019)
Efficacy of XP-Endo finisher in removal of calcium hydroxide from root canal system: A systematic review
Shruti Kamath (2019)
Evaluation of debris and smear layer removal with XP-endo finisher: A scanning electron microscopic study
Anita Jayakumaar (2019)
In vitro effect of XP-Endo finisher on the amount of residual debris and smear layer on the root canal walls
Shahrzad Azimian (2019)
Efficacy of Combined Use of XP-endo shaper and XP-endo Finisher in Cleaning Simulated Internal Root Resorption Defects: An In-Vitro Comparative Study
D. A. Moukarab (2019)
Evaluation of Apical Dimension, Canal Taper and Maintenance of Root Canal Morphology Using XP-endo Shaper.
Afif Tabbara (2019)
Efficacy of smear layer removal using sonic and rotary irrigant activation systems: a SEM evaluation
Rita Isabel da Silva Sousa Balaus Custódio (2019)
Distribution of sodium hypochlorite throughout the mesial root canal system of mandibular molars after adjunctive irrigant activation procedures: a micro-computed tomographic study
J. Pacheco-Yanes (2019)
OTIMIZAÇÃO DA DESINFECÇÃO PÓS PREPARO QUÍMICO-MECÂNICO OPTIMIZATION OF DISINFECTION AFTER CHEMICAL MECHANICAL PREPARATION
Érica de Andrade Almeida (2019)See more