Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

A Quantitative Review Comparing The Yields Of Two Candidate C4 Perennial Biomass Crops In Relation To Nitrogen, Temperature And Water

E. Heaton, T. Voigt, S. Long
Published 2004 · Chemistry

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
Abstract C 4 herbaceous rhizomatous perennials have many positive attributes as potential and actual biomass energy crops on agricultural land. Two species from this group have become widely planted. Miscanthus × giganteus has been extensively studied and planted in Europe, and Panicum virgatum in N. America. To date, side-by-side comparisons of mature stands of these crops have not been reported in the peer-reviewed literature. We examined all peer-reviewed articles describing productivity of these species and extracted dry matter yields, nitrogen fertilization (N), temperature (growing degree days) and precipitation/irrigation. Only yields reported 3 or more years after planting were included. Despite being on different continents, trials spanned similar temperature, N and water ranges. Miscanthus × giganteus (97 observations) yielded an average 22 Mg ha −1 compared to 10 Mg ha −1 for P. virgatum (77 observations). Both crops showed a significant positive response to water and N, but not to temperature. Miscanthus × giganteus yielded significantly more biomass than P. virgatum across the range of all three variables. There were differences between the species in their apparent responses to these variables. Miscanthus × giganteus showed a stronger response to water, while P. virgatum showed a significantly stronger response to nitrogen. Since energetic viability, and profitability, of biomass crops hinges critically on high outputs of biomass energy for low inputs of money and fossil fuels, these results suggest that M . × giganteus holds greater promise for biomass energy cropping than does P. virgatum across the range of trial conditions undertaken to date.
This paper references
10.2134/AGRONJ2001.9351013X
Performance of 15 Miscanthus genotypes at five sites in Europe
J. Clifton-Brown (2001)
10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00051-4
Comparative Economic Analysis of Perennial, Annual and Intercrops for Biomass Production
A. Hallam (2001)
10.1016/s0140-6701(98)96595-x
Evaluating physical, chemical, and energetic properties of perennial grasses as biofuels
S. Mclaughlin (1996)
10.1046/J.1469-8137.2002.00381.X
Comparative responses to water stress in stay-green, rapid- and slow senescing genotypes of the biomass crop, Miscanthus
J. Clifton-Brown (2002)
10.2307/4003287
Switchgrass growth and development: Water, nitrogen, and plant density effects
M. Sanderson (2000)
10.2134/AGRONJ2001.934896X
Biomass Production of ‘Alamo’ Switchgrass in Response to Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Row Spacing
J. P. Muir (2001)
10.2135/CROPSCI1995.0011183X003500050029X
Switchgrass Biomass Composition during Morphological Development in Diverse Environments
M. Sanderson (1995)
10.1016/S1161-0301(01)00102-2
Cropping of Miscanthus in Central Europe: biomass production and influence on nutrients and soil organic matter
P. Kahle (2001)
10.1016/S0961-9534(97)00016-0
Seasonal dynamics of nutrient accumulation and partitioning in the perennial C4-grasses Miscanthus × giganteus and Spartina cynosuroides
C. V. Beale (1997)
10.1046/J.1365-2486.1999.00265.X
Responses of wild C4 and C3 grass (Poaceae) species to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration: a meta‐analytic test of current theories and perceptions
S. J. Wand (1999)
10.1016/S0961-9534(97)10066-6
Evaluating environmental consequences of producing herbaceous crops for bioenergy.
S. Mclaughlin (1995)
10.1016/0960-8524(95)00176-X
Switchgrass as a sustainable bioenergy crop
M. Sanderson (1996)
10.1111/J.1601-5223.1993.00297.X
Cytogenetic Analysis of Miscanthus‘Giganteus’, an Interspecific Hybrid
I. Linde-Laursen (2004)
10.2134/JEQ2000.00472425002900040025X
Multispecies riparian buffers trap sediment and nutrients during rainfall simulations.
Kye-Han Lee (2000)
10.1016/S0926-6690(00)00042-X
The modelled productivity of Miscanthus×giganteus (GREEF et DEU) in Ireland.
J. Clifton-Brown (2000)
10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00013-1
Soil management impacts on soil carbon sequestration by switchgrass
Z. Ma (2000)
10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00273-5
Carbon sequestration in perennial bioenergy, annual corn and uncultivated systems in southern Quebec
Claudia S Zan (2001)
10.1023/B:MITI.0000038848.94134.BE
Miscanthus for Renewable Energy Generation: European Union Experience and Projections for Illinois
E. Heaton (2004)
Syntaxonomy of Miscanthus x giganteus Greef et Deu
J. M. Greef (1993)
10.1007/s004420050311
C4 photosynthesis, atmospheric CO2, and climate
J. Ehleringer (1997)
10.1046/J.1365-2486.2002.00498.X
A meta-analysis of elevated [CO2] effects on soybean (Glycine max) physiology, growth and yield
E. Ainsworth (2002)
10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00126-4
Avian response to warm-season grass use in pasture and hayfield management
W. Giuliano (2002)
Harvesting and storage of Miscanthus
N. E. Bassam (2001)
10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00057-X
Biomass cofiring: economics, policy and opportunities.
E. Hughes (2000)
10.2134/JPA1990.0333
Importance of nitrogen and phosphorus for production of grasses established with no-till and conventional planting systems.
G. Rehm (1990)
10.2134/AGRONJ1992.00021962008400030013X
Morphological Development of Switchgrass and Kleingrass
M. Sanderson (1992)
10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00032-5
Miscanthus : European experience with a novel energy crop
I. Lewandowski (2000)
10.1016/S1161-0301(96)02044-8
Combustion quality of biomass: practical relevance and experiments to modify the biomass quality of Miscanthus x giganteus
I. Lewandowski (1997)
10.2172/814564
Breeding and Selection of New Switchgrass Varieties for Increased Biomass Production
C. Taliaferro (2003)
10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00042-8
Nitrogen removal in switchgrass biomass under two harvest systems
J. H. Reynolds (2000)
10.1007/978-94-011-1158-4_24
The Application of Physiological and Molecular Understanding of the Effects of the Environment on Photosynthesis in the Selection of Novel “Fuel” Crops; With Particular Reference to C4 Perennials
S. Long (1994)
10.1104/pp.103.021790
Cold Tolerance of C4 photosynthesis in Miscanthus × giganteus: Adaptation in Amounts and Sequence of C4 Photosynthetic Enzymes1
S. Naidu (2003)
10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00077-X
Carbon dynamics subsequent to establishment of switchgrass
Z. Ma (2000)
10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00118-3
Energy production from biomass (Part 1): Overview of biomass.
P. McKendry (2002)
10.1016/S0360-5442(00)00016-5
Total costs and benefits of biomass in selected regions of the European Union
H.-M. Groscurth (2000)
10.1046/J.1365-3040.1999.00523.X
Effects of elevated (CO2) on photosynthesis in European forest species: a meta-analysis of model parameters
B. Medlyn (1999)
10.2134/AGRONJ1999.00021962009100010002X
Harvest management of switchgrass for biomass feedstock and forage production.
M. Sanderson (1999)



This paper is referenced by
Drying research in perennial mugwort (Artemisia dubia Wall.).
Z. Volkaviciute (2015)
10.1016/J.INDCROP.2018.08.090
Miscanthus, switchgrass, giant reed, and bulbous canary grass as potential bioenergy crops in a semi-arid Mediterranean environment
Recep Irfan Nazli (2018)
10.1002/JGRG.20052
Water use efficiency of perennial and annual bioenergy crops in central Illinois.
Marcelo Zeri (2013)
10.1094/FG-2013-0043-RS
Yield and Stand Persistence of Switchgrass as Affected by Cutting Height and Variety
A. Ashworth (2013)
Estudio del efecto de enzimas ligninolíticas y celulolíticas obtenidas del hongo Pleurotus ostreatus sobre una gramínea forrajera tropical
S. Ximena (2012)
10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02432.x
Bioenergy from plants and the sustainable yield challenge.
A. Karp (2008)
10.1007/978-3-319-55637-6_4
Biofuels and Bioenergy
Mika Sillanpää (2017)
10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2017.10.016
Nitrogen use efficiency and productivity of first year switchgrass and big bluestem from low to high soil nitrogen
Patrick Calvin Friesen (2017)
10.1371/journal.pone.0211471
Genetic diversity and population structure of Miscanthus lutarioriparius, an endemic plant of China
S. Yang (2019)
Lignocellulose Saccharification via Cellulose Solvent Based Fractionation Followed by Enzymatic Hydrolysis: the Last Obstacle to Integrated Biorefineries
Noppadon Sathitsuksanoh (2011)
Substituting Biofuel for Coal: Determining the Optimal Perennial Grass Species and Nitrogen Fertilization Level for Bioenergy Production in Eastern Ontario
Andrew L. Mendelson (2014)
10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2019.01.023
Herbaceous perennial biomass production on frequently saturated marginal soils: Influence on N2O emissions and shallow groundwater
Benjamin M. Rau (2019)
10.2135/CROPSCI2017.08.0513
Spacing Effect on Energy Cane Growth, Physiology, and Biomass Yield
Anuj Chiluwal (2018)
Dissecting key biomass and adaptation traits of Miscanthus through genetic mapping, exploring mechanisms of cold tolerance, and flowering time in Miscanthus and Saccharum
Hongxu Dong (2017)
10.1016/J.AGEE.2007.06.006
Agro-ecoregionalization of Iowa using multivariate geographical clustering
C. L. Williams (2008)
10.1016/J.BSE.2012.11.024
Higher genetic diversity and gene flow in wild populations of Miscanthus sinensis in southwest China
Wen-Zhi Xu (2013)
10.1111/J.1365-2486.2006.01195.X
The conversion of the corn/soybean ecosystem to no‐till agriculture may result in a carbon sink
C. Bernacchi (2005)
10.1007/s12155-013-9335-2
Agricultural Management of Switchgrass for Fuel Quality and Thermal Energy Yield on Highly Erodible Land in the Driftless Area of Southwest Wisconsin
K. Camille Hoagland (2013)
10.1093/jxb/eru229
Energy sorghum--a genetic model for the design of C4 grass bioenergy crops.
J. Mullet (2014)
10.2179/14-021R1
Growth and Yield of Miscanthus × giganteus Grown in Fertilized and Biochar-Amended Soils in the Western North Carolina Mountains
A. L. Teat (2015)
10.3389/fpls.2017.01618
Nitrogen Reserve Pools in Two Miscanthus × giganteus Genotypes under Contrasting N Managements
Ryan M. Dierking (2017)
Cool Temperature Effects on Productivity and Photosynthesis of Two Biomass Fuel Species: Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) and Miscanthus (Miscanthus x giganteus)
Jackson Lee Bean Mitchell (2013)
10.1016/J.WASMAN.2019.04.013
Techno-economic and life cycle analysis of a farm-scale anaerobic digestion plant in Iowa.
Alvina Aui (2019)
10.21608/mjae.2020.101797
MANUFACTURE AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A LOCAL THRESHING AND CLEANING MACHINE SUITS MEDICINAL AND AROMATIC PLANTS
M. M. Badr (2016)
10.9755/EJFA.2019.V31.I1.1896
The influence of morphological and geographical traits on yield of Miscanthus sinensis during the first two years
Lanming Cui Nuananong Purente Qiang Li (2019)
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.097
Aided phytostabilization using Miscanthus sinensis × giganteus on heavy metal-contaminated soils.
P. Pavel (2014)
10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01167.x
Impact of nitrogen allocation on growth and photosynthesis of Miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus)
Dan Wang (2012)
10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01184.x
Functional group and fertilization affect the composition and bioenergy yields of prairie plants
M. Jarchow (2012)
10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.018
Methane yield from switchgrass harvested at different stages of development in Eastern Canada.
D. Massé (2010)
10.1111/gcbb.12349
Variation in leaf‐level photosynthesis among switchgrass genotypes exposed to low temperatures does not scale with final biomass yield
Á. Cordero (2017)
10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.07.008
Application of sequence-independent amplification (SIA) for the identification of RNA viruses in bioenergy crops.
B. Agindotan (2010)
10.1111/gcbb.12202
Influence of soil texture and crop management on the productivity of miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus Greef et Deu.) in the Mediterranean
N. Roncucci (2015)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar